Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3306446.3340818acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesopencollabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Do you have a source for that?: understanding the challenges of collaborative evidence-based journalism

Published: 20 August 2019 Publication History

Abstract

WikiTribune is a pilot news service, where evidence-based articles are co-created by professional journalists and a community of volunteers using an open and collaborative digital platform. The WikiTribune project is set within an evolving and dynamic media landscape, operating under principles of openness and transparency. It combines a commercial for-profit business model with an open collaborative mode of production with contributions from both paid professionals and unpaid volunteers. This descriptive case study captures the first 12-months of WikiTribune's operations to understand the challenges and opportunities within this hybrid model of production. We use the rich literature on Wikipedia to understand the WikiTribune case and to identify areas of convergence and divergence, as well as avenues for future research. Data was collected on news articles with a focus on the time it takes for an article to reach published status, the number and type of contributors typically involved, article activity and engagement levels, and the types of topics covered.

References

[1]
Judd Antin and Coye Cheshire. 2010. Readers are not free-riders: reading as a form of participation on Wikipedia. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '10), 127--130.
[2]
O. Arazy, R. Kopak, and I. Hadar. 2017. Heuristic Principles and Differential Judgments in the Assessment of Information Quality. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 18, 5: 403--432.
[3]
Ofer Arazy, Wayne Morgan, and Raymond Patterson. 2006. Wisdom of the Crowds: Decentralized Knowledge Construction in Wikipedia. In 16th Annual Workshop on Information Technologies & Systems.
[4]
Yochai Benkler. 2002. Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and "The Nature of the Firm." The Yale Law Journal 112, 3: 369--446.
[5]
Taryn Bipat, David W. McDonald, and Mark Zachry. 2018. Do We All Talk Before We Type?: Understanding Collaboration in Wikipedia Language Editions. In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration - OpenSym '18, 1--11.
[6]
James Bohman and William Rehg. 1997. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. MIT Press.
[7]
Robert M. Bond, Christopher J. Fariss, Jason J. Jones, Adam D. I. Kramer, Cameron Marlow, Jaime E. Settle, and James H. Fowler. 2012. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489, 7415: 295--298.
[8]
Shayne Bowman and Chris Willis. 2003. We Media: How Audiences are Shaping the Future of News and Information. The Media Center, American Press Institute.
[9]
Engin Bozdag and Jeroen van den Hoven. 2015. Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design. Ethics and Information Technology 17, 4: 249--265.
[10]
Petter Bae Brandtzaeg, Asbjørn Følstad, and María Ángeles Chaparro Domínguez. 2018. How Journalists and Social Media Users Perceive Online Fact-Checking and Verification Services. Journalism Practice 12, 9: 1109--1129.
[11]
Taina Bucher. 2012. Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society 14, 7: 1164--1180.
[12]
Brian S. Butler, Patrick J. Bateman, Peter H. Gray, and E. Ilana Diamant. 2014. An Attraction-selection-attrition Theory of Online Community Size and Resilience. MIS Q. 38, 3: 699--728.
[13]
Andrea Carson and Kate Farhall. 2018. Understanding Collaborative Investigative Journalism in a "Post-Truth" Age. Journalism Studies 19, 13: 1899--1911.
[14]
Carlos Castillo, Mohammed El-Haddad, Jürgen Pfeffer, and Matt Stempeck. 2014. Characterizing the life cycle of online news stories using social media reactions. In ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing - CSCW '14, 211--223.
[15]
Michael A. DeVito. 2017. From Editors to Algorithms: A values-based approach to understanding story selection in the Facebook news feed. Digital Journalism 5, 6: 753--773.
[16]
Andreea D. Gorbatai. 2011. Exploring underproduction in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration -WikiSym '11, 205.
[17]
Aaron Halfaker, Aniket Kittur, and John Riedl. 2011. Don't bite the newbies: how reverts affect the quantity and quality of Wikipedia work. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration - WikiSym '11, 163.
[18]
Jason J. Jones, Robert M. Bond, Eytan Bakshy, Dean Eckles, and James H. Fowler. 2017. Social influence and political mobilization: Further evidence from a randomized experiment in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. PLOS ONE 12, 4: e0173851.
[19]
Michael Karlsson, Annika Bergström, Christer Clerwall, and Karin Fast. 2015. Participatory journalism - the (r)evolution that wasn't. Content and user behavior in Sweden 2007--2013. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20, 3: 295--311.
[20]
Aniket Kittur and Robert E. Kraut. 2008. Harnessing the Wisdom of Crowds in Wikipedia: Quality Through Coordination. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '08), 37--46.
[21]
Farooq A. Kperogi. 2011. Cooperation with the corporation? CNN and the hegemonic cooptation of citizen journalism through iReport.com. New Media & Society 13, 2: 314--329.
[22]
David Laniado, Riccardo Tasso, Yana Volkovich, and Andreas Kaltenbrunner. 2011. When the Wikipedians Talk: Network and Tree Structure of Wikipedia Discussion Pages. Assoication for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence: 8.
[23]
David M. J. Lazer, Matthew A. Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J. Berinsky, Kelly M. Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J. Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, Michael Schudson, Steven A. Sloman, Cass R. Sunstein, Emily A. Thorson, Duncan J. Watts, and Jonathan L. Zittrain. 2018. The science of fake news. Science 359, 6380: 1094--1096.
[24]
C.M. Lazo and P.F. Batlle. 2019. Information quality and trust: From traditional media to cybermedia. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control 154: 185--206.
[25]
S. Lewandowsky, U. K. H. Ecker, and J. Cook. 2017. Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the "Post-Truth" Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6, 4: 353--369.
[26]
Andrew Lih. 2005. Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource. 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism: 31.
[27]
Kurt Luther, Kelly Caine, Kevin Ziegler, and Amy Bruckman. 2010. Why it works (when it works): success factors in online creative collaboration. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Supporting group work - GROUP '10, 1.
[28]
Shawn McIntosh. 2008. Collaboration, Consensus, and Conflict. Journalism Practice 2, 2: 197--211.
[29]
R. Mejia, K. Beckermann, and C. Sullivan. 2018. White lies: a racial history of the (post)truth. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 15, 2: 109--126.
[30]
M. Mesgari, C. Okoli, M. Mehdi, F. Å. Nielsen, and A. Lanamäki. 2015. "The Sum of All Human Knowledge": A Systematic Review of Scholarly Research on the Content of Wikipedia. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66, 2: 219--245.
[31]
Vitali Mindel, Lars Mathiassen, and Arun Rai. 2018. The Sustainability of Polycentric Information Commons. MIS Quarterly 42, 2: 607-A14.
[32]
Niv Mor and Zvi Reich. 2018. From "Trust Me" to "Show Me" Journalism. Journalism Practice 12, 9: 1091--1108.
[33]
C. Okoli, M. Mehdi, M. Mesgari, F. Å. Nielsen, and A. Lanamäki. 2014. Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders: A systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65, 12: 2381--2403.
[34]
F. Xavier Olleros. 2018. Antirival goods, network effects and the sharing economy. First Monday 23, 2.
[35]
Tanja Pavleska, Andrej Školkay, Bissera Zankova, Nelson Ribeiro, and Anja Bechmann. 2018. Performance analysis of fact-checking organizations and initiatives in Europe: a critical overview of online platforms fighting fake news. Social media and convergence: 29.
[36]
Roy Rosenzweig. 2006. Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past. Journal of American History 93, 1: 117--146.
[37]
Nina-Birte Schirrmacher, Jan Ondrus, and Thomas Kude. 2017. Launch Strategies of Digital Platforms: Platforms with Switching and Non-Switching Users. In ECIS 2017 Completed Research, 17.
[38]
Jodi Schneider, Alexandre Passant, and John G Breslin. 2010. A Content Analysis: How Wikipedia Talk Pages Are Used. In Web Science Conference, 8.
[39]
W. Shin. 2015. Being a truth-teller who serves only the citizens: A case study of Newstapa. Journalism 16, 5: 699--704.
[40]
K. Shu, A. Sliva, S. Wang, J. Tang, and H. Liu. 2017. Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 19, 1: 22--36.
[41]
Emmanuelle Vaast and Geoff Walsham. 2013. Grounded theorizing for electronically mediated social contexts. European Journal of Information Systems 22, 1: 9--25.
[42]
Igor Vobič and Peter Dahlgren. 2013. Reconsidering Participatory Journalism in the Internet Age. Medijska istraživanja: znanstveno-stručni časopis za novinarstvo i medije 19, 2: 9--30.
[43]
David Westerman, Patric R. Spence, and Brandon Van Der Heide. 2014. Social Media as Information Source: Recency of Updates and Credibility of Information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 2: 171--183.
[44]
Robert K. Yin. 2009. Case study research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif Sage Publications.
[45]
Pujan Ziaie and Medin Imamovic. 2013. Lifecycle-based evolution of features in collaborative open production communities: the case of Wikipedia. In ECIS 2013 Completed Research.
[46]
About Us. Retrieved February 11, 2019 from https://www.wikitribune.com/about/
[47]
Wikipedia:The essence of Wikipedia. Wikipedia. Retrieved March 5, 2017 from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:The_essence_of_Wikipedia
[48]
Alexa Top 500 Global Sites. Alexa. Retrieved July 3, 2018 from https://www.alexa.com/topsites
[49]
Siteviews Analysis. Wikimedia. Retrieved July 3, 2018 from https://tools.wmflabs.org/siteviews/
[50]
Wikipedia:Multiyear ranking of most viewed pages. Wikipedia. Retrieved June 28, 2018 from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Multiyear_ranking_of_most_viewed_pages
[51]
List of Wikipedias. Wikipedia. Retrieved July 4, 2018 from https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Wikipedias
[52]
Wikipedia:Wikipedians. Wikipedia. Retrieved July 4, 2018 from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedians
[53]
Wikipedia:Size of Wikipedia. Wikipedia. Retrieved July 4, 2018 from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Size_of_Wikipedia
[54]
Conduct on WikiTribune - what you can expect, what we expect. WikiTribune. Retrieved July 3, 2017 from https://www.wikitribune.com/project/conduct-on-wikitribune-what-you-can-expect-what-we-expect/

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)SYNC: A Crowdsourcing Platform for News Co-editingCompanion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3462204.3481775(126-129)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Exploring Lightweight Interventions at Posting Time to Reduce the Sharing of Misinformation on Social MediaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34490925:CSCW1(1-42)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
  • (2020)Investigating Differences in Crowdsourced News Credibility AssessmentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34151644:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
OpenSym '19: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Open Collaboration
August 2019
197 pages
ISBN:9781450363198
DOI:10.1145/3306446
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 August 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. IT-enabled openness
  2. WikiTribune
  3. collaborative journalism
  4. news
  5. open digital platforms
  6. peer production

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

OpenSym '19

Acceptance Rates

OpenSym '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 17 of 23 submissions, 74%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 195 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)SYNC: A Crowdsourcing Platform for News Co-editingCompanion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3462204.3481775(126-129)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Exploring Lightweight Interventions at Posting Time to Reduce the Sharing of Misinformation on Social MediaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34490925:CSCW1(1-42)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
  • (2020)Investigating Differences in Crowdsourced News Credibility AssessmentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34151644:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media