Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

The Alternating Stock Size Problem and the Gasoline Puzzle

Published: 16 April 2018 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Given a set S of integers whose sum is zero, consider the problem of finding a permutation of these integers such that (i) all prefix sums of the ordering are nonnegative and (ii) the maximum value of a prefix sum is minimized. Kellerer et al. call this problem the stock size problem and showed that it can be approximated to within 3/2. They also showed that an approximation ratio of 2 can be achieved via several simple algorithms.
    We consider a related problem, which we call the alternating stock size problem, where the numbers of positive and negative integers in the input set S are equal. The problem is the same as that shown earlier, but we are additionally required to alternate the positive and negative numbers in the output ordering. This problem also has several simple 2-approximations. We show that it can be approximated to within 1.79.
    Then we show that this problem is closely related to an optimization version of the gasoline puzzle due to Lovász, in which we want to minimize the size of the gas tank necessary to go around the track. We present a 2-approximation for this problem, using a natural linear programming relaxation whose feasible solutions are doubly stochastic matrices. Our novel rounding algorithm is based on a transformation that yields another doubly stochastic matrix with special properties, from which we can extract a suitable permutation.

    References

    [1]
    H. M. Abdel-Wahab and T. Kameda. 1978. Scheduling to minimize maximum cumulative cost subject to series-parallel precedence constraints. Operations Research 26, 1, 141--158.
    [2]
    Wojciech Banaszczyk. 1987. The Steinitz constant of the plane. Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik 373, 218--220.
    [3]
    J. Blazewicz, J. K. Lenstra, and A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan. 1983. Scheduling subject to resource constraints: Classification and complexity. Discrete Applied Mathematics 5, 1, 11--24.
    [4]
    Dirk Briskorn, Byung-Cheon Choi, Kangbok Lee, Joseph Leung, and Michael Pinedo. 2010. Complexity of single machine scheduling subject to nonnegative inventory constraints. European Journal of Operational Research 207, 2, 605--619.
    [5]
    J. Carlier and A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan. 1982. Scheduling subject to nonrenewable-resource constraints. Operations Research Letters 1, 2, 52--55.
    [6]
    Victor S. Grinberg and Sergey V. Sevast’yanov. 1980. On the value of the Steinitz constant. Functional Analysis and Its Applications 14, 2, 125--126.
    [7]
    Péter Györgyi and Tamás Kis. 2014. Approximation schemes for single machine scheduling with non-renewable resource constraints. Journal of Scheduling 17, 2, 135--144.
    [8]
    Péter Györgyi and Tamás Kis. 2015. Approximability of scheduling problems with resource consuming jobs. Annals of Operations Research 235, 1, 319--336.
    [9]
    Hans Kellerer, Vladimir Kotov, Franz Rendl, and Gerhard J. Woeginger. 1998. The stock size problem. Operations Research 46, 3, S1--S12.
    [10]
    László Lovász. 1979. Combinatorial Problems and Exercises. North-Holland.
    [11]
    Clyde L. Monma. 1980. Sequencing to minimize the maximum job cost. Operations Research 28, 4, 942--951.
    [12]
    Ehab Morsy and Erwin Pesch. 2015. Approximation algorithms for inventory constrained scheduling on a single machine. Journal of Scheduling 18, 6, 645--653.
    [13]
    Klaus Neumann and Christoph Schwindt. 2003. Project scheduling with inventory constraints. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 56, 3, 513--533.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Algorithms
    ACM Transactions on Algorithms  Volume 14, Issue 2
    April 2018
    339 pages
    ISSN:1549-6325
    EISSN:1549-6333
    DOI:10.1145/3196491
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 April 2018
    Accepted: 01 December 2017
    Revised: 01 November 2017
    Received: 01 December 2016
    Published in TALG Volume 14, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Approximation algorithms
    2. gasoline puzzle
    3. stock size problem

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    • European Research Council under ERC
    • LabEx PERSYVAL-Lab

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 105
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media