Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3106426.3106520acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Machine learning is better than human to satisfy decision by majority

Published: 23 August 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Government 2.0 activities have become very attractive and popular these days. Using platforms to support the activities, anyone can anytime report issues or complaints in a city with their photographs and geographical information on the Web, and share them with other people. Since a variety of reports are posted, officials in the city management section have to check the importance of each report and sort out their priorities to the reports. However, it is not easy task to judge the importance of the reports. When several officials work on the task, the agreement rate of their judgments is not always high. Even if the task is done by only one official, his/her judgment sometimes varies on a similar report. To remedy this low agreement rate problem of human judgments, we propose a method of detecting signs of danger or unsafe problems described in citizens' reports. The proposed method uses a machine learning technique with word feature selection. Experimental results clearly explain the low agreement rate of human judgments, and illustrate that the proposed machine learning method has much higher performance than human judgments.

References

[1]
Yusuke Adachi, Naoya Onimura, Takanori Yamashita, and Sachio Hirokawa. 2016. Standard measure and SVM measure for feature selection and their performance effect for text classification. In the 18th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services (2016-11-28-30). ACM, 262--266.
[2]
Lora Aroyo and Chris Welty. 2015. Truth is a lie: Crowd truth and the seven myths of human annotation. AI Magazine 36, 1 (2015), 15--24.
[3]
Farzindar Atefeh and Wael Khreich. 2015. A survey of techniques for event detection in twitter. Computational Intelligence 31, 1 (2015), 132--164.
[4]
Stefano Cresci, Andrea Cimino, Felice DellĄfOrletta, and Maurizio Tesconi. 2015. Crisis mapping during natural disasters via text analysis of social media messages. In International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering. Springer, 250--258.
[5]
Mark Hall, Eibe Frank, Geoffrey Holmes, Bernhard Pfahringer, Peter Reutemann, and Ian H Witten. 2009. The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter 11, 1 (2009), 10--18.
[6]
Muhammad Imran, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Sarah Vieweg. 2015. Processing social media messages in mass emergency: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 47, 4 (2015), 67.
[7]
Muhammad Imran, Shady Mamoon Elbassuoni, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Patrick Meier. 2013. Extracting information nuggets from disaster-related messages in social media, In The 10th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management. Proc. of ISCRAM, Baden-Baden, Germany.
[8]
Toshihiko Sakai and Sachio Hirokawa. 2012. Feature words that classify problem sentence in scientific article. In the 14th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services. ACM, 360--367.
[9]
Yuta Sano and Tsunenori Mine. 2016. Extraction of Current Actual Status and Demand Expressions from Complaint Reports. In the 18th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services (iiWAS2016) (2016-11-28-30). 151--155.
[10]
Yuta Sano, Kohei Yamaguchi, and Tsunenori Mine. 2015. Automatic Classification of Complaint Reports about City Park. Information Engineering Express 1, 4 (12 2015), 119--130. http://www.iaiai.org/journals/index.php/IEE/article/view/35

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Estimation of Precedence Relations to Deal with Regional Complaint Reports2021 IEEE International Conference on Agents (ICA)10.1109/ICA54137.2021.00008(7-12)Online publication date: Dec-2021
  • (2020)Sequential Heterogeneous Feature Selection for Multi–Class Classification: Application in Government 2.02020 IEEE 30th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP)10.1109/MLSP49062.2020.9231767(1-6)Online publication date: Sep-2020
  • (2020)Knowing When to Stop: Joint Heterogeneous Feature Selection and Classification2020 54th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers10.1109/IEEECONF51394.2020.9443288(1227-1231)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Machine learning is better than human to satisfy decision by majority

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WI '17: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence
    August 2017
    1284 pages
    ISBN:9781450349512
    DOI:10.1145/3106426
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 August 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. classification
    2. feature selection
    3. government 2.0
    4. machine learning
    5. support vector machine

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • JSPS KAKENHI

    Conference

    WI '17
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    WI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 118 of 178 submissions, 66%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 118 of 178 submissions, 66%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Estimation of Precedence Relations to Deal with Regional Complaint Reports2021 IEEE International Conference on Agents (ICA)10.1109/ICA54137.2021.00008(7-12)Online publication date: Dec-2021
    • (2020)Sequential Heterogeneous Feature Selection for Multi–Class Classification: Application in Government 2.02020 IEEE 30th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP)10.1109/MLSP49062.2020.9231767(1-6)Online publication date: Sep-2020
    • (2020)Knowing When to Stop: Joint Heterogeneous Feature Selection and Classification2020 54th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers10.1109/IEEECONF51394.2020.9443288(1227-1231)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2020
    • (2020)On–The–Fly Feature Selection and Classification with Application to Civic Engagement PlatformsICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053564(3762-3766)Online publication date: May-2020
    • (2019)How Machine Learning is Changing e-GovernmentProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance10.1145/3326365.3326412(354-363)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2019
    • (2019)Automated Optimal Online Civil Issue Classification using Multiple Feature Sets2019 53rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers10.1109/IEEECONF44664.2019.9048766(1591-1595)Online publication date: Nov-2019
    • (2019)Automating the Classification of Urban Issue Reports: an Optimal Stopping ApproachICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8682778(3137-3141)Online publication date: May-2019
    • (2018)WHAT MATTERS THE MOST? OPTIMAL QUICK CLASSIFICATION OF URBAN ISSUE REPORTS BY IMPORTANCE2018 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP)10.1109/GlobalSIP.2018.8646639(106-110)Online publication date: Nov-2018
    • (2018)Is SVM+FS Better to Satisfy Decision by Majority?Recent Advances on Soft Computing and Data Mining10.1007/978-3-319-72550-5_26(261-271)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2018

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media