Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Energy Usage Behavior Modeling in Energy Disaggregation via Hawkes Processes

Published: 29 January 2018 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Energy disaggregation, the task of taking a whole home electricity signal and decomposing it into its component appliances, has been proved to be essential in energy conservation research. One powerful cue for breaking down the entire household’s energy consumption is user’s daily energy usage behavior, which has so far received little attention: existing works on energy disaggregation mostly ignored the relationship between the energy usages of various appliances by householders across different time slots. The major challenge in modeling such a relationship in that, with ambiguous appliance usage membership of householders, we find it difficult to appropriately model the influence between appliances, since such influence is determined by human behaviors in energy usage. To address this problem, we propose to model the influence between householders’ energy usage behaviors directly through a novel probabilistic model, which combines topic models with the Hawkes processes. The proposed model simultaneously disaggregates the whole home electricity signal into each component appliance and infers the appliance usage membership of household members and enables those two tasks to mutually benefit each other. Experimental results on both synthetic data and four real-world data sets demonstrate the effectiveness of our model, which outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in not only decomposing the entire consumed energy to each appliance in houses but also the inference of household structures. We further analyze the inferred appliance-householder assignment and the corresponding influence within the appliance usage of each householder and across different householders, which provides insight into appealing human behavior patterns in appliance usage.

    References

    [1]
    Y. Aït-Sahalia, J. Cacho-Diaz, and R. J. A. Laeven. 2015. Modeling financial contagion using mutually exciting jump processes. Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier 117, 39 (2015), 585--606.
    [2]
    M. Baptista, A. Fang, H. Prendinger, R. Prada, and Y. Yamaguchi. 2014. Accurate household occupant behavior modeling based on data mining techniques. In Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1164--1170.
    [3]
    S. Barker, A. Mishra, D. Irwin, E. Cecchet, P. Shenoy, and J. Albrecht. 2012. Smart*: An open data set and tools for enabling research in sustainable homes. In Proceedings of the 2012 Workshop on Data Mining Applications in Sustainability.
    [4]
    D. Blei and M. Jordan. 2005. Variational inference for dirichlet process mixtures. In Bayesian Analysis, Vol. 1. 121--144.
    [5]
    D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (March 2003), 993--1022.
    [6]
    C. Blundell, K. A Heller, and J. M Beck. 2012. Modelling reciprocating relationships with Hawkes processes. In Proceedings of the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’12).
    [7]
    P. Brmaud and L. Massouli. 2002. Power spectra of general shot noises and Hawkes point processes with a random excitation. Adv. Appl. Prob. 34, 1 (2002), 205--222.
    [8]
    D. C.-PenA, M. Orozco-Alzate, and G. Castellanos-Dominguez. 2013. Selection of time-variant features for earthquake classification at the nevado-del-ruiz volcano. Comput. Geosci. 51 (2 2013), 293--304.
    [9]
    D. R. Cox. 1972. Regression models and life-tables. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) 34, 2 (1972), 187--220.
    [10]
    R. Crane and D. Sornette. 2008. Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 41 (2008), 15649--15653.
    [11]
    S. Darby. 2006. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption.Technical Report, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.
    [12]
    A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) (1977), 1--38.
    [13]
    D. Easley and J. Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
    [14]
    E. Errais, K. Giesecke, and L. R. Goldberg. 2010. Affine point processes and portfolio credit risk. SIAM J. Fin. Math. 1, 1 (Sep 2010), 642--665.
    [15]
    L. Farinaccio and R. Zmeureanu. 1999. Using a pattern recognition approach to disaggregate the total electricity consumption in a house into the major end-uses. Energy Build. 30, 3 (1999), 245--259.
    [16]
    G. W. Hart. 1992. Nonintrusive appliance load monitoring. Proc. IEEE. 80, 12 (12 1992), 1870--1891.
    [17]
    A. G. Hawkes. 1971. Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika 58 (1971), 83--90.
    [18]
    D. Karabash and L. Zhu. 2015. Limit theorems for marked Hawkes processes with application to a risk model. Stoch. Models 31, 3 (2015), 433--451.
    [19]
    H. Kim, M. Marwah, M. F. Arlitt, G. Lyon, and J. Han. 2011. Unsupervised disaggregation of low frequency power measurements. In Proceedings of the SIAM Conference on Data Mining (SDM’11). SIAM/Omnipress, 747--758.
    [20]
    J. Z. Kolter, S. Batra, and A. Y. Ng. 2010. Energy disaggregation via discriminative sparse coding. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 1153--1161.
    [21]
    J. Z. Kolter and T. Jaakkola. 2012. Approximate inference in additive factorial HMMs with application to energy disaggregation. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS’12). 1472--1482.
    [22]
    J. Z. Kolter and M. J. Johnson. 2011. REDD: A public data set for energy disaggregation research. In Proceedings of the SustKDD Workshop on Data Mining Applications in Sustainability.
    [23]
    E. Lewisa and G. Mohlerb. 2011. A nonparametric EM algorithm for multiscale Hawkes processes. J. Nonpara. Stat. 1 (2011), 1--16.
    [24]
    L. Li, H. Deng, A. Dong, Y. Chang, and H. Zha. 2014. Identifying and labeling search tasks via query-based Hawkes processes. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’14). 731--740.
    [25]
    L. Li and H. Zha. 2013. Dyadic event attribution in social networks with mixtures of Hawkes processes. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information; Knowledge Management (CIKM’13). ACM, New York, NY, 1667--1672.
    [26]
    L. Li and H. Zha. 2014. Learning parametric models for social infectivity in multi-dimensional Hawkes processes. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
    [27]
    T. J. Liniger. 2009. Multivariate Hawkes processes. Ph.D. thesis. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich).
    [28]
    M. O. Mendez, M. Matteucci, V. Castronovo, L. F. Strambi, S. Cerutti, and A. M. Bianchi. 2010. Sleep staging from heart rate variability: Time-varying spectral features and hidden markov models. Int. J. Biomed. Eng. Technol. 3, 3--4 (2010), 246--263.
    [29]
    B. Neenan and J. Robinson. 2009. Residential electricity use feedback: A research synthesis and economic framework. Technical report, Electric Power Research Institute.
    [30]
    Y. Ogata. 1988. Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 83, 401 (1988), 9--27.
    [31]
    O. Parson, S. Ghosh, M. Weal, and A. Rogers. 2012. Non-intrusive load monitoring using prior models of general appliance types. In Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 356--362.
    [32]
    P. O. Perry and P. J. Wolfe. 2013. Point process modeling for directed interaction networks. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 75, 5 (2013), 821--849.
    [33]
    M. D. Porter and G. White. 2011. Self-exciting hurdle models for terrorist activity. Ann. Appl. Stat. 6, 1 (2011), 106--124.
    [34]
    J. G. Rasmussen. 2013. Bayesian inference for Hawkes processes. Method. Comput. Appl. Prob. 15, 3 (Sept. 2013), 623--642.
    [35]
    F. P. Schoenberg. 2010. Introduction to point processes. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (2010), 616--617.
    [36]
    A. Simma and M. Jordan. 2010. Modeling events with cascades of poisson processes. Uncert. Artific. Intell. (2010), 546--555.
    [37]
    A. Stomakhin, M. B. Short, and A. L. Bertozzi. 2011. Reconstruction of missing data in social networks based on temporal patterns of interactions. Inverse Problems. 27, 11 (Nov 2011), 115013.
    [38]
    R. Swan and J. Allan. 1999. Extracting significant time varying features from text. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’99). ACM, New York, NY, 38--45.
    [39]
    T. Osaki R. Konishi T. Saitoh, Y. Aota, and K. Sugahara. 2008. Current sensor based non-intrusive appliance recognition for intelligent outlet. In Proceedings of the International Technical Conference on Circuits/Systems, Computers and Communications.
    [40]
    M. Wytock and J. Z. Kolter. 2014. Contextually supervised source separation with application to energy disaggregation. In Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 486--492.
    [41]
    J. Yan, Y. Wang, K. Zhou, J. Huang, C. Tian, H. Zha, and W. Dong. 2013. Towards effective prioritizing water pipe replacement and rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’13). AAAI Press, 2931--2937.
    [42]
    A. Z.-Mangion, M. Dewarc, V. Kadirkamanathand, and G. Sanguinetti. 2012. Point process modelling of the Afghan war diary. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 31 (July 2012), 12414--12419.
    [43]
    K. Zhou, H. Zha, and L. Song. 2013. Learning social infectivity in sparse low-rank networks using multi-dimensional Hawkes processes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS’13) (JMLR), Vol. 31. JMLR.org, 641--649.
    [44]
    J. Zhuang, Y. Ogata, and David V. Jones. 2002. Stochastic declustering of space-time earthquake occurrences. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 97, 458 (2002), 369--380.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)An ephemerally self-exciting point processAdvances in Applied Probability10.1017/apr.2021.3554:2(340-403)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2022
    • (2021)Mining Customers’ Changeable Electricity Consumption for Effective Load ForecastingACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/346668412:4(1-26)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2021
    • (2021)Zero Shot on the Cold-Start ProblemProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3459637.3482312(474-483)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
    ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 9, Issue 3
    Regular Papers and Special Issue: Urban Intelligence
    May 2018
    370 pages
    ISSN:2157-6904
    EISSN:2157-6912
    DOI:10.1145/3167125
    • Editor:
    • Yu Zheng
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 January 2018
    Accepted: 01 June 2017
    Revised: 01 June 2017
    Received: 01 December 2016
    Published in TIST Volume 9, Issue 3

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Energy disaggregation
    2. Hawkes process
    3. energy usage behavior
    4. household structure analysis
    5. latent dirichlet allocation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)49
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)An ephemerally self-exciting point processAdvances in Applied Probability10.1017/apr.2021.3554:2(340-403)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2022
    • (2021)Mining Customers’ Changeable Electricity Consumption for Effective Load ForecastingACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/346668412:4(1-26)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2021
    • (2021)Zero Shot on the Cold-Start ProblemProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3459637.3482312(474-483)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2021
    • (2021)Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Lifetime Value in Cold-Start RecommendationProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3459637.3482292(782-791)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2021
    • (2021)Multi-view Denoising Graph Auto-Encoders on Heterogeneous Information Networks for Cold-start RecommendationProceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3447548.3467427(2338-2348)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2021
    • (2020)MAMOProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3394486.3403113(688-697)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2020
    • (2019)Recommending links to maximize the influence in social networksProceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3367243.3367344(2195-2201)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2019
    • (2019)Modeling and Applications for Temporal Point ProcessesProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3292500.3332298(3227-3228)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2019

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media