Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3297067.3297077acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Shape Matching Method Considering Computational Feasibility

Published: 28 November 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Regarding shape matching, we present a novel method of determining a correspondence between shapes that is applicable to existing local descriptors and somewhat enhances them. In our method, we determine the correspondence of a focusing point of a shape, considering the correspondence of neighboring points to the focusing point. This plays a vital role in avoiding the risk of failing to notice a more appropriate correspondence. However, considering neighboring points causes another problem of computational feasibility because there is a considerable increase in the number of possible correspondences searched in matching shapes. We therefore manage this problem using an efficient approximation to reduce the number of possible correspondences. Conducting numerical analysis on shape retrieval, we show that our method is useful for obtaining a better correspondence than the conventional method that does not consider the correspondence of neighboring points.

References

[1]
Serge Belongie, Greg Mori, and Jitendra Malik. 2006. Matching with Shape Contexts. In Statistics and Analysis of Shapes, Hamid Krim and Anthony Yezzi Jr. (Eds.). Birkhäuser, Boston, 81--105.
[2]
Jens Clausen. 1999. Branch and Bound Algorithms -- Principles and Examples. Retrieved December 8, 2018 from https://imada.sdu.dk/~jbj/heuristikker/TSPtext.pdf
[3]
Consumer Affairs Agency, Government of Japan. 2018. Washing Tag Symbols: After November 30, 2016. http://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/representation/ household_goods/guide/wash_01.html.
[4]
Consumer Affairs Agency, Government of Japan. 2018. Washing Tag Symbols: Before November 30, 2016. http://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/ representation/household_goods/guide/wash.html.
[5]
Huijie Fan, Yang Cong, and Yandong Tang. 2012. Self-closed partial shape descriptor for shape retrieval. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE Signal Processing Society, IEEE, Orlando, FL, 505--508.
[6]
Cosmin Grigorescu and Nicolai Petkov. 2003. Distance sets for shape filters and shape recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 12, 10 (Oct. 2003), 1274--1286.
[7]
Seymour Lipschutz and Marc Lars Lipson. 2007. Discrete Mathematics (3rd ed.). The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York.
[8]
Siddharth Manay, Daniel Cremers, Byung-Woo Hong, Anthony J. Yezzi Jr., and Stefano Soatto. 2006. Integral Invariants for Shape Matching. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28, 10 (Oct. 2006), 1602--1618.
[9]
R Core Team. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
[10]
Katsutoshi Ueaoki, Kazunori Iwata, Nobuo Suematsu, and Akira Hayashi. 2011. Matching Handwritten Line Drawings with Von Mises Distributions. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E94-D, 12 (Dec. 2011), 2487--2494.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SPML '18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning
November 2018
177 pages
ISBN:9781450366052
DOI:10.1145/3297067
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 November 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Shape matching
  2. branch and bound method
  3. shape retrieval

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SPML '18

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 33
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media