research-article

The Role of Information Visibility in Network Gatekeeping: Information Aggregation on Reddit during Crisis Events

Authors:

John J. RobinsonAuthors Info & Claims

CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

Pages 1246 - 1261

https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998299

Published: 25 February 2017 Publication History

Abstract

As social media platforms witness more and more contributions from participants during developing crisis events, some platforms provide affordances that support visibility for specific pieces of information. However, the design of information visibility, especially in the context of controlling information flows (through gatekeeping), may shape how participants collect and share up-to-date information in these systems. This paper looks at the field site of reddit.com through trace ethnography methods to understand how the design of reddit's platform (from algorithms to user roles) impacts the visibility of information and subsequently how participants aggregate information in response to ongoing events. Through trace ethnographic analysis, we illustrate three themes related to tensions around visibility - behavioral, structural, and relational - and show how visibility shapes the work of producing information about crises in social news sites.

References

[1]

Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A. Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 6239: 1130--1132.

[2]

Michael Barthel, Elisa Shearer, Jeffrey Gottfried, and Amy Mitchell. 2015. The Evolving Role of News on Twitter and Facebook. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2015/07/14/the-evolvingrole-of-news-on-twitter-and-facebook/

[3]

Karine Barzilai-Nahon. 2008. Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 9: 1493--1512.

Digital Library

[4]

Karine Barzilai-Nahon. 2009. Gatekeeping: A critical review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 43, 1: 1--79.

Digital Library

[5]

Michael A. Beam. 2014. Automating the News How Personalized News Recommender System Design Choices Impact News Reception. Communication Research 41, 8: 1019--1041.

[6]

W. Lance Bennett, Alexandra Segerberg, and Shawn Walker. 2014. Organization in the crowd: peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society 17, 2: 232--260.

[7]

Alvan Bregman and Caroline Haythornthwaite. 2003. Radicals of presentation: visibility, relation, and copresence in persistent conversation. New Media & Society 5, 1: 117--140.

[8]

Marcel Broersma and Todd Graham. 2013. TWITTER AS A NEWS SOURCE: How Dutch and British newspapers used tweets in their news coverage, 2007-2011. Journalism Practice 7, 4: 446--464.

[9]

Axel Bruns and Jean Burgess. 2012. RESEARCHING NEWS DISCUSSION ON TWITTER: New methodologies. Journalism Studies 13, 5--6: 801--814.

[10]

Axel Bruns and Tim Highfield. 2015. 18. From news blogs to news on Twitter: gatewatching and collaborative news curation. Handbook of Digital Politics: 325.

[11]

Axel Bruns, Tim Highfield, and Rebecca Ann Lind. 2012. Blogs, Twitter, and breaking news: The produsage of citizen journalism. Produsing Theory in a Digital World: The Intersection of Audiences and Production in Contemporary Theory 80, 2012: 15--32.

[12]

T. Bucher. 2012. Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society 14, 7: 1164--1180.

[13]

Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.

[14]

Dharma Dailey, John Robinson, and Kate Starbird. 2016. Sharing Food, Gathering Information: The Context and Visibility of Community Information Work in a Crisis Event. iSchools.

[15]

Dharma Dailey and Kate Starbird. 2014. Journalists as Crowdsourcerers: Responding to Crisis by Reporting with a Crowd. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 23, 4-6: 445--481.

Digital Library

[16]

Paul Dourish. 2003. The appropriation of interactive technologies: Some lessons from placeless documents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 12, 4: 465--490.

Digital Library

[17]

Thomas Erickson and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2000. Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM transactions on computer-human interaction (TOCHI) 7, 1: 59--83.

Digital Library

[18]

Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, et al. 2015. "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to {her}": Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. ACM Press, 153--162.

Digital Library

[19]

Janet Fulk and Y. Connie Yuan. 2013. Location, Motivation, and Social Capitalization via Enterprise Social Networking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 1: 20--37.

