Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3233547.3233718acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract
Public Access

CrossPlan: Systematic Planning of Genetic Crosses to Validate Mathematical Models

Published: 15 August 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Mathematical models of cellular processes can systematically predict the phenotypes of novel combinations of multi-gene mutations. Searching for informative predictions and prioritizing them for experimental validation is challenging since the number of possible combinations grows exponentially in the number of mutations. Moreover, keeping track of the crosses needed to make new mutants and planning sequences of experiments is unmanageable when the experimenter is deluged by hundreds of potentially informative predictions to test. We present CrossPlan, a novel methodology for systematically planning genetic crosses to make a set of target mutants from a set of source mutants. We base our approach on a generic experimental workflow used in performing genetic crosses in budding yeast. We prove that the CrossPlan problem is NP-complete. We develop an integer-linear-program (ILP) to maximize the number of target mutants that we can make under certain experimental constraints. We apply our method to a comprehensive mathematical model of the protein regulatory network controlling cell division in budding yeast. We also extend our solution to incorporate other experimental conditions such as a delay factor that decides the availability of a mutant and genetic markers to con rm gene deletions. The experimental flow that underlies our work is quite generic and our ILP-based algorithm is easy to modify. Hence our framework should be relevant in plant and animal systems as well. This paper opens up a new area of research: how to automatically synthesize efficient experimental plans for making large numbers of mutants carrying perturbations in multiple genes. Moreover, the principles used in CrossPlan can be directly extended to other organisms where siRNA or CRISPR-based screens are effective. Thus the growing community of biomedical scientists who are beginning to use CRISPR-based approaches to plan multiple, combinatorial gene perturbations will find our approach to be very relevant to their research.

Reference

[1]
Aditya Pratapa, Neil Adames, Pavel Kraikivski, Nicholas Franzese, John J. Tyson, Jean Peccoud, and T. M. Murali . 2018. CrossPlan: Systematic Planning of Genetic Crosses to Validate Mathematical Models. Bioinformatics Vol. 34, 13 (2018), 2237--2244.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
BCB '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics
August 2018
727 pages
ISBN:9781450357944
DOI:10.1145/3233547
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 August 2018

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. experiment planning
  2. genetic crosses
  3. integer linear program
  4. mathematical model simulations
  5. multi-gene mutants

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Funding Sources

Conference

BCB '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

BCB '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 46 of 148 submissions, 31%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 885 submissions, 29%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 146
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media