research-article

How Public Is My Private Life?: Privacy in Online Dating

Authors:

Tadayoshi KohnoAuthors Info & Claims

WWW '17: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web

Pages 1231 - 1240

https://doi.org/10.1145/3038912.3052592

Published: 03 April 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Online dating services let users expand their dating pool beyond their social network and specify important characteristics of potential partners. To assess compatibility, users share personal information -- e.g., identifying details or sensitive opinions about sexual preferences or worldviews -- in profiles or in one-on-one communication. Thus, participating in online dating poses inherent privacy risks. How people reason about these privacy risks in modern online dating ecosystems has not been extensively studied. We present the results of a survey we designed to examine privacy-related risks, practices, and expectations of people who use or have used online dating, then delve deeper using semi-structured interviews. We additionally analyzed 400 Tinder profiles to explore how these issues manifest in practice. Our results reveal tensions between privacy and competing user values and goals, and we demonstrate how these results can inform future designs.

References

[1]

15% of American adults have used online dating sites or mobile dating apps. http://pewrsr.ch/1SgNCZl. Accessed: 2016-10-22.

[2]

The case for an older woman. http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/the-case-for-an-older-woman/. Accessed: 2016-10-22.

[3]

OKCupid about. http://www.okcupid.com/about. Accessed: 2016-10-22.

[4]

Researchers caused an uproar by publishing data from 70,000 OKCupid users. http://fortune.com/2016/05/18/okcupid-data-research/. Accessed: 2016-15-9.

[5]

Tinder. www.gotinder.com/press. Accessed: 2016-10-22.

[6]

Young job-seekers hiding their Facebook pages. http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/03/29/facebook.job-seekers. Accessed: 2016-10-22.

[7]

PositiveSingles STD dating site faces $16.5m penalty. BBC, 2014.

[8]

Tourist sexually assaulted in Sydney by several men after meeting on Tinder. News.com.au, 2014.

[9]

Olympics and chill, 'a sexually charged time': Inside Rio Olympic's Tinder game where athletes are getting their swipe on. The Sun, 2016.

[10]

A. Acquisti and R. Gross. Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In PETS, 2006.

Digital Library

[11]

M. Benisch, P. G. Kelley, N. Sadeh, and L. F. Cranor. Capturing location-privacy preferences: Quantifying accuracy and user-burden tradeoffs. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 15(7):679--694, Oct. 2011.

Digital Library

[12]

I. Bilogrevic, K. Huguenin, B. Agir, M. Jadliwala, and J.-P. Hubaux. Adaptive information-sharing for privacy-aware mobile social networks. In UbiComp, 2013.

Digital Library

[13]

C. Blackwell, J. Birnholtz, and C. Abbott. Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society, 2014.

[14]

J. R. Brubaker, M. Ananny, and K. Crawford. Departing glances: A sociotechnical account of 'leaving' Grindr. New Media & Society, 2014.

[15]

S. Consolvo, I. E. Smith, T. Matthews, A. LaMarca, J. Tabert, and P. Powledge. Location disclosure to social relations: Why, when, & what people want to share. In CHI, 2005.

Digital Library

[16]

E. F. Corriero and S. T. Tong. Managing uncertainty in mobile dating applications: Goals, concerns of use, and information seeking in Grindr. New Media & Society, 2016.

[17]

B. Debatin, J. P. Lovejoy, A.-K. Horn, and B. N. Hughes. Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2009.

[18]

J. Farnden, B. Martini, and K. R. Choo. Privacy risks in mobile dating apps. CoRR, 2015.

[19]

J. L. Gibbs, N. B. Ellison, and C.-H. Lai. First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research, 2010.

[20]

D. Gudelunas. There's an app for that: The uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Sexuality & Culture, 2012.

[21]

J. T. Hancock, C. Toma, and N. Ellison. The truth about lying in online dating profiles. In CHI, 2007.

Digital Library

[22]

L. K. John, A. Acquisti, and G. Loewenstein. Strangers on a plane: Context-dependent willingness to divulge sensitive information. Journal of consumer research, 37(5):858--873, 2011.

[23]

M. Johnson, S. Egelman, and S. M. Bellovin. Facebook and privacy: It's complicated. In SOUPS, 2012.

Digital Library

[24]

S. Lederer, J. Mankoff, and A. K. Dey. Who wants to know what when? Privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing. In CHI EA, 2003.

Digital Library

[25]

Y. Liu, K. P. Gummadi, B. Krishnamurthy, and A. Mislove. Analyzing Facebook privacy settings: User expectations vs. reality. In IMC, 2011.

Digital Library

[26]

S. Livingstone. Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 2008.

[27]

H. Mao, X. Shuai, and A. Kapadia. Loose tweets: An analysis of privacy leaks on Twitter. In WPES, 2011.

Digital Library

[28]

C. M. Mascaro, R. M. Magee, and S. P. Goggins. Not just a wink and smile: an analysis of user-defined success in online dating. In iConference, 2012.

Digital Library

[29]

B. McNamara. Olympics 2016: Closeted gay athletes outed by Daily Beast Grindr article. Teen Vogue, 2016.

[30]

B. Meeder, J. Tam, P. G. Kelley, and L. F. Cranor. RT @IWantPrivacy: Widespread violation of privacy settings in the Twitter social network. In SNSP, 2010.

[31]

D. O'Brien and A. M. Torres. Social networking and online privacy: Facebook users' perceptions. Irish Journal of Management, 2012.

[32]

I. Polakis, G. Argyros, T. Petsios, S. Sivakorn, and A. D. Keromytis. Where's Wally?: Precise user discovery attacks in location proximity services. In CCS, 2015.