[20]

Eric Gilbert. 2013. Widespread underprovision on reddit. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM, 803--808. Retrieved April 14, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2441866

Digital Library

[21]

Tarleton Gillespie. 2010. The politics of "platforms." New Media & Society 12, 3: 347--364.

[22]

Michael H. Goldhaber. 1997. The attention economy and the net. First Monday 2, 4. Retrieved October 12, 2015 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/519

[23]

Nathan O. Hodas and Kristina Lerman. 2012. How visibility and divided attention constrain social contagion. Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT), 2012 International Conference on and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing (SocialCom), IEEE, 249--257. Retrieved September 13, 2015 from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6406290

Digital Library

[24]

Amanda L. Hughes and Leysia Palen. 2009. Twitter Adoption and Use in Mass Convergence and Emergency Events. Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference.

[25]

Cliff Lampe and Paul Resnick. 2004. Slash (dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 543--550. Retrieved October 12, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=985761

Digital Library

[26]

Alex Leavitt. 2016. Upvoting the News: Breaking News Aggregation, Crowd Collaboration, and AlgorithmDriven Attention on reddit.com.

[27]

Alex Leavitt and Joshua A. Clark. 2014. Upvoting Hurricane Sandy: Event-based News Production Processes on a Social News Site. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1495--1504.

Digital Library

[28]

Paul M. Leonardi and Stephen R. Barley. 2008. Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization 18, 3: 159--176.

Digital Library

[29]

Kristina Lerman. 2006. Social networks and social information filtering on digg. arXiv preprint cs/0612046. Retrieved January 8, 2016 from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0612046

[30]

Kurt Lewin. 1943. Forces behind food habits and methods of change. Bulletin of the National Research Council 108: 35--65.

[31]

Ann Majchrzak, Samer Faraj, Gerald C. Kane, and Bijan Azad. 2013. The Contradictory Influence of Social Media Affordances on Online Communal Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 1: 38--55.

[32]

Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw. 1972. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176--187.

[33]

Sharon Meraz. 2012. The Sociality of News Sociology: Examining User Participation and News Selection Practices in Social Media News Sites. In News with a View: Essays on the Eclipse of Objectivity in Modern Journalism, Burton St. John and Kirsten Johnson (eds.). McFarland & Company, Jefferson, NC.

[34]

Sharon Meraz and Zizi Papacharissi. 2013. Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on# Egypt. The international journal of press/politics:1940161212474472.

[35]

Mark EJ Newman. 2005. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary physics 46, 5: 323--351.

[36]

Joyce Y. M. Nip and King-wa Fu. 2015. Networked framing between source posts and their reposts: an analysis of public opinion on China's microblogs. Information, Communication & Society: 1--23.

[37]

Alexandra Olteanu, Sarah Vieweg, and Carlos Castillo. 2015. What to Expect When the Unexpected Happens: Social Media Communications Across Crises. ACM Press, 994--1009.

Digital Library

[38]

Leysia Palen and Sophia B. Liu. 2007. Citizen communications in crisis: anticipating a future of ICTsupported public participation. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 727--736. Retrieved January 28, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1240736

Digital Library

[39]

Leysia Palen, Sarah Vieweg, Jeannette Sutton, Sophia B. Liu, and Amanda L. Hughes. 2007. Crisis informatics: Studying crisis in a networked world.". Proceedings of the Third International Conference on E-Social Science. Retrieved July 22, 2015 from http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=vieweg

[40]

L. Palen, S. Vieweg, S. B. Liu, and A. L. Hughes. 2009. Crisis in a Networked World: Features of ComputerMediated Communication in the April 16, 2007, Virginia Tech Event. Social Science Computer Review 27, 4: 467--480.

Digital Library

[41]

Zizi Papacharissi. 2015. Toward New Journalism(s): Affective news, hybridity, and liminal spaces. Journalism Studies 16, 1: 27--40.

[42]

Zizi Papacharissi and Maria de Fatima Oliveira. 2012. Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication 62, 2: 266--282.

