Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3308558.3313420acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

BotCamp: Bot-driven Interactions in Social Campaigns

Published: 13 May 2019 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Bots (i.e. automated accounts) involve in social campaigns typically for two obvious reasons: to inorganically sway public opinion and to build social capital exploiting the organic popularity of social campaigns. In the process, bots interact with each other and engage in human activities (e.g. likes, retweets, and following).
    In this work, we detect a large number of bots interested in politics. We perform multi-aspect (i.e. temporal, textual, and topographical) clustering of bots, and ensemble the clusters to identify campaigns of bots. We observe similarity among the bots in a campaign in various aspects such as temporal correlation, sentimental alignment, and topical grouping. However, we also discover bots compete in gaining attention from humans and occasionally engage in arguments. We classify such bot interactions in two primary groups: agreeing (i.e. positive) and disagreeing (i.e. negative) interactions and develop an automatic interaction classifier to discover novel interactions among bots participating in social campaigns.

    References

    [1]
    2016. Natural Language Understanding. https://www.ibm.com/watson/services/natural-language-understanding
    [2]
    2019. Supporting web page containing data, code, results for BotCamp.http://cs.unm.edu/~nabuelrub/BotCamp.
    [3]
    Norah Abokhodair, Daisy Yoo, and David W. McDonald. 2015. Dissecting a Social Botnet: Growth, Content and Influence in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 839-851.
    [4]
    Noor Abu-El-Rub, Amanda Minnich, and Abdullah Mueen. 2017. Anomalous Reviews Owing to Referral Incentive. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2017. ACM, 313-316.
    [5]
    Noor Abu-El-Rub, Amanda Minnich, and Abdullah Mueen. 2017. Impact of referral incentives on mobile app reviews. In International Conference on Web Engineering. Springer, 351-359.
    [6]
    ADORABLEDEPLORABLE. 2016. ChristiChat: RT JaredWyand: Twitter pushing ...https://twitter.com/GoldStarMomTX55/status/795287405804879872
    [7]
    Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment 2008, 10(2008), P10008.
    [8]
    Zhu Sun Chang Xu Jie Zhang. 2017. Online Reputation Fraud Campaign Detection in User Ratings. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-17}. 3873-3879.
    [9]
    Nikan Chavoshi, Hossein Hamooni, and Abdullah Mueen. 2016. DeBot: Twitter Bot Detection via Warped Correlation. In ICDM. 817-822.
    [10]
    Nikan Chavoshi, Hossein Hamooni, and Abdullah Mueen. 2016. Identifying correlated bots in twitter. In International Conference on Social Informatics. Springer, 14-21.
    [11]
    Nikan Chavoshi, Hossein Hamooni, and Abdullah Mueen. 2017. On-Demand Bot Detection and Archival System. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (2017), 183-187.
    [12]
    Clayton Allen Davis, Onur Varol, Emilio Ferrara, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2016. Botornot: A system to evaluate social bots. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 273-274.
    [13]
    Son Dinh, Taher Azeb, Francis Fortin, Djedjiga Mouheb, and Mourad Debbabi. 2015. Spam campaign detection, analysis, and investigation. Digital Investigation 12, Supplement 1 (2015), S12 - S21.
    [14]
    Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol, Clayton Davis, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2014. The Rise of Social Bots. CoRR abs/1407.5(2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5225
    [15]
    Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2016. Detection of Promoted Social Media Campaigns.
    [16]
    Michelle C Forelle, Philip N. Howard, Andres Monroy-Hernandez, and Saiph Savage. 2015. Political Bots and the Manipulation of Public Opinion in Venezuela. SSRN Electronic Journal(2015).
    [17]
    Kiran Garimella, Ingmar Weber, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016. Quote RTs on Twitter: usage of the new feature for political discourse. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science. ACM, 200-204.
    [18]
    Kyumin Lee, James Caverlee, Zhiyuan Cheng, and Daniel Z. Sui. 2011. Content-driven detection of campaigns in social media. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM '11. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 551.
    [19]
    Kyumin Lee, James Caverlee, Zhiyuan Cheng, and Daniel Z. Sui. 2013. Campaign extraction from social media. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 5, 1 (12 2013), 1-28.
    [20]
    Huayi Li, A Mukherjee, Bing Liu, R Kornfield, and S Emery. 2014. Detecting Campaign Promoters on Twitter Using Markov Random Fields. In Data Mining (ICDM), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. 290-299.
    [21]
    Richard J. Oentaryo, Arinto Murdopo, Philips K. Prasetyo, and Ee-Peng Lim. 2016. On Profiling Bots in Social Media. Springer, Cham, 92-109.
    [22]
    Gordon Pennycook, Tyrone D Cannon, and David G Rand. 2017. Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. (2017).
    [23]
    Eduardo J Ruiz, Vagelis Hristidis, Carlos Castillo, and Aristides Gionis. 2013. Measuring and Summarizing Movement in Microblog Postings. In ICWSM.
    [24]
    Pablo Suárez-Serrato, Margaret E Roberts, Clayton Davis, and Filippo Menczer. 2016. On the influence of social bots in online protests. In International Conference on Social Informatics. Springer, 269-278.
    [25]
    V. S. Subrahmanian, Amos Azaria, Skylar Durst, Vadim Kagan, Aram Galstyan, Kristina Lerman, Linhong Zhu, Emilio Ferrara, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer, Rand Waltzman, Andrew Stevens, Alexander Dekhtyar, Shuyang Gao, Tad Hogg, Farshad Kooti, Yan Liu, Onur Varol, Prashant Shiralkar, Vinod Vydiswaran, Qiaozhu Mei, and Tim Huang. 2016. The DARPA Twitter Bot Challenge. (Jan. 2016). arxiv:1601.05140http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05140
    [26]
    A Nicole Sump-Crethar. 2012. Making the most of Twitter. The reference librarian 53, 4 (2012), 349-354.
    [27]
    Kurt Thomas, Vern Paxson, Damon Mccoy, and Chris Grier. 2013. Trafficking Fraudulent Accounts : The Role of the Underground Market in Twitter Spam and Abuse Trafficking Fraudulent Accounts :. In USENIX Security Symposium(SEC'13). 195-210.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)SoK: False Information, Bots and Malicious Campaigns: Demystifying Elements of Social Media ManipulationsProceedings of the 19th ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3634737.3644998(1784-1800)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2023)MRLBot: Multi-Dimensional Representation Learning for Social Media Bot DetectionElectronics10.3390/electronics1210229812:10(2298)Online publication date: 19-May-2023
    • (2023)Manipify: An Automated Framework for Detecting Manipulators in Twitter TrendsJournal of Social Computing10.23919/JSC.2023.00014:1(46-61)Online publication date: Mar-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '19: The World Wide Web Conference
    May 2019
    3620 pages
    ISBN:9781450366748
    DOI:10.1145/3308558
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 13 May 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Bots Interaction
    2. Campaign Detection
    3. Cluster Ensemble
    4. Graph Mining
    5. Influence

