research-article

Public Access

Non-Programming Activities for Engagement with Foundational Concepts in Introductory Programming

Authors:

Nicholas JackiwAuthors Info & Claims

SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Pages 1136 - 1142

https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287468

Published: 22 February 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Programming-in a text-based or visual language-is a complex activity that novices find difficult to learn. In this paper, we present an experience report on how novel activities designed for early conceptual exploration can support middle school students' engagement with and learning of foundational programming concepts beginning programmers often struggle with, specifically, variables, expressions (Boolean, arithmetic, relational), loops, and abstraction. We drew on mathematics education research on dynamic representations to design and develop a set of four non-programming, (open access) web-based, interactive activities and micro-worlds and two unplugged activities as part of a suite of activities that can be embedded in a typical introductory programming curriculum to introduce learners to the target concepts before they encounter them in programming. This report describes the activities as well as our experience with their use as part of an introductory computer science course in three diverse, urban, middle school classrooms in the US

References

[1]

Computer Science Teachers Association. 2017. CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards, Revised 2017. Retrieved from http://www.csteachers.org/standards.

[2]

Drijvers, P., Kieran, C., Mariotti, M. A., et al. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics education: Theoretical perspectives. In C. Hoyles, & J. P. Lagrange (Ed.), Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain (pp. 89--132). New York, NY: Springer.

[3]

du Boulay, B. (1986). Some difficulties of learning to program. Journal of Ed Computing Research, 2(1), 57--73.

[4]

Ebrahimi, A. (1994). Novice programmer errors: Language constructs and plan composition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(4), 457--480.

Digital Library

[5]

Franklin, D., Skifstad, G., Rolock, R., Mehrotra, I., Ding, V., Hansen, A., ... & Harlow, D. (2017, March). Using upper-elementary student performance to understand conceptual sequencing in a blocks-based curriculum. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 231--236). ACM.

Digital Library

[6]

Gobil, A. R. M., Shukor, Z., & Mohtar, I. A. (2009). Novice difficulties in selection structure. In International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 2, 351--356. New Jersey, USA: IEEE.

[7]

Grover, S. 2019. An Assessment for Introductory Programming Concepts in Middle School Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), Toronto, CA

[8]

Grover, S., Pea, R., Cooper, S. (2015). Designing for Deeper Learning in a Blended Computer Science Course for Middle School Students. Computer Science Education, 25(2), 199--237.

[9]

Grover, S., Pea, R. & Cooper, S. (2016). Factors Influencing Computer Science Learning in Middle School. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on CS Ed. (SIGCSE '16). ACM.

Digital Library

[10]

Grover, S. & Basu, S. (2017). Measuring Student Learning in Introductory Block- Based Programming: Examining Misconceptions of Loops, Variables, and Boolean Logic. In Proceedings of the 48th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '17). Seattle, WA: ACM.

Digital Library

[11]

Grover, S., Basu, S., & Schank, P. 2018. What We Can Learn About Student Learning From Open-Ended Programming Projects in Middle School Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 999--1004). ACM.

Digital Library

[12]

Jackiw, N. 1991, 2009. The Geometer's Sketchpad (computer software V1, V5). Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.

[13]

K-12 CS Framework Committee. 2016. K-12 Computer Science Framework. Retrieved from http://www.k12cs.org.

[14]

Laborde, J. M, & Stra'sser, R. 1990. Cabri-geometre: A microworld of geometry for guided discovery learning. Zentralblatt fur didaktik der athematic, 90(5), 171--177. {15} Lahtinen, E., Ala-Mutka, K., & Jarvinen, H. M. (2005). A study of the difficulties of novice programmers. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(3), 14--18.

Digital Library

[15]

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14.

[16]

Pea, R., & Kurland, D. (1984). On the cognitive effects of learning computer programming. New Ideas In Psychology, 2, 137--168.

[17]

Pears et al. (2007). A Survey of Literature on the Teaching of Introductory Programming. In Proceedings of the 38th Technical Symposium on CS Education. ACM.

Digital Library

[18]

Robins, A., Rountree, J. and Rountree, N., 2003. Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer scien education, 13(2), pp.137- 172.

[19]

Roschelle, J. et al. (2010). Integration of technology, curriculum, and professional development for advancing middle school mathematics: Three large-scale studies. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 833--878.

[20]

Samurcay, R. (1989). The concept of variable in programming: Its meaning and use in problem-solving by novice programmers. In E. Soloway and J. C. Spohrer, editors, Studying the Novice Programmer, 161--178.