[43]

Nathaniel Poor. 2006. Mechanisms of an Online Public Sphere: The Website Slashdot. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication 10, 2: 00--00.

[44]

Emilee Rader and Rebecca Gray. 2015. Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed. ACM Press, 173--182.

Digital Library

[45]

Frances Shaw, Jean Burgess, Kate Crawford, and Axel Bruns. 2013. Sharing news, making sense, saying thanks. Australian Journal of Communication 40, 1: 23.

[46]

Pamela Shoemaker. 1991. Gatekeeping. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

[47]

Pamela Shoemaker and Timothy Vos. 2009. Gatekeeping Theory. Routledge, New York, NY.

[48]

Herbert Simon. 1971. Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In Computers, communications and the public interest, M. Greenberger (ed.). John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 37--72.

[49]

Katarina Stanoevska-Slabeva, Vittoria Sacco, and Marco Giardina. 2012. Content Curation: a new form of gatewatching for social media? International Symposium on Online Journalism, Austin, TX. Retrieved January 27, 2016 from http://online.journalism.utexas.edu/2012/papers/Katarin a.pdf

[50]

Kate Starbird. 2013. Delivering Patients to Sacré Coeur: Collective Intelligence in Digital Volunteer Communities. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 801--810.

Digital Library

[51]

Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2010. Pass it on?: Retweeting in mass emergency. International Community on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management. Retrieved October 12, 2015 from https://www.cs.colorado.edu/~palen/starbirdpaleniscramretweet.pdf

[52]

Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2011. "Voluntweeters": Self-organizing by Digital Volunteers in Times of Crisis. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1071--1080.

Digital Library

[53]

Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2012. (How) Will the Revolution Be Retweeted?: Information Diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian Uprising. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 7--16.

Digital Library

[54]

Lucy Suchman. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

Digital Library

[55]

Steven Taylor and Robert Bogdan. 1998. Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. Wiley, New York, NY.

[56]

J. B. Thompson. 2005. The New Visibility. Theory, Culture & Society 22, 6: 31--51.

[57]

Kjerstin Thorson and Chris Wells. 2015. Curated Flows: A Framework for Mapping Media Exposure in the Digital Age: Curated Flows. Communication Theory: n/a-n/a.

[58]

Jeffrey W. Treem and Paul M. Leonardi. 2012. Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication yearbook 36: 143--189.

[59]

Pieter Van der Walt and Pieter Van Brakel. 2000. Task analysis of the webmaster: results of an empirical study. Aslib Proceedings 52, 1: 20--38.

[60]

Aaron S. Veenstra, Narayanan Iyer, Chang Sup Park, and Fawaz Alajmi. 2014. Twitter as "a journalistic substitute"? Examining# wiunion tweeters' behavior and self-perception. Journalism: 1464884914521580.

[61]

Sarah Vieweg, Amanda L. Hughes, Kate Starbird, and Leysia Palen. 2010. Microblogging During Two Natural Hazards Events: What Twitter May Contribute to Situational Awareness. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1079--1088.

Digital Library

[62]

Stefaan Walgrave and Peter Van Aelst. 2006. The Contingency of the Mass Media's Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory. Journal of Communication 56, 1: 88--109.

[63]

David M. White. 1950. The "gate keeper": A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly 27: 383--391.

[64]

Joanne I. White and Leysia Palen. 2015. Expertise in the Wired Wild West. ACM Press, 662--675.

Digital Library

[65]

Kevin Wise, Brian Hamman, and Kjerstin Thorson. 2006. Moderation, Response Rate, and Message Interactivity: Features of Online Communities and Their Effects on Intent to Participate. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication 12, 1: 24--41.

