Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3079628.3079655acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

A Personalized Global Filter To Predict Retweets

Published: 09 July 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Information shared on Twitter is ever increasing and users-recipients are overwhelmed by the number of tweets they receive, many of which of no interest. Filters that estimate the interest of each incoming post can alleviate this problem, for example by allowing users to sort incoming posts by predicted interest (e.g., "top stories" vs. "most recent" in Facebook). Global and personal filters have been used to detect interesting posts in social networks. Global filters are trained on large collections of posts and reactions to posts (e.g., retweets), aiming to predict how interesting a post is for a broad audience. In contrast, personal filters are trained on posts received by a particular user and the reactions of the particular user. Personal filters can provide recommendations tailored to a particular user's interests, which may not coincide with the interests of the majority of users that global filters are trained to predict. On the other hand, global filters are typically trained on much larger datasets compared to personal filters. Hence, global filters may work better in practice, especially with new users, for which personal filters may have very few training instances ("cold start" problem).
Following Uysal and Croft, we devised a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of both global and personal filters. As in global filters, we train a single system on a large, multi-user collection of tweets. Each tweet, however, is represented as a feature vector with a number of user-specific features.

References

[1]
O. Alonso, C. C. Marshall, and M. Najork. 2013. Are some tweets more interesting than others? #hardquestion. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval. Vancouver, Canada, 2.
[2]
J. Chen, R. Nairn, L. Nelson, M. Bernstein, and E. Chi. 2010. Short and tweet: experiments on recommending content from information streams. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Atlanta, USA, 1185-- 1194.
[3]
K. Gimpel, N. Schneider, B. O'Connor, D. Das, D. Mills, J. Eisenstein, M. Heilman, D. Yogatama, J. Flanigan, and N. Smith. 2011. Part-of-Speech tagging for twitter: Annotation, features, and experiments. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the ACL: Human Language Technologies. Portland, USA, 42--47.
[4]
I. Uysal and W. Bruce Croft. 2011. User oriented tweet ranking: a filtering approach to microblogs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. Glasgow, Scotland, 2261--2264.
[5]
M. Yang and H. Rim. 2014. Identifying interesting Twitter contents using topical analysis. Expert Systems with Applications 41, 9 (2014), 4330--4336.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)“I Definitely Did Not Report It When I Was Raped . . . #WeBelieveChristine #MeToo”: A Content Analysis of Disclosures of Sexual Assault on TwitterSocial Media + Society10.1177/20563051209746106:4Online publication date: 29-Nov-2020
  • (2018)Identifying Retweetable Tweets with a Personalized Global ClassifierProceedings of the 10th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.1145/3200947.3201019(1-8)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2018

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UMAP '17: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
July 2017
420 pages
ISBN:9781450346351
DOI:10.1145/3079628
  • General Chairs:
  • Maria Bielikova,
  • Eelco Herder,
  • Program Chairs:
  • Federica Cena,
  • Michel Desmarais
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 July 2017

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. evaluation
  2. filtering
  3. machine learning
  4. personalization
  5. recommendation
  6. social media
  7. social networks
  8. twitter
  9. user modeling

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract

Conference

UMAP '17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

UMAP '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 29 of 80 submissions, 36%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

UMAP '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)“I Definitely Did Not Report It When I Was Raped . . . #WeBelieveChristine #MeToo”: A Content Analysis of Disclosures of Sexual Assault on TwitterSocial Media + Society10.1177/20563051209746106:4Online publication date: 29-Nov-2020
  • (2018)Identifying Retweetable Tweets with a Personalized Global ClassifierProceedings of the 10th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.1145/3200947.3201019(1-8)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media