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    WWW '19
    WWW '19: The Web Conference
    May 13 - 17, 2019
    CA, San Francisco, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)51
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)SoK: False Information, Bots and Malicious Campaigns: Demystifying Elements of Social Media ManipulationsProceedings of the 19th ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3634737.3644998(1784-1800)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2023)MRLBot: Multi-Dimensional Representation Learning for Social Media Bot DetectionElectronics10.3390/electronics1210229812:10(2298)Online publication date: 19-May-2023
    • (2023)Manipify: An Automated Framework for Detecting Manipulators in Twitter TrendsJournal of Social Computing10.23919/JSC.2023.00014:1(46-61)Online publication date: Mar-2023
    • (2023)Fighting False Information from Propagation Process: A SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/356338855:10(1-38)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Systematic Literature Review of Social Media Bots Detection SystemsJournal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.04.00435:5Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
    • (2023)A hybrid framework for bot detection on twitter: Fusing digital DNA with BERTMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-023-14730-582:20(30831-30854)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Soziale Medien in der politischen KommunikationHandbuch Soziale Medien10.1007/978-3-658-25995-2_5(57-80)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
    • (2022)A New Joint Approach with Temporal and Profile Information for Social Bot DetectionSecurity and Communication Networks10.1155/2022/91193882022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
    • (2022)Detection of Fake Users in Twitter Using Network Representation and NLP2022 14th International Conference on COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS)10.1109/COMSNETS53615.2022.9668371(754-758)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2022
    • (2022)Ridge count thresholding to uncover coordinated networks during onset of the Covid-19 pandemicSocial Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-022-00873-012:1Online publication date: 25-Mar-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media