Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3012709.3012728acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Indoor pedestrian navigation systems: is more than one landmark needed for efficient self-localization?

Published: 12 December 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Research examining pedestrian navigation systems that use landmarks to explain routes became popular in the past years. Nevertheless, it is still an open question how many landmarks should be depicted at once. In this paper a user study is presented that evaluates two different indoor navigation system designs that depict either one (N = 63) or four (N = 60) landmarks to guide the user. The time it took the participants to recognize where to go was captured as a dependent variable. Results show that the interface only depicting one landmark leads to faster self-localization. Therefore, it is argued that a pedestrian navigation system should mainly depict one highly salient landmark in a navigation instruction in order to keep navigation efficiency high.

References

[1]
Ashweeni Kumar Beeharee and Anthony Steed. 2006. A Natural Wayfinding Exploiting Photos in Pedestrian Navigation Systems. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81--88.
[2]
Stefan Bienk, Markus Kattenbeck, Bernd Ludwig, Manuel Müller, and Christina Ohm. 2013. I Want to View It My Way: Interfaces to Mobile Maps Should Adapt to the User's Orientation Skills. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 34, 9 pages.
[3]
Stephany Bigler, Annina Brügger, Fiona Utzinger, and Kai-Florian Richter. 2014. Spatial Cognition IX: International Conference, Spatial Cognition 2014, Bremen, Germany, September 15--19, 2014. Proceedings. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Chapter Up, Down, Turn Around: Assisted Wayfinding Involving Level Changes, 176--189.
[4]
Anders Bouwer, Frank Nack, and Abdallah El Ali. 2012. Lost in navigation: evaluating a mobile map app for a fair. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction. ACM, 173--180.
[5]
Claus Brenner and Birgit Elias. 2003. Extracting landmarks for car navigation systems using existing GIS databases and laser scanning. International archives of photogrammetry remote sensing and spatial information sciences 34, 3/W8 (2003), 131--138.
[6]
Beatrix Brunner-Friedrich and Verena Radoczky. 2006. Visual Information and Information Systems: 8th International Conference, VISUAL 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, July 5, 2005, Revised Selected Papers. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, Chapter Active Landmarks in Indoor Environments, 203--215.
[7]
Luca Chittaro and Stefano Burigat. 2005. Augmenting Audio Messages with Visual Directions in Mobile Guides: An Evaluation of Three Approaches. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services (MobileHCI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 107--114.
[8]
Markus Kattenbeck. 2015. Empirically Measuring Salience of Objects for Use in Pedestrian Navigation. In Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (GIS '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 10 pages.
[9]
Christian Kray, Christian Elting, Katri Laakso, and Volker Coors. 2003. Presenting Route Instructions on Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 117--124.
[10]
Andrew J. May, Tracy Ross, Steven H. Bayer, and Mikko J. Tarkiainen. 2003. Pedestrian navigation aids: information requirements and design implications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 7, 6 (2003), 331--338.
[11]
Andreas Möller, Matthias Kranz, Stefan Diewald, Luis Roalter, Robert Huitl, Tobias Stockinger, Marion Koelle, and Patrick A. Lindemann. 2014. Experimental Evaluation of User Interfaces for Visual Indoor Navigation. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3607--3616.
[12]
A. Mulloni, H. Seichter, and D. Schmalstieg. 2011. User experiences with augmented reality aided navigation on phones. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on. 229--230.
[13]
Christina Ohm, Manuel Müller, and Bernd Ludwig. 2015. Displaying landmarks and the user's surroundings in indoor pedestrian navigation systems. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments 7, 5 (2015), 635--657.
[14]
Timo Partala and Miikka Salminen. 2012. User Experience of Photorealistic Urban Pedestrian Navigation. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 204--207.
[15]
Arto Puikkonen, Ari-Heikki Sarjanoja, Merja Haveri, Jussi Huhtala, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2009. Towards Designing Better Maps for Indoor Navigation: Experiences from a Case Study. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 4 pages.
[16]
Martin Raubal and Stephan Winter. 2002. Enriching Wayfinding Instructions with Local Landmarks. In Geographic Information Science: Second International Conference, GIScience 2002 Boulder, CO, USA, September 25--28, 2002 Proceedings, Max J. Egenhofer and David M. Mark (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 243--259.
[17]
Nanja J. J. M. Smets, Guido M. te Brake, Mark A. Neerincx, and Jasper Lindenberg. 2008. Effects of Mobile Map Orientation and Tactile Feedback on Navigation Speed and Situation Awareness. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 73--80.
[18]
Stephan Winter, Martin Raubal, and Clemens Nothegger. 2005. Focalizing Measures of Salience for Wayfinding. In Map-based Mobile Services: Theories, Methods and Implementations, L. Meng, T. Reichenbacher, and A. Zipf (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 125--139.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)NavMarkAR: A landmark-based augmented reality (AR) wayfinding system for enhancing older Adults’ spatial learningAdvanced Engineering Informatics10.1016/j.aei.2024.10263562(102635)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2023)URWalking: Indoor Navigation for Research and Daily UseKI - Künstliche Intelligenz10.1007/s13218-022-00795-137:1(83-90)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2023
  • (2022)Designing Mixed Reality-Based Indoor Navigation for User StudiesDie Gestaltung Mixed-Reality-basierter Indoor-Navigation für NutzerstudienKN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information10.1007/s42489-022-00108-472:2(129-138)Online publication date: 20-May-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Indoor pedestrian navigation systems: is more than one landmark needed for efficient self-localization?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MUM '16: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
    December 2016
    366 pages
    ISBN:9781450348607
    DOI:10.1145/3012709
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 December 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. indoor
    2. landmarks
    3. pedestrian navigation
    4. wayfinding

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    MUM '16

    Acceptance Rates

    MUM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 77 submissions, 45%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)NavMarkAR: A landmark-based augmented reality (AR) wayfinding system for enhancing older Adults’ spatial learningAdvanced Engineering Informatics10.1016/j.aei.2024.10263562(102635)Online publication date: Oct-2024
    • (2023)URWalking: Indoor Navigation for Research and Daily UseKI - Künstliche Intelligenz10.1007/s13218-022-00795-137:1(83-90)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2023
    • (2022)Designing Mixed Reality-Based Indoor Navigation for User StudiesDie Gestaltung Mixed-Reality-basierter Indoor-Navigation für NutzerstudienKN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information10.1007/s42489-022-00108-472:2(129-138)Online publication date: 20-May-2022
    • (2021)Spatial knowledge acquisition with virtual semantic landmarks in mixed reality-based indoor navigationCartography and Geographic Information Science10.1080/15230406.2021.190817148:4(305-319)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
    • (2019)Applying user-centred design for smartwatch-based pedestrian navigation systemJournal of Location Based Services10.1080/17489725.2019.161058213:3(213-237)Online publication date: 17-May-2019
    • (2017)PharosProceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services10.1145/3098279.3098529(1-13)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2017

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media