Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3243394.3243700acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hand-Eye Camera Calibration with an Optical Tracking System

Published: 03 September 2018 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a method for hand-eye camera calibration via an optical tracking system (OTS) faciltating robotic applications. The camera pose cannot be directly tracked via the OTS. Because of this, a transformation matrix between a marker-plate pose, tracked via the OTS, and the camera pose needs to be estimated. To this end, we evaluate two different approaches for hand-eye calibration. In the first approach, the camera is in a fixed position and a 2D calibration plate is displaced. In the second approach, the camera is also fixed, but now a 3D calibration object is moved. The first step of our method consists of collecting N views of the marker-plate pose and the calibration plates, acquired via OTS. This is achieved by keeping the camera fixed and moving the calibration plate, while taking a picture of the calibration plate using the camera. A dataset is constructed that contains marker-plate poses and the relative camera poses. Afterwards, the transformation matrix is then computed, following a least-squares minimization. Accuracy in hand-eye calibration is computed in terms of re-projection error, calculated based on camera homography transformations. For both approaches, we measure the changes in accuracy as a function of the number of poses used for each calibration, while we define the minimum number of poses required to obtain a good camera calibration. Results of the experiments show similar performances for the two evaluated methods, achieving a median value of the re-projection error at N = 25 poses of 0.76 mm for the 2D calibration plate and 0.70 mm for the 3D calibration object. Also, we have found that minimally 15 poses are required to achieve a good camera calibration.

References

[1]
Anubhav Agarwal, CV Jawahar, and PJ Narayanan. 2005. A survey of planar homography estimation techniques. Centre for Visual Information Technology, Tech. Rep. IIIT/TR/2005/12 (2005).
[2]
Sylvain Bernhardt, Stéphane A Nicolau, Luc Soler, and Christophe Doignon. 2017. The status of augmented reality in laparoscopic surgery as of 2016. Medical image analysis 37 (2017), 66--90.
[3]
Jack CK Chou and M Kamel. 1991. Finding the position and orientation of a sensor on a robot manipulator using quaternions. The international journal of robotics research 10, 3 (1991), 240--254.
[4]
Konstantinos Daniilidis. 1999. Hand-eye calibration using dual quaternions. The International Journal of Robotics Research 18, 3 (1999), 286--298.
[5]
Xiao-Shan Gao, Xiao-Rong Hou, Jianliang Tang, and Hang-Fei Cheng. 2003. Complete solution classification for the perspective-three-point problem. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 25, 8 (2003), 930--943.
[6]
Richard Hartley and Andrew Zisserman. 2003. Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge university press.
[7]
J Ilonen and V Kyrki. 2011. Robust robot-camera calibration. In Advanced Robotics (ICAR), 2011 15th International Conference on. IEEE, 67--74.
[8]
Kumsok Kang, Huamin Yang, Yu Miao, Weili Shi, Fei He, Fei Yan, Zhengang Jiang, Huimao Zhang, et al. 2015. A hand-eye calibration method for computer assisted endoscopy. In Natural Computation (ICNC), 2015 11th International Conference on. IEEE, 850--855.
[9]
Seongpung Lee, Hyunki Lee, Hyunseok Choi, Sangseo Jeon, and Jaesung Hong. 2017. Effective calibration of an endoscope to an optical tracking system for medical augmented reality. Cogent Engineering 4, 1 (2017), 1359955.
[10]
Aiguo Li, Lin Wang, and Defeng Wu. 2010. Simultaneous robot-world and hand-eye calibration using dual-quaternions and Kronecker product. International Journal of Physical Sciences 5, 10 (2010), 1530--1536.
[11]
David Marr and Tomaso Poggio. 1979. A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 204, 1156 (1979), 301--328.
[12]
Daniel J Mirota, Ali Uneri, Sebastian Schafer, Sajendra Nithiananthan, Douglas D Reh, Gary L Gallia, Russell H Taylor, Gregory D Hager, and Jeffrey H Siewerdsen. 2011. High-accuracy 3D image-based registration of endoscopic video to C-arm cone-beam CT for image-guided skull base surgery. In Medical Imaging 2011: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling, Vol. 7964. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 79640J.
[13]
Hiroshi NisHioka. 2017. Recent evolution of endoscopic endonasal surgery for treatment of pituitary adenomas. Neurologia medico-chirurgica 57, 4 (2017), 151--158.
[14]
Florian Schulze, Katja Bühler, André Neubauer, Armin Kanitsar, Leslie Holton, and Stefan Wolfsberger. 2010. Intra-operative virtual endoscopy for image guided endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery 5, 2 (2010), 143--154.
[15]
Philip HS Torr and Andrew Zisserman. 2000. MLESAC: A new robust estimator with application to estimating image geometry. Computer vision and image understanding 78, 1 (2000), 138--156.
[16]
Christian Winne, Martin Khan, Fabian Stopp, Emanuel Jank, and Erwin Keeve. 2011. Overlay visualization in endoscopic ENT surgery. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery 6, 3 (2011), 401--406.
[17]
Zhengyou Zhang. 2000. A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 22, 11 (2000), 1330--1334.
[18]
Hangi Zhuang and Zvi S Roth. 1996. Camera-aided robot calibration. CRC press.
[19]
Hanqi Zhuang, Zvi S Roth, and Raghavan Sudhakar. 1994. Simultaneous robot/world and tool/flange calibration by solving homogeneous transformation equations of the form AX= YB. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 10, 4 (1994), 549--554.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Hybrid optical-vision tracking in laparoscopy: accuracy of navigation and ultrasound reconstructionMinimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies10.1080/13645706.2024.231303233:3(176-183)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Intraoperative patient‐specific volumetric reconstruction and 3D visualization for laparoscopic liver surgeryHealthcare Technology Letters10.1049/htl2.1210611:6(374-383)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Laparoscopic Feature-Less 3D Reconstruction Using Neural Radiance Fields and Optical TrackingAdvances in Digital Health and Medical Bioengineering10.1007/978-3-031-62520-6_67(601-609)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Hand-Eye Camera Calibration with an Optical Tracking System

