poster

How Developers Make Design Decisions about Users' Privacy: The Place of Professional Communities and Organizational Climate

Authors:

Oshrat Ayalon,

Eran Toch,

Irit Hadar,

Michael BirnhackAuthors Info & Claims

CSCW '17 Companion: Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

Pages 135 - 138

https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3026326

Published: 25 February 2017 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

New technologies continuously challenge people's information privacy, while privacy protection practices, such as Privacy-by-Design, did not become widespread engineering practices. The difficulty of designing privacy-preserving information systems highlights the need for studying developers' privacy decision-making processes, as the developers' communities are well coordinated and they are the ones who can promote or hinder privacy in the systems they design. We conducted an online survey (n=101), to understand the effectors on developers' professional privacy attitudes and practices. We investigate whether developer's privacy decision-making is shaped by several factors, including organizational (organizational privacy climate, business and legal contexts), professional (privacy knowledge) and personal (personal perceived privacy).

References

[1]

Barsade, S. G., Ramarajan, L., & Westen, D. (2009). Implicit affect in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 29, 135--162

Google Scholar

[2]

Dinev, T., Xu, H., Smith, J. H., & Hart, P. (2013). Information privacy and correlates: an empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(3), 295--316.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[3]

Gellman, R. (2014). Fair information practices: A basic history. Available at SSRN 2415020

Google Scholar

[4]

Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of occupational health psychology, 5(3), 347.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[5]

Hadar, I., Hasson, T., Ayalon, O., Toch, E., Birnhack, M., Sherman, S., & Balissa, A. (2014, March). Are Designers Ready for Privacy by Design? Examining Perceptions of Privacy Among Information Systems Designers. In 2014 TPRC Conference Paper.

Google Scholar

[6]

Rubinstein, I. S. and Good, N. (2013). Privacy by design: A counterfactual analysis of google and Facebook privacy incidents. Berkeley Tech. LJ, 28:1333.

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Aljeraisy ARana OPerera C(2024)Empowering IoT Developers with Privacy-Preserving End-User Development ToolsProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785888:3(1-47)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678588
Li TArya AJin H(2024)Redesigning Privacy with User Feedback: The Case of Zoom Attendee Attention TrackingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642594(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642594
Abomhara MNweke LYayilgan SComparin DTeyras Kde Labriolle S(2024)Enhancing privacy protections in national identification systems: an examination of stakeholders’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices of privacy by designInternational Journal of Information Security10.1007/s10207-024-00905-0Online publication date: 3-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-024-00905-0
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

How Developers Make Design Decisions about Users' Privacy: The Place of Professional Communities and Organizational Climate
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Computing / technology policy

Recommendations

Privacy by designers: software developers' privacy mindset

Privacy by design (PbD) is a policy measure that guides software developers to apply inherent solutions to achieve better privacy protection. For PbD to be a viable option, it is important to understand developers' perceptions, interpretation and ...
Understanding developers’ privacy and security mindsets via climate theory
Abstract
Privacy and security by design are policy measures that guide software developers to engineer privacy and security solutions inherently into the software systems they develop. However, although these policy measures have been widely discussed and ...
Freedom of Privacy: Anonymous Data Collection with Respondent-Defined Privacy Protection

The massive amount of sensitive survey data about individuals that agencies collect and share through the Internet is causing a great deal of privacy concerns. These concerns may discourage individuals from revealing their sensitive information. ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

CSCW '17 Companion: Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

February 2017

472 pages

ISBN:9781450346887

DOI:10.1145/3022198

General Chairs:
Charlotte P. Lee
University of Washington
,
Steve Poltrock
Retired
,
Program Chairs:
Louise Barkhuus
Stockholm University and Cornell Tech
,
Marcos Borges
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
,
Wendy Kellogg
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 February 2017

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Poster

Funding Sources

Israel Science Foundation (ISF)

Conference

CSCW '17

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CSCW '17: Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

February 25 - March 1, 2017

Oregon, Portland, USA

Acceptance Rates

CSCW '17 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate 183 of 530 submissions, 35%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

27
Total Citations
View Citations
491
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)34
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Aljeraisy ARana OPerera C(2024)Empowering IoT Developers with Privacy-Preserving End-User Development ToolsProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785888:3(1-47)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678588
Li TArya AJin H(2024)Redesigning Privacy with User Feedback: The Case of Zoom Attendee Attention TrackingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642594(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642594
Abomhara MNweke LYayilgan SComparin DTeyras Kde Labriolle S(2024)Enhancing privacy protections in national identification systems: an examination of stakeholders’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices of privacy by designInternational Journal of Information Security10.1007/s10207-024-00905-0Online publication date: 3-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-024-00905-0
Candra ASudiro ASusilowati C(2023)The relationship between work professionalism and job satisfaction toward employee performance in mediating of organizational climateInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478)10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.238012:2(177-186)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.2380
Nurgalieva LFrik ADoherty G(2023)A Narrative Review of Factors Affecting the Implementation of Privacy and Security Practices in Software DevelopmentACM Computing Surveys10.1145/358995155:14s(1-27)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3589951
Alhirabi NBeaumont SLlanos JMeedeniya DRana OPerera C(2023)PARROTProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35808807:1(1-37)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3580880
Kühtreiber PPak VReinhardt D(2023)“A method like this would be overkill”: Developers’ Perceived Issues with Privacy-preserving Computation Methods2023 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)10.1109/TrustCom60117.2023.00145(1041-1048)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TrustCom60117.2023.00145
Iwaya LBabar MRashid A(2023)Privacy Engineering in the Wild: Understanding the Practitioners’ Mindset, Organizational Aspects, and Current PracticesIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2023.329023749:9(4324-4348)Online publication date: Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2023.3290237
Tahaei MBernd JRashid A(2022)Privacy, Permissions, and the Health App Ecosystem: A Stack Overflow ExplorationProceedings of the 2022 European Symposium on Usable Security10.1145/3549015.3555669(117-130)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3549015.3555669
Alhazmi AHameed MArachchilage N(2022)Developers’ Privacy Education: A game framework to stimulate secure coding behaviour2022 IEEE Smartworld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Digital Twin, Privacy Computing, Metaverse, Autonomous & Trusted Vehicles (SmartWorld/UIC/ScalCom/DigitalTwin/PriComp/Meta)10.1109/SmartWorld-UIC-ATC-ScalCom-DigitalTwin-PriComp-Metaverse56740.2022.00321(2255-2264)Online publication date: Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartWorld-UIC-ATC-ScalCom-DigitalTwin-PriComp-Metaverse56740.2022.00321
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Privacy by designers: software developers' privacy mindset

Understanding developers’ privacy and security mindsets via climate theory

Freedom of Privacy: Anonymous Data Collection with Respondent-Defined Privacy Protection