Cited By

Seredko AHillman T(2024)What Does a Downvote Do? Performing Complementary and Competing Knowledge Practices on an Online PlatformProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36536928:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3653692
He CHe LYang WLi B(2024)Images Connect Us Together: Navigating a COVID-19 Local Outbreak in China Through Social Media ImagesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373498:CSCW1(1-32)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637349
Schmüser JSri Ramulu HWöhler NStransky CBensmann FDimitrov DSchellhammer SWermke DDietze SAcar YFahl S(2024)Analyzing Security and Privacy Advice During the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine on TwitterProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642826(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642826
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

The Role of Information Visibility in Network Gatekeeping: Information Aggregation on Reddit during Crisis Events
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing

Recommendations

Upvote My News: The Practices of Peer Information Aggregation for Breaking News on reddit.com

Citizen participation in crisis communication increasingly occurs in social media contexts. As some platforms -- e.g., social news sites -- evolve around collaborative voting, filtering, and information sharing, the aggregation of breaking news ...
The dynamic role of social media during Hurricane #Sandy

Social media has introduced a key ingredient, and a potentially unfamiliar variable, into the practice of crisis communication. In this paper, the authors critically assess the social media milestones related to Hurricane Sandy according to situational ...
Theorizing Self Visibility on Social Media: A Visibility Objects Lens
Self-presentation undergirds social interaction on social media. HCI and social computing scholarship draw on visibility to theorize self-presentation management; while research addresses how social media users leverage (in)visibility for self-...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

February 2017

2556 pages

ISBN:9781450343350

DOI:10.1145/2998181

General Chairs:
Charlotte P. Lee
University of Washington
,
Steve Poltrock
Retired
,
Program Chairs:
Louise Barkhuus
Stockholm University and Cornell Tech
,
Marcos Borges
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
,
Wendy Kellogg
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 February 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CSCW '17

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CSCW '17: Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

February 25 - March 1, 2017

Oregon, Portland, USA

Acceptance Rates

CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 183 of 530 submissions, 35%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

33
Total Citations
View Citations
853
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)127
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 18 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Seredko AHillman T(2024)What Does a Downvote Do? Performing Complementary and Competing Knowledge Practices on an Online PlatformProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36536928:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3653692
He CHe LYang WLi B(2024)Images Connect Us Together: Navigating a COVID-19 Local Outbreak in China Through Social Media ImagesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373498:CSCW1(1-32)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637349
Schmüser JSri Ramulu HWöhler NStransky CBensmann FDimitrov DSchellhammer SWermke DDietze SAcar YFahl S(2024)Analyzing Security and Privacy Advice During the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine on TwitterProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642826(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642826
Wu QRomero TSemaan B(2024)Negotiating Sociotechnical Boundaries: Moderation Work to Counter Racist Attacks in Online CommunitiesProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642688(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642688
Schmid SHartwig KCieslinski RReuter C(2024)Digital Resilience in Dealing with Misinformation on Social Media during COVID-19Information Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-022-10347-526:2(477-499)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10796-022-10347-5
Wu QSemaan B(2023)"How Do You Quantify How Racist Something Is?": Color-Blind Moderation in Decentralized GovernanceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36100307:CSCW2(1-27)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610030
Moriarty DMehlenbacher A(2023)Reddit and Engaged Science Communication Online: An Examination of Reddit’s R/Science Ask-Me-Anythings and Science Discussion SeriesTechnical Communication Quarterly10.1080/10572252.2023.219467633:1(54-70)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2194676
Cui YYamashita NLee Y(2022)"We Gather Together We Collaborate Together": Exploring the Challenges and Strategies of Chinese Lesbian and Bisexual Women's Online Communities on WeiboProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551486:CSCW2(1-31)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555148
He CDeng YYang WLi B(2022)"Help! Can You Hear Me?": Understanding How Help-Seeking Posts are Overwhelmed on Social Media during a Natural DisasterProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551476:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555147
He LHe C(2022)Help Me #DebunkThis: Unpacking Individual and Community's Collaborative Work in Information Credibility AssessmentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551386:CSCW2(1-31)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555138
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents