Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3274895.3274971acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

Pine: a system for crowdsourced spatial data source discovery while map browsing

Published: 06 November 2018 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Locating spatial data sources for a specific area of interest (AOI) is a difficult task, because of constantly updating server locations (URLs), specific layer location changes within that server location, and the relative unpopularity of a specific spatial data source. The proposed system, named Pine attempts to remedy the issue using automatic, yet user-led discovery of data sources by utilizing a web plug-in that discovers spatial data sources as users browse the web. The web plug-in has a two-fold function, (1) immediately presenting the spatial data source and all of the layers contained within that server discovered by the plug-in, (2) sending those layers and servers into a centralized, search-able repository that is accessible via the web. By utilizing the users browsing habits, and their machines as the discoverers of spatial data, Pine avoids the very high computational overhead of discovery of spatial data sources from a central server using a web crawling approach. As with any user-contributed data set, Pine must get users to actually contribute to the central repository, and it achieves this by including functionality that is useful to the user on its own by displaying a search-able list in the web plug-in of spatial data sources that the user has discovered themselves, a previously difficult task. The system implements a push based approach for discovering data sources, as the plug-in sends the data directly to the central repository, it is always up to date with the newest data sources discovered by any of the many instances of the web plug-in running on users computers

    References

    [1]
    D. Bégin, R. Devillers, and S. Roche. Contributors withdrawal from online collaborative communities: The case of openstreetmap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(11):340, 2017.
    [2]
    ESRI. ArcGIS REST API. https://developers.arcgis.com/rest/, May 2018.
    [3]
    GeoPlatform. About geoplatform. https://www.geoplatform.gov/about-geoplatform/, May 2018.
    [4]
    A. M. Hendawi, D. Hazel, J. Larson, Y. Li, D. Trummert, M. Ali, and A. Teredesai. Amadeus. In 7th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, iEMSs 2014. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, 2014.
    [5]
    M.-J. Kraak. The role of the map in a web-gis environment. Journal of Geographical Systems, 6(2):83--93, 2004.
    [6]
    PostGIS. Spatial and Geographic objects for PostgreSQL. https://postgis.net/, May 2018.
    [7]
    PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL - The World's Most Advanced Open Source Database. https://www.postgresql.org/, May 2018.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGSPATIAL '18: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
    November 2018
    655 pages
    ISBN:9781450358897
    DOI:10.1145/3274895
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 November 2018

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Google Chrome
    2. crowdsourcing
    3. environmental systems research institute
    4. geographic information systems

    Qualifiers

    • Demonstration

    Conference

    SIGSPATIAL '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGSPATIAL '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 30 of 150 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 220 of 1,116 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 73
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media