Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Can Less be More?: Contrasting Limited, Unlimited, and Automatic Picture Capture for Augmenting Memory Recall

Published: 30 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Today's abundance1 of cheap digital storage in the form of tiny memory cards put literally no bounds on the number of images one can capture with one's digital camera or smartphone during an event. However, prior work has shown that taking many pictures may actually make us remember less of a particular event. Does automated picture taking (lifelogging) help avoid this, yet still offer to capture meaningful pictures? In this work, we investigate the effect of capture modality (i.e., limited, unlimited, automatic, and no capture) on people's ability to recall a past event – with and without the support of the pictures captured through these modalities. Our results from a field experiment with 83 participants show that capturing fewer pictures does not necessarily lead to the capture of more relevant pictures. However, when controlling for number of pictures taken, our results show that having a limited number of pictures to capture may lead to pictures with increased memory value. At the same time, automated capture failed to produce pictures that would help remember the past experience better.

References

[1]
Michael C. Anderson, Robert A. Bjork, and Elizabeth L. Bjork. 1994. Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20, 5: 1063.
[2]
Agon Bexheti, Marc Langheinrich, and Sarah Clinch. 2016. Secure Personal Memory-Sharing with Co-located People and Places. 73--81.
[3]
Christopher DB Burt, David A. Mitchell, Peter TF Raggatt, Carol A. Jones, and Terrina M. Cowan. 1995. A snapshot of autobiographical memory retrieval characteristics. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9, 1: 61--74.
[4]
Sarah Clinch, Paul Metzger, and Nigel Davies. 2014. Lifelogging for “observer” view memories: an infrastructure approach. 1397--1404.
[5]
Martin A. Conway. 2009. Episodic memories. Neuropsychologia 47, 11: 2305--2313.
[6]
Nigel Davies, Adrian Friday, Sarah Clinch, Corina Sas, Marc Langheinrich, Geoff Ward, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2015. Security and privacy implications of pervasive memory augmentation. Pervasive Computing, IEEE 14, 1: 44--53.
[7]
Tilman Dingler, Passant El Agroudy, Huy Viet Le, Albrecht Schmidt, Evangelos Niforatos, Agon Bexheti, and Marc Langheinrich. 2016. Multimedia Memory Cues for Augmenting Human Memory. IEEE MultiMedia 23, 2: 4--11.
[8]
Patrick Ehlen, Matthew Purver, John Niekrasz, Kari Lee, and Stanley Peters. 2008. Meeting adjourned: off-line learning interfaces for automatic meeting understanding. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, 276--284. Retrieved March 21, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1378810
[9]
Endel Tulving and Zena Pearlstone. 1966. Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5, 4: 381--391.
[10]
Jim Gemmell, Gordon Bell, and Roger Lueder. 2006. MyLifeBits: A Personal Database for Everything. Commun. ACM 49, 1: 88--95.
[11]
Cathal Gurrin, Alan F. Smeaton, and Aiden R. Doherty. 2014. Lifelogging: Personal big data. Foundations and trends in information retrieval 8, 1: 1--125.
[12]
L. A. Henkel. 2014. Point-and-Shoot Memories: The Influence of Taking Photos on Memory for a Museum Tour. Psychological Science 25, 2: 396--402.
[13]
Steve Hodges, Lyndsay Williams, Emma Berry, Shahram Izadi, James Srinivasan, Alex Butler, Gavin Smyth, Narinder Kapur, and Ken Wood. 2006. SenseCam: A retrospective memory aid. UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing: 177--193.
[14]
V. Kalnikaite, A. Sellen, S. Whittaker, and D. Kirk. 2010. Now let me see where i was: understanding how lifelogs mediate memory. 2045--2054. Retrieved December 8, 2012 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1753638
[15]
Matthew L. Lee and Anind K. Dey. 2007. Providing good memory cues for people with episodic memory impairment. In Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, 131--138. Retrieved October 30, 2014 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1296867
[16]
Matthew L. Lee and Anind K. Dey. 2008. Lifelogging memory appliance for people with episodic memory impairment. In (UbiComp ’08), 44--53.
[17]
Michael Lynn. 1992. The psychology of unavailability: Explaining scarcity and cost effects on value. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 13, 1: 3--7.
[18]
Gregory A. Miller and Jean P. Chapman. 2001. Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of abnormal psychology 110, 1: 40.
[19]
Evangelos Niforatos and Evangelos Karapanos. 2014. EmoSnaps: a mobile application for emotion recall from facial expressions. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 2014, June: 1--20.
[20]
Evangelos Niforatos, Evangelos Karapanos, Marc Langheinrich, Daniela Wurhofer, Alina Krischkowsky, Marianna Obrist, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. eMotion: retrospective in-car user experience evaluation. 118--123.
[21]
Evangelos Niforatos, Marc Langheinrich, and Agon Bexheti. 2014. My Good Old Kodak: Understanding the Impact of Having Only 24 Pictures to Take. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication (UbiComp ’14 Adjunct), 1355--1360.
[22]
Evangelos Niforatos, Veranika Lim, Christian Vuerich, Marc Langheinrich, and Agon Bexheti. 2015. PulseCam: Biophysically Driven Life Logging. 1002--1009.
[23]
Corina Sas, Tomasz Fratczak, Matthew Rees, Hans Gellersen, Vaiva Kalnikaite, Alina Coman, and Kristina Höök. 2013. AffectCam: arousal-augmented sensecam for richer recall of episodic memories. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1041--1046. Retrieved May 12, 2014 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2468542
[24]
Abigail J. Sellen, Andrew Fogg, Mike Aitken, Steve Hodges, Carsten Rother, and Ken Wood. 2007. Do life-logging technologies support memory for the past?: an experimental study using sensecam. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 81--90. Retrieved March 28, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1240636
[25]
Abigail J. Sellen and Steve Whittaker. 2010. Beyond total capture: a constructive critique of lifelogging. Communications of the ACM 53, 5: 70--77.
[26]
Sophie Nightingale, Kimberley Wade, Derrick Watson, Andrew Mills, Rachel Zajac, and Maryanne Garry. 2016. Taking photos does not impair memory. In Proc. of the 6th Intl. Conference on Memory, 648--657.
[27]
B. Sparrow, J. Liu, and D. M. Wegner. 2011. Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips. Science 333, 6043: 776--778.
[28]
Benjamin C. Storm, Sean M. Stone, and Aaron S. Benjamin. 2016. Using the Internet to access information inflates future use of the Internet to access other information. Memory: 1--7.
[29]
Endel Tulving. 1984. Precis of elements of episodic memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, 2: 223--68.
[30]
Steve Whittaker, Vaiva Kalnikaitė, Daniela Petrelli, Abigail Sellen, Nicolas Villar, Ofer Bergman, Paul Clough, and Jens Brockmeier. 2012. Socio-Technical Lifelogging: Deriving Design Principles for a Future Proof Digital Past. Human--Computer Interaction 27, 1--2: 37--62.
[31]
Narrative Clip 2: The World’s Most Wearable Camera. Retrieved from http://getnarrative.com/

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Memory in the Digital AgeThe Oxford Handbook of Human Memory, Two Volume Pack10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190917982.013.82(2351-2375)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Are we taking too many pictures? An investigation of the impact of smartphone photography on memoryJournal of Cognitive Psychology10.1080/20445911.2024.233771636:4(429-442)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-ModelPsychological Inquiry10.1080/1047840X.2024.238412535:2(83-105)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 2
June 2017
665 pages
EISSN:2474-9567
DOI:10.1145/3120957
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 June 2017
Accepted: 01 May 2017
Revised: 01 April 2017
Received: 01 February 2017
Published in IMWUT Volume 1, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Human Memory Augmentation
  2. Lifelogging
  3. Memory Recall
  4. Picture Capture
  5. Picture Review

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)63
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Memory in the Digital AgeThe Oxford Handbook of Human Memory, Two Volume Pack10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190917982.013.82(2351-2375)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Are we taking too many pictures? An investigation of the impact of smartphone photography on memoryJournal of Cognitive Psychology10.1080/20445911.2024.233771636:4(429-442)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-ModelPsychological Inquiry10.1080/1047840X.2024.238412535:2(83-105)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Social Media in TourismReference Module in Social Sciences10.1016/B978-0-443-13701-3.00011-6Online publication date: 2024
  • (2022)Does taking multiple photos lead to a photo-taking-impairment effect?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review10.3758/s13423-022-02149-229:6(2211-2218)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Capturing life or missing it: how mindful photo-taking can affect experiencesCurrent Opinion in Psychology10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101334(101334)Online publication date: Mar-2022
  • (2021)Exploring functions of and recollections with photos in the age of smartphone camerasMemory Studies10.1177/1750698021104471215:2(287-303)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Curiosity-Inspired Learning: Insitu versus Post-Event Approaches to Recall and ReflectionExtended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411763.3451715(1-6)Online publication date: 8-May-2021
  • (2021)Technology-Mediated Memory ImpairmentTechnology-Augmented Perception and Cognition10.1007/978-3-030-30457-7_4(71-124)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2021
  • (2020)Effects of Photographic Reviews on Recollections of the Personal Past: A New Perspective on Benefits and CostsReview of General Psychology10.1177/108926802095868624:4(369-381)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media