research-article

Open access

Blossom: A Handcrafted Open-Source Robot

Authors:

Michael Suguitan,

Guy HoffmanAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), Volume 8, Issue 1

Article No.: 2, Pages 1 - 27

https://doi.org/10.1145/3310356

Published: 13 March 2019 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Blossom is an open-source social robotics platform responding to three challenges in human-robot interaction (HRI) research: (1) Designing, manufacturing, and programming social robots requires a high level of technical knowledge; (2) social robot designs are fixed in appearance and movement capabilities, making them hard to adapt to a specific application; and (3) the use of rigid mechanisms and hard outer shells limits the robots’ expressive capabilities. Addressing these challenges, Blossom aims at three design objectives: accessibility, flexibility, and expressiveness. The robot’s mechanism can be quickly assembled and partially extended by end-users. Blossom’s appearance is open-ended through handcrafted fabric exteriors created and customized by users. Smooth organic movements are achieved with tensile mechanisms, elastic components, and a soft exterior cover attached loosely to the body. Blossom’s smartphone-based gesture generation requires neither programming nor character animation experience, allowing lay users to create their own behaviors. All elements in the design were conceived with a low barrier-of-entry in mind. The result is an accessible and customizable social robot for researchers. This article details the implementation of Blossom’s design and demonstrates the platform’s potential through four field deployment case studies.

References

[1]

Henny Admoni, Caroline Bank, Joshua Tan, Mariya Toneva, and Brian Scassellati. 2011. Robot gaze does not reflexively cue human attention. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 33.

[2]

Henny Admoni, Bradley Hayes, David Feil-Seifer, Daniel Ullman, and Brian Scassellati. 2013. Are you looking at me?: Perception of robot attention is mediated by gaze type and group size. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. IEEE Press, 389--396.

Digital Library

[3]

Baris Akgun, Maya Cakmak, Karl Jiang, and Andrea L. Thomaz. 2012. Keyframe-based learning from demonstration. Int. J. Social Rob. 4, 4 (2012), 343--355.

[4]

Aris Alissandrakis, Chrystopher L. Nehaniv, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2007. Correspondence mapping induced state and action metrics for robotic imitation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 37, 2 (2007), 299--307.

Digital Library

[5]

ArcBotics. 2016. Hexy the Hexapod. Retrieved from http://arcbotics.com/products/hexy/.

[6]

Brenna D. Argall, Sonia Chernova, Manuela Veloso, and Brett Browning. 2009. A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Rob. Auton. Syst. 57, 5 (2009), 469--483.

Digital Library

[7]

ASUS. 2018. Zenbo—Your Smart Little Companion. Retrieved from https://zenbo.asus.com/.

[8]

Ross Atkin. 2018. Smartibot: The world’s first A.I. enabled cardboard robot. Retrieved August 28, 2018 from https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/460355237/smartibot-the-worlds-first-ai-enabled-cardboard-ro.

[9]

Kim Baraka, Ana Paiva, and Manuela Veloso. 2016. Expressive lights for revealing mobile service robot state. In Robot 2015: Second Iberian Robotics Conference. Springer, 107--119.

[10]

Christoph Bartneck, Michel Van Der Hoek, Omar Mubin, and Abdullah Al Mahmud. 2007. Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do&excl;: Switching off a robot. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 217--222.

Digital Library

[11]

Casey C. Bennett and Selma Šabanović. 2014. Deriving minimal features for human-like facial expressions in robotic faces. Int. J. Social Rob. 6, 3 (2014), 367--381.

[12]

Cynthia L. Breazeal. 2004. Designing Sociable Robots. MIT press.

Digital Library

[13]

Allison Bruce, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Reid Simmons. 2002. The role of expressiveness and attention in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’02), Vol. 4. IEEE, 4138--4142.

[14]

Paul Bucci, Xi Laura Cang, Anasazi Valair, David Marino, Lucia Tseng, Merel Jung, Jussi Rantala, Oliver S. Schneider, and Karon E. MacLean. 2017. Sketching CuddleBits: Coupled prototyping of body and behaviour for an affective robot pet. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3681--3692.

Digital Library

[15]

Reinhard Budde, Karlheinz Kautz, Karin Kuhlenkamp, and Heinz Züllighoven. 1992. Prototyping. In Prototyping. Springer, 33--46.

