Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3159450.3159525acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

How Near Peer Mentoring Affects Middle School Mentees

Published: 21 February 2018 Publication History

Abstract

In response to the national demand to increase participation in CS, we argue that youth's interest in computer science (CS) can be sparked by providing them with role models who are relatable and who resonate with their identities. To that end, we developed a mentoring model in which we train high schoolers to be near-peer mentors for middle schoolers learning to program in summer camps. In this paper, we present results from a mixed-methods study where we examined the relationship between mentor relatability and middle school campers' self-efficacy and interest in CS. Pre- and post-surveys were used to measure campers' affective outcomes around computing and mentor relatability. In addition, interviews and observations were used to illustrate the mechanisms that led to change in affect. Our findings suggest that mentor relatability is a significant predictor of campers' self-efficacy and interest in CS. Results from the qualitative data further exemplify how mentor relatability was perceived and manifested in the camps.

References

[1]
Catherine Ashcraft, Elizabeth Eger, and Michelle Friend. 2012. Girls in IT: The Facts, Boulder, CO: National Center for Women & IT. Retrieved from: http://austinwomenintechnology.wildapricot.org/Resources/Documents/Girls%20in%20IT.%20The%20Facts.pdf
[2]
Albert Bandura. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Phycological Review, Vol. 84(2), 191.
[3]
Albert Bandura. 1977. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
[4]
Albert Bandura. 1981. Self-referent thought: A developmental analysis of self-efficacy. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social Cognitive Development: Frontiers and Possible Futures, 200--239. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[5]
Albert Bandura. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
[6]
Carolein Bulte, Aaron Betts, Kathryn Garner, and Steven Durning. 2007. Student teaching: Views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Medical Teacher, Vol. 29, 583--590.
[7]
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Projections of occupational employment, 2014--24, https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2015/article/projections-occupation.htm, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, 2014.
[8]
Jennifer Burg, Paúl V. Pauca, William Turkett, Errin Fulp, Samuel S. Cho, Peter Santago, Daniel Cañas, and H. Donald Gage. 2015. Engaging Non-Traditional Students in Computer Science through Socially-Inspired Learning and Sustained Mentoring. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 639--644. ACM.
[9]
Cheryl Carrico, and Chosang Tendhar. 2012. The use of the social cognitive career theory to predict engineering students' motivation in the PRODUCED program, In the Am. Society for Eng. Education.
[10]
Jody Clarke-Midura, Vicki Allan, and Kevin Close. 2016. Investigating the role of being a mentor as a way of increasing interest in CS. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, 297--302. ACM.
[11]
Jody Clarke-Midura, Frederick Poole, Katarina Pantic, and Vicki Allan. In press. Playing mentor: A new strategy for recruiting young women into computer science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering.
[12]
John W. Creswell, and Vicki L. Plano. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
[13]
Jill Denner, 2011. What Predicts Middle School Girls' Interest in Computing Int. Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 3, Vol. 1. Available at: http://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/view/106
[14]
Daryl D'Souza, Margaret Hamilton, James Harland, Peter Muir, Charles Thevathayan, and Cecily Walker. 2008. Transforming learning of programming: a mentoring project. In Proc. of the tenth Conf. on Australasian Comp. Edu., Vol. 78, 75--84. Australian Computing Society, Inc.
[15]
David F. Feldon, Michelle A. Maher, Melissa Hurst, and Briana Timmerman. 2015. Faculty mentors?, graduate students', and performance-based assessments of students' research skill development. American educational research journal, 52(2), 334--370.
[16]
Elizabeth Fennema, and Julia A. Sherman. 1976. Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 5, 324--326.
[17]
Yasmin B. Kafai, Shiv Desai, Kylie Peppler, Grace Chiu, and Jesse Moya. 2008. Mentoring partnerships in a community technology centre: A constructionist approach for fostering equitable service learning. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, Vol. 16, 191--205.
[18]
Yasmin B. Kafai, Jean Griffin, Quinn Burke, Michelle Slattery, Deborah Fields, Rita Powell, Michele Grab, Susan Davidson, and Joseph Sun. 2013. A cascading mentoring pedagogy in a CS service learning course to broaden participation and perceptions. In Proc. for SIGCSE'13. Denver, Colorado.
[19]
Michael J. Karcher, Alice J. Davidson, Jean E. Rhodes, and Carla Herrera. 2010. Pygmalion in the program: The role of teenage peer mentors' attitudes in shaping their mentees' outcomes. Applied Developmental Science, vol. 14(4), 212--227.
[20]
Tim Murphey, and Hiriko Arao. 2001. Reported belief changes through near peer role modeling. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, Vol. 5(3). Retrieved from http://tesl-ej.org/ej19/a1.html
[21]
Tim Murphey, and K. Murakami. 1998. Near peer role models and changing beliefs. Academia, 65, 1--29.
[22]
Michael D. Pluth, Shannon W. Boettcher, George V. Nazin, Ann L. Greenaway, and Matthew D. Hartle. 2015. Collaboration and near-peer mentoring as a platform for sustainable science education outreach. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(4), 625--630.
[23]
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.
[24]
Mustafa S. Rashid, Oluwaseun Sobowale, and David Gore. 2011. A near-peer teaching program developed and delivered exclusively by recent medical graduates for final year medical students sitting the final objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). BMC Medical Education, 11, 11.
[25]
Nicholas Tayler, Samuel Hall, Norman J. Carr, Jonny R. Stephens, and Scott Border. 2015. Near peer teaching in medical curricula: Integrating student teachers in pathology tutorials. Medical Education Online, Vol. 20(1). Retrieved from
[26]
Olle Ten Cate, O., Irene van de Vorst, and Sjoukje van den Broek, S. 2012. Academic achievement of students tutored by near-peers. International Journal of Medical Education, 3, 6--13.
[27]
Laura S. Tenenbaum, Margery K. Anderson, Marti Jett, and Debra L. Yourick. 2014. An innovative near-peer mentoring model for undergraduate and secondary students: STEM focus. Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 39(5), 375--385.
[28]
Wang, J., Hong, H., Ravitz, J., and Ivory, M., Gender differences in factors influencing pursuit of computer science and related fields, Proc. ACM Tech. Symp. CS Educ., pp. 117--122, 2015.
[29]
Brett Williams, and James Fowler. 2014. Can near-peer teaching improve academic performance? International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 3(4), 142--149.
[30]
Williams, B. & Fowler, J. (2014). Can near-peer teaching improve academic performance? International Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 142--149.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Virtual Peer Mentoring to Develop a Sense of Belonging During COVID-19 - A Pilot StudyProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630962(283-288)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Effects of Peer Monitoring on Student Stress Level of College Students Based on Multi-Layer Perceptron Approach2024 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Data Communication Technologies and Internet of Things (IDCIoT)10.1109/IDCIoT59759.2024.10467811(1370-1375)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Experiences of Novice Design Facilitators in a Remote Participatory WorkshopProceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3596671.3598575(1-11)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 2018
1174 pages
ISBN:9781450351034
DOI:10.1145/3159450
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 February 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Badges

  • Best Paper

Author Tags

  1. app inventor
  2. middle school youth
  3. near-peer mentors

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGCSE '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGCSE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 161 of 459 submissions, 35%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE Virtual 2024
1st ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
December 5 - 8, 2024
Virtual Event , NC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)272
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)43
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Virtual Peer Mentoring to Develop a Sense of Belonging During COVID-19 - A Pilot StudyProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630962(283-288)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Effects of Peer Monitoring on Student Stress Level of College Students Based on Multi-Layer Perceptron Approach2024 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Data Communication Technologies and Internet of Things (IDCIoT)10.1109/IDCIoT59759.2024.10467811(1370-1375)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Experiences of Novice Design Facilitators in a Remote Participatory WorkshopProceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3596671.3598575(1-11)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2023
  • (2023)A Longitudinal Study of the Post-Secondary Experiences of Women of Color in Computing2023 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)10.1109/RESPECT60069.2023.00018(36-43)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2023
  • (2023)The science of science is fun: assessing the impact of interactive science demonstrations through everyday experiences and near-peer role modelingInternational Journal of Science Education10.1080/09500693.2022.216447345:5(405-429)Online publication date: 22-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Learning by doing: A multi‐level analysis of the impact of citizen science educationScience Education10.1002/sce.21810107:5(1324-1351)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Recruiting K-12 youth into computer scienceACM Inroads10.1145/352491613:2(22-29)Online publication date: 17-May-2022
  • (2022)Can female underrepresentation in information technology be solved through an awareness-based approach?Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Gender Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1145/3524501.3527606(1-5)Online publication date: 19-May-2022
  • (2022)How can Email Interventions Increase Students’ Completion of Online Homework? A Case Study Using A/B ComparisonsLAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3506860.3506874(107-118)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2022
  • (2022)What do We Know about Computing Education for K-12 in Non-formal Settings? A Systematic Literature Review of Recent ResearchProceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3501385.3543960(264-281)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media