Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3170427.3188679acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

DebugAR: Mixed Dimensional Displays for Immersive Debugging of Distributed Systems

Published: 20 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Distributed systems are very complex and in case of errors hard to debug. The high number of messages with non deterministic delivery timings, as well as message losses, data corruption and node crashes cannot be efficiently analyzed with traditional GUI tools. We propose to use immersive technologies in a multi-display environment to tackle these shortcomings. Our DebugAR approach shows a representation of the current systems state, message provenance, and the lifetime of participating nodes and offers layouting techniques. By providing a screen that shows a traditional text-log, we bridge the gap to conventional tools. Additionally, we propose an interactive 3D visualization of the message flow, combining an interactive tabletop with augmented reality using a head-mounted display. We are confident that our proposed solution can not only be used to analyze distributed system, but also for other time-dependent networks.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (lbw1713-file3.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Jenny Abrahamson, Ivan Beschastnikh, Yuriy Brun, and Michael D. Ernst. 2014. Shedding Light on Distributed System Executions. In Proc. ICSE'14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 598--599.
[2]
Apache Issues. 2017. Zookeper-335. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-335. (2017). Accessed: 2017-12-11.
[3]
Elisa Gonzalez Boix, Carlos Noguera, Tom Van Cutsem, Wolfgang De Meuter, and Theo D'Hondt. 2011. REME-D: A Reflective Epidemic Message-oriented Debugger for Ambient-oriented Applications. In Proc. SAC'11 (SAC '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1275--1281.
[4]
D. Bonyuet, M. Ma, and K. Jaffrey. 2004. 3D visualization for software development. In Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Web Services, 2004. 708--715.
[5]
Lauren Bradel, Alex Endert, Kristen Koch, Christopher Andrews, and Chris North. 2013. Large High Resolution Displays for Co-located Collaborative Sensemaking: Display Usage and Territoriality. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 71, 11 (Nov. 2013), 1078--1088.
[6]
Darren Dao, Jeannie Albrecht, Charles Killian, and Amin Vahdat. 2009. Live Debugging of Distributed Systems. In Proce CC'09 (CC '09). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 94--108.
[7]
Niklas Elmqvist. 2011. Distributed User Interfaces: State of the Art. Springer London, London, 1--12.
[8]
Steven Feiner and Ari Shamash. 1991. Hybrid User Interfaces: Breeding Virtually Bigger Interfaces for Physically Smaller Computers. In Proc. UIST'91 (UIST '91). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9--17.
[9]
Dennis Geels, Gautam Altekar, Scott Shenker, and Ion Stoica. 2006. Replay Debugging for Distributed Applications. In Pro. ATEC'06 (ATEC '06). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 27--27. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1267359.1267386.
[10]
Pooya Khaloo, Mehran Maghoumi, Eugene Taranta, David Bettner, and Joseph Laviola. 2017. Code Park: A New 3D Code Visualization Tool. In Proc. VISSOFT'17. IEEE, 43--53.
[11]
Ricardo Langner, Tom Horak, and Raimund Dachselt. 2017. VisTiles: Coordinating and Combining Co-located Mobile Devices for Visual Data Exploration. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 24, no. 1 (10 2017), 11.
[12]
Tanakorn Leesatapornwongsa, Jeffrey F. Lukman, Shan Lu, and Haryadi S. Gunawi. 2016. TaxDC: A Taxonomy of Non-Deterministic Concurrency Bugs in Datacenter Distributed Systems. SIGPLAN Not. 51, 4 (March 2016), 517--530.
[13]
J. C. Roberts. 2007. State of the Art: Coordinated Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization. In Proc. CMV'07. 61--71.
[14]
Malte Weiss, Simon Voelker, Christine Sutter, and Jan Borchers. 2010. BendDesk: Dragging Across the Curve. In Proc. ITS'10 (ITS '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--10.
[15]
C. Eric Wu, Anthony Bolmarcich, Marc Snir, David Wootton, Farid Parpia, Anthony Chan, Ewing Lusk, and William Gropp. 2000. From Trace Generation to Visualization: A Performance Framework for Distributed Parallel Systems. In Proc. SC'00 (SC '00). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, Article 50. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=370049.370458

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Design Space of Multi-Display Spatial Interactions for Visualization TasksProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3607822.3614516(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2023
  • (2021)Survey of Immersive AnalyticsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2019.292903327:3(2101-2122)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
  • (2020)Identifying Usability Issues of Software Analytics Applications in Immersive Augmented Reality2020 Working Conference on Software Visualization (VISSOFT)10.1109/VISSOFT51673.2020.00015(100-104)Online publication date: Sep-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. DebugAR: Mixed Dimensional Displays for Immersive Debugging of Distributed Systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2018
    3155 pages
    ISBN:9781450356213
    DOI:10.1145/3170427
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 April 2018

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. 3d visualizations
    2. augmented reality
    3. debugging
    4. distributed systems
    5. interactive surfaces
    6. multi-display environments

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Funding Sources

    • ScaDS BMBF Project

    Conference

    CHI '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI EA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 1,208 of 3,955 submissions, 31%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)A Design Space of Multi-Display Spatial Interactions for Visualization TasksProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3607822.3614516(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2023
    • (2021)Survey of Immersive AnalyticsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2019.292903327:3(2101-2122)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
    • (2020)Identifying Usability Issues of Software Analytics Applications in Immersive Augmented Reality2020 Working Conference on Software Visualization (VISSOFT)10.1109/VISSOFT51673.2020.00015(100-104)Online publication date: Sep-2020
    • (2019)An AR/TUI-supported Debugging Teaching EnvironmentProceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction10.1145/3369457.3369538(590-594)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2019
    • (2019)Metaphors for Software Visualization Systems Based on Virtual RealityAugmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics10.1007/978-3-030-25965-5_6(60-70)Online publication date: 28-Jul-2019

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media