Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3240876.3240921acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Compressive hyperspectral imaging mask optimization

Published: 17 August 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Hyperspectral imaging is a hot topic nowadays. It is an urgent problem to be solved how to achieve swift hyperspectral imaging. In this thesis, our primary purpose is to further optimize how to place a mask in front of a sensor in order to achieve compressed Hyperspectral imaging. We apply optimized projection matrix, matrix differential, projection analysis and other related knowledge to optimizing this realistic matter. After we simply introduce the background of hyperspectral imaging, we will firstly present the basic principle of compressed hyperspectral imaging based on mask, and then mainly analyze the way to achieve projection matrix optimizing algorithm and the challenges these sort of realistic problems face. Finally, we compare the experiment results of these two methods, and the rebuilding results before and after the optimizing.

References

[1]
Robert W. Basedow. 1995. HYDICE system: implementation and performance. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 2480, 1 (1995), 258--267.
[2]
Emmanuel J Candes and Terence Tao. 2005. Decoding by linear programming. IEEE transactions on information theory 51, 12 (2005), 4203--4215.
[3]
A. Chakrabarti and T. Zickler. 2011. Statistics of real-world hyperspectral images. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 193--200.
[4]
Hao Du, Xin Tong, Xun Cao, and Stephen Lin. 2010. A prism-based system for multispectral video acquisition. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 175--182.
[5]
Michael Elad. 2007. Optimized projections for compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 55, 12 (2007), 5695--5702.
[6]
Nahum Gat, Gordon Scriven, John Garman, Ming De Li, and Jingyi Zhang. 2006. Development of four-dimensional imaging spectrometers (4D-IS). In SPIE Optics+ Photonics. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 63020M--63020M.
[7]
Ling Ge, Ran Ju, Tongwei Ren, and Gangshan Wu. 2015. Interactive RGB-D Image Segmentation Using Hierarchical Graph Cut and Geodesic Distance. In Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia. 114--124.
[8]
ME Gehm, R John, DJ Brady, RM Willett, and TJ Schulz. 2007. Single-shot compressive spectral imaging with a dual-disperser architecture. Optics express 15, 21 (2007), 14013--14027.
[9]
William R Johnson, Daniel W Wilson, and Greg Bearman. 2006. Spatial-spectral modulating snapshot hyperspectral imager. Applied optics 45, 9 (2006), 1898--1908.
[10]
Xing Lin, Yebin Liu, Jiamin Wu, and Qionghai Dai. 2014. Spatial-spectral encoded compressive hyperspectral imaging. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 33, 6 (2014), 233.
[11]
X. Lin, G Wetzstein, Y. Liu, and Q. Dai. 2014. Dual-coded compressive hyperspectral imaging. Optics Letters 39, 7 (2014), 2044.
[12]
Jing Liu, Tongwei Ren, Yuantian Wang, Sheng Hua Zhong, Jia Bei, and Shengchao Chen. 2016. Object proposal on RGB-D images via elastic edge boxes. Neurocomputing 236 (2016).
[13]
D. Schonfeld and J. Goutsias. 1991. Optimal Morphological Pattern Restoration from Noisy Binary Images. Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History 7, 3 (1991), 225--244.
[14]
Y. Sun, Q. Liu, J. Tang, and D. Tao. 2014. Learning Discriminative Dictionary for Group Sparse Representation. IEEE Trans Image Process 23, 9 (2014), 3816--3828.
[15]
J. Tang, Z. Li, M. Wang, and R. Zhao. 2015. Neighborhood Discriminant Hashing for Large-Scale Image Retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 24, 9 (2015), 2827--2840.
[16]
Jiamin Wu, Xiong Bo, Lin Xing, Jijun He, Jinli Suo, and Qionghai Dai. {n. d.}. Snapshot Hyperspectral Volumetric Microscopy. Scientific Reports 6 ({n. d.}), 24624.
[17]
Xiangyang Xu, Yuncheng Li, Gangshan Wu, and Jiebo Luo. 2017. Multi-modal Deep Feature Learning for RGB-D Object Detection. Pattern Recognition 72 (2017).
[18]
Masahiro Yamaguchi, Hideaki Haneishi, Hiroyuki Fukuda, Junko Kishimoto, and Hiroshi Kanazawa. 2008. High-fidelity video and still-image communication based on spectral information: natural vision system and its applications. In Spectral Imaging: Eighth International Symposium on Multispectral Color Science. 60620G-60620G-12.
[19]
Daniel K. Zhou, Henry E. Revercomb, Allen M. Larar, Hung Lung Huang, and Bormin Huang. 2001. Hyperspectral remote sensing of atmospheric profiles from satellites and aircraft. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 4151 (2001), 94--102.

Index Terms

  1. Compressive hyperspectral imaging mask optimization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICIMCS '18: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service
    August 2018
    243 pages
    ISBN:9781450365208
    DOI:10.1145/3240876
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 August 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. compressive sensing
    2. hyperspectral imaging
    3. optimized mask

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ICIMCS'18

    Acceptance Rates

    ICIMCS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 46 of 116 submissions, 40%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 163 of 456 submissions, 36%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 133
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media