research-article

Towards Augmented Reality in Quality Assurance Processes

Authors:

Mathias Müller,

Franziska Hannß, and

Rainer GrohAuthors Info & Claims

MMVE '18: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Immersive Mixed and Virtual Environment Systems

June 2018

Pages 16 - 21

https://doi.org/10.1145/3210438.3210442

Published: 12 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) has gained exceptional importance in supporting task performance. Particularly, in quality assurance (QA) processes in the automotive sector AR offers a diversity of use cases. In this paper we propose an interface design which projects information as a digital canvas on the surface of vehicle components. Based on a requirement analysis, we discuss design aspects and describe our application in applying the quality assurance process of a luxury automaker. The application includes a personal view on spatial information embedded in a guided interaction process as a design solution that can be applied to enhance QA processes.

References

[1]

Haslina Arshad, Shahan Ahmad Chowdhury, Lam Meng Chun, Behrang Parhizkar, and Waqas Khalid Obeidy. 2016. A Freeze-object Interaction Technique for Handheld Augmented Reality Systems. Multimedia Tools Appl. 75, 10 (May 2016), 5819--5839.

Digital Library

[2]

Ronald Azuma, Yohan Baillot, Reinhold Behringer, Steven Feiner, Simon Julier, and Blair MacIntyre. 2001. Recent Advances in Augmented Reality. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 21, 6 (Nov. 2001), 34--47.

Digital Library

[3]

Ronald Azuma and Chris Furmanski. 2003. Evaluating Label Placement for Augmented Reality View Management. In Proceedings of the 2Nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR '03). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 66--.

Digital Library

[4]

Huidong Bai, Gun A. Lee, and Mark Billinghurst. 2012. Freeze View Touch and Finger Gesture Based Interaction Methods for Handheld Augmented Reality Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 126--131.

Digital Library

[5]

Sebastian Boring, Dominikus Baur, Andreas Butz, Sean Gustafson, and Patrick Baudisch. 2010. Touch Projector: Mobile Interaction Through Video. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2287--2296.

Digital Library

[6]

Juanita Brown. 2006. The World Café - Shaping Our Futures through Conversations that Matter. Journal of OrgChange Mgmt 19, 2 (March 2006), 266--268.

[7]

Alan B. Craig. 2013. Understanding Augmented Reality: Concepts and Applications. Newnes.

Digital Library

[8]

Arindam Dey and Christian Sandor. 2014. Lessons learned: Evaluating visualizations for occluded objects in handheld augmented reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72, 10 (Oct. 2014), 704--716.

Digital Library

[9]

David Drascic and Paul Milgram. 1996. Perceptual issues in augmented reality, Vol. 2653. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 123--135.

[10]

Inc FARO Technologies. 2017. Augmented Reality for Quality Assurance. https://www.faro.com/en-gb/news/augmented-reality-for-quality-assurance/. (2017). Accessed: 2017-03-15.

[11]

C. Furmanski, R. Azuma, and M. Daily. 2002. Augmented-reality visualizations guided by cognition: perceptual heuristics for combining visible and obscured information. In Proceedings. International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 215--320.

Digital Library

[12]

Steffen Gauglitz, Benjamin Nuernberger, Matthew Turk, and Tobias Höllerer. 2014. In Touch with the Remote World: Remote Collaboration with Augmented Reality Drawings and Virtual Navigation. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 197--205.

Digital Library

[13]

Thomas Geymayer, Markus Steinberger, Alexander Lex, Marc Streit, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2014. Show Me the Invisible: Visualizing Hidden Content. Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst CHI -apos14 (2014), 3705--3714.

Digital Library

[14]

Georg Glaeser. 2018. Extreme and Subjective Perspectives. In Topics in Algebra, Analysis and Geometry.

[15]

J. Grubert, H. Seichter, and D. Schmalstieg. 2014. {DEMO} Towards user perspective augmented reality for public displays. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 339--340.

[16]

Sean G. Gustafson and Pourang P. Irani. 2007. Comparing Visualizations for Tracking Off-screen Moving Targets. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2399--2404.

Digital Library

[17]

S. E. Hove and B. Anda. 2005. Experiences from conducting semi-structured interviews in empirical software engineering research. In 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'05). 10 pp.--23.

Digital Library

[18]

E. Kruijff, J. E. Swan, and S. Feiner. 2010. Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited. In 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 3--12.

[19]

Gun A. Lee, Ungyeon Yang, Yongwan Kim, Dongsik Jo, Ki-Hong Kim, Jae Ha Kim, and Jin Sung Choi. 2009. Freeze-Set-Go Interaction Method for Handheld Mobile Augmented Reality Environments. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143--146.

Digital Library

[20]

Rui Li and Jiayan Zhao. 2017. Off-Screen Landmarks on Mobile Devices: Levels of Measurement and the Perception of Distance on Resized Icons. Künstliche Intelligenz 31, 2 (May 2017), 141--149.

[21]

Peter Mohr, Bernhard Kerbl, Michael Donoser, Dieter Schmalstieg, and Denis Kalkofen. 2015. Retargeting Technical Documentation to Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3337--3346.

Digital Library

[22]

A. Nagyová and H. Paciova. 2010. Quality Evaluation Methodology for Research Projects. DAAAM International Scientific Book.

[23]

Andrew YC Nee and Soh-Khim Ong. 2013. Virtual and augmented reality applications in manufacturing. IFAC proceedings volumes 46, 9 (2013), 15--26.

[24]

Gerhard Reitmayr and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2004. Collaborative augmented reality for outdoor navigation and information browsing. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Location Based Services and TeleCartography.

[25]

Ruth Rosenholtz, Yuanzhen Li, Jonathan Mansfield, and Zhenlan Jin. 2005. Feature Congestion: A Measure of Display Clutter. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 761--770.

Digital Library

[26]

Torben Schinke, Niels Henze, and Susanne Boll. 2010. Visualization of Off-screen Objects in Mobile Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 313--316.

Digital Library

[27]

M. H. Sung, Y. Choi, H. Ko, and J. I. Hwang. 2014. Level-of-detail AR: Managing points of interest for attentive augmented reality. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE). 351--352.

[28]

Yao-Ting Sung, Kuo-En Chang, Huei-Tse Hou, and Pin-Fu Chen. 2010. Designing an Electronic Guidebook for Learning Engagement in a Museum of History. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 1 (Jan. 2010), 74--83.

Digital Library

[29]

Matthew Tait and Mark Billinghurst. 2015. The Effect of View Independence in a Collaborative AR System. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 24, 6 (Dec. 2015), 563--589.

Digital Library

[30]

M. Tatzgern, V. Orso, D. Kalkofen, G. Jacucci, L. Gamberini, and D. Schmalstieg. 2016. Adaptive information density for augmented reality displays. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 83--92.

[31]

Giles Westerfield, Antonija Mitrovic, and Mark Billinghurst. 2015. Intelligent Augmented Reality Training for Motherboard Assembly. Int J Artif Intell Educ 25, 1 (March 2015), 157--172.

[32]

Jan Wojdziak, Bastian Bansemir, Bettina Kirchner, Berit Lochner, and Rainer Groh. 2016. Low-Fidelity Prototyping for Collaborative User Interface Specifications. In HCI International 2016 - Posters' Extended Abstracts (Communications in Computer and Information Science). Springer, Cham, 167--172.

Cited By

Albers ABohné TTadeja S(2023)Augmented Reality for Quality Inspection: A User-Centred Systematic Review of Use Cases, Trends and Technology2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct60411.2023.00038(146-153)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct60411.2023.00038
Seeliger ACheng LNetland T(2023)Augmented reality for industrial quality inspectionComputers in Industry10.1016/j.compind.2023.103985151:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.compind.2023.103985
Brunschwig LCampos-Lopez RGuerra Ede Lara J(2021)Towards Domain-Specific Modelling Environments based on Augmented Reality2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results (ICSE-NIER)10.1109/ICSE-NIER52604.2021.00020(56-60)Online publication date: May-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-NIER52604.2021.00020
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Towards Augmented Reality in Quality Assurance Processes
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms
      1. Mixed / augmented reality
  2. Visualization
    1. Visualization application domains
      1. Information visualization

Recommendations

Haptics in Augmented Reality
ICMCS '99: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems - Volume 2

An augmented reality system merges synthetic sensory information into a user's perception of a three-dimensional environment. An important performance goal for an augmented reality system is that the user perceives a single seamless environment. In most ...
Read More
Augmented reality as perceptual reality
VSMM'06: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Interactive Technologies and Sociotechnical Systems

As shown in Paul Milgram et al’s Reality-Virtuality Continuum (1994), Augmented Reality occupies a very unique status in the spectrum of Mixed Reality. Unlike Virtual Reality, which is completely made up of the virtual and has been the most important ...
Read More
Multimodal augmented reality: the norm rather than the exception
MVAR '16: Proceedings of the 2016 workshop on Multimodal Virtual and Augmented Reality

Augmented reality (AR) is commonly seen as a technology that overlays virtual imagery onto a participant's view of the world. In line with this, most AR research is focused on what we see. In this paper, we challenge this focus on vision and make a case ...
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

MMVE '18: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Immersive Mixed and Virtual Environment Systems

June 2018

42 pages

ISBN:9781450357715

DOI:10.1145/3210438

General Chair:
Wei Tsang Ooi
National University of Singapore, Singapore

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 June 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Sächsische Aufbaubank

Conference

MMSys '18

Sponsor:

SIGMM

MMSys '18: 9th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference

June 12 - 15, 2018

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 26 of 44 submissions, 59%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
251
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)15
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Albers ABohné TTadeja S(2023)Augmented Reality for Quality Inspection: A User-Centred Systematic Review of Use Cases, Trends and Technology2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct60411.2023.00038(146-153)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct60411.2023.00038
Seeliger ACheng LNetland T(2023)Augmented reality for industrial quality inspectionComputers in Industry10.1016/j.compind.2023.103985151:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.compind.2023.103985
Brunschwig LCampos-Lopez RGuerra Ede Lara J(2021)Towards Domain-Specific Modelling Environments based on Augmented Reality2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results (ICSE-NIER)10.1109/ICSE-NIER52604.2021.00020(56-60)Online publication date: May-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-NIER52604.2021.00020
Hube NMüller MLapczyna EWojdziak J(2020)Mixed Reality based Collaboration for Design Processesi-com10.1515/icom-2020-001219:2(123-137)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2020-0012

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents