Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

An Efficient Budget Allocation Approach for Quantifying the Impact of Input Uncertainty in Stochastic Simulation

Published: 27 October 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Simulations are often driven by input models estimated from finite real-world data. When we use simulations to assess the performance of a stochastic system, there exist two sources of uncertainty in the performance estimates: input and simulation estimation uncertainty. In this article, we develop a budget allocation approach that can efficiently employ the potentially tight simulation resource to construct a percentile confidence interval quantifying the impact of the input uncertainty on the system performance estimates, while controlling the simulation estimation error. Specifically, nonparametric bootstrap is used to generate samples of input models quantifying both the input distribution family and parameter value uncertainty. Then, the direct simulation is used to propagate the input uncertainty to the output response. Since each simulation run could be computationally expensive, given a tight simulation budget, we propose an efficient budget allocation approach that can balance the finite sampling error introduced by using finite bootstrapped samples to quantify the input uncertainty and the system response estimation error introduced by using finite replications to estimate the system response at each bootstrapped sample. Our approach is theoretically supported, and empirical studies also demonstrate that it has better and more robust performance than direct bootstrapping.

Supplementary Material

a25-yi-apndx.pdf (yi.zip)
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, An Efficient Budget Allocation Approach for Quantifying the Impact of Input Uncertainty in Stochastic Simulation

References

[1]
Russell R. Barton. 2007. Presenting a more complete characterization of uncertainty: Can it be done? In Proceedings of the 2007 INFORMS Simulation Society Research Workshop. INFORMS Simulation Society, Fontainebleau.
[2]
Russell R. Barton. 2012. Tutorial: Input uncertainty in output analysis. In Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference, C. Laroque, J. Himmelspach, R. Pasupathy, O. Rose, and A. M. Uhrmacher (Eds.). IEEE Computer Society, 67--78.
[3]
Russel R. Barton, Barry L. Nelson, and Wei Xie. 2014. Quantifying input uncertainty via simulation confidence intervals. INFORMS Journal on Computing 26, 1 (2014), 74--87.
[4]
Russell R. Barton and Lee W. Schruben. 1993. Uniform and bootstrap resampling of input distributions. In Proceedings of the 1993 Winter Simulation Conference, G. W. Evans, M. Mollaghasemi, E. C. Russell, and W. E. Biles (Eds.). IEEE Computer Society, 503--508.
[5]
Russell R. Barton and Lee W. Schruben. 2001. Resampling methods for input modeling. In Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, B. A. Peters, J. S. Smith, D. J. Medeiros, and M. W. Rohrer (Eds.). IEEE Computer Society, 372--378.
[6]
Evren R. Baysal and Jeremy Staum. 2008. Empirical likelihood for value-at-risk and expected shortfall. Journal of Risk 11, 1 (2008), 3--32.
[7]
Bahar Biller and Canan G. Corlu. 2011. Accounting for parameter uncertainty in large-scale stochastic simulations with correlated inputs. Operations Research 59 (2011), 661--673.
[8]
Christopher M. Bishop. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, New York.
[9]
Justin Boesel, Barry L. Nelson, and Seong-Hee Kim. 2003. Using ranking and selection to ‘clean up’ after simulation optimization. Operations Research 51, 5 (2003), 814--825.
[10]
Mark Broadie, Yiping Du, and Ciamac C. Moallemi. 2011. Efficient risk estimation via nested sequential simulation. Management Science 57, 6 (2011), 1172--1194.
[11]
S. H. Brooks. 1958. A discussion of random methods for seeking maxima. Operations Research 6 (1958), 244--251.
[12]
Russell C. H. Cheng and Wayne Holland. 1997. Sensitivity of computer simulation experiments to errors in input data. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 57 (1997), 219--241.
[13]
Stephen E. Chick. 1997. Bayesian analysis for simulation input and output. In Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, S. Andradóttir, K. J. Healy, D. H. Withers, and B. L. Nelson (Eds.). IEEE, 253--260.
[14]
Stephen E. Chick. 2001. Input distribution selection for simulation experiments: Accounting for input uncertainty. Operations Research 49 (2001), 744--758.
[15]
Michael B. Gordy and Sandeep Juneja. 2010. Nested simulation in portfolio risk measurement. Management Science 56, 10 (2010), 1833--1848.
[16]
Peter Hall. 1992. The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[17]
J. M. Hammersley and K. W. Morton. 1956. A new Monte Carlo technique: Antithetic variates. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 52, 3 (1956), 449--475.
[18]
L. Jeff Hong and Barry L. Nelson. 2006. Discrete optimization via simulation using COMPASS. Operations Research 54, 1 (2006), 115--129.
[19]
L. Jeff Hong, Barry L. Nelson, and Jie Xu. 2014. Discrete optimization via simulation. In Handbook on Simulation Optimization, M. C. Fu (Ed.). Springer, New York, 9--44.
[20]
Joel L. Horowitz. 2001. The Bootstrap. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 5. North Holland, Oxford, UK.
[21]
D. Jones, M. Schonlau, and W. Welch. 1998. Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. Journal of Global Optimization 13 (1998), 455--492.
[22]
Seong-Hee Kim and Barry L. Nelson. 2007. Recent advances in ranking and selection. In Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE Computer Society, 162--172.
[23]
Hai Lan, Barry L. Nelson, and Jeremy Staum. 2010. A confidence interval procedure for expected shortfall risk measurement via two-level simulation. Operations Research 58, 5 (2010), 1481--1490.
[24]
Shing-Hoi Lee and Peter W. Glynn. 2003. Computing the distribution function of a conditional expectation via Monte Carlo: Discrete conditioning spaces. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 13, 3 (2003), 238--258.
[25]
Vadim Lesnevski, Barry L. Nelson, and Jeremy Staum. 2007. Simulation of coherent risk measures based on generalized scenarios. Management Science 53, 11 (2007), 1756--1769.
[26]
Vadim Lesnevski, Barry L. Nelson, and Jeremy Staum. 2008. An adaptive procedure for estimating coherent risk measures based on generalized scenarios. Journal of Computational Finance 11, 4 (2008), 1--31.
[27]
Ming Liu and Jeremy Staum. 2010. Stochastic kriging for efficient nested simulation of expected shortfall. Journal of Risk 12 (2010), 3--27.
[28]
Barry L. Nelson and David Goldsman. 2001. Comparisons with a standard in simulation experiments. Management Science 47, 3 (2001), 449--463.
[29]
Barry L. Nelson, Julie Swann, David Goldsman, and Wheyming Song. 2001. Simple procedures for selecting the best simulated system when the number of alternatives is large. Operations Research 49 (2001), 950--963.
[30]
Szu H. Ng and Stephen E. Chick. 2006. Reducing parameter uncertainty for stochastic systems. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 16 (2006), 26--51.
[31]
Jun Shao and Dongsheng Tu. 1995. The Jackknife and Bootstrap. Springer-Verlag.
[32]
Lihua Sun, Jeff L. Hong, and Zhaolin Hu. 2014. Balancing exploitation and exploration in discrete optimization via simulation through a Gaussian process-based search. Operations Research 62 (2014), 1416--1438.
[33]
Yunpeng Sun, Daniel W. Apley, and Jeremy Staum. 2011. Efficient nested simulation for estimating the variance of a conditional expectation. Operations Research 59, 4 (2011), 998--1007.
[34]
Shing Chih Tsai, Barry L. Nelson, and Jeremy Staum. 2009. Combined Screening and Selection of the Best with Control Variates. International Series in Operations Research 8 Management Science, Vol. 133. Springer, New York.
[35]
Wei Xie, Cheng Li, and Pu Zhang. 2017. A Bayesian nonparametric hierarchical framework for uncertainty quantification in simulation. (2017). Under Review.
[36]
Wei Xie, Barry L. Nelson, and Russell. R. Barton. 2014a. A Bayesian framework for quantifying uncertainty in stochastic simulation. Operations Research 62, 6 (2014), 1439--1452.
[37]
Wei Xie, Barry L. Nelson, and Russell R. Barton. 2014b. Statistical uncertainty analysis for stochastic simulation with dependent input models. In Proceedings of the 2014 Winter Simulation Conference, A. Tolk, S. Y. Diallo, I. O. Ryzhov, L. Yilmaz, S. Buckley, and J. A. Miller (Eds.). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 674--685.
[38]
Wei Xie, Barry L. Nelson, and Russell R. Barton. 2016. Statistical uncertainty analysis for stochastic simulation. Working Paper, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
[39]
Jie Xu, Barry L. Nelson, and L. Jeff Hong. 2010. Industrial strength compass: A comprehensive algorithm and software for optimization via simulation. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 20, 1 (2010), 1--29.
[40]
Jie Xu, Barry L. Nelson, and L. Jeff Hong. 2013. An adaptive hyperbox algorithm for high-dimensional discrete optimization via simulation problems. INFORMS Journal on Computing 25, 1 (2013), 133--146.
[41]
Yuan Yi, Wei Xie, and Enlu Zhou. 2015. A sequential experiment design for input uncertainty quantification in stochastic simulation. In Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE Computer Society.
[42]
Faker Zouaoui and James R. Wilson. 2003. Accounting for parameter uncertainty in simulation input modeling. IIE Transactions 35 (2003), 781--792.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Uncertainty Quantification and Exploration for Reinforcement LearningOperations Research10.1287/opre.2023.243672:4(1689-1709)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2024)A FAST Method for Nested EstimationINFORMS Journal on Computing10.1287/ijoc.2023.0118Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)A Shrinkage Approach to Improve Direct Bootstrap Resampling Under Input UncertaintyINFORMS Journal on Computing10.1287/ijoc.2022.004436:4(1023-1039)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. An Efficient Budget Allocation Approach for Quantifying the Impact of Input Uncertainty in Stochastic Simulation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation
    ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation  Volume 27, Issue 4
    October 2017
    158 pages
    ISSN:1049-3301
    EISSN:1558-1195
    DOI:10.1145/3155315
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 October 2017
    Accepted: 01 July 2017
    Revised: 01 May 2017
    Received: 01 March 2016
    Published in TOMACS Volume 27, Issue 4

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Confidence interval
    2. budget allocation
    3. input uncertainty
    4. nonparametric bootstrap
    5. percentile estimation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Uncertainty Quantification and Exploration for Reinforcement LearningOperations Research10.1287/opre.2023.243672:4(1689-1709)Online publication date: Jul-2024
    • (2024)A FAST Method for Nested EstimationINFORMS Journal on Computing10.1287/ijoc.2023.0118Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
    • (2024)A Shrinkage Approach to Improve Direct Bootstrap Resampling Under Input UncertaintyINFORMS Journal on Computing10.1287/ijoc.2022.004436:4(1023-1039)Online publication date: Jul-2024
    • (2023)Input Uncertainty Quantification via Simulation BootstrappingProceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference10.5555/3643142.3643451(3693-3704)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Input Uncertainty Quantification Via Simulation Bootstrapping2023 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)10.1109/WSC60868.2023.10407968(3693-3704)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
    • (2022)Subsampling to Enhance Efficiency in Input Uncertainty QuantificationOperations Research10.1287/opre.2021.216870:3(1891-1913)Online publication date: May-2022
    • (2022)Bayesian Optimisation vs. Input Uncertainty ReductionACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation10.1145/351038032:3(1-26)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2022
    • (2021)A Nonparametric Bayesian Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Stochastic SimulationSIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification10.1137/20M13455179:4(1527-1552)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021
    • (2020)Stochastic Simulation under Input Uncertainty: A ReviewOperations Research Perspectives10.1016/j.orp.2020.100162(100162)Online publication date: Sep-2020

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media