research-article

Towards an "Ethics by Design" Methodology for AI Research Projects

Authors:

Mathieu d'Aquin,

Pinelopi Troullinou,

Noel E. O'Connor,

Aindrias Cullen,

Gráinne Faller,

Louise HoldenAuthors Info & Claims

AIES '18: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society

Pages 54 - 59

https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278765

Published: 27 December 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Addressing ethical issues arising from AI research, and by extension from most areas of Data Science, is a core challenge in both the academic and industry worlds. The nature of research and the specific set of technical skills involved imply that AI and Data Science researchers are not equipped to identify and anticipate such issues arising, or to establish solutions at the time a specific research project is being designed. In this paper, we discuss the need for a methodology for ethical research design that involves a broader set of skills from the start of the project. We specifically identify, from the relevant literature, a set of requirements that we argue to be needed for such a methodology. We then explore two case studies where such ethical considerations have been explored in conjunction with the development of specific research projects, in order to validate those assumptions and generalise them into a set of principles guiding an "Ethics by Design" method for conducting AI and Data Science research.

References

[1]

N. Backus and C. Ferraris. 2004. Theory meets practice: Using the potter box to teach business communication ethics. Association for Business Communication (2004), 222--229.

[2]

J. Bleecker. 2009. Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. report from the Near Future Laboratory.

[3]

A. Cavoukian. 2010. Privacy by design: The 7 foundational principles. implementation and mapping of fair information practices. Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Canada (2010).

[4]

J. Eakin, A. Robertson, B. Poland, D. Coburn, and R. & Edwards. 1996. Towards a critical social science perspective on health promotion research. Health promotion international, Vol. 11, 2 (1996), 157--165.

[5]

E. J. Emanuel, C. C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller, and D. D. Wendler (Eds.). 2008. The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethic .Oxford University Press.

[6]

B. Friedman and P. H. Kahn Jr. 2007. Human values, ethics, and design. In The human-computer interaction handbook. 1223--1248.

[7]

M. Guillemin and L. Gillam. 2004. Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative inquiry, Vol. 2, 10 (2004), 261--280.

[8]

S. Gürses, C. Troncoso, and C. Diaz. 2011. Engineering privacy by design. Computers, Privacy & Data Protection (2011).

[9]

H. Herzogenrath-Amelung, P. Troullinou, and N. Thomopoulos. 2015. Reversing the order: towards a philosophically informed debate on ICT for transport. ICT for Transport: Opportunities and Threats 205 (2015).

[10]

Wall J., Izquierdo E., Argyriou L., Monaghan D.S., O'Connor N.E., Poulakos S., Smolic A., and Mekuria R. 2014. REVERIE: Natural human interaction in virtual immersive environments. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). 2165--2167.

[11]

M. Leese. 2017. Holding the Project Accountable: Research Governance, Ethics, and Democracy. Science and engineering ethics, Vol. 6, 23 (2017), 1597--1616.

[12]

E. Luger and T. Rodden. 2013. An informed view on consent for UbiComp. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing .

Digital Library

[13]

J. Millar. 2015. Technology as moral proxy: Autonomy and paternalism by design. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Vol. 2, 34 (2015).

[14]

F. Ó Brolcháin, T. Jacquemard, D.S. Monaghan, N.E. O'Connor, P. Novitzky, and B. Gordijn. 2016. The convergence of virtual reality and social networks: threats to privacy and autonomy. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 2, 22 (2016), 1--29.

[15]

S. Panchanathan, S Chakraborty, T. McDaniel, R. Tadayon, B. Fakhri, N. E. O'Connor, M. Marsden, S. Little, K. McGuinness, and D. Monaghan. 2017. Enriching the fan experience in a smart stadium using internet of things technologies. International Journal of Semantic Computing, Vol. 2, 11 (2017).

[16]

M. Sanjari, F. Bahramnezhad, F. K. Fomani, M. Shoghi, and M. A. Cheraghi. 2014. Ethical challenges of researchers in qualitative studies: the necessity to develop a specific guideline. Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine 7 (2014).

[17]

P. Troullinou and M. d'Aquin. 2018. Seeing the “Surveillant Face” of Technology in Black Mirror: Using Futuristic Scenarios for an Interdisciplinary Discussion on the Feasibility and Implications of Technology. In Black Mirror and Critical Media Theory, A. M. Cirucci and B. Vacker (Eds.). Lexington Books.

[18]

P. Troullinou, I. Tiddi, and M. d'Aquin (Eds.). 2017. Proceedings of the Re-coding Black Mirror 2017 Workshop co-located with 16th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2017) . CEUR-WS proceedings, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1939/.

[19]

J. van Rest, D. Boonstra, M. Everts, M. van Rijn, and R. van Paassen. 2012. Designing privacy-by-design. In Annual Privacy Forum .

Digital Library

[20]

A. Van Wynsberghe and S. Robbins. 2013. Ethicist as Designer: a pragmatic approach to ethics in the lab. Science and engineering ethics, Vol. 4, 20 (2013), 947--961.

[21]

P. P. Verbeek. 2006. Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 3, 31 (2006), 361--380.

[22]

L.D. Watley. 2014. Training in ethical judgment with a modified Potter Box. Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 1, 23 (2014), 1--14.

[23]

D. Wright and P. De Hert. 2012. Introduction to privacy impact assessment. In Privacy Impact Assessment . Springer Netherlands.

Cited By

Şenocak DBozkurt AKoçdar S(2024)Exploring the Ethical Principles for the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in EducationTransforming Education With Generative AI10.4018/979-8-3693-1351-0.ch010(200-213)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1351-0.ch010
Calzati SPloeger H(2024)Problem-solving? No, problem-opening! A method to reframe and teach data ethics as a transdisciplinary endeavourBig Data & Society10.1177/2053951724127068711:3Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241270687
Ekundayo TKhan ZNuzhat S(2024)Evaluating the Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Scholarly Research: A Study Focused on AcademicsHuman Behavior and Emerging Technologies10.1155/2024/87137182024(1-13)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8713718
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Towards an "Ethics by Design" Methodology for AI Research Projects
1. Social and professional topics

Recommendations

Automated Kantian Ethics: A Faithful Implementation
KI 2022: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Abstract
As we grant artificial intelligence increasing power and independence in contexts like healthcare, policing, and driving, AI faces moral dilemmas but lacks the tools to solve them. Warnings from regulators, philosophers, and computer scientists ...
Towards an ontological foundation of information ethics

The paper presents, firstly, a brief review of the long history of information ethics beginning with the Greek concept of parrhesia or freedom of speech as analyzed by Michel Foucault. The recent concept of information ethics is related particularly ...
Towards a Feminist Metaethics of AI
AIES '22: Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society

The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has sparked an overwhelming number of AI ethics guidelines, boards and codes of conduct. These outputs primarily analyse competing theories, principles and values for AI development and deployment. ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

AIES '18: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society

December 2018

406 pages

ISBN:9781450360128

DOI:10.1145/3278721

Program Chairs:
Jason Furman
Harvard University, USA
,
Gary Marchant
Arizona State University, USA
,
Huw Price
Cambridge University, UK
,
Francesca Rossi
IBM Research, USA & University of Padova, Italy

Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

SIGAI: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 December 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Science Foundation Ireland

Conference

AIES '18

Sponsor:

SIGAI

AIES '18: AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society

February 2 - 3, 2018

LA, New Orleans, USA

Acceptance Rates

AIES '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 61 of 162 submissions, 38%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 61 of 162 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

47
Total Citations
View Citations
1,661
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)273
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29

Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Şenocak DBozkurt AKoçdar S(2024)Exploring the Ethical Principles for the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in EducationTransforming Education With Generative AI10.4018/979-8-3693-1351-0.ch010(200-213)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1351-0.ch010
Calzati SPloeger H(2024)Problem-solving? No, problem-opening! A method to reframe and teach data ethics as a transdisciplinary endeavourBig Data & Society10.1177/2053951724127068711:3Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241270687
Ekundayo TKhan ZNuzhat S(2024)Evaluating the Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Scholarly Research: A Study Focused on AcademicsHuman Behavior and Emerging Technologies10.1155/2024/87137182024(1-13)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8713718
Iliadis E(2024)AI-GFA: Applied Framework for Producing Responsible Artificial IntelligenceProceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good10.1145/3677525.3678646(93-99)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677525.3678646
Lu QZhu LXu XWhittle JZowghi DJacquet A(2024)Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and EngineeringACM Computing Surveys10.1145/362623456:7(1-35)Online publication date: 9-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626234
Sparrow LGalwey CLoveridge BGlasser SOsborne MKelly R(2024)Heart and Soul: The Ethics of Biometric Capture in Immersive Artistic PerformanceProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642309(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642309
Gray CObi IChivukula SLi ZCarlock TWill MPivonka AJohns JRigsbee BMenon ABharadwaj A(2024)Building an Ethics-Focused Action Plan: Roles, Process Moves, and TrajectoriesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642302(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642302
Taddeo M(2024)The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Defence10.1093/oso/9780197745441.001.0001Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197745441.001.0001
Stathis Gvan den Herik J(2024)Ethical and preventive legal technologyAI and Ethics10.1007/s43681-023-00413-2Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00413-2
Perperidis G(2024)Designing Ethical A.I. Under the Current Socio-Economic Milieu: Philosophical, Political and Economic Challenges of Ethics by Design for A.I.Philosophy & Technology10.1007/s13347-024-00766-437:3Online publication date: 4-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00766-4
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents