Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3209281.3209365acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Culture of openness: the beginning of open government in municipalities in Germany

Published: 30 May 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Open government and open government data are not new ideas but its implementation is still in its infancies. Germany has entered the Open Government Partnership in 2016. According to a regional agreement of the federal state North Rhine-Westphalia - the federal state with the highest population in Germany - the open exchange of best practice examples and improvement of open government development is anticipated. Based on an expert questionnaire and web content analysis we will present a case study on the current development of open government in North Rhine-Westphalia and discuss the potential for the future. We focus on the current understanding of open government to obtain insights if there is a common understanding or if there are different views. Furthermore, we consider the status regarding the realization of open government and expectations of future open government cooperation. Based on the results we propose four pillars of maturity that could be defined towards an open municipality. These pillars will be a part of a comprehensive framework for the adoption and implementation of open government at the municipal level.

References

[1]
{n. d.}. Arbeitskreis Open Government Partnership (OGP) Deutschland. ({n. d.}). https://opengovpartnership.de/
[2]
{n. d.}. Open Knowledge: What is Open? ({n. d.}). https://okfn.org/opendata/
[3]
Lisa Blomgren Bingham, Tina Nabatchi, and Rosemary O'Leary. 2005. The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review 65, 5 (sep 2005), 547--558.
[4]
Kaja J. Fietkiewicz, Agnes Mainka, and Wolfgang G Stock. 2016. eGovernment in cities of the knowledge society. An empirical investigation of smart cities' governmental websites. Government Information Quarterly (aug 2016).
[5]
Uwe Flick. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications. 528 pages.
[6]
Freedom House. 2016. About freedom on the net. (2016). https://freedomhouse.org/report-types/freedom-net
[7]
Stephan G Grimmelikhuijsen and Mary K Feeney. 2016. Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments. 00 (2016), 1--12.
[8]
Teresa M Harrison, G Brian Burke, Meghan Cook, Anthony Cresswell, and Jana Hrdinová. 2011. Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. In 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. ACM, College Park, MD, 245--253.
[9]
F. La Rue. 2011. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. Technical Report. United Nations, New York, NY. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/17session/A.HRC.17.27{_}en.pdf
[10]
P.J. Lor and J. J. Britz. 2007. Challenges of the approaching knowledge society: Major international issues facing LIS professionals. Libri 57, 3 (sep 2007), 111--122.
[11]
Agnes Mainka, Sarah Hartmann, Christine Meschede, and Wolfgang G Stock. 2015. Open government: Transforming data into value-added city services. In Citizen's right to the digital city: Urban interfaces, activism, and placemaking, Marcus Foth, Martin Brynskov, and Timo Ojala (Eds.). Springer, Singapore, SG, 199--214.
[12]
Patrice McDermott. 2010. Building open government. Government Information Quarterly 27, 4 (oct 2010), 401--413.
[13]
Albert Meijer, Maarten Hillebrandt, Deirdre Curtin, and Gijs Jan Brandsma. 2010. Open Government: Connecting Discourses on Transparency and Participation. NIG Conference 2010 (2010), 1--23.
[14]
Open NRW. 2016. Rahmenvereinbarung über die Zusammenarbeit im Bereich des Open Government in Nordrhein-Westfalen "Open Government Pakt für NRW". (2016). https://open.nrw/sites/default/files/asset/document/rahmenvereinbarung{_}zum{_}open{_}government{_}pakt{_}nrw.pdf
[15]
Alessandra Orofino. 2014. It's our city. Lets fix it {Video file}. (2014). https://www.ted.com/speakers/alessandra{_}orofino
[16]
Shailendra C. Jain Palvia and Sushil S. Sharma. 2007. E-government and e-governance: Definitions/domain framework and status around the world. In International Conference on E-governance. 1--12.
[17]
Michel Pimbert and Tom Wakeford. 2001. Deliberative democracy and citizen empowerment. Participatory Learning and Action {PLA Notes 40} (2001), 23--28. http://www.iied.org/pla-40-deliberative-democracy-citizen-empowerment
[18]
Reporters without Borders. 2016. World press freedom index 2016. (2016). https://rsf.org/en/
[19]
Dcat A P De Spezifikation and Metadaten Dokumentes. 2017. DCAT-AP.de Spezifikation. Deutsche Adaption des, Data Catalogue Application Profile'' (DCAT-AP) für Datenportale in Europa. (2017), 47 pages. http://dcat-ap.de/def/dcatde/1{_}0/spec/specification.pdf
[20]
United Nations. 2016. United Nation e-governmnet survey 2016. E-government in support of sustainable development. Technical Report. United Nations, New York. http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN96407.pdf
[21]
Harlan Yu and David G Robinson. 2012. The new ambiguity of open government. 59 UCLA L. Rev. Disc. 178, 2012 (2012), 178--208.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Deconstructing Human-assisted Video Transcription and Annotation for Legislative ProceedingsDigital Government: Research and Practice10.1145/33953161:3(1-24)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2020

Index Terms

  1. Culture of openness: the beginning of open government in municipalities in Germany

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age
    May 2018
    889 pages
    ISBN:9781450365260
    DOI:10.1145/3209281
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 30 May 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Germany
    2. case study
    3. open data
    4. open government
    5. transparency

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    dg.o '18

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Deconstructing Human-assisted Video Transcription and Annotation for Legislative ProceedingsDigital Government: Research and Practice10.1145/33953161:3(1-24)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2020

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media