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICDSC '18: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras
    September 2018
    134 pages
    ISBN:9781450365116
    DOI:10.1145/3243394
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 September 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Hand-eye calibration
    2. augmented reality
    3. endoscope
    4. neurosurgery
    5. optical tracking system
    6. tracking

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • European Union?s Horizon 2020

    Conference

    ICDSC '18
    ICDSC '18: International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras
    September 3 - 4, 2018
    Eindhoven, Netherlands

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 92 of 117 submissions, 79%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Hybrid optical-vision tracking in laparoscopy: accuracy of navigation and ultrasound reconstructionMinimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies10.1080/13645706.2024.231303233:3(176-183)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Intraoperative patient‐specific volumetric reconstruction and 3D visualization for laparoscopic liver surgeryHealthcare Technology Letters10.1049/htl2.1210611:6(374-383)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2024
    • (2024)Laparoscopic Feature-Less 3D Reconstruction Using Neural Radiance Fields and Optical TrackingAdvances in Digital Health and Medical Bioengineering10.1007/978-3-031-62520-6_67(601-609)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2024
    • (2023)Robot–Camera Calibration in Tightly Constrained Environment Using Interactive PerceptionIEEE Transactions on Robotics10.1109/TRO.2023.329953339:6(4952-4970)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
    • (2022)Development of a CT-Compatible, Anthropomorphic Skull and Brain Phantom for Neurosurgical Planning, Training, and SimulationBioengineering10.3390/bioengineering91005379:10(537)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2022
    • (2021)The Future of Endoscopic Navigation: A Review of Advanced Endoscopic Vision TechnologyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.30651049(41144-41167)Online publication date: 2021
    • (2020)Fusion of augmented reality imaging with the endoscopic view for endonasal skull base surgery; a novel application for surgical navigation based on intraoperative cone beam computed tomography and optical trackingPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.022731215:1(e0227312)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2020
    • (2020)Simultaneous Optimization of Patient–Image Registration and Hand–Eye Calibration for Accurate Augmented Reality in SurgeryIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering10.1109/TBME.2020.296780267:9(2669-2682)Online publication date: Sep-2020
    • (2020)Influence of sampling accuracy on augmented reality for laparoscopic image-guided surgeryMinimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies10.1080/13645706.2020.1727524(1-10)Online publication date: 5-Mar-2020
    • (2019)Image fusion on the endoscopic view for endo-nasal skull-base surgeryMedical Imaging 2019: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling10.1117/12.2512734(48)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media