Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3209978.3210107acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

Consistency and Variation in Kernel Neural Ranking Model

Published: 27 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

This paper studies the consistency of the kernel-based neural ranking model K-NRM, a recent state-of-the-art neural IR model, which is important for reproducible research and deployment in the industry. We find that K-NRM has low variance on relevance-based metrics across experimental trials. In spite of this low variance in overall performance, different trials produce different document rankings for individual queries. The main source of variance in our experiments was found to be different latent matching patterns captured by K-NRM. In the IR-customized word embeddings learned by K-NRM, the query-document word pairs follow two different matching patterns that are equally effective, but align word pairs differently in the embedding space. The different latent matching patterns enable a simple yet effective approach to construct ensemble rankers, which improve K-NRM's effectiveness and generalization abilities.

References

[1]
Aleksandr Chuklin, Ilya Markov, and Maarten de Rijke . 2015. Click Models for Web Search. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services (2015), 1--115.
[2]
Jiafeng Guo, Yixing Fan, Qingyao Ai, and W Bruce Croft . 2016. A deep relevance matching model for ad-hoc retrieval Proceedings of the 25th ACM CIKM. ACM, 55--64.
[3]
Eldad Haber and Lars Ruthotto . 2017. Stable architectures for deep neural networks. Inverse Problems, Vol. 34, 1 (2017), 014004.
[4]
Po-Sen Huang, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, Alex Acero, and Larry Heck . 2013. Learning deep structured semantic models for web search using clickthrough data Proceedings of the 22nd ACM CIKM. ACM, 2333--2338.
[5]
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton . 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks Advances in NIPS.
[6]
Anders Krogh and Jesper Vedelsby . 1995. Neural network ensembles, cross validation, and active learning Advances in NIPS. 231--238.
[7]
Yiqun Liu, Xiaohui Xie, Chao Wang, Jian-Yun Nie, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma . 2016. Time-Aware Click Model. ACM TOIS (2016), 16.
[8]
Yelong Shen, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, and Grégoire Mesnil . 2014. A latent semantic model with convolutional-pooling structure for information retrieval Proceedings of the 23rd ACM CIKM. ACM, 101--110.
[9]
Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V Le . 2014. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks Advances in NIPS. 3104--3112.
[10]
Chenyan Xiong, Zhuyun Dai, Jamie Callan, Zhiyuan Liu, and Russell Power . 2017. End-to-end neural ad-hoc ranking with kernel pooling Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2017. ACM, 55--64.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGIR '18: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval
June 2018
1509 pages
ISBN:9781450356572
DOI:10.1145/3209978
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 June 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ensemble-rankers
  2. neural-ir
  3. retrieval model stability

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGIR '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGIR '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 86 of 409 submissions, 21%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 287
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)40
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media