Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3064663.3064711acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design Guidelines for Web Readability

Published: 10 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Reading is fundamental to interactive-system use, but around 800 million of people might struggle with it due to literacy difficulties. Few websites are designed for high readability, as readability remains an underinvestigated facet of User Experience. Existing readability guidelines have multiple issues: they are too many or too generic, poorly worded, and often lack cognitive grounding. This paper developed a set of 61 readability guidelines in a series of workshops with design and dyslexia experts. A user study with dyslexic and average readers further narrowed the 61-guideline set down to a core set of 12 guidelines -- an acceptably small set to keep in mind while designing. The core-set guidelines address reformatting -- such as using larger fonts and narrower content columns, or avoiding underlining and italics -- and may well aply to the interactive system other than websites.

References

[1]
A. Ailesgain, O'Connor S., D. O'donoghue, A. Quinn, and G. Tinney. (2011) Make it Easy: A guide to preparing Easy to Read information. {Online}. http://www.walk.ie/userfiles/file/Make%20It%20Easy %20%20A%20guide%20to%20preparing%20Easy%20to% 20Read%20Information.pdf
[2]
A. Al-Wabil, P. Zaphiris, and S. Wilson, "Web navigation for individuals with dyslexia: an exploratory study," in International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, 2007, pp. 593602.
[3]
American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
[4]
F. A. Aziz and H. Husni, "Interaction Design for Dyslexic Children Reading Application: A Guideline," in Knowledge Management International Conference (KMICe), 2012, pp. 682--686.
[5]
British Dyslexia Association. (2012) Dyslexia style guide. {Online}. http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/common/ckeditor/filem anager/userfiles/About_Us/policies/Dyslexia_Style_Guide.pdf
[6]
C. J. Chen, M. W. Y. Keong, C. S. Teh, and K. M. Chuah, "Web text reading: what satisfy both dyslexic and normal learners'," Journal of Computers in Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47--58, 2016.
[7]
M. G. Friedman and D. N. Bryen, "Web accessibility design recommendations for people with cognitive disabilities," Technology and Disability, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 205--212, 2007.
[8]
S. He, P. Cavanagh, and J. Intriligator, "Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness," Nature, vol. 383, pp. 334--337, 1996.
[9]
J. E. Jackson, "Towards Universally Accessible Typography: A Review of Research on Dyslexia," in 29th Annual International Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, 2014.
[10]
T. B. Kirkwood, J. Bond, C. May, I. McKeith, and M. M. Teh, "Foresight mental capital and wellbeing project.," The Government Office for Science, 2008.
[11]
S. Kurniawan and P. Zaphiris, "Research-Derived Web Design Guidelines for Older People," in 7th ACM Conference on Computers and Assessibility, 2005, pp. 129--135.
[12]
M. Martelli, G. Di Filippo, D. Spinelli, and P. Zoccolotti, "Crowding, reading, and developmental dyslexia," Journal of Vision, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1--14, 2009.
[13]
J. Nielsen. (2005) Lower-Literacy Users: Writing for a Broad Consumer Audience. {Online}. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/writing-for-lowerliteracy-users/
[14]
E. Paulesu et al., "Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity," Sience, vol. 259, no. 5511, pp. 2165--2167, 2001.
[15]
M. Perea and V. Panadero, "Does Viotin Activate Violin More Than Viocin?," Experimental Psychology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 23--29, 2014.
[16]
H. Petrie and O. Kheir, "The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites," in SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 2007, pp. 397--406.
[17]
E. Pitler and A. Nenkova, "Revisiting readability: A unified framework for predicting text quality," in Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2008, pp. 186--195.
[18]
P. Rainger. (2003) A Dyslexic Perspective on eContent Accessibility. {Online}. https://users.dimi.uniud.it/~giorgio.brajnik/dida/psw/ga lleria/05/vallega/relaz-1/03-04-01_dyslexic.pdf
[19]
L. Rello and R. Baeza-Yates, "Good fonts for dyslexia," in 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 2013.
[20]
L. Rello, G. Kanvinde, and R. Baeza-Yates, "Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to improve accessibility for dyslexics," in International crossdisciplinary conference on web accessibility, 2012.
[21]
L. Rello, M. Pielot, and M. C. Marcos, "Make it big! The effect of font size and line spacing on online readability," in CHI'16, 2016, pp. 3637--3648.
[22]
L. Rello, M. Pielot, and M.C. Marcos, "Size Matters (Spacing Not): 18 Poionts for a Dyslexic-friendly Wikipedia," in 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessbility, 2013.
[23]
G. Rugg and P. McGeorge, "The sorting techniques: a tutorial paper on card sorts, picture sorts and item sorts," Expert Systems, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 94--107, 2005.
[24]
V. F. Santana, R. de Oliveira, L. D. A. Almeida, and M. C. C. Baranauskas, "Web accessibility and people with dyslexia: a survey on techniques and guidelines," in International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, 2012.
[25]
V. F. Santana, R. Oliveira, L. D. A. Almeida, and M. Ito, "Firefixia: An accessibility web browser customization toolbar for people with dyslexia," in 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, 2013.
[26]
M. H. Schneps et al., "Shorter lines facilitate reading in those who struggle," PloS one, vol. 8, no. 8, 2013.
[27]
P. H. K. Seymour, M. Aro, and J. M. Erskine, "Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies," British Journal of Psychology, vol. 94, pp. 143--174, 2003.
[28]
D. Spinelli, M. De Luca, A. Judica, and P. Zoccolotti, "Crowding effects on word identification in developmental dyslexia," Cortex, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 179--200, 2002.
[29]
M. F. Theofanos and J. Redish, "Guidelines for accessible and usable web sites: Observing users who work with screen readers," Interactions, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 38--51, 2003.
[30]
A. Tseng. (2012) uxmovement.com. {Online}. http://uxmovement.com/content/ 6-surprising-badpractices-that-hurt-dyslexic-users/
[31]
T. R. Vidyasagar and K. Pammer, "Dyslexia: a deficit in visuo-spatial attention, not in phonological processing," Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 57--63, 2010.
[32]
D. Whitney and D. M. Levi, "Visual crowding: A fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition," Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 160--168, 2011.
[33]
World Wide Web Consortium. (2008) w3.org. {Online}. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/
[34]
Y. Yeshurun and E. Rashal, "Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance," Journal of Vision, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1--16, 2010.
[35]
C. H. Yu and R. C. Miller, "Enhancing web page readability for non-native readers," in the sIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2010, pp. 2523--2532.
[36]
V. Zarach and JISC CETIS. (2002) Ten Guidelines for Improving Accessibility for People with Dyslexia. {Online}. http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/Ten_Guidelines_for_Improving_ Accessibility_for_People_with_Dyslexia
[37]
M. Zorzi et al., "Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, no. 28, pp. 1145511459, 2012.
[38]
Braun, C. C., Mine, P. B., & Silver, N. C. (1995). The influence of color on warning label perceptions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15(3), 179--187.
[39]
K. Höök and J. Löwgren. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 19(3), 23, 2012.
[40]
E. Pitler and A. Nenkova. "Revisiting readability: A unified framework for predicting text quality." In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 186195). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008.
[41]
N. C. Silver and C. C. Braun. "Perceived readability of warning labels with varied font sizes and styles." Safety Science, 16(5--6), 615--625, 1993.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Disability, Accessibility, and Universal DesignEncyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00139-5(511-518)Online publication date: 2025
  • (2024)Improving Web Readability Using Video Content: A Relevance-Based ApproachApplied Sciences10.3390/app14231105514:23(11055)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2024
  • (2024)The Iterative Survey Adaptation of The Imitation Game: A survey approach to defining group identity through analysis of distinctivenessMethodological Innovations10.1177/2059799124128580217:4(203-214)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Design Guidelines for Web Readability

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
    June 2017
    1444 pages
    ISBN:9781450349222
    DOI:10.1145/3064663
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 June 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. accessibility
    2. dyslexia
    3. readability
    4. wcag 2.0
    5. web

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Italian Ministry of Universities and Research

    Conference

    DIS '17
    Sponsor:
    DIS '17: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2017
    June 10 - 14, 2017
    Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    Acceptance Rates

    DIS '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 107 of 487 submissions, 22%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

    Upcoming Conference

    DIS '25
    Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 5 - 9, 2025
    Funchal , Portugal

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)245
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Disability, Accessibility, and Universal DesignEncyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00139-5(511-518)Online publication date: 2025
    • (2024)Improving Web Readability Using Video Content: A Relevance-Based ApproachApplied Sciences10.3390/app14231105514:23(11055)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2024
    • (2024)The Iterative Survey Adaptation of The Imitation Game: A survey approach to defining group identity through analysis of distinctivenessMethodological Innovations10.1177/2059799124128580217:4(203-214)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Generating Automatic Feedback on UI Mockups with Large Language ModelsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642782(1-20)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)COR Themes for Readability from Iterative FeedbackProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642108(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Analyzing Excessive Permission Requests in Google Workspace Add-OnsEngineering of Complex Computer Systems10.1007/978-3-031-66456-4_18(323-345)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2024
    • (2023)Beyond Readability with RateMyPDFProceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law10.1145/3594536.3595146(287-296)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Exploring Types of On-Demand Reading Assistance for Elementary School StudentsExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585711(1-5)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)THERIF: Themes for Readability from Iterative FeedbackExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585679(1-11)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Characteristics of Deep and Skim Reading on Smartphones vs. Desktop: A Comparative StudyProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581174(1-14)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media