Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Moving Destination Prediction Using Sparse Dataset: A Mobility Gradient Descent Approach

Published: 14 April 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Moving destination prediction offers an important category of location-based applications and provides essential intelligence to business and governments. In existing studies, a common approach to destination prediction is to match the given query trajectory with massive recorded trajectories by similarity calculation. Unfortunately, due to privacy concerns, budget constraints, and many other factors, in most circumstances, we can only obtain a sparse trajectory dataset. In sparse dataset, the available moving trajectories are far from enough to cover all possible query trajectories; thus the predictability of the matching-based approach will decrease remarkably. Toward destination prediction with sparse dataset, instead of searching similar trajectories over the sparse records, we alternatively examine the changes of distances from sampling locations to final destination on query trajectory. The underlying idea is intuitive: It is directly motivated by travel purpose, people always get closer to the final destination during the movement. By borrowing the conception of gradient descent in optimization theory, we propose a novel moving destination prediction approach, namely MGDPre. Building upon the mobility gradient descent, MGDPre only investigates the behavior characteristics of query trajectory itself without matching historical trajectories, and thus is applicable for sparse dataset. We evaluate our approach based on extensive experiments, using GPS trajectories generated by a sample of taxis over a 10-day period in Shenzhen city, China. The results demonstrate that the effectiveness, efficiency, and scalability of our approach outperform state-of-the-art baseline methods.

References

[1]
J. A. Alvarez-Garcia, J. A. Ortega, L. Gonzalez-Abril, and F. Velasco. 2010. Trip destination prediction based on past GPS log using a hidden Markov model. Expert Systems with Applications 37, 12 (2010), 8166--8171.
[2]
Daniel Ashbrook and Thad Starner. 2003. Using GPS to learn significant locations and predict movement across multiple users. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 7, 5 (2003), 275--286.
[3]
Amiya Bhattacharya and Sajal K. Das. 1999. LeZi-update: An information-theoretic approach to track mobile users in PCS networks. In Proceeding of the 5th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom’99). ACM, 1--12.
[4]
Bruce Allison and Geoffrey Gordon. 2004. Better motion prediction for people-tracking. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’04). 1--6.
[5]
C. Burges, T. Shaked, E. Renshaw, A. Lazier, M. Deeds, N. Hamilton, and G. Hullender. 2005. Learning to rank using gradient descent. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’05). ACM, 89--96.
[6]
Chao Chen, Daqing Zhang, Nan Li, and Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2014. B-Planner: Planning bidirectional night bus routes using large-scale taxi GPS traces. IEEE Transaction Intelligent Transportation Systems 15, 4 (2014), 1451--1465.
[7]
Ling Chen, Mingqi Lv, and Gencai Chen. 2010. A system for destination and future route prediction based on trajectory mining. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 6, 6 (2010), 657--676.
[8]
C. S. Jensen. 2002. Research challenges in location-enabled m-services. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM’02). IEEE, 3--7.
[9]
Hoyoung Jeung, Qing Liu, Heng Tao Shen, and Xiaofang Zhou. 2008. A hybrid prediction model for moving objects. In Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’08). IEEE, 70--79.
[10]
A. Karbassi and M. Barth. 2003. Vehicle route prediction and time of arrival estimation techniques for improved transportation system management. In Proceedings of Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV’03). IEEE, 511--516.
[11]
Yong-Joong Kim and Sung-Bae Cho. 2013. A HMM-based location prediction framework with location recognizer combining k-nearest neighbor and multiple decision trees. In Proceedings of International Conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems (HAIS’13). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 618--628.
[12]
J. Kivinen and M. K. Warmuth. 1997. Exponentiated gradient versus gradient descent for linear predictors. Information and Computation 132, 1 (1997), 1--63.
[13]
V. Kostov, J. Ozawa, M. Yoshioka, and T. Kudoh. 2005. Travel destination prediction using frequent crossing pattern from driving history. In Proceedings of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC’05). IEEE, 343--350.
[14]
John Krumm. 2006. Real Time Destination Prediction Based on Efficient Routes. SAE Technical Paper, Warrendale, PA.
[15]
John Krumm and Eric Horvitz. 2006. Predestination: Inferring destinations from partial trajectories. In Proceedings of International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp’06). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 243--260.
[16]
J. Krumm and E. Horvitz. 2007. Predestination: Where do you want to go today? Computer 40, 4 (2007), 105--107.
[17]
Lurng-Kuo Liu and Ephraim Feig. 1996. A block-based gradient descent search algorithm for block motion estimation in video coding. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 6, 4 (1996), 419--422.
[18]
Xiaoqiang Lu, Yulong Wang, and Yuan Yuan. 2013. Sparse coding from a Bayesian perspective. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 24, 6 (2013), 929--939.
[19]
Xiaoqiang Lu, Yuan Yuan, and Pingkun Yan. 2014. Alternatively constrained dictionary learning for image superresolution. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 44, 3 (2014), 366--377.
[20]
Y. Yuan, Lu, X., and X. Zheng. 2016. Jointly dictionary learning for change detection in multispectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 52, 5 (2016), 2858--2874.
[21]
C. Manasseh and R. Sengupta. 2013. Predicting driver destination using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC’13). IEEE, 142--147.
[22]
Natalia Marmasse and Larry Chris Schmandt. 2002. A user-centered location model. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6, 5--6 (2002), 318--321.
[23]
K. Miyashita, T. Terada, and S. Nishio. 2008. A map matching algorithm for car navigation systems that predict user destination. In Proceedings of Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA Workshops’08). IEEE, 1551--1556.
[24]
Mikolaj Morzy. 2007. Mining frequent trajectories of moving objects for location prediction. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition (MLDM’07). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 667--680.
[25]
A. Nadembega, T. Taleb, and A. Hafid. 2012. A destination prediction model based on historical data, contextual knowledge and spatial conceptual maps. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’12). IEEE, 1416--1420.
[26]
Kohei Tanaka, Yasue Kishino, Tsutomu Terada, and Shojiro Nishio. 2009. A destination prediction method using driving contexts and trajectory for car navigation systems. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC’09 ). ACM, 190--195.
[27]
Kari Torkkola, Keshu Zhang, Haifeng Li, Harry Zhang, Christopher Schreiner, and Mike Gardner. 2007. Traffic advisories based on route prediction. In Proceedings of Workshop on Mobile Interaction with the Real World (MIRW’07). 33--36.
[28]
Adrien Treuille, Seth Cooper, and Zoran Popovic. 2006. Continuum crowds. ACM Transactions on Graphics 25, 3 (2006), 1160--1168.
[29]
D. Vasquez and T. Fraichard. 2004. Motion prediction for moving objects: A statistical approach. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’04). IEEE, 3931--3936.
[30]
Liang Wang, Kunyuan Hu, Taoku, and Xiaohui Yan. 2013. Mining frequent trajectory pattern based on vague space partition. Knowledge-Based Systems 50 (2013), 100--111.
[31]
A. Y. Xue, Rui Zhang, Yu Zheng, Xing Xie, Jin Huang, and Zhenghua Xu. 2013b. Destination prediction by sub-trajectory synthesis and privacy protection against such prediction. In Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’13). IEEE, 254--265.
[32]
Andy Yuan Xue, Jianzhong Qi, Xing Xie, Rui Zhang, Jin Huang, and Yuan Li. 2013a. Solving the data sparsity problem in destination prediction. The VLDB Journal—The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases 24, 2 (2013), 219--243.
[33]
Andy Yuan Xue, Rui Zhang, Yu Zheng, Xing Xie, Jianhui Yu, and Yong Tang. 2013c. DesTeller: A system for destination prediction based on trajectories with privacy protection. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (VLDB’13). ACM, 1198--1201.
[34]
Zhiwen Yu, Hui Wang, Bin Guo, Tao Gu, and Tao Mei. 2015. Supporting serendipitous social interaction using human mobility prediction. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 45, 6 (2015), 811--818.
[35]
Zhiwen Yu, Huang Xu, Zhe Yang, and Bin Guo. 2016. Personalized travel package with multi-point-of-interest recommendation based on crowdsourced user footprints. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 46, 1 (2016), 151--158.
[36]
Brian D. Ziebart, Andrew L. Maas, Anind K. Dey, and J. Andrew Bagnell. 2008. Navigate like a cabbie: Probabilistic reasoning from observed context-aware behavior. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp’08). ACM, 322--331.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024) F 3 VeTrac: Enabling Fine-grained, Fully-road-covered, and Fully-individual penetrative Vehicle Trajectory Recovery IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2023.3301871(1-16)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2023)Human-computer interaction for virtual-real fusionJournal of Image and Graphics10.11834/jig.23002028:6(1513-1542)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Demand-Driven Urban Facility Visit PredictionACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/3625233Online publication date: 9-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data  Volume 11, Issue 3
August 2017
372 pages
ISSN:1556-4681
EISSN:1556-472X
DOI:10.1145/3058790
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 April 2017
Accepted: 01 February 2017
Revised: 01 December 2016
Received: 01 June 2016
Published in TKDD Volume 11, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Markov transition model
  2. Moving destination prediction
  3. gradient descent
  4. space division
  5. sparse dataset

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • National Basic Research Program of China

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024) F 3 VeTrac: Enabling Fine-grained, Fully-road-covered, and Fully-individual penetrative Vehicle Trajectory Recovery IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2023.3301871(1-16)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2023)Human-computer interaction for virtual-real fusionJournal of Image and Graphics10.11834/jig.23002028:6(1513-1542)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Demand-Driven Urban Facility Visit PredictionACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/3625233Online publication date: 9-Nov-2023
  • (2023)A Context- and Trajectory-Based Destination Prediction of Public Transportation UsersIEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine10.1109/MITS.2021.313277215:1(300-317)Online publication date: Jan-2023
  • (2022)Mobility in Unsupervised Word Embeddings for Knowledge Extraction—The Scholars’ Trajectories across Research TopicsFuture Internet10.3390/fi1401002514:1(25)Online publication date: 9-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Spatial-Temporal Attention Mechanism and Graph Convolutional Networks for Destination PredictionFrontiers in Neurorobotics10.3389/fnbot.2022.92521016Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
  • (2022)A Novel Vehicle Destination Prediction Model With Expandable Features Using Attention Mechanism and Variational AutoencoderIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2021.313716823:9(16548-16557)Online publication date: Sep-2022
  • (2021)A Utility-Aware General Framework With Quantifiable Privacy Preservation for Destination Prediction in LBSsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2021.308425129:5(2228-2241)Online publication date: Oct-2021
  • (2021)Influence Spread in Geo-Social Networks: A Multiobjective Optimization PerspectiveIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics10.1109/TCYB.2019.290607851:5(2663-2675)Online publication date: May-2021
  • (2021)Object Tracking by the Least Spatiotemporal SearchesIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2021.30637798:16(12934-12946)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media