Digital Library

[33]

F. Roesner, B. T. Gill, and T. Kohno. Sex, lies, or kittens? Investigating the use of Snapchat's self-destructing messages. In Financial Crypto, 2014.

[34]

S. Shah. Hzone HIV dating app suffers massive data breach exposing 5,000 user accounts. 2015.

[35]

J. Staddon, D. Huffaker, L. Brown, and A. Sedley. Are privacy concerns a turn-off?: Engagement and privacy in social networks. In SOUPS, 2012.

Digital Library

[36]

C. Stenson, A. Balcells, and M. Chen. Burning up privacy on Tinder. In SOUPS (Posters), 2015.

[37]

E. Toch and I. Levi. Locality and privacy in people-nearby applications. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp '13, pages 539--548, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.

Digital Library

[38]

C. L. Toma, J. T. Hancock, and N. B. Ellison. Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2008.

[39]

C. Van De Wiele and S. T. Tong. Breaking boundaries: The uses & gratifications of grindr. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp '14, pages 619--630, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.

Digital Library

[40]

D. Victor. The Ashley Madison data dump, explained. The New York Times, 2015.

[41]

J. Woo. The right not to be identified: privacy and anonymity in the interactive media environment. New Media & Society, 2006.

[42]

P. Xia, B. F. Ribeiro, C. X. Chen, B. Liu, and D. F. Towsley. A study of user behavior on an online dating site. In ASONAM, 2013.

Digital Library

[43]

D. Zytko, S. A. Grandhi, and Q. Jones. Impression management struggles in online dating. In GROUP, 2014.

Digital Library

Cited By

Noah NThakur SBeck JDas S(2024)Evaluating Privacy & Security of Online Dating Applications with a Focus on Older AdultsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4828190Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4828190
Shah ERana AShashwat SDeshpande SKaur S(2024)It’s a (Mis)match: Practices and Perceptions of University Students About Online DatingSocial Computing and Social Media10.1007/978-3-031-61281-7_17(250-265)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-61281-7_17
He CHe LLu ZLi B(2023)Seeking Love and Companionship through Streaming: Unpacking Livestreamer-moderated Senior Matchmaking in ChinaProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581195(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581195
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

How Public Is My Private Life?: Privacy in Online Dating
1. Security and privacy
  1. Human and societal aspects of security and privacy

Recommendations

Privacy in online dating: does it matter?
ICCSP '19: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cryptography, Security and Privacy

More people are engaging in the online dating phenomenon nowadays. However, in most cases online dating applications require additional sensitive information such as a user's geographical location or sexual orientation. This situation raises concerns ...
Evaluating 'Prefer not to say' Around Sensitive Disclosures
CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

As people's offline and online lives become increasingly entwined, the sensitivity of personal information disclosed online is increasing. Disclosures often occur through structured disclosure fields (e.g., drop-down lists). Prior research suggests these ...
Secure and private search protocols for RFID systems

In many real world applications, there is a need to search for RFID tagged items. In this paper, we propose a set of protocols for secure and private search for tags based on their identities or certain criteria they must satisfy. When RFID enabled ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

WWW '17: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web

April 2017

1678 pages

ISBN:9781450349130

General Chairs:
Rick Barrett
W3Events
,
Rick Cummings
Murdoch University
,
Program Chairs:
Eugene Agichtein
Emory University
,
Evgeniy Gabrilovich
Google Research

Copyright © 2017 Copyright is held by the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2).

Sponsors

IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

In-Cooperation

SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web

Publisher

International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

Publication History

Published: 03 April 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

WWW '17

Sponsor:

IW3C2

WWW '17: 26th International World Wide Web Conference

April 3 - 7, 2017

Perth, Australia

Acceptance Rates

WWW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 164 of 966 submissions, 17%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

23
Total Citations
View Citations
1,809
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)238
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13

Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Noah NThakur SBeck JDas S(2024)Evaluating Privacy & Security of Online Dating Applications with a Focus on Older AdultsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4828190Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4828190
Shah ERana AShashwat SDeshpande SKaur S(2024)It’s a (Mis)match: Practices and Perceptions of University Students About Online DatingSocial Computing and Social Media10.1007/978-3-031-61281-7_17(250-265)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-61281-7_17
He CHe LLu ZLi B(2023)Seeking Love and Companionship through Streaming: Unpacking Livestreamer-moderated Senior Matchmaking in ChinaProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581195(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581195
Wei MZeng EKohno TRoesner FChiasson SKapadia A(2022)Anti-privacy and anti-security advice on tiktokProceedings of the Eighteenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security10.5555/3563609.3563633(447-462)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3563609.3563633
Borchert AHeisel M(2022)The Role of Trustworthiness Facets for Developing Social Media Applications: A Structured Literature ReviewInformation10.3390/info1301003413:1(34)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010034
Hamilton VBarakat HRedmiles E(2022)Risk, Resilience and Reward: Impacts of Shifting to Digital Sex WorkProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556506:CSCW2(1-37)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555650
Cui YYamashita NLiu MLee Y(2022)“So Close, yet So Far”: Exploring Sexual-minority Women’s Relationship-building via Online Dating in ChinaProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517624(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3517624
Erickson JYuzon JBonaci T(2022)What You Do Not Expect When You Are Expecting: Privacy Analysis of FemtechIEEE Transactions on Technology and Society10.1109/TTS.2022.31609283:2(121-131)Online publication date: Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2022.3160928
Wu YEdwards WDas S(2022)SoK: Social Cybersecurity2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)10.1109/SP46214.2022.9833757(1863-1879)Online publication date: May-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46214.2022.9833757
Al-Dawood AAlhajhussein SYarosh S(2021)Saudi Arabian Parents' Perception of Online Marital Matchmaking TechnologiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34329104:CSCW3(1-32)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3432910
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents