Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Intelligent Disaster Response via Social Media Analysis A Survey

Published: 01 September 2017 Publication History

Abstract

The success of a disaster relief and response process is largely dependent on timely and accurate information regarding the status of the disaster, the surrounding environment, and the a ected people. This information is primarily provided by rst responders on-site and can be enhanced by the firsthand reports posted in real-time on social media. Many tools and methods have been developed to automate disaster relief by extracting, analyzing, and visualizing actionable information from social media. However, these methods are not well integrated in the relief and response processes and the relation between the two requires exposition for further advancement. In this survey, we review the new frontier of intelligent disaster relief and response using social media, show stages of disasters which are reflected on social media, establish a connection between proposed methods based on social media and relief efforts by rst responders, and outline pressing challenges and future research directions.

References

[1]
Disasters and emergencies: Definitions. http://apps.who.int/disasters/repo/7656.pdf, 2002. accessed 09 Jan 2017.
[2]
Twitter responds to the japanese disaster. https://goo.gl/8V1WC7, Mar. 17, 2011. accessed 13 Feb 2017.
[3]
Hurricane matthew recap: Destruction from the caribbean to the united states. https://goo.gl/8Rfn6S, Oct. 9, 2016. accessed 10 Oct 2016.
[4]
J. Allan, J. G. Carbonell, G. Doddington, J. Yamron, and Y. Yang. Topic detection and tracking pilot study final report. In Proceedings of the DARPA Broadcast News Transcription and Understanding Workshop, pages 194--218, 1998.
[5]
S. Asur and B. A. Huberman. Predicting the future with social media. In Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on, volume 1, pages 492--499. IEEE, 2010.
[6]
F. Atefeh and W. Khreich. A survey of techniques for event detection in twitter. Computational Intelligence, 31(1):132--164, 2015.
[7]
L. Backstrom, E. Sun, and C. Marlow. Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, pages 61--70. ACM, 2010.
[8]
H. Becker, F. Chen, D. Iter, M. Naaman, and L. Gravano. Automatic identification and presentation of twitter content for planned events. In ICWSM, pages 655--656, 2011.
[9]
H. Becker, M. Naaman, and L. Gravano. Beyond trending topics: Real-world event identification on twitter. ICWSM, 11:438--441, 2011.
[10]
G. Beigi, X. Hu, R. Maciejewski, and H. Liu. An overview of sentiment analysis in social media and its applications in disaster relief. In Sentiment Analysis and Ontology Engineering, pages 313--340. Springer, 2016.
[11]
D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research, 3(Jan):993--1022, 2003.
[12]
B. J. Boruff. Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disasters, 5th edition by keith smith and david n. petley. Geographical Research, 47(4):454--455, 2009.
[13]
A. Bruns and Y. E. Liang. Tools and methods for capturing twitter data during natural disasters. First Monday, 17(4), 2012.
[14]
C. Castillo. Big Crisis Data. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
[15]
J. Chae, D. Thom, Y. Jang, S. Kim, T. Ertl, and D. S. Ebert. Public behavior response analysis in disaster events utilizing visual analytics of microblog data. Computers & Graphics, 38:51--60, 2014.
[16]
Z. Cheng, J. Caverlee, and K. Lee. You are where you tweet: a content-based approach to geo-locating twitter users. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 759--768. ACM, 2010.
[17]
Z. Chu, S. Gianvecchio, H.Wang, and S. Jajodia. Who is tweeting on twitter: human, bot, or cyborg? In Proceedings of the 26th annual computer security applications conference, pages 21--30. ACM, 2010.
[18]
R. B. Cleveland, W. S. Cleveland, J. E. McRae, and I. Terpenning. Stl: A seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess. Journal of Official Statistics, 6(1):3--33, 1990.
[19]
M. A. Cohn, M. R. Mehl, and J. W. Pennebaker. Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding september 11, 2001. Psychological science, 15(10):687--693, 2004.
[20]
M. Cordeiro. Twitter event detection: combining wavelet analysis and topic inference summarization. In Doctoral Symposium on Informatics Engineering, 2012.
[21]
M. Cordeiro and J. Gama. Online social networks event detection: a survey. In Solving Large Scale Learning Tasks. Challenges and Algorithms, pages 1--41. Springer, 2016.
[22]
A. Crowe. Disasters 2.0: The application of social media systems for modern emergency management. CRC press, 2012.
[23]
W. Cui, S. Liu, L. Tan, C. Shi, Y. Song, Z. Gao, H. Qu, and X. Tong. Textow: Towards better understanding of evolving topics in text. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 17(12):2412--2421, 2011.
[24]
N. DiFonzo and P. Bordia. Rumor psychology: Social and organizational approaches. American Psychological Association, 2007.
[25]
R. R. Dynes. Organized behavior in disaster. Heath LexingtonBooks, 1970.
[26]
E. Ellis. How the usgs uses twitter data to track earthquakes. https://goo.gl/E6r0b2, Oct. 7, 2015. accessed 28 Nov 2016.
[27]
M. Faulkner, R. Clayton, T. Heaton, K. M. Chandy, M. Kohler, J. Bunn, R. Guy, A. Liu, M. Olson, M. Cheng, et al. Community sense and response systems: Your phone as quake detector. Communications of the ACM, 57(7):66--75, 2014.
[28]
M. Faulkner, M. Olson, R. Chandy, J. Krause, K. M. Chandy, and A. Krause. The next big one: Detecting earthquakes and other rare events from communitybased sensors. In Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2011 10th International Conference on, pages 13--24. IEEE, 2011.
[29]
A. Gupta, H. Lamba, and P. Kumaraguru. $1.00 per rt #bostonmarathon #prayforboston: Analyzing fake content on twitter. In eCrime Researchers Summit (eCRS), pages 1--12. IEEE, 2013.
[30]
A. Gupta, H. Lamba, P. Kumaraguru, and A. Joshi. Faking sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on twitter during hurricane sandy. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, pages 729--736. ACM, 2013.
[31]
M. Guy, P. Earle, C. Ostrum, K. Gruchalla, and S. Horvath. Integration and dissemination of citizen reported and seismically derived earthquake information via social network technologies. In International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis, pages 42--53. Springer, 2010.
[32]
B. Han, P. Cook, and T. Baldwin. A stacking-based approach to twitter user geolocation prediction. In ACL (Conference System Demonstrations), pages 7--12, 2013.
[33]
S. Havre, B. Hetzler, and L. Nowell. Themeriver: Visualizing theme changes over time. In Information Visualization, 2000. InfoVis 2000. IEEE Symposium on, pages 115--123. IEEE, 2000.
[34]
P. Heymann, G. Koutrika, and H. Garcia-Molina. Fighting spam on social web sites: A survey of approaches and future challenges. IEEE Internet Computing, 11(6):36--45, 2007.
[35]
R. Hill and D. Hansen. Families in disaster. In Man and Society in Disaster, pages 185--221. Basic Books, 1962.
[36]
J. B. Houston, J. Hawthorne, M. F. Perreault, E. H. Park, M. Goldstein Hode, M. R. Halliwell, S. E. Turner McGowen, R. Davis, S. Vaid, J. A. McElderry, et al. Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1):1--22, 2015.
[37]
M. Imran, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, and S. Vieweg. Processing social media messages in mass emergency: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 47(4):67:1--67:38, 2015.
[38]
M. Imran, C. Castillo, J. Lucas, P. Meier, and S. Vieweg. Aidr: Artificial intelligence for disaster response. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 159--162. ACM, 2014.
[39]
M. Imran, S. Elbassuoni, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, and P. Meier. Practical extraction of disaster-relevant information from social media. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 1021--1024. ACM, 2013.
[40]
M. Imran, S. M. Elbassuoni, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, and P. Meier. Extracting information nuggets from disaster-related messages in social media. Proc. of IS- CRAM, Baden-Baden, Germany, 2013.
[41]
J. P. John, A. Moshchuk, S. D. Gribble, A. Krishnamurthy, et al. Studying spamming botnets using botlab. In NSDI, volume 9, pages 291--306, 2009.
[42]
D. Jurafsky and J. H. Martin. Speech and language processing. Pearson, 2014.
[43]
D. Jurgens. That's what friends are for: Inferring location in online social media platforms based on social relationships. ICWSM, 13:273--282, 2013.
[44]
J. Kalyanam, A. Mantrach, D. Saez-Trumper, H. Vahabi, and G. Lanckriet. Leveraging social context for modeling topic evolution. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 517--526. ACM, 2015.
[45]
S. V. M. C. Kalyanam, Janani and G. Lanckriet. From event detection to story telling on microblogs. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pages 437--442. ACM, 2016.
[46]
L. Kavner. Hurricane sandy: Red cross, other relief organizations see social media as double-edged sword for relief efforts. https://goo.gl/angXF8, Oct. 31, 2012. accessed 09 Jan 2017.
[47]
Y. Koh. Only 11% of new twitter users in 2012 are still tweeting. https://goo.gl/vl9D3h, Mar. 21, 2014. accessed 13 Feb 2017.
[48]
G. Kossinets and D. J. Watts. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. science, 311(5757):88--90, 2006.
[49]
S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler. On information and sufficiency. The annals of mathematical statistics, 22(1):79--86, 1951.
[50]
S. Kumar, G. Barbier, M. A. Abbasi, and H. Liu. Tweettracker: An analysis tool for humanitarian and disaster relief. In ICWSM, pages 661--662, 2011.
[51]
S. Kumar, X. Hu, and H. Liu. A behavior analytics approach to identifying tweets from crisis regions. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media, pages 255--260. ACM, 2014.
[52]
D. D. Lee and H. S. Seung. Algorithms for nonnegative matrix factorization. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 556--562, 2001.
[53]
K. Lee, B. D. Eoff, and J. Caverlee. Seven months with the devils: A long-term study of content polluters on twitter. In ICWSM, pages 185--192, 2011.
[54]
J. Lehmann, B. Gonçalves, J. J. Ramasco, and C. Cattuto. Dynamical classes of collective attention in twitter. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, pages 251--260. ACM, 2012.
[55]
J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, and J. Kleinberg. Memetracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 497--506. ACM, 2009.
[56]
R. Li, S. Wang, H. Deng, R. Wang, and K. C.-C. Chang. Towards social user profiling: unified and discriminative influence model for inferring home locations. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 1023--1031. ACM, 2012.
[57]
V. Luckerson. Fear, misinformation, and social media complicate ebola fight. Time Magazine, 2014.
[58]
J. Mahmud, J. Nichols, and C. Drews. Where is this tweet from? inferring home locations of twitter users. ICWSM, 12:511--514, 2012.
[59]
M. Mathioudakis and N. Koudas. Twittermonitor: trend detection over the twitter stream. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data, pages 1155--1158. ACM, 2010.
[60]
P. Meier. Digital humanitarians: how big data is changing the face of humanitarian response. Crc Press, 2015.
[61]
P. Meier. How crisis mapping saved lives in haiti. https://goo.gl/uASbu8, Jul. 2, 2012. accessed 09 Jan 2017.
[62]
M. Mendoza, B. Poblete, and C. Castillo. Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we rt? In Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics, pages 71--79. ACM, 2010.
[63]
G. Mishne, N. S. Glance, et al. Predicting movie sales from blogger sentiment. In AAAI spring symposium: computational approaches to analyzing weblogs, pages 155--158, 2006.
[64]
F. Morstatter, N. Lubold, H. Pon-Barry, J. Pfeffer, and H. Liu. Finding eyewitness tweets during crises. arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.1773, 2014.
[65]
F. Morstatter, L. Wu, T. H. Nazer, K. M. Carley, and H. Liu. A new approach to bot detection: striking the balance between precision and recall. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pages 533--540, 2016.
[66]
A. Musaev, D. Wang, and C. Pu. Litmus: Landslide detection by integrating multiple sources. In 11th International Conference Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM), pages 677--686, 2014.
[67]
M. Naaman, H. Becker, and L. Gravano. Hip and trendy: Characterizing emerging trends on twitter. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(5):902--918, 2011.
[68]
V. Niculae, C. Suen, J. Zhang, C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and J. Leskovec. Quotus: The structure of political media coverage as revealed by quoting patterns. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 798--808. ACM, 2015.
[69]
O. Okolloh. Ushahidi, or testimony: Web 2.0 tools for crowdsourcing crisis information. Participatory learning and action, 59(1):65--70, 2009.
[70]
A. Olteanu, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, and S. Vieweg. Crisislex: A lexicon for collecting and ltering microblogged communications in crises. In ICWSM, pages 376--385, 2014.
[71]
L. Palen and K. M. Anderson. Crisis informaticsnew data for extraordinary times. Science, 353(6296):224--225, 2016.
[72]
L. Palen and K. M. Anderson. Crisis informatics|new data for extraordinary times. Science, 353(6296):224--225, 2016.
[73]
B. Palm. Hurricane matthew reaches category 4 status, barreling toward orida. https://goo.gl/ZW33U3, Oct. 6, 2016. accessed 10 Oct 2016.
[74]
A.-M. Popescu and M. Pennacchiotti. Detecting controversial events from twitter. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 1873--1876. ACM, 2010.
[75]
A.-M. Popescu, M. Pennacchiotti, and D. Paranjpe. Extracting events and event descriptions from twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web, pages 105--106. ACM, 2011.
[76]
J. W. Powell. An introduction to the natural history of disaster. Univ. of Maryland: Disaster Research Project, 1954.
[77]
R. Power, B. Robinson, J. Colton, and M. Cameron. Emergency situation awareness: Twitter case studies. In International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management in Mediterranean Countries, pages 218--231. Springer, 2014.
[78]
H. Purohit, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, A. Sheth, and P. Meier. Emergency-relief coordination on social media: Automatically matching resource requests and offers. First Monday, 19(1), 2013.
[79]
J. Ratkiewicz, M. Conover, M. Meiss, B. Gonçalves, S. Patil, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web, pages 249--252. ACM, 2011.
[80]
A. Reese. How we'll predict the next natural disaster: Advances in natural hazard forecasting could help keep more people out of harm's way. Discover Magazine, Sep. 2016.
[81]
T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo. Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, pages 851--860. ACM, 2010.
[82]
N. SAMBULI. How useful is a tweet? a review of the first tweets from the westgate mall attack. https://goo.gl/qRGYZD, Oct. 3, 2013. accessed 10 Feb 2017.
[83]
J. Sampson, F. Morstatter, R. Zafarani, and H. Liu. Real-time crisis mapping using language distribution. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW), pages 1648--1651. IEEE, 2015.
[84]
D. Schramm and R. Hansen. Aim & scope of disaster management: Study guide and course text. Disaster Management Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1986.
[85]
A. Schulz, A. Hadjakos, H. Paulheim, J. Nachtwey, and M. Mühlhäuser. A multi-indicator approach for geolocalization of tweets. In ICWSM, pages 573--582, 2013.
[86]
J. SEDERHOLM. #strandedinus: Americans open homes to strangers stuck after paris attacks. https://goo.gl/NQqEDh, Nov. 14, 2015. accessed 09 Jan 2017.
[87]
J. H. Sorensen. Hazard warning systems: Review of 20 years of progress. Natural Hazards Review, 1(2):119--125, 2000.
[88]
K. Starbird and J. Stamberger. Tweak the tweet: Leveraging microblogging proliferation with a prescriptive syntax to support citizen reporting. In Proceedings of the 7th International ISCRAM Conference--Seattle, pages 1--5, 2010.
[89]
G. Szabo and B. A. Huberman. Predicting the popularity of online content. Communications of the ACM, 53(8):80--88, 2010.
[90]
I. Temnikova, C. Castillo, and S. Vieweg. Emterms 1. 0: a terminological resource for crisis tweets. In IS-CRAM 2015 proceedings of the 12th international conference on information systems for crisis response and management, 2015.
[91]
K. Thomas, C. Grier, and V. Paxson. Adapting social spam infrastructure for political censorship. In LEET, 2012.
[92]
A. Tumasjan, T. O. Sprenger, P. G. Sandner, and I. M. Welpe. Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. ICWSM, 10:178--185, 2010.
[93]
C. K. Vaca, A. Mantrach, A. Jaimes, and M. Saerens. A time-based collective factorization for topic discovery and monitoring in news. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web,WWW'14, pages 527--538, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
[94]
I. Varga, M. Sano, K. Torisawa, C. Hashimoto, K. Ohtake, T. Kawai, J.-H. Oh, and S. De Saeger. Aid is out there: Looking for help from tweets during a large scale disaster. In ACL (1), pages 1619--1629, 2013.
[95]
S. Vieweg, A. L. Hughes, K. Starbird, and L. Palen. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1079--1088. ACM, 2010.
[96]
X. Wang, M. S. Gerber, and D. E. Brown. Automatic crime prediction using events extracted from twitter posts. In International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction, pages 231--238. Springer, 2012.
[97]
D. H. Wolpert. Stacked generalization. Neural networks, 5(2):241--259, 1992.
[98]
F. Wu, J. Shu, Y. Huang, and Z. Yuan. Social spammer and spam message co-detection in microblogging with social context regularization. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 1601--1610. ACM, 2015.
[99]
W. Xie, F. Zhu, J. Jiang, E.-P. Lim, and K. Wang. Topicsketch: Real-time bursty topic detection from twitter. In 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining, pages 837--846. IEEE, 2013.
[100]
Y. Xie, F. Yu, K. Achan, R. Panigrahy, G. Hulten, and I. Osipkov. Spamming botnets: signatures and characteristics. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(4):171--182, 2008.
[101]
S. Yu and S. Kak. A survey of prediction using social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.1647, 2012.
[102]
R. Zafarani and H. Liu. 10 bits of surprise: Detecting malicious users with minimum information. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 423--431. ACM, 2015.
[103]
W. Zhang and S. Skiena. Improving movie gross prediction through news analysis. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Con- ference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology-Volume 01, pages 301--304. IEEE Computer Society, 2009.
[104]
M. Zook, M. Graham, T. Shelton, and S. Gorman. Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: a case study of the haitian earthquake. World Medical and Health Policy by Wiley On-line Library, 2(2):7--33, 2010.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Harnessing prompt-based large language models for disaster monitoring and automated reporting from social media feedbackOnline Social Networks and Media10.1016/j.osnem.2024.10029545(100295)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2023)Helping Hands - An AI based Real Time System for Effective Flood Relief Operations in Indian CitiesProceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation10.1145/3632754.3632762(83-87)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Leveraging Social Media Analysis for Effective Water ManagementCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3584931.3607003(289-292)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter  Volume 19, Issue 1
June 2017
59 pages
ISSN:1931-0145
EISSN:1931-0153
DOI:10.1145/3137597
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 2017
Published in SIGKDD Volume 19, Issue 1

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)60
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 06 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Harnessing prompt-based large language models for disaster monitoring and automated reporting from social media feedbackOnline Social Networks and Media10.1016/j.osnem.2024.10029545(100295)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2023)Helping Hands - An AI based Real Time System for Effective Flood Relief Operations in Indian CitiesProceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation10.1145/3632754.3632762(83-87)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Leveraging Social Media Analysis for Effective Water ManagementCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3584931.3607003(289-292)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Deep Learning Based Event Detection Using Multilingual Tweets During Disaster2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Generation Computing, Communication and Networking (SMART GENCON)10.1109/SMARTGENCON60755.2023.10442734(1-5)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Urgent Computing for Protecting People From Natural DisastersComputer10.1109/MC.2023.324173356:4(131-134)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Analysis of Social Media Data Using Deep Learning and NLP Method for potential use as Natural Disaster Management in Indonesia2023 2nd International Conference on Computer System, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering (COSITE)10.1109/COSITE60233.2023.10249849(143-148)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Optimizing disaster communication for future fire mitigationIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science10.1088/1755-1315/1190/1/0120271190:1(012027)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
  • (2023)ICT for public awareness culture on hydrometeorological disasterInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103690(103690)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • (2023)Improving search for gasoline during a hurricane evacuation event using social mediaEURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics10.1016/j.ejtl.2023.10011112(100111)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Role of Microblogs in Relief Operations During DisastersInternational Handbook of Disaster Research10.1007/978-981-19-8388-7_173(595-606)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media