Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3219166.3219190acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Network Pricing: How to Induce Optimal Flows Under Strategic Link Operators

Published: 11 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Network pricing games provide a framework for modeling real-world settings with two types of strategic agents: owners (operators) of the network and users of the network. Owners of the network post a price for usage of the link they own so as to attract users and maximize profit; users of the network select routes based on price and level of use by other users. We point out that an equilibrium in these games may not exist, may not be unique and may induce an arbitrarily inefficient network performance. Our main result is to observe that a simple regulation on the network owners market solves all three issues above. Specifically, if an authority could set appropriate caps (upper bounds) on the tolls (prices) operators can charge, then: the game among the link operators has a unique and strong Nash equilibrium and the users' game results in a Wardrop equilibrium that achieves the optimal total delay. We call any price vector with these properties a great set of tolls. As a secondary objective, we want to compute great tolls that minimize total users' payments and we provide a linear program that does this. We obtain multiplicative approximation results compared to the optimal total users' payments for arbitrary networks with polynomial latencies of bounded degree, while in the single-commodity case we obtain a bound that only depends on the topology of the network. Lastly, we show how the same mechanism of setting appropriate caps on the allowable prices extends to the model of elastic demands.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (p375.mp4)

References

[1]
D. Acemoglu and A. Ozdaglar. 2007. Competition and Efficiency in Congested Markets. Mathematics of Operations Research 32, 1 (2007), 1--31.
[2]
D. Acemoglu and A. Ozdaglar. 2007. Competition in parallel-serial networks. IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications 25, 6 (2007), 1180--1192.
[3]
E. Anshelevich and S. Sekar. 2015. Price Competition in Networked Markets: How Do Monopolies Impact Social Welfare. In WINE 2015, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 9--12, 2015, Proceedings. 16--30.
[4]
M. Beckmann, C. McGuire, and C. Winsten. 1956. Studies in the economics of transportation. Yale Univ. Press.
[5]
C. Berge. 1963. Topological Spaces: Including a Treatment of Multi-valued Functions, Vector Spaces, and Convexity. Dover Publications.
[6]
V. Bonifaci, M. Salek, and G. Schafer. 2011. Efficiency of Restricted Tolls in Non-atomic Network Routing Games. In SAGT 2011, Amalfi, Italy, October 17--19, 2011, Proceedings. 302--313.
[7]
P. Briest, M. Hoefer, and P. Krysta. 2012. Stackelberg Network Pricing Games. Algorithmica 62, 3--4 (2012).
[8]
I. Caragiannis, X. Chatzigeorgiou, P. Kanellopoulos, G.A. Krimpas, N. Protopapas, and A. Voudouris. 2017. Efficiency and Complexity of Price Competition Among Single-Product Vendors. Artificial Intelligence 248 (2017), 9--25.
[9]
L. Castelli, M. Labb, and A. Violin. 2017. Network pricing problem with unit toll. Networks 69, 1 (2017), 83--93.
[10]
S. Chawla and F. Niu. 2009. The Price of Anarchy in Bertrand Games. In EC '09, Stanford, CA, USA, July 6--10, 2009, Proceedings. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 305--314.
[11]
S. Chawla, F. Niu, and T. Roughgarden. 2008. Bertrand competition in networks. In SAGT 2008, Paderborn, Germany, April/May, 2008, Proceedings. 70--82.
[12]
R. Cole, Y. Dodis, and T. Roughgarden. 2003. Pricing network edges for heterogeneous selfish users. In STOC '03, San Diego, CA, USA, June 9--11, 2003, Proceedings, Vol. 3. 444--467.
[13]
J.R. Correa and N.E. Stier-Moses. 2011. Wardrop equilibria. Wiley encyclopedia of op. research and man. science (2011).
[14]
R. Dial. 1999. Minimal-revenue congestion pricing part I: A fast algorithm for the single origin case. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 33, 3 (1999), 189 -- 202.
[15]
H. Dixon. 2001. Surfing Economics : Essays for the Inquiring Economist. Palgrave Macmillan.
[16]
A. Epstein, M. Feldman, and Y. Mansour. 2009. Efficient graph topologies in network routing games. Games and Economic Behavior 66, 1 (2009), 115 -- 125.
[17]
L. Fleischer. 2005. Linear Tolls Suffice: New Bounds and Algorithms for Tolls in Single Source Networks. Theoretical Computer Science 348 (2005), 217--225.
[18]
D. Fotakis, D. Kalimeris, and T. Lianeas. 2015. Improving Selfish Routing for Risk-Averse Players. In WINE 2015, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 9--12, 2015, Proceedings. 328--342.
[19]
A. Gonzalez. 2016. Controversias por reducciones en la demanda en las concesiones de carreteras en Chile. Revista de Derecho Economico 76 (2016).
[20]
T. Harks, M. Schroder, and D. Vermeulen. 2018. Toll Caps in Privatized Road Networks. (2018). arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.10514.
[21]
A. Hayrapetyan, E. Tardos, and T. Wexler. 2007. A network pricing game for selfish traffic. Distributed Computing 19, 4 (2007), 255--266.
[22]
T. Jelinek, M. Klaas, and G. Schafer. 2014. Computing Optimal Tolls with Arc Restrictions and Heterogeneous Players. In STACS 2014, Lyon, France, March 5--8, 2014, Proceedings.
[23]
P. Kleer and G. Schafer. 2016. The Impact of Worst-Case Deviations in Non-Atomic Network Routing Games. In SAGT 2016, Liverpool, UK, September 19--21, 2016, Proceedings. 129--140.
[24]
A. Kuiteing, P. Marcoffe, and G. Savard. 2016. Network Pricing of Congestion-Free Networks: The Elastic and Linear Demand Case. Transportation Science 51, 3 (2016), 791--806.
[25]
H. Lin, T. Roughgarden, E. Tardos, and A. Walkover. 2011. Stronger Bounds on Braess's Paradox and the Maximum Latency of Selfish Routing. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 25, 4 (2011), 1667--1686.
[26]
J. Musacchio. 2009. The Price of Anarchy in Parallel-Serial Competition with Elastic Demand. (2009). Technical Report No. UCSC-SOE-09--20.
[27]
J. Musacchio and S. Wu. 2007. The Price of Anarchy in a Network Pricing Game. In Allerton Conference, Monticello, IL, USA, September 26--28, 2007, Proceedings.
[28]
E. Nikolova and N. Stier-Moses. 2015. The Burden of Risk Aversion in Mean-Risk Selfish Routing. In EC '15, Portland, OR, USA, June 15--19, 2015, Proceedings. 489--506.
[29]
A. Ozdaglar. 2008. Price Competition with Elastic Traffic. Networks 52, 3 (2008), 141--155.
[30]
A. Ozdaglar and R. Srikant. 2007. Incentives and pricing in communication networks. In Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge Press, 571--591.
[31]
C. Papadimitriou and G. Valiant. 2010. A New Look at Selfish Routing. In ICS 2010, Beijing, China, January 5--7, 2010, Proceedings. 178--187.
[32]
A. Pigou. 1920. The economics of welfare. Macmillan.
[33]
T. Roughgarden. 2005. Selfish Routing and the Price of Anarchy. MIT press.
[34]
T. Roughgarden and E. Tardos. 2002. How bad is selfish routing? J. ACM 49, 2 (2002), 236--259.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Capacity Allocation and Pricing of High Occupancy Toll Lane Systems with Heterogeneous Travelers2023 62nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)10.1109/CDC49753.2023.10383517(3252-3256)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2023
  • (2021)Stackelberg pricing games with congestion effectsMathematical Programming10.1007/s10107-021-01672-9203:1-2(763-799)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
EC '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
June 2018
713 pages
ISBN:9781450358293
DOI:10.1145/3219166
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 June 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. nash equilibria
  2. network pricing
  3. selfish routing
  4. toll operators

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

EC '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

EC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 70 of 269 submissions, 26%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 664 of 2,389 submissions, 28%

Upcoming Conference

EC '25
The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
July 7 - 11, 2025
Stanford , CA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)172
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)54
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Capacity Allocation and Pricing of High Occupancy Toll Lane Systems with Heterogeneous Travelers2023 62nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)10.1109/CDC49753.2023.10383517(3252-3256)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2023
  • (2021)Stackelberg pricing games with congestion effectsMathematical Programming10.1007/s10107-021-01672-9203:1-2(763-799)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2021

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media