Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3041021.3054142acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Selfie is Worth a Thousand Words: Mining Personal Patterns behind User Selfie-posting Behaviours

Published: 03 April 2017 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Selfies have become increasingly fashionable in the social media era. People are willing to share their selfies in various social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and Flicker. The popularity of selfie have caught researchers' attention, especially psychologists. In computer vision and machine learning areas, little attention has been paid to this phenomenon as a valuable data source. In this paper, we focus on exploring the deeper personal patterns behind people's different kinds of selfie-posting behaviours. We develop this work based on a dataset of WeChat, one of the most extensively used instant messaging platform in China. In particular, we first propose an unsupervised approach to classify the images posted by users. Based on the classification result, we construct three types of user-level features that reflect user preference, activity and posting habit. Based on these features, for a series of selfie related tasks, we build classifiers that can accurately predict two sets of users with opposite selfie-posting behaviours. We have found that people's interest, activity and posting habit have a great influence on their selfie-posting behaviours. Taking selfie frequency as an example, the classification accuracy between selfie-posting addict and nonaddict can reach 89.36%. We also prove that using user's image information to predict these behaviours achieve better performance than using text information. More importantly, for each set of users with a specific selfie-posting behaviour, we extract and visualize significant personal patterns about them. In addition, to concisely construct the relation between personal pattern and selfie-posting behaviour, we cluster users and extract their high-level attributes, revealing the correlation between these attributes and users' selfie-posting behaviours. In the end, we demonstrate that users' selfie-posting behaviour, as a good predictor, could predict their different preferences toward these high-level attributes accurately.

    References

    [1]
    J. D. Burger, J. Henderson, G. Kim, and G. Zarrella. Discriminating gender on twitter. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP, 1301--1309, 2011.
    [2]
    A. Cobo and D. e. a. Parra. Identifying relevant messages in a twitter-based citizen channel for natural disaster situations. Proceedings of. ACM International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2015.
    [3]
    A. Dhir, S. Pallesen, T. Torsheim, and C. S. Andreassen. Do age and gender differences exist in selfie-related behaviours? Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 63: 549--555, 2016.
    [4]
    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03385, 2015.
    [5]
    T. Hu, H. Xiao, J. Luo, and T. vy Thi Nguyen. What the language you tweet says about your occupation. Proceedings of the 10th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM, 2016.
    [6]
    E. Kim, J. A. Lee, Y. Sung, and S. M. Choi. Predicting selfie-posting behavior on social networking sites: An extension of theory of planned behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 62(C):116--123, 2016.
    [7]
    A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 25(2), 2012.
    [8]
    Z. Li, L. Chen, Y. Bai, K. Bian, and P. Zhou. On diffusion-restricted social network: A measurement study of wechat moments. IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2016.
    [9]
    L. Liu, D. PreotiucPietro, and Z. R. Samani. Analyzing personality through social media profile picture choice. Proceedings of the 10th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM, 2016.
    [10]
    J. Qiu, Y. Li, J. Tang, Z. Lu, H. Ye, B. Chen, Q. Yang, and J. E. Hopcroft. The lifecycle and cascade of wechat social messaging groups. Proceedings of. ACM International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW) Pages 311--320, 2016.
    [11]
    L. Qiu, J. Lu, S. Yang, W. Qu, and T. Zhu. What does your selfie say about you? Computers in Human Behavior, 52(C):443--449, 2015.
    [12]
    D. Quercia, L. M. Aiello, R. Schifanella, and A. Davies. The digital life of walkable streets. Proceedings of. ACM International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2015.
    [13]
    D. Rao, D. Yarowsky, and A. Shreevats. Classifying latent user attributes in twitter. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Search and Mining User-generated Contents, SMUC, 37--44, 2010.
    [14]
    A. Sadilek, H. Kautz, and V. Silenzio. Predicting disease transmission from geo-tagged micro-blog data. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2012.
    [15]
    A. Saravanou, G. Valkanas, D. Gunopulos, and G. Andrienko. Twitter floods when it rains: A case study of the uk floods in early 2014. Proceedings of. ACM International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2015.
    [16]
    K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Computer Science, 2014.
    [17]
    C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke, and A. Rabinovich. Going deeper with convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2015: 1--9, 2015.
    [18]
    A. Tumasjan, T. O. Sprenger, P. G. Sandner, and I. M. Welpe. Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2010.
    [19]
    Q. You, S. Bhatia, and J. Luo. The eyes of the beholder: Gender prediction using images posted in online social networks. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), Workshop on Social Multimedia Data Mining, 2014.
    [20]
    Q. You, S. Bhatia, and J. Luo. A picture tells a thousand words-about you! user interest profiling from user generated visual content. Signal Processing, 124(C):45--53, 2016.
    [21]
    Q. You, L. Cao, Y. Cong, and X. Zhang. A multifaceted approach to social multimedia-based prediction of elections. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 17(12):1--1, 2015.
    [22]
    J. Zhang, X. Hu, Y. Zhang, and H. Liu. Your age is no secret: Inferring microbloggers' ages via content and interaction analysis. Proceedings of the 10th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM, 2016.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Selfie addiction: The impact of personality traits? A cross-sectional study among the Lebanese populationPerspectives in Psychiatric Care10.1111/ppc.12539Online publication date: 3-Jun-2020
    • (2019)Life-TagsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33311573:EICS(1-22)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2019
    • (2018)You Type a Few Words and We Do the Rest: Image Recommendation for Social Multimedia Posts2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)10.1109/BigData.2018.8622513(2124-2133)Online publication date: Dec-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '17 Companion: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion
    April 2017
    1738 pages
    ISBN:9781450349147

    Sponsors

    • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

    Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

    Publication History

    Published: 03 April 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. deep residual networks
    2. selfie behavior analysis
    3. social media mining
    4. user modeling

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    WWW '17
    Sponsor:
    • IW3C2

    Acceptance Rates

    WWW '17 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate 164 of 966 submissions, 17%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Selfie addiction: The impact of personality traits? A cross-sectional study among the Lebanese populationPerspectives in Psychiatric Care10.1111/ppc.12539Online publication date: 3-Jun-2020
    • (2019)Life-TagsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33311573:EICS(1-22)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2019
    • (2018)You Type a Few Words and We Do the Rest: Image Recommendation for Social Multimedia Posts2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)10.1109/BigData.2018.8622513(2124-2133)Online publication date: Dec-2018
    • (2017)Exploiting Digital DNA for the Analysis of Similarities in Twitter Behaviours2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA)10.1109/DSAA.2017.57(686-695)Online publication date: Oct-2017
    • (2017)How Polarized Have We Become? A Multimodal Classification of Trump Followers and Clinton FollowersSocial Informatics10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_27(440-456)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2017

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media