Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3106426.3106516acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Brand key asset discovery via cluster-wise biased discriminant projection

Published: 23 August 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Accurate and effective discovery of a brand's key assets, namely, Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) and potential customers, plays an essential role in marketing campaigns. In a massive online social network, brands are challenged with identifying a small portion of key assets over an enormous volume of irrelevant users, making the problem a highly imbalanced one. Moreover, having to deal with social media data that are usually high-dimensional, the task of brand key asset discovery can be immensely expensive yet inaccurate if the information are not processed efficiently to extract representative features from the original space prior to the learning process. To address the above issues, we propose a novel method dubbed Cluster-wise Biased Discriminant Projection (CBDP) to uncover the compact and informative features from users' data for brand key asset discovery. CBDP conducts a two-layer learning procedure. In the first layer, a Discriminant Clustering (DC) scheme is developed to partition the original dataset into clusters with maximum discriminant capacity. In the second layer, a Biased Discriminant Projection (BDP) algorithm is proposed and performed on each cluster to map the high-dimensional data to the low-dimensional subspace, where the discriminant information of classes with high importance/preference is preserved. A unified mapping function of CBDP is finally established by integrating these two layers. Experiments on both synthetic examples and a real-world brand key asset dataset validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

References

[1]
M. Belkin and P. Niyogi. 2001. Laplacian Eigenmaps and Spectral Techniques for Embedding and Clustering. In NIPS 14. 585--591.
[2]
P. D. Berger and N. I. Nasr. 1998. Customer lifetime value: Marketing models and applications. Journal of interactive marketing 12, 1 (1998), 17--30.
[3]
B. Bi, L. Ji, and Q. Hu. 2008. Comparative Study on Classification Techniques to Identify Potential Customers. In Proc. ISCID, Vol. 2. 308--311.
[4]
C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. 2011. LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2, 3 (2011), 27:1--27:27.
[5]
J. P. Cunningham and Z. Ghahramani. 2015. Linear Dimensionality Reduction: Survey, Insights, and Generalizations. Journal of Machine Learning Research 16 (2015), 2859--2900.
[6]
Z. Fan, Y. Xu, and D. Zhang. 2011. Local Linear Discriminant Analysis Framework Using Sample Neighbors. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 22, 7 (2011), 1119--1132.
[7]
R. A. Fisher. 1936. The Use of Multiple Measurements in Taxonomic Problems. Ann. Eugen. 7 (1936), 179--188.
[8]
X. He, S. Yan, Y. Hu, P. Niyogi, and H.-J. Zhang. 2005. Face recognition using Laplacianfaces. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 3 (2005), 328--340.
[9]
H. Hotelling. 1933. Analysis of a Complex of Statistical Variables Into Principal Components. J. Edu. Psychol. 24 (1933), 417--441, 498--520.
[10]
F. Li and T. C. Du. 2011. Who is talking? An ontology-based opinion leader identification framework for word-of-mouth marketing in online social blogs. Decision Support Systems 51, 1 (2011), 190--197.
[11]
Y. Liu, Z. Gu, and Y.-M. Cheung. 2016. Supervised Manifold Learning for Media Interestingness Prediction. In Proc. of the MediaEval 2016 Workshop.
[12]
Y. Liu, Y. Liu, K. C. C. Chan, and K. A. Hua. 2014. Hybrid Manifold Embedding. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 25, 12 (2014), 2295--2302.
[13]
D. Luo, F. Nie, C. Ding, and H. Huang. 2011. Multi-subspace representation and discovery. In ECML/PKDD. 405--420.
[14]
F. Nie, W. Zhu, and X. Li. 2017. Unsupervised Large Graph Embedding. In Proc. 31st AAAI. 2422--2428.
[15]
T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, and T. Maenpaa. 2002. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 7 (2002), 971--987.
[16]
A. Rajaraman and J. D. Ullman. 2011. Mining of Massive Datasets. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
[17]
A. Rodriguez and A. Laio. 2014. Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks. Science 344, 6191 (2014), 1492--1496.
[18]
Bernhard Schölkopf, Alex J. Smola, Robert C. Williamson, and Peter L. Bartlett. 2000. New Support Vector Algorithms. Neural Comput. 12, 5 (2000), 1207--1245.
[19]
H. Sharara, L. Getoor, and M. Norton. 2011. Active Surveying: A Probabilistic Approach for Identifying Key Opinion Leaders. In Proc. 22nd IJCAI. 1485--1490.
[20]
S. Yan, Y. Hu, D. Xu, H.-J. Zhang, B. Zhang, and Q. Cheng. 2007. Nonlinear Discriminant Analysis on Embedded Manifold. IEEE Trans. Cir. and Sys. for Video Technol. 17, 4 (2007), 468--477.
[21]
Z. Zhai, H. Xu, and P. Jia. 2008. Identifying Opinion Leaders in BBS. In Proc. IEEE/WIC/ACM WI-IAT'08, Vol. 3. 398--401.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Identifying Key Opinion Leaders in Social Media via Modality-Consistent Harmonized Discriminant EmbeddingIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics10.1109/TCYB.2018.287176550:2(717-728)Online publication date: Feb-2020
  • (2018)Who is the Mr. Right for Your Brand?The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3209978.3210091(1113-1116)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2018
  • (2018)Multi-Modal Media Retrieval via Distance Metric Learning for Potential Customer Discovery2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)10.1109/WI.2018.00-75(310-317)Online publication date: Dec-2018

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WI '17: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence
August 2017
1284 pages
ISBN:9781450349512
DOI:10.1145/3106426
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 August 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. brand key asset discovery
  2. cluster-wise biased discriminant projection
  3. supervised feature extraction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

WI '17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

WI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 118 of 178 submissions, 66%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 118 of 178 submissions, 66%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 18 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Identifying Key Opinion Leaders in Social Media via Modality-Consistent Harmonized Discriminant EmbeddingIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics10.1109/TCYB.2018.287176550:2(717-728)Online publication date: Feb-2020
  • (2018)Who is the Mr. Right for Your Brand?The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3209978.3210091(1113-1116)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2018
  • (2018)Multi-Modal Media Retrieval via Distance Metric Learning for Potential Customer Discovery2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)10.1109/WI.2018.00-75(310-317)Online publication date: Dec-2018

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media