Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3275116.3275145acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Smart Campus Innovation Lab

Published: 10 October 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Smart Campus Innovation Lab (SCIL) is a new idea to develop the brand new Tampere3 university consortium in Tampere area, Finland. In SCIL students work as experts in learning projects to develop operations, services and educational content of their own higher education institutions. This way SCIL produces a win-win situation, where both the students and the university consortium are clear winners. SCIL is based on projects, which combine students of many subject areas creating multidisciplinary project groups. As a result, the students learn great many things, e.g. project working, social skills, reporting and presentation skills, and Tampere3 has a vast amount of developers with which it can develop towards the future challenges both in education and in research. In this paper, we give an overview of SCIL concept and report first experiences on running SCIL projects.

References

[1]
Smart Campus Innovation Lab (2018), http://scil.tampere3.fi/
[2]
Maina, F.W. (2004). Authentic learning: Perspectives from contemporary educators. Journal of Authentic Learning, 1(1): 1--8.
[3]
A.C. Rule (2006). The Components of Authentic Learning. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1): 1--10.
[4]
H.S. Barrows (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(68): 3--12.
[5]
C.E. Hmelo-Silver (2004). Problem-based learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3): 235--266.
[6]
J.M. Blackbourn, et al. (2017). Challenging orthodoxy: problem based learning in preservice teacher training. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 38(3-4): 140--153.
[7]
J. Krajcik and C. Czerniak (2002). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
[8]
N. Capon and D. Kuhn (2004). What's so Good about Problem-Based Learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22(1): 61--79.
[9]
A. Luostarinen and I.-M. Peltomaa, (2016). Reseptit OPSin käyttöön -- opettajan opas työssä onnistumiseen. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
[10]
E.F. Barkley, K.P. Cross, and C. Howell Major (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
[11]
D.A. Kolb (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
[12]
J. Enqvist and H. Aarnio (2004). Kohti tiedon yhdessä luomista verkossa: Diana-projekti 2002-2003. Hämeen ammattikorkeakoulu.
[13]
L.J. Rennie, G. Venville and J. Wallace (2012). Knowledge that counts in a global community: Exploring the contribution of integrated curriculum. London: Routledge.
[14]
T. Pippola, T. Poranen, M. Vuori, V. Kairamo, J. Tuominiemi (2012). Teaching Innovation Projects in Universities at Tampere, in Proceedings of the ICEE 2012, part 3, pages 785--792.
[15]
T. Ahtee and T. Poranen (2007). Teaching software projects in universities at Tampere, in Proceedings of the INSPIRE XII, pages 75--81.
[16]
J. Myllärniemi, N. Helander, P. Hellsten, and I. Ilvonen (2016). Co-design, co-teaching and co-learning in technology hands-on university tuition, in Proceedings of the Academic Mindtrek '16, pages 153--158.
[17]
Demola (2018). Demola's Mission. https://www.demola.net/about/#what-is
[18]
Aalto Design Factory (2018). https://designfactory.aalto.fi/
[19]
Monitieteinen työelämäprojekti (2018). University of Jyväskylä, Finland.

Index Terms

  1. Smart Campus Innovation Lab

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    Mindtrek '18: Proceedings of the 22nd International Academic Mindtrek Conference
    October 2018
    282 pages
    ISBN:9781450365895
    DOI:10.1145/3275116
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    In-Cooperation

    • Tampere University of Technology
    • UTA: The University of Tampere
    • SIGCHI Finland: ACM SIGCHI Finland
    • Tampere University of Applied Sciences

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 October 2018

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Multidisciplinary projects
    2. innovation
    3. internal development

    Qualifiers

    • Poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    Mindtrek 2018
    Mindtrek 2018: Academic Mindtrek 2018
    October 10 - 11, 2018
    Tampere, Finland

    Acceptance Rates

    Mindtrek '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 34 of 68 submissions, 50%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 110 of 207 submissions, 53%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 145
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media