Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3210604.3210646acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Does AI make PD obsolete?: exploring challenges from artificial intelligence to participatory design

Published: 20 August 2018 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper1, we explore if and how Artificial Intelligence (AI) challenges Participatory Design (PD). We base our analysis on the basic characteristics of AI and its subfield Machine Learning and discuss how and what kinds of design decisions users are able to participate in when technology that includes AI is designed. We conclude that AI challenges PD but that classic PD methods can be useful for parts of the design process. However, AI poses new challenges to PD all originating in the fact that AI technologies change unpredictably over time.

References

[1]
L. Bainbridge, Ironies of automation, Automatica, 19 (1983), pp. 775--779.
[2]
I. Björnsdottir and G. B. Verne, Exhibiting caution with use of big data: The case of amphetamine in Iceland's prescription registry, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, in press (2018).
[3]
M. A. Blythe and P. C. Wright, Pastiche scenarios: Fiction as a resource for user centred design, Interacting with Computers, 18 (2006), pp. 1139--1164.
[4]
E. Brandt, T. Binder and E. B.-N. Sanders, Tools and techniques: ways to engage telling, making and enacting, in J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, eds., Routledge international handbook of participatory design, Routledge, London, 2013.
[5]
T. Bratteteig and G. Verne, Creating a space for action within sociomaterial entanglements, Scandianavian Journal of Information Systems, 24 (2012), pp. 99--108.
[6]
T. Bratteteig and I. Wagner, Unpacking the Notion of Participation in Participatory Design, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 25 (2016), pp. 425--475.
[7]
J. Copeland, Artificial intelligence: a philosophical introduction, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK, 1993.
[8]
M. L. Cummings, Automation Bias in Intelligent Time Critical Decision Support Systems, AIAA 3rd Intelligent Systems Conference, AIAA, 2004.
[9]
G. Dove, K. Halskov, J. Forlizzi and J. Zimmerman, UX Design Innovation: Challenges for Working with Machine Learning as a Design Material, CHI, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2017.
[10]
H. Dreyfus, What computers can't do, Harper & Row, 1972.
[11]
H. Dreyfus, What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason, MIT Press, 1986.
[12]
A. Dunne and F. Raby, Design noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2011.
[13]
A. Følstad and P. B. Brandtzæg, Chatbots and the New World of HCI, interactions, 2017 (2017), pp. 38--42.
[14]
L. Gasser, The integration of computing and routine work, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 4 (1986), pp. 205--225.
[15]
Y. Goldberg, Neural Network Methods for Natural Language Processing, Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 10 (2017), pp. 1--309.
[16]
I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio and A. Courville, Deep Learning, MIT Press, 2016.
[17]
J. Hill, W. Randolph Ford and I. G. Farreras, Real conversations with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human-human online conversations and human-chatbot conversations, Computers in Human Behavior, 49 (2015), pp. 245--250.
[18]
L. E. Holmquist, Intelligence on Tap: Artificial Intelligence as a New Design Material, interactions, 2017 (2017), pp. 28--33.
[19]
A. Huxley, Brave New World, Harper Perennial Modern Classics; Reprint edition 2006, 1932.
[20]
Q. V. Liao, M. M. Hussain, P. Chandar, M. Davis, Y. Khazaen, M. P. Crasso, D. Wang, M. Muller, N. S. Shami and W. Geyer, All Work and No Play? Conversations with a Question-and-Answer Chatbot in the Wild, CHI 2018, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2018.
[21]
K. W. Miller, M. J. Wolf and F. S. Grodzinsky, Why we should have seen that coming, ORBIT Journal, 1 (2017).
[22]
M. Muller and Q. V. Liao, Exploring AI Ethics and Values through Participatory Design Fictions., Human Computer Interaction Consortium, Pajaro Dunes, Watsonville, CA, 2017.
[23]
K. Nygaard, När kunnskap blir vara: Konsekvenser i samhälls- och yrkesliv av kunskapsindustrin, Lecture at Linköping Conference on Knowledge-Based Systems, Linköping, Sweden, 1986.
[24]
W. Odom, J. Zimmerman, S. Davidoff, J. Forlizzi, A. K. Dey and M. K. Lee, A fieldwork of the future with user enactments, Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, ACM, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 2012, pp. 338--347.
[25]
W. J. Orlikowski, Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work, Organization Studies, 28 (2007), pp. 1435--1448.
[26]
G. Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four, Secker & Warburg, London, 1949.
[27]
S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial intelligence : A modern approach, Pearson, Boston, 2010.
[28]
D. Schön, The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action, Aldershot: Arena, 1995.
[29]
J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, eds., Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, Routledge, 2013.
[30]
L. Suchman, Plans and situated actions : The Problem of Human-Machine Communication, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1987.
[31]
R. Turner, Logics for artificial intelligence, Ellis Horwood Limited series in Artificial Intelligence, Chichester, UK., 1994.
[32]
G. Verne, Formalisering av naturlige språk : konstruksjon av en syntaksanalysator for et fragment av norsk basert på Montague-grammatikk, Departement of Informatics, University of Oslo, 1983.
[33]
G. Verne, The winners are those who have used the old paper form. On citizens and automated public services, PhD Thesis, Department of Informatics, UiO, University of Oslo, 2015.
[34]
J. Weizenbaum, Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation, W.H. Freeman and Company, 1976.
[35]
T. Winograd, Understanding Natural Language, Academic Press, 1972.
[36]
Q. Yang, A. Scuito, J. Zimmerman, J. Forlizzi and A. Steinfeld, Investigating How Experienced UX Designers Effectively Work with Machine Learning, DIS '18, Hong Kong, 2018.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Challenges and Facilitation Approaches for the Participatory Design of AI-based clinical decision support systems - Protocol for a scoping review (Preprint)JMIR Research Protocols10.2196/58185Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Investigating How Generative AI Affects Decision-Making in Participatory Design: Shifting the space to make design choicesProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685384(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Participatory Design meets Artificial Intelligence: Co-imagining mutual learning of AI technologies and designing with AI toolsAdjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3677045.3685471(1-3)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2
August 2018
230 pages
ISBN:9781450355742
DOI:10.1145/3210604
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 August 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ACM AI
  2. ML
  3. PD
  4. design
  5. machine learning

