Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3091478.3091491acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deconstructing Diffusion on Tumblr: Structural and Temporal Aspects

Published: 25 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Online social networks enable collectives of users to create and share content at scale. The diffusion of content through the network, and the resulting information cascades, are phenomena that have been widely investigated on various platforms, which facilitate information diffusion using diverse technical mechanisms, user interfaces and incentives. This paper focuses on Tumblr, an online microblogging social network with a core 'reblogging' functionality that allows information to diffuse across its network by appearing on multiple user blogs. The formation of any cascade network is visible as a list of reblogging events attached as notes to each appearance of the post in the cascade. In this paper, we examine cascade networks on Tumblr, recreated from the series of diffusion events, and analyse them from structural and temporal perspectives. To achieve this, we utilise a cascade construction model that create cascade networks, overcoming problems of a lack of contextual information and missing/degraded data. Finally, we compare cascades in Tumblr with those appearing on other social network platforms. Our analysis shows that popular content on Tumblr creates 'large' cascades that are deep, branching into a large number of separate and long paths, having a consistent number of reblogs at each depth and at each given time.

References

[1]
Lada A. Adamic, Thomas M Lento, and Andrew T Fiore. 2012. How You Met Me. In The 6th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM).
[2]
Eytan Adar and Lada A. Adamic. 2005. Tracking Information Epidemics in Blogspace. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI '05). IEEE, Washington, DC, USA, 207--214.
[3]
Ashton Anderson, Daniel Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg, Jure Leskovec, and Mitul Tiwari. 2015. Global diffusion via cascading invitations: Structure, growth, and homophily. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 66--76.
[4]
Isabel Anger and Christian Kittl. 2011. Measuring Influence on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies (i-KNOW '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 31, 4 pages.
[5]
Eytan Bakshy, Jake M. Hofman, Winter A. Mason, and Duncan J. Watts. 2011. Everyone's an Influencer: Quantifying Influence on Twitter. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '11). ACM, 65--74.
[6]
Eytan Bakshy, Itamar Rosenn, Cameron Marlow, and Lada Adamic. 2012. The Role of Social Networks in Information Diffusion. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 519--528.
[7]
Sushil Bikhchandani, David Hirshleifer, and Ivo Welch. 1992. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of political Economy (1992), 992--1026.
[8]
Meeyoung Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and P. K. Gummadi. 2010. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In Proceedings of 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM). 10--17.
[9]
Yi Chang, Lei Tang, Yoshiyuki Inagaki, and Yan Liu. 2014. What is Tumblr: A Statistical Overview and Comparison. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 16, 1 (2014), 21--29.
[10]
Justin Cheng, Lada Adamic, P. Alex Dow, Jon Michael Kleinberg, and Jure Leskovec. 2014. Can Cascades Be Predicted? In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '14). ACM, 925--936.
[11]
Justin Cheng, Lada A. Adamic, Jon M. Kleinberg, and Jure Leskovec. 2016. Do Cascades Recur? In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '16). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 671--681.
[12]
P. Alex Dow, Lada A. Adamic, and Adrien Friggeri. 2013. The Anatomy of Large Facebook Cascades. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM.
[13]
Wojciech Galuba, Karl Aberer, Dipanjan Chakraborty, Zoran Despotovic, and Wolfgang Kellerer. 2010. Outtweeting the Twitterers - Predicting Information Cascades in Microblogs. In Proceedings of the 3rd Wonference on Online Social Networks (WOSN'10). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 3--3.
[14]
Ashish Goel, Kamesh Munagala, Aneesh Sharma, and Hongyang Zhang. 2015. A Note on Modeling Retweet Cascades on Twitter. In Algorithms and Models for the Web Graph. Springer, 119--131.
[15]
Sharad Goel, Ashton Anderson, Jake Hofman, and Duncan Watts. 2013. The structural virality of online diffusion. Preprint 22 (2013), 26.
[16]
Sharad Goel, Duncan J. Watts, and Daniel G. Goldstein. 2012. The Structure of Online Diffusion Networks. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC '12). 623--638.
[17]
Mark Granovetter. 1978. Threshold models of collective behavior. American journal of sociology (1978), 1420--1443.
[18]
Daniel Gruhl, R. Guha, David Liben-Nowell, and Andrew Tomkins. 2004. Information Diffusion Through Blogspace. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '04). ACM, 491--501.
[19]
Adrien Guille, Hakim Hacid, Cecile Favre, and Djamel A. Zighed. 2013. Information Diffusion in Online Social Networks: A Survey. SIGMOD Rec. 42, 2 (July 2013), 17--28.
[20]
Andrey Kupavskii, Liudmila Ostroumova, Alexey Umnov, Svyatoslav Usachev, Pavel Serdyukov, Gleb Gusev, and Andrey Kustarev. 2012. Prediction of Retweet Cascade Size over Time. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2335--2338.
[21]
Haewoon Kwak, Changhyun Lee, Hosung Park, and Sue Moon. 2010. What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media? In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 591--600.
[22]
Jure Leskovec, Mary McGlohon, Christos Faloutsos, Natalie Glance, and Matthew Hurst. 2007. Cascading Behavior in Large Blog Graphs. In 7th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM). 1--21.
[23]
Jure Leskovec, Ajit Singh, and Jon Kleinberg. 2006. Patterns of Influence in a Recommendation Network. In Proceedings of the 10th Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD'06). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 380--389.
[24]
David Liben-Nowell and Jon Kleinberg. 2008. Tracing information flow on a global scale using Internet chain-letter data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 12 (2008), 4633--4638.
[25]
Zongyang Ma, Aixin Sun, and Gao Cong. 2013. On predicting the popularity of newly emerging hashtags in Twitter. JASIST 64, 7 (2013), 1399--1410.
[26]
Fred Morstatter, Jürgen Pfeffer, and Huan Liu. 2014. When is it biased? assessing the representativeness of twitter's streaming API. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 23rd international conference on World wide web companion. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 555--556.
[27]
Sasa Petrovic, Miles Osborne, and Victor Lavrenko. 2011. RT to Winff Predicting Message Propagation in Twitter. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 586--589.
[28]
Io Taxidou and Peter M. Fischer. 2014. Online Analysis of Information Diffusion in Twitter. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (WWW Companion '14). ACM, 1313--1318.
[29]
Duncan J. Watts. 2002. A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 9 (2002), 5766--5771.
[30]
Jiejun Xu, Ryan Compton, Tsai-Ching Lu, and David Allen. 2014. Rolling Through Tumblr: Characterizing Behavioral Patterns of the Microblogging Platform. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Web Science (WebSci '14). ACM, 13--22.
[31]
Jiang Yang and Scott Counts. 2010. Predicting the Speed, Scale, and Range of Information Diffusion in Twitter. In Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media ICWSM. 355--358.
[32]
Linhong Zhu and Kristina Lerman. 2016. Attention Inequality in Social Media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.07200 (2016).

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Hybrid Onion Layered System for the Analysis of Collective Subjectivity in Social NetworksIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.321746710(115435-115468)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2020)Phans, Stans and Cishets: Self-Presentation Effects on Content Propagation in TumblrProceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Web Science10.1145/3394231.3397893(39-48)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2020
  • (2019)Spread of Hate Speech in Online Social MediaProceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science10.1145/3292522.3326034(173-182)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WebSci '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference
June 2017
438 pages
ISBN:9781450348966
DOI:10.1145/3091478
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 June 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cascades
  2. information diffusion
  3. social network analysis
  4. tumblr

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WebSci '17
Sponsor:
WebSci '17: ACM Web Science Conference
June 25 - 28, 2017
New York, Troy, USA

Acceptance Rates

WebSci '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 30 of 85 submissions, 35%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Hybrid Onion Layered System for the Analysis of Collective Subjectivity in Social NetworksIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.321746710(115435-115468)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2020)Phans, Stans and Cishets: Self-Presentation Effects on Content Propagation in TumblrProceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Web Science10.1145/3394231.3397893(39-48)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2020
  • (2019)Spread of Hate Speech in Online Social MediaProceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science10.1145/3292522.3326034(173-182)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2019
  • (2018)The Platform Effect: Analysing User Activity on TumblrInternet Science10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_13(154-168)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2018
  • (2017)Cascades on Online Social Networks: A Chronological AccountInternet Science10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_31(393-411)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2017

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media