Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3209635.3209655acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswccceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exam Wrappers: Not a Silver Bullet

Published: 04 May 2018 Publication History

Abstract

An exam wrapper is a structured activity that students engage in after their instructor has graded and returned an exam, and is designed to promote self-reflection and improve study practices. This paper describes two studies examining the efficacy and student perceptions of exam wrappers. The studies were conducted at two major Canadian universities, using complementary research designs. We report that neither study produced evidence that exam wrappers have a significant effect on final exam scores or on course drop rates. However, we also find that the use of wrappers was associated with improved rates of test pickup and increased scores on a course evaluation question regarding the fairness of evaluation methods. Given these results, we advise instructors who are considering the use of exam wrappers to review the evidence for other possible interventions that may more effectively serve the same goals.
(Full paper originally published as: Ben Stephenson, Michelle Craig, Daniel Zingaro, Diane Horton, Danny Heap, & Elaine Huynh. Exam Wrappers: Not a Silver Bullet. In SIGCSE '2017: Proceedings of the 2017 ASM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, March 8--11, 2017, Seattle, Washington, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017701)

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)What Do We Think We Think We Are Doing?Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research10.1145/3372782.3406263(2-13)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2020

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WCCCE '18: Proceedings of the 23rd Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education
May 2018
86 pages
ISBN:9781450358057
DOI:10.1145/3209635
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 May 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WCCCE '18

Acceptance Rates

WCCCE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 19 of 29 submissions, 66%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 78 of 117 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)What Do We Think We Think We Are Doing?Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research10.1145/3372782.3406263(2-13)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media