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

PDC '18
PDC '18: Participatory Design Conference 2018
August 20 - 24, 2018
Hasselt and Genk, Belgium

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 49 of 289 submissions, 17%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)240
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)73
Reflects downloads up to 10 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Challenges and Facilitation Approaches for the Participatory Design of AI-based clinical decision support systems - Protocol for a scoping review (Preprint)JMIR Research Protocols10.2196/58185Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Investigating How Generative AI Affects Decision-Making in Participatory Design: Shifting the space to make design choicesProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685384(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Participatory Design meets Artificial Intelligence: Co-imagining mutual learning of AI technologies and designing with AI toolsAdjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3677045.3685471(1-3)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Potentials and Challenges of Hybrid Participatory Design Tools in European Urban PlanningProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Situated Actions, Doctoral Colloquium, PDC places, Communities - Volume 310.1145/3661456.3666068(64-67)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Beyond Urban Challenges – Virtual Reality Tools in Participatory Design ProcessesProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669874(81-86)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Supportive Role of Artificial Intelligence in Participatory Design: A Systematic ReviewProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669868(37-44)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Reconfiguring Participatory Design to Resist AI RealismProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669867(31-36)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Characterising CSCW Research on Human-Robot CollaborationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36409998:CSCW1(1-31)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)From Primary Education to Premium Workforce: Drawing on K-12 Approaches for Developing AI LiteracyProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642607(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Sketching AI Concepts with Capabilities and Examples: AI Innovation in the Intensive Care UnitProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641896(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media