Technological development of visualization of magnetic resonance sectional images and pelvic floor ultrasonography for teaching purposes
Authors: 
Lourdes Asensio Romero, Manuel Asensio Gómez, Alberto Prats-Galino, Juan A. Juanes MéndezAuthors Info & Claims
Lourdes Asensio Romero, Manuel Asensio Gómez, Alberto Prats-Galino, Juan A. Juanes MéndezAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 357 - 361
Abstract
Computer developments as didactic resources are gaining an increasingly relevant role as new technologies are integrated into the teaching activity. A good knowledge and interpretation of radiological procedures, such as nuclear magnetic resonance and ultrasound, is essential to carry out correct clinical diagnoses, especially in an anatomical area as complex as the pelvis and the female pelvic floor. The need for training both students, residents and specialists in gynecology in the anatomy of that area, in the interpretation of diagnostic images and, especially, in surgical anatomy, makes this form of learning through technological resources, such as the one we present, is seen as a new alternative or as a complement to those already used up to the present time
References
[1]
Robert B. Trelease. 2016. From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-Learning: How computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anat. Sci. Educ. 9, 6 (November 2016), 583--602.
[2]
Roberto D. Tabernero Rico, Juan A. Juanes Méndez, and Alberto Prats Galino. 2017. New Generation of Three-Dimensional Tools to Learn Anatomy. J. Med. Syst. 41, 5 (May 2017), 88.
[3]
Dong Sun Shin, Hae Gwon Jang, Sung Bae Hwang, Dong-Hwan Har, Young Lae Moon, and Min Suk Chung. 2013. Two-dimensional sectioned images and three-dimensional surface models for learning the anatomy of the female pelvis. Anat. Sci. Educ. 6, 5 (September 2013), 316--323.
[4]
Manuel Rubio, José Carretero, Ricardo Vázquez, José Manuel Riesco, Juan Antonio Juanes and Enrique Blanco. 2007. Educational strategies applied to the teaching of anatomy. The evolution of resources. Eur J Anat 11, 1 (2007), 31--43.
[5]
Sanjib Kumar Ghosh. 2015. Evolution of illustrations in anatomy: A study from the classical period in Europe to modern times. Anat. Sci. Educ. 8, 2 (March 2015), 175--188.
[6]
Mohamed Estai and Stuart Bunt. 2016. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann. Anat. - Anat. Anzeiger 208 (November 2016), 151--157.
[7]
Sandra Berney, Mireille Bétrancourt, Gaëlle Molinari, and Nady Hoyek. 2015. How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models. Anat. Sci. Educ. 8, 5 (September 2015), 452--462.
[8]
Yun Peng, Rose Khavari, Nissrine A. Nakib, Timothy B. Boone, and Yingchun Zhang. 2016. Assessment of urethral support using MRI-derived computational modeling of the female pelvis. Int. Urogynecol. J. 27, 2 (February 2016), 205--212.
[9]
Andrea Giannini, Veronica Iodice, Eugenia Picano, Eleonora Russo, Virna Zampa, Vincenzo Ferrari, and Tommaso Simoncini. 2017. Magnetic Resonance Imaging--Based Three Dimensional Patient-Specific Reconstruction of Uterine Fibromatosis: Impact on Surgery. J. Gynecol. Surg. 33, 4 (August 2017), 138--144.
[10]
Laura García del Salto, Jaime de Miguel Criado, Luis Felipe Aguilera del Hoyo, Leticia Gutiérrez Velasco, Patricia Fraga Rivas, Marcos Manzano Paradela, María Isabel Díez Pérez de las Vacas, Ana Gloria Marco Sanz, and Eduardo Fraile Moreno. 2014. MR Imaging--based Assessment of the Female Pelvic Floor. RadioGraphics 34, 5 (September 2014), 1417--1439.
[11]
Grazia T. Bitti, Giovanni M. Argiolas, Nicola Ballicu, Elisabetta Caddeo, Martina Cecconi, Giovanna Demurtas, Gildo Matta, M. Teresa Peltz, Simona Secci, and Paolo Siotto. 2014. Pelvic Floor Failure: MR Imaging Evaluation of Anatomic and Functional Abnormalities. RadioGraphics 34, 2 (March 2014), 429--448.
[12]
M. M. Bertrand, F. Macri, R. Mazars, S. Droupy, J. P. Beregi, and M. Prudhomme. 2014. MRI-based 3D pelvic autonomous innervation: a first step towards image-guided pelvic surgery. Eur. Radiol. 24, 8 (August 2014), 1989--1997.
[13]
F. Vellucci, C. Regini, C. Barbanti and S. Luisi. 2018. Pelvic floor evaluation with transperineal ultrasound: a new approach. Minerva Ginecol. 70, 1 (2018), 58--68.
[14]
G. Rostaminia, J. Manonai, E. Leclaire, F. Omoumi, M. Marchiorlatti, L. H. Quiroz, and S. A. Shobeiri. 2014. Interrater reliability of assessing levator ani deficiency with 360° 3D endovaginal ultrasound. Int. Urogynecol. J. 25, 6 (June 2014), 761--766.
[15]
Hans Peter Dietz. 2017. Pelvic Floor Ultrasound. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 60, 1 (March 2017), 58--81.
[16]
Fernando de la Portilla, Mercedes Rubio Manzanares Dorado, Verónica Pino Díaz, Jorge M. Vazquez Monchul, Carmen Palacios, José M. Díaz Pavón, José M. Sánchez Gil, and Ana María García Cabrera. 2015. Utilidad de la ecografía dinámica tridimensional en el estudio del suelo pélvico. Cirugía Española 93, 8 (October 2015), 530--535.
[17]
Luciana P. Chamié, Duarte Miguel Ferreira Rodrigues Ribeiro, Angela H. M. Caiado, Gisele Warmbrand, and Paulo C. Serafini. 2018. Translabial US and Dynamic MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor: Normal Anatomy and Dysfunction. RadioGraphics 38, 1 (January 2018), 287--308.
[18]
Céline D. Alt, Franziska Hampel, Peter Hallscheidt, Christof Sohn, Bettina Schlehe, and Kerstin A. Brocker. 2016. 3 T MRI-based measurements for the integrity of the female pelvic floor in 25 healthy nulliparous women. Neurourol. Urodyn. 35, 2 (February 2016), 218--223.
[19]
Sindhura Alapati and Kedar Jambhekar. 2017. Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pelvic Floor. Semin. Ultrasound, CT MRI 38, 3 (June 2017), 188--199.
[20]
Aly Youssef, Elisa Montaguti, Olimpia Sanlorenzo, Luisa Cariello, Elsayed Elbadawy Awad, Giuseppina Pacella, Tullio Ghi, Gianluigi Pilu, and Nicola Rizzo. 2015. A New Simple Technique for 3-Dimensional Sonographic Assessment of the Pelvic Floor Muscles. J. Ultrasound Med. 34, 1 (January 2015), 65--72.
[21]
Roopa Ram, Sallie S. Oliphant, Susan A. Barr, and Tarun Pandey. 2017. Imaging of Pelvic Floor Reconstruction. Semin. Ultrasound, CT MRI 38, 3 (June 2017), 200--212.
[22]
Kim J. B. Notten, Kirsten B. Kluivers, Jurgen J. Fütterer, Karlijn J. Schweitzer, Jaap Stoker, Femke E. Mulder, Regina G. Beets-Tan, Roy F. A. Vliegen, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Roy F. P. M. Kruitwagen, Jan-Paul W. R. Roovers, and Mirjam Weemhoff. 2014. Translabial Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Levator Ani Defects. Obstet. Gynecol. 124, 6 (December 2014), 1190--1197.
[23]
Sthela M. Murad-Regadas, Francisco Sergio Pinheiro Regadas Filho, Francisco Sergio Pinheiro Regadas, Lusmar Veras Rodrigues, Jacyara de J. R. Pereira, Graziela Olivia da S. Fernandes, Iris Daiana Dealcanfreitas, and Jose Jader Mendonca Filho. 2014. Use of Dynamic 3-Dimensional Transvaginal and Transrectal Ultrasonography to Assess Posterior Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Related to Obstructed Defecation. Dis. Colon Rectum 57, 2 (February 2014), 228--236.
[24]
Mélanie Morin, Sophie Bergeron, Samir Khalifé, Marie-Hélène Mayrand, and Yitzchak M. Binik. 2014. Morphometry of the Pelvic Floor Muscles in Women With and Without Provoked Vestibulodynia Using 4D Ultrasound. J. Sex. Med. 11, 3 (March 2014), 776--785.
[25]
Pouya Javadian, Dena O'Leary, Ghazaleh Rostaminia, Justin North, Jason Wagner, Lieschen H. Quiroz, and S. Abbas Shobeiri. 2017. How does 3D endovaginal ultrasound compare to magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of levator ani anatomy? Neurourol. Urodyn. 36, 2 (February 2017), 409--413.
[26]
Lewis Chan and Vincent Tse. 2018. Pelvic floor ultrasound in the diagnosis of sling complications. World J. Urol. 36, 5 (May 2018), 753--759.
[27]
Marina Yiasemidou, Daniel Glassman, Faisal Mushtaq, Christos Athanasiou, Mark-Mon Williams, David Jayne, and Danilo Miskovic. 2017. Mental practice with interactive 3D visual aids enhances surgical performance. Surg. Endosc. 31, 10 (October 2017), 4111--4117.
[28]
Sonia Pujol, Michael Baldwin, Joshua Nassiri, Ron Kikinis, and Kitt Shaffer. 2016. Using 3D Modeling Techniques to Enhance Teaching of Difficult Anatomical Concepts. Acad. Radiol. 23, 4 (April 2016), 507--516.
[29]
Daniel Preece, Sarah B. Williams, Richard Lam, and Renate Weller. 2013. "Let's Get Physical": Advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat. Sci. Educ. 6, 4 (July 2013), 216--224.
[30]
Diana Coomes Peterson and Gregory S.A. Mlynarczyk. 2016. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures. Anat. Sci. Educ. 9, 6 (November 2016), 529--536.
[31]
Brittany Star Hampton and Vivian W. Sung. 2010. Improving medical student knowledge of female pelvic floor dysfunction and anatomy: a randomized trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 202, 6 (June 2010), 601.e1--601.e8.
[32]
Ginevra Salsi, Ilaria Cataneo, Maria Gaia Dodaro, Nicola Rizzo, Gianluigi Pilu, Mar Sanz Gascón, and Aly Youssef. 2017. Three-dimensional/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: clinical utility and future prospects. Int. J. Womens. Health 9, (September 2017), 643--656.
[33]
Ya-Hong Xue, Shu-Qing Ding, Yi-Jiang Ding, and Li-Qun Pan. 2017. Role of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in assessing the anal sphincter morphology of female patients with chronic proctalgia. World J. Gastroenterol. 23, 21 (2017), 3900.
[34]
Yinghua Xuan, Song Yue, Lijuan Sun, Yan Pei, Jingjing Wang, Li Tan, Zhaoling Lu, Liman Yang, Yuanyuan An, Yuxin Jiang, and Qingqing Wu. 2017. Repeatability of Female Midurethral Measurement Using High-Frequency 3-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasonography. J. Ultrasound Med. (December 2017).
[35]
Edyta Wlaźlak, Tomasz Kluz, Jacek Kociszewski, Karolina Frachowicz, Magdalena Janowska, Wiktor Wlaźlak, and Grzegorz Surkont. 2017. The analysis of repeatability and reproducibility of bladder neck mobility measurements obtained during pelvic floor sonography performed introitally with 2D transvaginal probe. Ginekol. Pol. 88, 7 (July 2017), 360--365.
[36]
T. F. M. Vergeldt, K. J. B. Notten, J. Stoker, J. J. Fütterer, R. G. Beets-Tan, R. F. A. Vliegen, K. J. Schweitzer, F. E. M. Mulder, S. M. J. van Kuijk, J. P. W. R. Roovers, K. B. Kluivers, and M. Weemhoff. 2016. Comparison of translabial three-dimensional ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging for measurement of levator hiatal biometry at rest. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 47, 5 (May 2016), 636--641.
[37]
Stéphanie Thibault-Gagnon, Linda McLean, Corrie Goldfinger, Caroline Pukall, and Susan Chamberlain. 2016. Differences in the Biometry of the Levator Hiatus at Rest, During Contraction, and During Valsalva Maneuver Between Women With and Without Provoked Vestibulodynia Assessed by Transperineal Ultrasound Imaging. J. Sex. Med. 13, 2 (February 2016), 243--252.
[38]
G. Rostaminia, D. White, L. H. Quiroz, and S. A. Shobeiri. 2014. 3D pelvic floor ultrasound findings and severity of anal incontinence. Int. Urogynecol. J. 25, 5 (May 2014), 623--629.
[39]
García-Peñalvo, F. J., 2014. Formación en la sociedad del conocimiento, un programa de doctorado con una perspectiva interdisciplinar. Education in the Knowledge Society 15, 1, 4--9.
[40]
García-Peñalvo, F. J., 2015. Engineering contributions to a Knowledge Society multicultural perspective. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje (IEEE RITA) 10, 1, 17--18.
Index Terms
- Technological development of visualization of magnetic resonance sectional images and pelvic floor ultrasonography for teaching purposes
Recommendations
3D Reconstruction of the Female Perineal Musculature, from Sections of Magnetic Resonance: Interactive computer development
TEEM'19: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityA computer development that allows to visualize and interact with the musculature of the female pelvis reconstructed from serial sections of high resolution magnetic resonance in a virtual environment is presented.
The possibilities of representing ...
Computer Application of Ultrasound and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Images for the Anatomical Learning of the Pelvis and the Female Pelvic Floor
Computer applications have been incorporated as valuable components in teaching, especially thanks to the advancement and innovation of new technologies during the last decades. The implementation of these computer developments in medicine and in the ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2018 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
In-Cooperation
- University of Salamanca: University of Salamanca
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 24 October 2018
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
TEEM'18
TEEM'18: Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
October 24 - 26, 2018
Salamanca, Spain
Acceptance Rates
TEEM'18 Paper Acceptance Rate 151 of 243 submissions, 62%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 53Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)1
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in