Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025749acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

All about Acceptability?: Identifying Factors for the Adoption of Data Glasses

Published: 06 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Innovations often trigger objections before becoming widely accepted. This paper assesses whether a familiarisation over time can be expected for data glasses, too. While user attitudes towards those devices have been reported to be prevalently negative [14], it is still unclear, to what extent this initial, negative user attitude might impede adoption. However, indepth understanding is crucial for reducing barriers early in order to gain access to potential benefits from the technology. With this paper we contribute to a better understanding of factors affecting data glasses adoption, as well as current trends and opinions. Our multiple-year case study (N=118) shows, against expectations, no significant change towards a more positive attitude between 2014 and 2016. We complement these findings with an expert survey (N=51) investigating prognoses, challenges and discussing the relevance of social acceptability. We elicit and contrast a controversial spectrum of expert opinions, and assess whether initial objections can be overwritten. Our analysis shows that while social acceptability is considered relevant for the time being, utility and usability are more valued for long-term adoption.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (pm9000.mp4)

References

[1]
Fraser Anderson, Tovi Grossman, Daniel Wigdor, and George Fitzmaurice. 2015. Supporting Subtlety with Deceptive Devices and Illusory Interactions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1489-1498.
[2]
Angela Berkley. 2015. Snapshot Seeing: Kodak Fiends, Child Photographers, and Henry James's What Maisie Knew. MFS Modern Fiction Studies 61, 3 (2015), 375-403. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/594732
[3]
Cherrylyn Buenaflor and Hee-Cheol Kim. 2013. Six Human Factors to Acceptability of Wearable Computers. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering 8, 3 (2013), 1-8. http://www.sersc.org/journals/IJMUE/vol8_no3_2013/10.pdf
[4]
Daniel Castro and Alan McQuinn. 2015. The Privacy Panic Cycle: A Guide to Public Fears About New Technologies. The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, Washington, DC, USA. http://www2.itif.org/2015-privacy-panic.pdf
[5]
Fred D. Davis Jr. 1986. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15192
[6]
Tamara Denning, Zakariya Dehlawi, and Tadayoshi Kohno. 2014. In situ with Bystanders of Augmented Reality Glasses: Perspectives on Recording and Privacy-mediating Technologies. In Proceedings of the 32rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'14). ACM, New York, NY, 2377-2386.
[7]
David Dobbelstein, Philipp Hock, and Enrico Rukzio. 2015. Belt: An Unobtrusive Touch Input Device for Head-worn Displays. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2135-2138.
[8]
Barrett Ens, Tovi Grossman, Fraser Anderson, Justin Matejka, and George Fitzmaurice. 2015. Candid Interaction: Revealing Hidden Mobile and Wearable Computing Activities. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 467-476.
[9]
Vivian Genaro Motti and Kelly Caine. 2014. Understanding the Wearability of Head-mounted Devices from a Human-centered Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 83-86.
[10]
Shuhei Hosokawa. 1984. The Walkman Effect. Popular Music 4 (1984), 165.
[11]
Elena Karahanna, Detmar W. Straub, and Norman L. Chervany. 1999. Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-sectional Comparison of Pre-adoption and Post-adoption Beliefs. MIS Q. 23, 2 (June 1999), 183-213.
[12]
Hee-Cheol Kim. 2015. Acceptability Engineering: The Study of user Acceptance of Innovative Technologies. Journal of Applied Research and Technology 13, 2 (2015), 230-237.
[13]
Ki Joon Kim and Dong-Hee Shin. 2015. An acceptance model for smart watches. Internet Research 25, 4 (2015), 527-541.
[14]
Marion Koelle, Matthias Kranz, and Andreas Möller. 2015. Don't Look at Me That Way!: Understanding User Attitudes Towards Data Glasses Usage. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI'15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 362-372.
[15]
Kate Miriam Loewenthal. 2001. An Introduction to Psychological Tests and Scales (2nd Edition). Psychology Press, New York, NY, USA.
[16]
Yogesh Malhotra and Dennis F. Galletta. 1999. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Account for Social Influence: Theoretical Bases and Empirical Validation. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'99). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1006-1019. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=874068.875913
[17]
Philipp Mayring. 2014. Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. SSOAR, Klagenfurt, Germany. 143 pages. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
[18]
Philipp A. Rauschnabel, Alexander Brem, and Bjoern S. Ivens. 2015. Who will buy smart glasses? Empirical results of two pre-market-entry studies on the role of personality in individual awareness and intended adoption of Google Glass wearables. Computers in Human Behavior 49 (2015), 635-647.
[19]
Philipp A Rauschnabel, Daniel W.E Hein, Jun He, Young K. Ro, Samir Rawashdeh, and Bryan Krulikowski. 2016. Fashion or Technology? A Fashnology Perspective on the Perception and Adoption of Augmented Reality Smart Glasses. i-com 15, 2 (2016), 179-194.
[20]
Philipp A. Rauschnabel and Young K. Ro. 2016. Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing 11, 2 (2016), 123.
[21]
Stuart Reeves, Steve Benford, Claire O'Malley, and Mike Fraser. 2005. Designing the Spectator Experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 741-750.
[22]
Everett M Rogers. 2010. Diffusion of Innovations (4th Edition). Free Press, Simon and Schuster Inc., New York, NY, USA.
[23]
Neil Selwyn. 2003. Apart from Technology: Understanding People's Non-use of Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life. Technology in sSociety 25, 1 (2003), 99-116.
[24]
Brian Shackel. 2009. Usability - Context, Framework, Definition, Design and Evaluation. Interact. Comput. 21, 5-6 (Dec. 2009), 339-346.
[25]
Koert M. van Mensvoort. 2013. Pyramid of Technology: How Technology becomes Nature in Seven Steps. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/3805415/760124.pdf
[26]
Viswanath Venkatesh and Michael G. Morris. 2000. Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior. MIS Q. 24, 1 (March 2000), 115-139.
[27]
Heetae Yang, Jieun Yu, Hangjung Zo, and Munkee Choi. 2016. User Acceptance of Wearable Devices: An extended Perspective of Perceived Value. Telematics and Informatics 33, 2 (2016), 256-269.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Bridging Divide with Innovative Media: Telexistence and Human AugmentationEmerging Media10.1177/275235432412660752:2(288-310)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Understanding Novice Users' Mental Models of Gesture Discoverability and Designing Effective OnboardingCompanion of the 2024 on ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing10.1145/3675094.3678370(290-295)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Do I Just Tap My Headset?Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314517:4(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2017
7138 pages
ISBN:9781450346559
DOI:10.1145/3025453
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 May 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Augmented Reality
  2. Data Glasses
  3. Public Experiences
  4. Social Acceptability
  5. Technology Adoption
  6. User Acceptance

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CHI '17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 600 of 2,400 submissions, 25%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)53
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Bridging Divide with Innovative Media: Telexistence and Human AugmentationEmerging Media10.1177/275235432412660752:2(288-310)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Understanding Novice Users' Mental Models of Gesture Discoverability and Designing Effective OnboardingCompanion of the 2024 on ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing10.1145/3675094.3678370(290-295)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Do I Just Tap My Headset?Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314517:4(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Make Interaction Situated: Designing User Acceptable Interaction for Situated Visualization in Public EnvironmentsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642049(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)The Role of Social Feedback in Technology Acceptance: A One-Week Diary Study with Exoskeleton Users at the WorkplaceInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2406119(1-14)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2023)The Social Perception of Autonomous Delivery Vehicles Based on the Stereotype Content ModelSustainability10.3390/su1506519415:6(5194)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Exploring the Effects of Head-Mounted Augmented Reality on Helping BehaviourProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3626705.3627969(440-455)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Society's Attitudes Towards Human Augmentation and Performance Enhancement Technologies (SHAPE) ScaleProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36109157:3(1-23)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Reality Anchors: Bringing Cues from Reality to Increase Acceptance of Immersive Technologies in TransitProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042667:MHCI(1-28)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Beyond Hiding and Revealing: Exploring Effects of Visibility and Form of Interaction on the Witness ExperienceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042477:MHCI(1-23)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media