Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3132847.3133145acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

An Enhanced Topic Modeling Approach to Multiple Stance Identification

Published: 06 November 2017 Publication History

Abstract

People often publish online texts to express their stances, which reflect the essential viewpoints they stand. Stance identification has been an important research topic in text analysis and facilitates many applications in business, public security and government decision making. Previous work on stance identification solely focuses on classifying the supportive or unsupportive attitude towards a certain topic/entity. The other important type of stance identification, multiple stance identification, was largely ignored in previous research. In contrast, multiple stance identification focuses on identifying different standpoints of multiple parties involved in online texts. In this paper, we address the problem of recognizing distinct standpoints implied in textual data. As people are inclined to discuss the topics favorable to their standpoints, topics thus can provide distinguishable information of different standpoints. We propose a topic-based method for standpoint identification. To acquire more distinguishable topics, we further enhance topic model by adding constraints on document-topic distributions. We finally conduct experimental studies on two real datasets to verify the effectiveness of our approach to multiple stance identification.

References

[1]
R. Abbott, M. Walker, P. Anand, J.E.F. Tree, R. Bowmani, and J. King. 2011. How can you say such things?!: Recognizing disagreement in informal political argument. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media. 2--11.
[2]
K.S. Hasan and V. Ng. 2013. Stance classification of ideological debates: data, models, features, and constraints. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. 1348--1356.
[3]
L. Wang and C. Cardie. 2014. Improving agreement and disagreement identification in online discussions with a socially-tuned sentiment lexicon. In Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Computational Approaches To Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis. 97--106.
[4]
D. Sridhar, L. Getoor, and M. Walker. 2014. Collective stance classification of posts in online debate forums. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 109--117.
[5]
H.L. Hammer, P.E. Solberg, and L. Øvrelid. 2014. Sentiment classification of online political discussions: A comparison of a word-based and dependency-based method. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 90--96.
[6]
S. Mohammad, S. Kiritchenko, P. Sobhani, X. Zhu, and C. Cherry. 2016. SemEval-2016 task 6: Detecting stance in tweets. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. 31--41.
[7]
W. Wei, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Chen, and T. Wang. 2016. Pkudblab at SemEval-2016 task 6 : A specific convolutional neural network system for effective stance detection. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. 384--388.
[8]
I. Augenstein, T. Rocktäschel, A. Vlachos, and K. Bontcheva. 2016. Stance detection with bidirectional conditional encoding. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 876--885.
[9]
W.-H. Lin, T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and A. Hauptmann. 2006. Which side are you on?: Identifying perspectives at the document and sentence levels. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics. 109--116.
[10]
D. Kuang, J. Choo, and H. Park, 2015. Nonnegative matrix factorization for interactive topic modeling and document clustering. Partitional Clustering Algorithms, 215--243.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CIKM '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
November 2017
2604 pages
ISBN:9781450349185
DOI:10.1145/3132847
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 November 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Multiple stance identification
  2. constrained Nonnegative Matrix Factorization
  3. topic modeling

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Funding Sources

  • The Ministry of Science and Technology of China Major Grant
  • CAS Key Grant
  • Grant
  • NSFC Grant

Conference

CIKM '17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CIKM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 171 of 855 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media