[21]

Schofield, E., Erlinger, M., & Dodds, Z. (2014). MyCS: CS for middle-years students and their teachers. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 337--342). ACM.

Digital Library

Cited By

Sagimbayeva ANiyetbayeva NTassuov B(2024)A model for teaching students to create educational games in supplementary education in computer scienceScientific Herald of Uzhhorod University Series Physics10.54919/physics/55.2024.43lh7(437-445)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.43lh7
Song YTian XRegatti NKatuka GBoyer KIsrael MStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)Artificial Intelligence Unplugged: Designing Unplugged Activities for a Conversational AI Summer CampProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630783(1272-1278)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626252.3630783
Shehzad URecker MClarke-Midura JDoyle MStephenson BDorn BSoh LBattestilli L(2023)A Literature Review Examining Broadening Participation in Upper Elementary CS EducationProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569873(570-576)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545945.3569873
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Non-Programming Activities for Engagement with Foundational Concepts in Introductory Programming
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education

Recommendations

Measuring Student Learning in Introductory Block-Based Programming: Examining Misconceptions of Loops, Variables, and Boolean Logic
SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Programming in block-based environments is a key element of introductory computer science (CS) curricula in K-12 settings. Past research conducted in the context of text-based programming points to several challenges related to novice learners' ...
A Survey of Introductory Programming Courses in Ireland
ITiCSE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

Between January and April of 2018, a comprehensive survey of introductory programming courses was undertaken across all sectors of Irish third-level institutions (universities, institutes of technology, and private colleges). The survey instrument was ...
Using robots to teach programming to K-12 teachers
FIE '12: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)

We present the results of a pilot study in which twenty K-12 teachers were introduced to LEGO NXT-G robot programming through a three-day summer workshop. Our aim was to give teachers the confidence and skills to start after-school robotics programs ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

February 2019

1364 pages

ISBN:9781450358903

DOI:10.1145/3287324

General Chairs:
Elizabeth K. Hawthorne
Union County College, USA
,
Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones
University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Sarah Heckman
North Carolina State University, USA
,
Jian Zhang
Texas Woman's University, USA

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 February 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

National Science Foundation

Conference

SIGCSE '19

Sponsor:

SIGCSE

SIGCSE '19: The 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

February 27 - March 2, 2019

MN, Minneapolis, USA

Acceptance Rates

SIGCSE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 169 of 526 submissions, 32%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE TS 2025

Sponsor:
sigcse

The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

February 26 - March 1, 2025

Pittsburgh , PA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

8
Total Citations
View Citations
810
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)110
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21

Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Sagimbayeva ANiyetbayeva NTassuov B(2024)A model for teaching students to create educational games in supplementary education in computer scienceScientific Herald of Uzhhorod University Series Physics10.54919/physics/55.2024.43lh7(437-445)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.43lh7
Song YTian XRegatti NKatuka GBoyer KIsrael MStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)Artificial Intelligence Unplugged: Designing Unplugged Activities for a Conversational AI Summer CampProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630783(1272-1278)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626252.3630783
Shehzad URecker MClarke-Midura JDoyle MStephenson BDorn BSoh LBattestilli L(2023)A Literature Review Examining Broadening Participation in Upper Elementary CS EducationProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569873(570-576)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545945.3569873
Katchapakirin KAnutariya CSupnithi T(2022)ScratchThAI: A conversation-based learning support framework for computational thinking developmentEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-021-10870-z27:6(8533-8560)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10870-z
Poulakis EPolitis P(2020)Teaching Computational Thinking UnpluggedHandbook of Research on Tools for Teaching Computational Thinking in P-12 Education10.4018/978-1-7998-4576-8.ch009(196-232)Online publication date: 2020
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4576-8.ch009
Nanavati AOwens AStehlik MZhang JSherriff MHeckman SCutter PMonge A(2020)Pythons and Martians and Finches, Oh My! Lessons Learned from a Mandatory 8th Grade Python ClassProceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3328778.3366906(811-817)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3328778.3366906
Grover SJackiw NLundh P(2019)Concepts before coding: non-programming interactives to advance learning of introductory programming concepts in middle schoolComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2019.1568955(1-30)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2019
https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1568955
Monjelat NLantz-Andersson A(2019)Teachers’ narrative of learning to program in a professional development effort and the relation to the rhetoric of computational thinkingEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-019-10048-8Online publication date: 6-Dec-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10048-8

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents