Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/317210.317227acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

End-user application development: practices, policies, and organizational impacts

Published: 16 October 1986 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In their study of user managers' systems needs, Alloway and Quillard surveyed 529 managers to determine whether current systems supported their information needs. Managers reported that only 44 percent of the installed base of applications systems, most of which were transactions processing systems, were useful. Inquiry systems, which enabled managers to query data bases and to generate reports, and data analysis systems, which provided opportunities for modeling, simulation, and statistical analysis, were overwhelmingly favored by the managers surveyed.
    The findings also showed that the invisible backlog, composed of systems which users needed but which had not yet been approved as projects, consisted primarily of inquiry and analysis systems. The invisible backlog for analysis systems was 784 percent greater than the known backlog of approved development projects, demonstrating a significant shift away from the need for transactions processing type systems of the past (Alloway and Quillard, 1983).
    Users have begun to satisfy these systems needs by developing applications using fourth generation languages and microcomputer software. The actual growth of end-user computing within organizations has been overwhelming. In 1970, end-user computing at one Xerox component required very little capacity but by 1980 had grown to almost 40 percent of capacity, an increase of 20 times over the decade, with an expected increase to 75 percent of the total workload by 1990 (EDP Analyzer, 1983). Without question, the emergence of user development means a new style of computing which raises a number of research questions.

    References

    [1]
    Alavi, Maryam, "Some Thoughts on Quality Issues of End-User Developed Systems~" ACM Proceedings of the Computer Personnel and Business Data Processing Research Conference, Minneapolis, MN, May 1985, pp. 200-207.
    [2]
    Alloway, Robert M. and Quillard, Judith A., "User Managers' Systems Needs," MIS Quarterly, June 1983, pp. 27-41.
    [3]
    Brancheau, James C., Vogel, Douglas R., and Wetherbe, James C., "An Investigation of the Information Center from the User's Perspective," Database, Fall 1985, pp. 4-17.
    [4]
    Davis, Gordon, "Caution: User Developed Systems Can be Dangerous to Your Organization," MISRC Working Paper 82-04, University of Minnesota, February 1984.
    [5]
    "Future Effects of End-User Computing," EDP Analyzer, November 1983, V. 21, No. 11.
    [6]
    Guimares, Tor, "The Benefits and Problems of User Computing," Journal of Information Systems Management, V. 1, No. 4, Fall 1984, pp. 8-9.
    [7]
    McFarlan, F. Warren, McKenney, James L., and Pyburn, Philip, "The Information Archipelago: Plotting a Course," Harvard Business Review, January-February 1983, pp. 145-156.
    [8]
    Meador, C. Lawrence and Keen, Peter, "Setting Priorities for DSS Development," MIS Quarterly, June 1984, pp. 117-129.
    [9]
    Parsons, Gregory L., "Information Technology: A New Competitive Weapon," Sloan Management Review, Fall 1983, pp. 3-13.
    [10]
    Rivard, Suzanne and Huff, Sid, "User Developed Applications: Evaluation of Success from the DP Department Perspective," MIS Quarterly, March 1984.
    [11]
    Rockart, John, "Executive Information Support Systems," Sloan Working Paper No. 1167-80, CISR, MIT, April 1981.
    [12]
    Rockart, Oohn and Flannery, Lauren, "The Management of End-User Computing," Communications of the ACM, V. 26, No. 10, October 1983.
    [13]
    Sumner, Mary, "The Impact of User-Developed Applications on Managers' Information Needs," Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Inslitute of Decision Sciences, Las Vegas, November 1985.

    Cited By

    View all
    1. End-user application development: practices, policies, and organizational impacts

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCPR '86: Proceedings of the twenty-second annual computer personnel research conference on Computer personnel research conference
      October 1986
      168 pages
      ISBN:0897912071
      DOI:10.1145/317210
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 16 October 1986

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 300 of 480 submissions, 63%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)65
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media