Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Does the Public Still Look at Public Displays?: A Field Observation of Public Displays in the Wild

Published: 05 July 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Public displays are widely used for displaying information in public space, such as shopping centres. They are typically programmed to display advertisements or general information about the space in which they are situated. Due to recent advances in technology, public displays are becoming ubiquitous in space around cities and can potentially enable new interactions with public space. However, despite these advances, research reports that public displays are often found to be: (1) generally irrelevant to the space in which they are situated; and (2) ignored by passers-by. Although much research has focused on tackling these issues, a gap remains regarding knowledge about how public displays in the wild are currently being used at a time when people are increasingly relying on their smartphones as a main source for accessing information and for connecting with others. The study reported in this article aims to address this gap by presenting new insights about the current practices of non-research public displays and their role in a hyperconnected society. To achieve this, we provide results from a field observation study of non-research public displays and contextualise our findings within an analysis of related work. This article makes three main contributions: (1) identifying how user engagement with public displays has changed over the past 10 years; (2) understanding how the pervasiveness of smartphones and other connected devices has modified whether users notice public displays and their interactions with public displays; and (3) outlining design recommendations and opportunities towards making public displays more relevant in a hyperconnected society.

References

[1]
Gregory D Abowd, Anind K Dey, Peter J Brown, Nigel Davies, Mark Smith, and Pete Steggles. 1999. Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In International Symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 304--307.
[2]
Christopher Ackad, Martin Tomitsch, and Judy Kay. 2016. Skeletons and Silhouettes: Comparing User Representations at a Gesture-based Large Display. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2343--2347.
[3]
Stefano Alletto, Rita Cucchiara, Giuseppe Del Fiore, Luca Mainetti, Vincenzo Mighali, Luigi Patrono, and Giuseppe Serra. 2016. An indoor location-aware system for an IoT-based smart museum. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 3, 2 (2016), 244--253.
[4]
Florian Alt, Thomas Kubitza, Dominik Bial, Firas Zaidan, Markus Ortel, Björn Zurmaar, Tim Lewen, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2011. Digiieds: insights into deploying digital public notice areas in the wild. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, 165--174.
[5]
Florian Alt, Stefan Schneegaß, Albrecht Schmidt, Jörg Müller, and Nemanja Memarovic. 2012. How to evaluate public displays. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 17.
[6]
Florian Alt, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Thomas Kubitza, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. Interaction techniques for creating and exchanging content with public displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1709--1718.
[7]
Matthias Baldauf, Katrin Lasinger, and Peter Fröhlich. 2012. Real-world drag'n'drop-bidirectional camera-based media transfer between smartphones and large displays. In Proc. International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Newcastle, UK.
[8]
Matthias Baldauf, Stefan Suette, Peter Fröhlich, and Ulrich Lehner. 2014. Interactive opinion polls on public displays: studying privacy requirements in the wild. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices 8 services. ACM, 495--500.
[9]
Till Ballendat, Nicolai Marquardt, and Saul Greenberg. 2010. Proxemic interaction: designing for a proximity and orientation-aware environment. In ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. ACM, 121--130.
[10]
Christine Bauer, Paul Dohmen, and Christine Strauss. 2011. Interactive digital signage-an innovative service and its future strategies. In Emerging Intelligent Data and Web Technologies (EIDWT), 2011 International Conference on. IEEE, 137--142.
[11]
Gilbert Beyer, Vincent Binder, Nina Jäger, and Andreas Butz. 2014. The puppeteer display: attracting and actively shaping the audience with an interactive public banner display. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. ACM, 935--944.
[12]
Courtney Blackwell, Jeremy Birnholtz, and Charles Abbott. 2015. Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New media 8 society 17, 7 (2015), 1117--1136.
[13]
Harry Brignull and Yvonne Rogers. 2003. Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In Proceedings of INTERACT, Vol. 3. 17--24.
[14]
Jorge C. S. Cardoso and Rui José. 2009. A Framework for Context-Aware Adaptation in Public Displays. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 118--127.
[15]
Alex Jinsung Choi. 2014. Internet of things: Evolution towards a hyper-connected society. In Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC), 2014 IEEE Asian. IEEE, 5--8.
[16]
Ashley Colley, Leena Ventä-Olkkonen, Florian Alt, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2015. Insights from Deploying See-Through Augmented Reality Signage in the Wild. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 179--185.
[17]
Nicholas S Dalton, Emily Collins, and Paul Marshall. 2015. Display blindness?: Looking again at the visibility of situated displays using eye-tracking. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3889--3898.
[18]
Nigel Davies, Sarah Clinch, Mateusz Mikusz, Oliver Bates, Helen Turner, and Adrian Friday. 2017. Better off: when should pervasive displays be powered down?. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 19.
[19]
Nigel Davies, Adrian Friday, Peter Newman, Sarah Rutlidge, and Oliver Storz. 2009. Using bluetooth device names to support interaction in smart environments. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 151--164.
[20]
Nigel Davies, Marc Langheinrich, Sarah Clinch, Ivan Elhart, Adrian Friday, Thomas Kubitza, and Bholanathsingh Surajbali. 2014. Personalisation and privacy in future pervasive display networks. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2357--2366.
[21]
Ivan Elhart, Mateusz Mikusz, Cristian Gomez Mora, Marc Langheinrich, and Nigel Davies. 2017. Audience monitor: an open source tool for tracking audience mobility in front of pervasive displays. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 10.
[22]
Kazjon Grace, Rainer Wasinger, Christopher Ackad, Anthony Collins, Oliver Dawson, Richard Gluga, Judy Kay, and Martin Tomitsch. 2013. Conveying interactivity at an interactive public information display. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 19--24.
[23]
Saul Greenberg, Nicolai Marquardt, Till Ballendat, Rob Diaz-Marino, and Miaosen Wang. 2011. Proxemic interactions: the new ubicomp? interactions 18, 1 (2011), 42--50.
[24]
Tali Hatuka and Eran Toch. 2017. Being visible in public space: The normalisation of asymmetrical visibility. Urban Studies 54, 4 (2017), 984--998.
[25]
Luke Hespanhol and Martin Tomitsch. 2015. Strategies for intuitive interaction in public urban spaces. Interacting with Computers 27, 3 (2015), 311--326.
[26]
Luke Hespanhol, Martin Tomitsch, Ian McArthur, Joel Fredericks, Ronald Schroeter, and Marcus Foth. 2015. Vote as you go: blending interfaces for community engagement into the urban space. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. ACM, 29--37.
[27]
Marius Hoggenmueller, Martin Tomitsch, and Alexander Wiethoff. 2018. Understanding Artefact and Process Challenges for Designing Low-Res Lighting Displays. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.
[28]
Steven Houben and Christian Weichel. 2013. Overcoming interaction blindness through curiosity objects. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1539--1544.
[29]
Elaine M Huang, Anna Koster, and Jan Borchers. 2008. Overcoming assumptions and uncovering practices: When does the public really look at public displays?. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 228--243.
[30]
Jae-Hoon Lee and Woo-Jung Lee. 2013. A Study on the Impact of Ubiquitous Street Furniture on Human Behavior-Based on Media Poles Installed on SeoulâĂš s Gangnam Boulevard. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 12, 2 (2013), 181--188.
[31]
Kabo Lee, Sarah Clinch, Chris Winstanley, and Nigel Davies. 2014. I love my display: Combatting display blindness with emotional attachment. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 154.
[32]
Lev Manovich. 2006. The poetics of augmented space. Visual Communication 5, 2 (2006), 219--240.
[33]
Nemanja Memarovic, Sarah Clinch, and Florian Alt. 2015. Understanding display blindness in future display deployments. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 7--14.
[34]
Nemanja Memarovic and Marc Langheinrich. 2010. Beyond Web 2.0: Challenges in Personalizing for Networked Public Display Environments. In Pervasive Personalisation Workshop, held in conjunction with Pervasive.
