Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3055399.3055401acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exponential separation of quantum communication and classical information

Published: 19 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

We exhibit a Boolean function for which the quantum communication complexity is exponentially larger than the classical information complexity. An exponential separation in the other direction was already known from the work of Kerenidis et. al. [SICOMP 44, pp. 1550-1572], hence our work implies that these two complexity measures are incomparable.
As classical information complexity is an upper bound on quantum information complexity, which in turn is equal to amortized quantum communication complexity, our work implies that a tight direct sum result for distributional quantum communication complexity cannot hold.
The function we use to present such a separation is the Symmetric k-ary Pointer Jumping function introduced by Rao and Sinha [ECCC TR15-057], whose classical communication complexity is exponentially larger than its classical information complexity. In this paper, we show that the quantum communication complexity of this function is polynomially equivalent to its classical communication complexity. The high-level idea behind our proof is arguably the simplest so far for such an exponential separation between information and communication, driven by a sequence of round-elimination arguments, allowing us to simplify further the approach of Rao and Sinha.
As another application of the techniques that we develop, a simple proof for an optimal trade-off between Alice's and Bob's communication is given, even when allowing pre-shared entanglement, while computing the related Greater-Than function on n bits: say Bob communicates at most b bits, then Alice must send n/2O (b) bits to Bob. We also present a classical protocol achieving this bound.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (d2_sa_t1.mp4)

References

[1]
Anurag Anshu, Dave Touchette, Penghui Yao, Nengkun Yu. Exponential Separation of Quantum Communication and Classical Information. arXiv:1611.08946, 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08946
[2]
Huzihiro Araki and Elliott H. Lieb. Entropy inequalities. Comm. Math. Phys., 18(2):160–170, 1970.
[3]
Charles H. Bennett, Gilles Brassard, Claude Crépeau, Richard Jozsa, Asher Peres, and William K. Wootters. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70:1895–1899, Mar 1993.
[4]
Boaz Barak, Mark Braverman, Xi Chen, and Anup Rao. How to compress interactive communication. SIAM Journal on Computing, 42(3), pages 1327– 1363.
[5]
Mark Braverman, Ankit Garg, Young Kun Ko, Jieming Mao, and Dave Touchette. Near-optimal bounds on bounded-round quantum communication complexity of disjointness. In Proceedings of the 56th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’15), pages 773–791, Washington, DC, USA, 2015. IEEE Computer Society.
[6]
Ziv Bar-Yossef, T. S. Jayram, Ravi Kumar, and D. Sivakumar. An information statistics approach to data stream and communication complexity. In J. Comput. Syst. Sci., pages 702–732.
[7]
Mark Braverman and Anup Rao. Information equals amortized communication. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 60(10), 6058–6069, 2014.
[8]
Mark Braverman. Interactive information complexity. SIAM Journal on Computing, 44(6), pages 1698–1739, 2015.
[9]
Mark Braverman. A hard-to-compress interactive task? In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton’13), pages 8–12, Oct 2013.
[10]
Mark Braverman, Anup Rao, Omri Weinstein, and Amir Yehudayoff. Direct product via round-preserving compression. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP’13) - Volume Part I, pages 232–243, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013. Springer-Verlag.
[11]
Mark Braverman, Anup Rao, Omri Weinstein, and Amir Yehudayoff. Direct products in communication complexity. In Proceedings of the 54th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’13), pages 746–755, Washington, DC, USA, 2013. IEEE Computer Society.
[12]
Mark Braverman and Omri Weinstein. A discrepancy lower bound for information complexity. In Algorithmica, vol 76, no. 3, pages 846–864. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2016.
[13]
Mark Braverman and Omri Weinstein. An interactive information odometer and applications. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’15), pages 341–350, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM.
[14]
Richard Cleve and Harry Buhrman. Substituting quantum entanglement for communication. Phys. Rev. A, 56:1201–1204, Aug 1997.
[15]
F.R.K Chung, R.L Graham, P Frankl, and J.B Shearer. Some intersection theorems for ordered sets and graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 43(1):23 – 37, 1986.
[16]
Amit Chakrabarti, Yaoyun Shi, Anthony Wirth, and Andrew C. Yao. Informational complexity and the direct sum problem for simultaneous message complexity. In Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’01), page 270–278, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. IEEE Computer Society.
[17]
STOC’17, June 2017, Montreal, Canada Anurag Anshu, Dave Touchette, Penghui Yao, and Nengkun Yu
[18]
Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas. Elements of Information Theory. Wiley Series in Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
[19]
D. Dieks. Communication by EPR devices. Physics Letters A, 92(6):271 – 272, 1982.
[20]
Igor Devetak and Jon Yard. Exact cost of redistributing multipartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:230501, Jun 2008.
[21]
Lila Fontes, Rahul Jain, Iordanis Kerenidis, Mathieu Laurière, and Jérémie Roland. Relative Discrepancy Does not Separate Information and Communication Complexity. ACM Trans. Comput. Theory, vol 9, no. 1, Article 4 (December 2016), 15 pages.
[22]
Uriel Feige, Prabhakar Raghavan, David Peleg, and Eli Upfal. Computing with noisy information. SIAM Journal on Computing, 23(5):1001–1018, 1994.
[23]
Christopher A Fuchs and Jeroen Van De Graaf. Cryptographic distinguishability measures for quantum-mechanical states. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 45(4):1216– 1227, 1999.
[24]
Anat Ganor, Gillat Kol, and Ran Raz. Exponential separation of information and communication. In Proceedings of the 55th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’14) pages 176–185, Washington, DC, USA, Oct 2014. IEEE Computer Society.
[25]
Anat Ganor, Gillat Kol, and Ran Raz. Exponential separation of information and communication for boolean functions. J. ACM, 63, 5, Article 46 (November 2016), 31 pages.
[26]
Anat Ganor, Gillat Kol, and Ran Raz. Exponential separation of communication and external information. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’16), pages 977–986, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM.
[27]
Rahul Jain. New strong direct product results in communication complexity. J. ACM, 62, 3, Article 20 (June 2015), 27 pages.
[28]
Rahul Jain and Ashwin Nayak. Short proofs of the quantum substate theorem. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 58(6):3664–3669, 2012.
[29]
Rahul Jain and Ashwin Nayak. The space complexity of recognizing wellparenthesized expressions in the streaming model: The index function revisited. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 60(10):6646–6668, 2014.
[30]
Rahul Jain, Attila Pereszlényi, and Penghui Yao. A direct product theorem for the two-party bounded-round public-coin communication complexity. In Proceedings of the 53rd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’12), pages 167–176, Washington, DC, USA, 2012. IEEE Computer Society.
[31]
Rahul Jain, Jaikumar Radhakrishnan, and Pranab Sen. Privacy and interaction in quantum communication complexity and a theorem about the relative entropy of quantum states. In Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’02), pages 429–438, Washington, DC, USA, 2002. IEEE Computer Society.
[32]
Rahul Jain, Jaikumar Radhakrishnan, and Pranab Sen. A direct sum theorem in communication complexity via message compression. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP’03), pages 300–315, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003. Springer-Verlag.
[33]
Rahul Jain, Jaikumar Radhakrishnan, and Pranab Sen. A lower bound for the bounded round quantum communication complexity of set disjointness. In Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’03), pages 220–229, Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
[34]
Rahul Jain, Jaikumar Radhakrishnan, and Pranab Sen. Prior entanglement, message compression and privacy in quantum communication. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC’05), pages 285–296, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society.
[35]
Rahul Jain, Jaikumar Radhakrishnan, and Pranab Sen. Optimal direct sum and privacy trade-off results for quantum and classical communication complexity. CoRR, abs/0807.1267, 2008. https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1267
[36]
Rahul Jain, Jaikumar Radhakrishnan, and Pranab Sen. A new informationtheoretic property about quantum states with an application to privacy in quantum communication. J. ACM, 56, 6, Article 33 (September 2009), 32 pages.
[37]
Rahul Jain and Penghui Yao. A strong direct product theorem in terms of the smooth rectangle bound. CoRR, abs/1209.0263, 2012.
[38]
https://arxiv.org/abs/1209.0263
[39]
Hartmut Klauck. Lower bounds for quantum communication complexity. SIAM Journal on Computing, 37(1):20–46, April 2007.
[40]
Iordanis Kerenidis, Sophie Laplante, Virginie Lerays, Jérémie Roland, and David Xiao. Lower bounds on information complexity via zero-communication protocols and applications. SIAM Journal on Computing, 44(5):1550–1572, 2015.
[41]
Eyal Kushilevitz and Noam Nisan. Communication Complexity. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[42]
Hartmut Klauck, Ashwin Nayak, Amnon Ta-Shma, and David Zuckerman. Interaction in quantum communication and the complexity of set disjointness. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC ’01), pages 124–133, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM.
[43]
Gillat Kol. Interactive compression for product distributions. In In Proceedings of the 48th annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC ’16), pages 987–998, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM.
[44]
Elliott H Lieb. Convex trace functions and the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson conjecture. Advances in Mathematics, 11(3):267 – 288, 1973.
[45]
Sophie Laplante, Virginie Lerays, and Jérémie Roland. Classical and quantum partition bound and detector inefficiency. In Proceedings of the 39th International Colloquium Conference on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP’12) - Volume Part I, pages 617–628, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. Springer-Verlag.
[46]
Elliott H. Lieb and Mary Beth Ruskai. Proof of the strong subadditivity of quantum-mechanical entropy. J. Math. Phys., 14(12):1938–1941, 1973.
[47]
Troy Lee and Adi Shraibman. Lower bounds in communication complexity. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 3(4):263–399, 2007.
[48]
Mathieu Laurière and Dave Touchette. The flow of information in interactive quantum protocols :the cost of forgetting. In Proceedings of the 8th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS ’17), 2017.
[49]
Peter Bro Miltersen, Noam Nisan, Shmuel Safra, and Avi Wigderson. On data structures and asymmetric communication complexity. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 57(1):37–49, August 1998.
[50]
Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.
[51]
Noam Nisan. The communication complexity of threshold gates. In Proceedings of Combinatorics, Paul Erdös is Eighty, pages 301–315, 1994.
[52]
Ashwin Nayak and Dave Touchette. Augmented index and quantum streaming for DYCK(2). Technical Report arXiv:1610.04937, 2016.
[53]
https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.04937
[54]
Jaikumar Radhakrishnan. Entropy and counting. Computational Mathematics, Modelling and Algorithms (Ed. J.C.Misra), pages 146–168, 2003.
[55]
Oded Regev and Bo’az Klartag. Quantum one-way communication can be exponentially stronger than classical communication. In Proceedings of the 43rd annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC ’11), pages 31–40, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
[56]
Sivaramakrishnan N. Ramamoorthy and Makrand Sinha. On the communication complexity of greater-than. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton’15), pages 442–444, Sept 2015.
[57]
Anup Rao and Makrand Sinha. Simplified separation of information and communication. ECCC, 15:057, 2015. https://eccc.weizmann.ac.il/report/2015/057/
[58]
Alexander A. Sherstov. The pattern matrix method for lower bounds on quantum communication. In Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC ’08), pages 85–94, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
[59]
Alexander Sherstov. Compressing interactive communication under product distributions. In Proceedings of the 57th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’16), pages 535–544, Oct 2016.
[60]
Dave Touchette. Quantum information complexity. In Proceedings of the 47th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC ’15), pages 317–326, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM.
[61]
Emanuele Viola. The communication complexity of addition. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms (SODA ’13), Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pages 632–651. 2013.
[62]
John Watrous. Theory of Quantum Information, lecture notes, https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/ watrous/LectureNotes.html
[63]
Mark M. Wilde. Quantum Information Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2013.
[64]
W. K. Wotters and W. H. Zurek. A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature, 299:802, October 1982.
[65]
Andrew C. Yao. Some complexity questions related to distributive computing (preliminary report). In Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC ’79), pages 209–213, New York, NY, USA, 1979. ACM.
[66]
Andrew C. Yao. Quantum circuit complexity. In Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’93), pages 352–361, Nov 1993.
[67]
Jon Yard and Igor Devetak. Optimal quantum source coding with quantum side information at the encoder and decoder. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 55(11):5339– 5351, Nov 2009.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Exponential separation of quantum communication and classical information

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      STOC 2017: Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing
      June 2017
      1268 pages
      ISBN:9781450345286
      DOI:10.1145/3055399
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 19 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Direct Sum
      2. Exponential Separation
      3. Information Complexity
      4. Quantum Communication Complexity

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      STOC '17
      Sponsor:
      STOC '17: Symposium on Theory of Computing
      June 19 - 23, 2017
      Montreal, Canada

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Quantum NETwork: from theory to practiceScience China Information Sciences10.1007/s11432-023-3773-466:8Online publication date: 5-Jul-2023
      • (2022)Viability of quantum communication across interstellar distancesPhysical Review D10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123033105:12Online publication date: 28-Jun-2022
      • (2020)On the Entanglement Cost of One-Shot CompressionQuantum10.22331/q-2020-06-25-2864(286)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2020
      • (2019)Quantum Log-Approximate-Rank Conjecture is Also False2019 IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS.2019.00063(982-994)Online publication date: Nov-2019
      • (2019)Exponential Separation between Quantum Communication and Logarithm of Approximate Rank2019 IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS.2019.00062(966-981)Online publication date: Nov-2019
      • (2018)Expected Communication Cost of Distributed Quantum Tasks2018 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)10.1109/ISIT.2018.8437550(806-810)Online publication date: Jun-2018

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media