Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3274895.3274960acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Coverage constrained spatial Co-clustering

Published: 06 November 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Given two geometric spaces, a set of matched points between two geometric spaces, the Coverage Constrained Spatial Co-clustering (CCSCO) problem produces k co-clusters that honor the coverage constraint and minimize the total distances of the spatial points to their cluster center. The CCSCO problem is important for many societal applications, such as design of evacuation routes and resource allocation. The problem is NP-hard; it is computationally challenging because of the large size of spatial points and the coverage constraint. This paper proposes a novel approach, called Bipartite Space Shrinking (BSS), for finding k clusters that minimize the total distances of the points to their cluster center under the coverage constraint. To improve the performance, we introduce the Distance Map data structure to efficiently construct a CCSCO. Experiments using real-world New York City Taxi Trip datasets demonstrate that the proposed algorithm significantly reduces the computational cost to create a CCSCO.

References

[1]
Ravindra K Ahyja et al. 1993. Network flows: theory, algorithms, and applications. (1993).
[2]
PS Bradley et al. 2000. Constrained k-means clustering. Microsoft Research, Redmond (2000), 1--8.
[3]
Stanislav Busygin et al. 2008. Biclustering in data mining. Computers & Operations Research 35, 9 (2008), 2964--2987.
[4]
Malika Charrad et al. 2011. Simultaneous clustering: A survey. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence. Springer, 370--375.
[5]
Mihee Lee et al. 2010. Biclustering via sparse singular value decomposition. Biometrics 66, 4 (2010), 1087--1095.
[6]
Meena Mahajan et al. 2012. The planar k-means problem is NP-hard. Theoretical Computer Science 442 (2012), 13--21.
[7]
Mikko I Malinen et al. 2014. Balanced k-means for clustering. In Joint IAPR International Workshops on Statistical Techniques in Pattern Recognition and Structural and Syntactic Pattern Recognition. Springer, 32--41.
[8]
NYC. 2016. "NYC Open Data"". https://opendata.cityofnewyork.us. Online; accessed Dec. 15, 2017.
[9]
Dev Oliver et al. 2014. A k-main routes approach to spatial network activity summarization. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering 26, 6 (2014), 1464--1478.
[10]
Arkadiusz Paterek. 2007. Improving regularized singular value decomposition for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of KDD cup and workshop, Vol. 2007. 5--8.
[11]
KwangSoo Yang. 2016. Distance-constrained k spatial sub-networks: a summary of results. In International Conference on Geographic Information Science. Springer, 68--84.
[12]
KwangSoo Yang et al. 2015. Capacity-constrained network-voronoi diagram. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 27, 11 (2015), 2919--2932.
[13]
Sheng Zhang et al. 2005. Using singular value decomposition approximation for collaborative filtering. In null. IEEE, 257--264.
[14]
Yu Zheng. 2015. Trajectory data mining: an overview. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 6, 3 (2015), 29.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGSPATIAL '18: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
November 2018
655 pages
ISBN:9781450358897
DOI:10.1145/3274895
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 November 2018

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. constrained optimization
  2. spatial Co-clustering
  3. spatio-temporal data analysis

Qualifiers

  • Poster

Conference

SIGSPATIAL '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGSPATIAL '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 30 of 150 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 220 of 1,116 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 112
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media