Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3063955.3063965acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-turcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on quantitative quality evaluation method based on double cycles

Published: 12 May 2017 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Based on 7-year CDIO implementation and 2-year accreditation preparation, a quantitative quality evaluation method is proposed. The quality is evaluated by achievement scale of graduation requirements which take both self-evaluation and stakeholder evaluation into account. The features of quality evaluation method are shown as following: It pays more attention to the learning process rather than the score of examinations; It quantifies quality evaluation by means of formulas; Continuous improvement works owing to two cycles. The paper describes the implementation framework based on double cycles and the seven steps of implementation.

    References

    [1]
    Lorin W Anderson, David R Krathwohl, and Benjamin Samuel Bloom. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon. 1013--1014 pages.
    [2]
    Sin-Moh Cheah, CA Koh, and Claire HT Ng. 2013. Using C-DIO Self-Evaluation for Quality Assurance and Accreditation. In Proceedings of the 9th International.
    [3]
    Keng Wah Choo, Desmond Tan, Joseph Chong, and Kwek Siew Wee. 2015. CDIO and ABET Accreditation C The Nanyang Polytechnic Experience. In International Cdio Conference.
    [4]
    António Manuel Cardoso Costa, Ângelo Manuel Silva Martins, and João Manuel Simões Rocha. 2012. CDIO as a Foundation for Program Accreditation/Certification in Portugal. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education (IJQAETE) 2, 2 (2012), 23--33.
    [5]
    Edward Crawley, Johan Malmqvist, Peter Goodhew, and Peter Gray. 2011. Using the CDIO Standards to Meet Accreditation Expectations. (2011).
    [6]
    HJ De Jager and FJ Nieuwenhuis. 2005. Linkages between total quality management and the outcomes-based approach in an education environment. Quality in Higher Education 11, 3 (2005), 251--260.
    [7]
    Peter J Gray. 2012. CDIO standards and quality assurance: From application to accreditation. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education (IJQAETE) 2, 2 (2012), 1--8.
    [8]
    et al. Gu Peihua, Hu Wenlong. 2014. OBE Engineering Education Model in Shantou University. Research in Higher Education of Engineering 1 (2014), 27--37.
    [9]
    David C Levy. 2011. Using CDIO to Meet Accreditation Expectations at The University of Sydney. In Proceedings 7th International CDIO Conference. 20--23.
    [10]
    et al. Li Tong, Zhang Xuan. 2014. Exploration and Practice of the SE-CDIO Engineering Education Model. Research in Higher Education of Engineering 1 (2014), 52--57.
    [11]
    Kiruthika Ragupathi. 2004. OutcomeCbased Education (OBE): A New Paradigm for Learning. Learning (2004).

    Index Terms

    1. Research on quantitative quality evaluation method based on double cycles

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ACM TURC '17: Proceedings of the ACM Turing 50th Celebration Conference - China
      May 2017
      371 pages
      ISBN:9781450348737
      DOI:10.1145/3063955
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 12 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. OBE
      2. calculation of achievement scale of graduation requirements
      3. double cycles
      4. quantitative quality evaluation

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      ACM TUR-C '17

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 47
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media