[35]
Daniel Michelis and Jörg Müller. 2011. The audience funnel: Observations of gesture based interaction with multiple large displays in a city center. Intl. Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 27, 6 (2011), 562--579.
[36]
Andrew Vande Moere and Niels Wouters. 2012. The role of context in media architecture. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 12.
[37]
Jörg Müller, Robert Walter, Gilles Bailly, Michael Nischt, and Florian Alt. 2012. Looking glass: a ield study on noticing interactivity of a shop window. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 297--306.
[38]
Jörg Müller, Dennis Wilmsmann, Juliane Exeler, Markus Buzeck, Albrecht Schmidt, Tim Jay, and Antonio Krüger. 2009. Display blindness: The effect of expectations on attention towards digital signage. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 1--8.
[39]
T Ojala, V Kostakos, H Kukka, T Heikkinen, T Linden, M Jurmu, S Hosio, F Kruger, and D Zanni. 2012. Multipurpose Interactive Public Displays in the Wild: Three Years Later. Computer 45, 5 (2012), 42--49.
[40]
Callum Parker, Joel Fredericks, Martin Tomitsch, and Soojeong Yoo. 2017. Towards Adaptive Height-Aware Public Interactive Displays. In Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, 257--260.
[41]
Callum Parker, Judy Kay, Matthias Baldauf, and Martin Tomitsch. 2016. Design implications for interacting with personalised public displays through mobile augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 52--58.
[42]
Callum Parker, Judy Kay, and Martin Tomitsch. 2018. Device-free: An Implicit Personalisation Approach for Public Interactive Displays. In ACSW'18: Proceedings of Australasian Computer Science Week 2018. ACM.
[43]
Callum Parker and Martin Tomitsch. 2017. Bridging the Interaction Gulf: Understanding the Factors that Drive Public Interactive Display Usage. In OzCHI'17: Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (OZCHI 2017). ACM.
[44]
Callum Parker, Martin Tomitsch, Judy Kay, and Matthias Baldauf. 2015. Keeping it private: an augmented reality approach to citizen participation with public displays. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 807--812.
[45]
Brasilina Passarelli and Alan Cesar Belo Angeluci. 2017. The Hyperconnected Contemporary Society. In Brazil: Media from the Country of the Future. Emerald Publishing Limited, 343--362.
[46]
Thorsten Prante, Carsten Röcker, Norbert Streitz, Richard Stenzel, Carsten Magerkurth, Daniel Van Alphen, and Daniela Plewe. 2003. Hello. wall--beyond ambient displays. In Adjunct Proceedings of Ubicomp, Vol. 2003. 277--278.
[47]
PwC. {n. d.}. Out-of-home advertising. ({n. d.}). http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/entertainment-media/outlook/segment-insights/out-of-home-advertising.html
[48]
JCDecaux Media Release. 2016. JCDecaux's Live Touch screens see strong growth. (2016). http://oma.org.au/media2/latest-news/archive-items/jcdecauxs-live-touch-screens-see-strong-growth
[49]
Bill N Schilit, Anthony LaMarca, Gaetano Borriello, William G Griswold, David McDonald, Edward Lazowska, Anand Balachandran, Jason Hong, and Vaughn Iverson. 2003. Challenge: Ubiquitous location-aware computing and the place lab initiative. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Wireless mobile applications and services on WLAN hotspots. ACM, 29--35.
[50]
Ronald Schroeter and Marcus Foth. 2009. Discussions in space. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7. ACM, 381--384.
[51]
Fabius Steinberger, Marcus Foth, and Florian Alt. 2014. Vote with your feet: Local community polling on urban screens. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 44.
[52]
Martin Tomitsch, Christopher Ackad, Oliver Dawson, Luke Hespanhol, and Judy Kay. 2014. Who cares about the content? An analysis of playful behaviour at a public display. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 160.
[53]
Elias Z Tragos, Henrich C Pöhls, Ralf C Staudemeyer, Daniel Slamanig, Adam Kapovits, Santiago Suppan, Alexandros Fragkiadakis, Gianmarco Baldini, Ricardo Neisse, Peter Langendörfer, et al. 2015. Securing the internet of things - security and privacy in a hyperconnected world. Building the hyperconnected society - internet of things research and innovation value chains, ecosystems and markets. River Publishers Series of Communications (2015), 189--219.
[54]
Mettina Veenstra, Niels Wouters, Marije Kanis, Stephan Brandenburg, Kevin te Raa, Bart Wigger, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2015. Should public displays be interactive? Evaluating the impact of interactivity on audience engagement. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 15--21.
[55]
Fred Vogelstein. 2017. Inside Apple's 6-Month Race to Make the First IPhone a Reality. (2017). https://www.wired.com/story/iphone-history-dogfight/
[56]
Miaosen Wang, Sebastian Boring, and Saul Greenberg. 2012. Proxemic peddler: a public advertising display that captures and preserves the attention of a passerby. In Proceedings of the 2012 international symposium on pervasive displays. ACM, 3.
[57]
Mark Weiser. 1991. The Computer for the 21 st Century. Scientiic american 265, 3 (1991), 94--105.
[58]
Julie R Williamson and John Williamson. 2017. Understanding Public Evaluation: Quantifying Experimenter Intervention. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3414--3425.
[59]
Niels Wouters, John Downs, Mitchell Harrop, Travis Cox, Eduardo Oliveira, Sarah Webber, Frank Vetere, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2016. Uncovering the honeypot effect: How audiences engage with public interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 5--16.
[60]
Niels Wouters, Jonathan Huyghe, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2014. StreetTalk: participative design of situated public displays for urban neighborhood interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. ACM, 747--756.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)“Tele” Me More: Using Telepresence Charades to Connect Strangers and Exhibits in Different MuseumsExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650834(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Digital Interaction with Physical Museum ArtifactsTechnologies10.3390/technologies1103006511:3(65)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2023
  • (2023)AI-to-Human ActuationProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35808127:1(1-32)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Does the Public Still Look at Public Displays?: A Field Observation of Public Displays in the Wild

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 2, Issue 2
    June 2018
    741 pages
    EISSN:2474-9567
    DOI:10.1145/3236498
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 July 2018
    Accepted: 01 April 2018
    Revised: 01 April 2018
    Received: 01 February 2018
    Published in IMWUT Volume 2, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Design
    2. Field Observation
    3. Hyperconnected society
    4. Public Displays

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)132
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)“Tele” Me More: Using Telepresence Charades to Connect Strangers and Exhibits in Different MuseumsExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650834(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)Digital Interaction with Physical Museum ArtifactsTechnologies10.3390/technologies1103006511:3(65)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2023
    • (2023)AI-to-Human ActuationProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35808127:1(1-32)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2023
    • (2023)The “Three-Legged Stool": Designing for Equitable City, Community, and Research Partnerships in Urban Environmental SensingProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581289(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Passenger Perceptions, Information Preferences, and Usability of Crowding Visualizations on Public Displays in Transit Stations and VehiclesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581241(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Investigation of Advertising Performance by Image Effects in Interactive Digital Signageインタラクティブデジタルサイネージにおける映像エフェクトの違いによる広告効果の検証The Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers10.3169/itej.76.29776:2(297-303)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2022)Sprayful Interaction: Perceptions of a Moss-based SLow-resolution Living Media DisplayProceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3572921.3576207(235-240)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Pandemic Displays: Considering Hygiene on Public Touchscreens in the Post-Pandemic EraProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501937(1-12)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Spatial and Temporal Audience Behavior of Scrum Practitioners Around Semi-Public Ambient DisplaysInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2022.209923839:18(3567-3585)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2022
    • (2021)Evaluating Virtual Reality as a Tool for Empathic Modelling of Vision ImpairmentProceedings of the 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3520495.3520519(190-197)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media