Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3197091.3197125acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How seamless are technology-rich learning environments? the voice of IT educators

Published: 02 July 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Educational environments in higher education Information Technology (IT) courses typically involve the use of multiple technologies. Such technology-rich learning and teaching environments (TRLTEs) can enhance a student’s learning experiences and support learning in different settings (e.g., in-class and out-of-class, individual and group learning) and promote flexibility in learning in terms of time, space and access to learning resources. However, these can be complex teaching environments for educators to manage. A challenge for educators is to ensure that learning across multiple technologies and contexts happens seamlessly. Seamless learning is a notion whereby students transition smoothly from one learning setting to another, typically aided by technology. This paper reports the findings of an exploratory qualitative study of IT educators’ experiences of a TRLTE. Semi-structured interviews were used to elicit IT educators’ views of enablers and barriers to learning seamlessly. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis technique. The findings revealed several issues in facilitating learning in a TRLTE and IT educators used various technologies to bridge the seams in their students’ learning. We discuss the findings and the implications for providing a seamless learning experience.

References

[1]
K. Burden and M. Kearney. 2016. Future Scenarios for Mobile Science Learning. Research in Science Education 46, 2 (2016).
[2]
s11165-016-9514-1
[3]
Nadire Cavus and Dogan Ibrahim. 2009. m-Learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology 40, 1 (jan 2009), 78–91. 00801.x
[4]
Tak-Wai Chan, Jeremy Roschelle, Sherry Hsi, Kinshuk, Mike Sharples, Tom Brown, Charles Patton, John Cherniavsky, Roy Pea, Cathie Norris, Elliot Soloway, Nicolas Balacheff, Marlene Scardamalia, Pierre Dillenbourg, Chee-Kit Looi, Marcelo Milrad, and Ulrich Hoppe. 2006. One-To-One Technology-Enhanced Learning: an Opportunity for Global Research Collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 01, 01 (2006), 3–29. S1793206806000032
[5]
Linda Creanor, Kathryn Trinder, Doug Gowan, and Carol Howells. 2006. LEX: Learner experiences of e-Learning: Final Project Report. Technical Report August. 1– 44 pages. arXiv: arXiv:1011.1669v3
[6]
John W. Creswell. 2009. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications Ltd, Los Angeles. 260 pages.
[7]
Teresa Franklin and Li-Wei Peng. 2008. Mobile math: math educators and students engage in mobile learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 20, 2 (oct 2008), 69–80.
[8]
Jennifer Groff. 2013. Technology-rich innovative learning environments. Oecd.Org (2013), 1–30. arXiv: arXiv:1011.1669v3
[9]
Jisc. 2006. Designing Spaces for Effective Learning:A guide to 21st century learning space design. Technical Report 27/08/09. 1–36 pages. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/ eli{_}learningspaces.html
[10]
S.C. Kong and Y. Song. 2014. The impact of a principle-based pedagogical design on inquiry-based learning in a seamless learning environment in Hong Kong. Educational Technology and Society 17, 2 (2014).
[11]
Agnes Kukulska-Hulme. 2007. Mobile usability in educational contexts: What have we learnt? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 8, 2 (2007). http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2. 0-34250688362{&}partnerID=tZOtx3y1
[12]
Mary R. Lea and Sylvia Jones. 2011. Digital literacies in higher education: exploring textual and technological practice. Studies in Higher Education 36, 4 (2011), 377–393.
[13]
C.-K. Looi, P. Seow, B. Zhang, H.-J. So, W. Chen, and L.-H. Wong. 2010. Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology 41, 2 (2010).
[14]
2008.00912.x
[15]
C.-K. Looi, D. Sun, and W. Xie. 2015. Exploring students’ progression in an inquiry science curriculum enabled by mobile learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 8, 1 (2015).
[16]
C.-K. Looi and L.-H. Wong. 2014. Implementing mobile learning curricula in schools: A programme of research from innovation to scaling. Educational Technology and Society 17, 2 (2014).
[17]
Nadia Pantidi, Hugh Robinson, and Yvonne Rogers. 2010. Understanding technology-rich learning spaces. In 28th CHI Conference. Oepn UUniversity y, 1 – 4.
[18]
Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, and Adrian Thornhill. 2009. Research methods for business students (5th editio ed.). Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate. 649 pages. https://is.vsfs.cz/el/6410/leto2014/BA{_}BSeBM/um/ Research{_}Methods{_}for{_}Business{_}Students{_}{_}5th{_}Edition.pdf
[19]
Carly Shuler, Niaal Winters, and Mark West. 2013. THE FUTURE OF MOBILE LEARNING - Implications for policy makers and planners. UNESCO - United National Educational. (2013), 1–44.
[20]
Y. Toh, H.-J. So, P. Seow, W. Chen, and C.-K. Looi. 2013. Seamless learning in the mobile age: A theoretical and methodological discussion on using cooperative inquiry to study digital kids on-the-move. Learning, Media and Technology 38, 3 (2013).
[21]
Kirsty Williamson and Graeme Johanson (Eds.). 2013. Research Methods: Information, Systems and Contexts. Tilde Publishing and Distribution. 556 pages.
[22]
Daniel T Willingham, Elizabeth M Hughes, and David G Dobolyi. 2016. The Scientific Status of Learning Styles Theories. Teaching of Psychology 42, 3 (2016), 266–271.
[23]
L.-H. Wong. 2013. Enculturating self-directed learners through a facilitated seamless learning process framework. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 22, 3 (2013).
[24]
L.-H. Wong, C.-K. Chin, C.-L. Tan, and M. Liu. 2010. Students’ personal and social meaning making in a Chinese idiom mobile learning environment. Educational Technology and Society 13, 4 (2010).
[25]
Lung Hsiang Wong and Chee Kit Looi. 2011. What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. (2011).

Index Terms

  1. How seamless are technology-rich learning environments? the voice of IT educators

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ITiCSE 2018: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
    July 2018
    394 pages
    ISBN:9781450357074
    DOI:10.1145/3197091
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 July 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Seamless learning
    2. educational technology
    3. interactive learning environment
    4. mobile learning
    5. technology-rich teaching and learning environments

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ITiCSE '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

    Upcoming Conference

    ITiCSE '25
    Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
    June 27 - July 2, 2025
    Nijmegen , Netherlands

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 130
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media