[16]

Hoang-Long Cao, Greet Van de Perre, Ramona Simut, Cristina Pop, Andreea Peca, Dirk Lefeber, and Bram Vanderborght. 2014. Enhancing My Keepon robot: A simple and low-cost solution for robot platform in human-robot interaction studies. In 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN’14). IEEE, 555--560.

[17]

Ginevra Castellano, André Pereira, Iolanda Leite, Ana Paiva, and Peter W. McOwan. 2009. Detecting user engagement with a robot companion using task and social interaction-based features. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces. ACM, 119--126.

Digital Library

[18]

Caitlyn Clabaugh and Maja J. Matarić. 2016. Exploring elicitation frequency of learning-sensitive information by a robotic tutor for interactive personalization. In 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN’16). IEEE, 968--973.

[19]

Anki Corporation. 2017. Meet Cozmo. Retrieved August 28, 2018 from https://www.anki.com/en-us/cozmo.

[20]

Christopher Crick, Graylin Jay, Sarah Osentoski, Benjamin Pitzer, and Odest Chadwicke Jenkins. 2017. Rosbridge: ROS for non-ROS users. In Robotics Research. Springer, 493--504.

[21]

John Crinnion. 1991. Evolutionary Systems Development: A Practical Guide to the Use of Prototyping within a Structured Systems Methodology. Pitman London.

Digital Library

[22]

Victor C. Dibia, Maryam Ashoori, Aaron Cox, and Justin D. Weisz. 2017. Tjbot: An open source DIY cardboard robot for programming cognitive systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 381--384.

Digital Library

[23]

Carl F. DiSalvo, Francine Gemperle, Jodi Forlizzi, and Sara Kiesler. 2002. All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’02). ACM Press, New York, New York, 321--326.

Digital Library

[24]

Naomi T. Fitter, Yasmin Chowdhury, Elizabeth Cha, Leila Takayama, and Maja J. Matarić. 2018. Evaluating the effects of personalized appearance on telepresence robots for education. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 109--110.

Digital Library

[25]

Neil Fraser. 2015. Ten things we’ve learned from Blockly. In Blocks and Beyond Workshop (Blocks and Beyond). IEEE, 49--50.

Digital Library

[26]

Willow Garage. 2011. Turtlebot. Retrieved from http://turtlebot.com/last visited, 11--25.

[27]

V. Scott Gordon and James M. Bieman. 1995. Rapid prototyping: Lessons learned. IEEE Software 12, 1 (1995), 85--95.

Digital Library

[28]

Kristof Goris, Jelle Saldien, Bram Vanderborght, and Dirk Lefeber. 2011. How to achieve the huggable behavior of the social robot Probo. A reflection on the actuators. Mechatron. 21, 3 (2011), 490--500.

[29]

David Gouaillier, Vincent Hugel, Pierre Blazevic, Chris Kilner, Jerome Monceaux, Pascal Lafourcade, Brice Marnier, Julien Serre, and Bruno Maisonnier. 2009. Mechatronic design of NAO humanoid. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. September 2015 (2009), 769--774.

Digital Library

[30]

Rodolphe Hasselvander. 2017. Buddy: The Companion Robot Accessible to Everyone. Retrieved August 28, 2018 from http://www.bluefrogrobotics.com/en/buddy-your-companion-robot/.

[31]

Guy Hoffman. 2012. Dumb robots, smart phones: A case study of music listening companionship. In RO-MAN, 2012 IEEE. IEEE, 358--363.

[32]

Guy Hoffman. 2016. OpenWoZ: A runtime-configurable Wizard-of-Oz framework for human-robot interaction. In 2016 AAAI Spring Symposium Series.

[33]

Guy Hoffman and Wendy Ju. 2014. Designing robots with movement in mind. J. Human-Robot Interact. 3, 1 (2014), 89--122.

Digital Library

[34]

Honda. 2018. Honda 3E. Retrieved from https://global.honda/innovation/CES/2018.html.

[35]

Dominique Hunziker, Mohanarajah Gajamohan, Markus Waibel, and Raffaello D’Andrea. 2013. Rapyuta: The roboearth cloud engine. In ICRA. Citeseer, 438--444.

[36]

Inc Jibo. 2015. Jibo. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from https://www.jibo.com/.

[37]

Jinyung Jung, Seok-Hyung Bae, Joon Hyub Lee, and Myung-Suk Kim. 2013. Make it move: A movement design method of simple standing products based on systematic mapping of torso movements 8 product messages. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1279--1288.

Digital Library

[38]

Alisa Kalegina, Grace Schroeder, Aidan Allchin, Keara Berlin, and Maya Cakmak. 2018. Characterizing the design space of rendered robot faces. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 96--104.

Digital Library

[39]

Michelle Karg, Ali-Akbar Samadani, Rob Gorbet, Kolja Kühnlenz, Jesse Hoey, and Dana Kulić. 2013. Body movements for affective expression: A survey of automatic recognition and generation. IEEE Trans. Affective Comput. 4, 4 (2013), 341--359.

[40]

Jun Kato, Daisuke Sakamoto, and Takeo Igarashi. 2012. Phybots: A toolkit for making robotic things. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, 248--257.

Digital Library

[41]

Hideki Kozima, Marek P. Michalowski, and Cocoro Nakagawa. 2009. Keepon. Int. J. Social Rob. 1, 1 (2009), 3--18.

[42]

Hideki Kozima, Cocoro Nakagawa, and Yuriko Yasuda. 2005. Interactive robots for communication-care: A case-study in autism therapy. In IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN’05). IEEE, 341--346.

[43]

Jason Kulk, James Welsh, et al. 2008. A low power walk for the NAO robot. In Proceedings of the 2008 Australasian Conference on Robotics 8 Automation (ACRA’08), J. Kim and R. Mahony, Eds. 1--7.

[44]

Gael Langevin. 2017. InMoov open-source 3D printed life-size robot. Retrieved August 28, 2018 from http://inmoov.fr/.

[45]

Matthieu Lapeyre, Pierre Rouanet, Jonathan Grizou, Steve Nguyen, Fabien Depraetre, Alexandre Le Falher, and Pierre-Yves Oudeyer. 2014. Poppy project: Open-source fabrication of 3D printed humanoid robot for science, education and art. In Digital Intelligence 2014. 6.

[46]

John Lasseter. 1987. Principles of traditional animation applied to 3D computer animation. In ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics, Vol. 21. ACM, 35--44.

Digital Library

[47]

David Ledo, Steven Houben, Jo Vermeulen, Nicolai Marquardt, Lora Oehlberg, and Saul Greenberg. 2018. Evaluation strategies for HCI toolkit research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 36.

Digital Library

[48]

Min Kyung Lee, Jodi Forlizzi, Sara Kiesler, Paul Rybski, John Antanitis, and Sarun Savetsila. 2012. Personalization in HRI: A longitudinal field experiment. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 319--326.

Digital Library

[49]

Iolanda Leite, Marissa McCoy, Monika Lohani, Daniel Ullman, Nicole Salomons, Charlene Stokes, Susan Rivers, and Brian Scassellati. 2015. Emotional storytelling in the classroom: Individual versus group interaction between children and robots. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 75--82.

Digital Library

[50]

Daniel Leyzberg, Samuel Spaulding, and Brian Scassellati. 2014. Personalizing robot tutors to individuals’ learning differences. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 423--430.

Digital Library

[51]

LG. 2018. LG Exploring New Commercial Opportunities with Expanding Robot Portfolio. Retrieved from http://www.lg.com/au/ces2018/lg-exploring-new-commercial-opportunities-with-expanding-robot-portfolio.jsp.

[52]

Giorgio Metta, Giulio Sandini, David Vernon, Lorenzo Natale, and Francesco Nori. 2008. The iCub humanoid robot: An open platform for research in embodied cognition. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems. ACM, 50--56.

Digital Library

[53]

Gajamohan Mohanarajah, Dominique Hunziker, Raffaello D’Andrea, and Markus Waibel. 2015. Rapyuta: A cloud robotics platform. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 12, 2 (2015), 481--493.

[54]

Ken Nakagaki, Artem Dementyev, Sean Follmer, Joseph A. Paradiso, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2016. ChainFORM: A linear integrated modular hardware system for shape changing interfaces. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 87--96.

Digital Library

[55]

Michael I. Norton, Daniel Mochon, and Dan Ariely. 2012. The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. J. Consum. Psychol. 22, 3 (2012), 453--460.

[56]

Hyunjoo Oh, Mark D. Gross, and Michael Eisenberg. 2015. FoldMecha: Design for linkage-based paper toys. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software 8 Technology. ACM, 91--92.

Digital Library

[57]

Eunil Park and Jaeryoung Lee. 2014. I am a warm robot: The effects of temperature in physical human--robot interaction. Robotica 32, 1 (2014), 133--142.

[58]

Goren Gordon, Samuel Spaulding, Jacqueline Kory Westlund, Jin Joo Lee, Luke Plummer, Marayna Martinez, Madhurima Das, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2016. Affective personalization of a social robot tutor for children’s second language skills. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Digital Library

[59]

Alison Powell. 2012. Democratizing production through open source knowledge: From open software to open hardware. Media, Culture 8 Society 34, 6 (2012), 691--708.

[60]

Morgan Quigley, Ken Conley, Brian Gerkey, Josh Faust, Tully Foote, Jeremy Leibs, Rob Wheeler, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2009. ROS: An open-source robot operating system. In ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software, Vol. 3. Kobe, Japan, 5.

[61]

Hayes Solos Raffle, Amanda J. Parkes, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2004. Topobo: A constructive assembly system with kinetic memory. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 647--654.

Digital Library

[62]

Sekou L. Remy and M. Brian Blake. 2011. Distributed service-oriented robotics. IEEE Internet Comput. 2 (2011), 70--74.

Digital Library

[63]

Mitchel Resnick, John Maloney, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Natalie Rusk, Evelyn Eastmond, Karen Brennan, Amon Millner, Eric Rosenbaum, Jay Silver, Brian Silverman, et al. 2009. Scratch: Programming for all. Commun. ACM 52, 11 (2009), 60--67.

Digital Library

[64]

Tiago Ribeiro and Ana Paiva. 2012. The illusion of robotic life: Principles and practices of animation for robots. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 383--390.

Digital Library

[65]

SoftBank Robotics. 2014. Pepper, the humanoid robot from SoftBank Robotics. Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/robots/pepper.

[66]

Daniela Rus and Michael T. Tolley. 2015. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nat. 521, 7553 (2015), 467.

[67]

Nicole Salomons, Michael van der Linden, Sarah Strohkorb Sebo, and Brian Scassellati. 2018. Humans conform to robots: Disambiguating trust, truth, and conformity. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 187--195.

Digital Library

[68]

Joe Saunders, Dag Sverre Syrdal, Kheng Lee Koay, Nathan Burke, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2016. “Teach me--show me”—End-user personalization of a smart home and companion robot. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 46, 1 (2016), 27--40.

[69]

Adam Michael Setapen. 2012. Creating Robotic Characters for Long-term Interaction. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[70]

Syamimi Shamsuddin, Hanafiah Yussof, Luthffi Ismail, Fazah Akhtar Hanapiah, Salina Mohamed, Hanizah Ali Piah, and Nur Ismarrubie Zahari. 2012. Initial response of autistic children in human-robot interaction therapy with humanoid robot NAO. In IEEE 8th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications (CSPA’12). IEEE, 188--193.

[71]

Elaine Short, Katelyn Swift-Spong, Jillian Greczek, Aditi Ramachandran, Alexandru Litoiu, Elena Corina Grigore, David Feil-Seifer, Samuel Shuster, Jin Joo Lee, Shaobo Huang, et al. 2014. How to train your DragonBot: Socially assistive robots for teaching children about nutrition through play. In 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN’14). IEEE, 924--929.

[72]

Abhishek Singh. 2016. Peeqo—The GIF Bot. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from https://imgur.com/a/ue4Ax.

[73]

Ronit Slyper, Guy Hoffman, and Ariel Shamir. 2015. Mirror puppeteering: Animating toy robots in front of a webcam. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 241--248.

Digital Library

[74]

Michael Suguitan and Guy Hoffman. 2018. Blossom Public Repository. Retrieved from https://github.com/hrc2/blossom-public.

[75]

Yuan Sun and S. Shyam Sundar. 2016. Psychological importance of human agency: How self-assembly affects user experience of robots. In The 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. IEEE Press, 189--196.

Digital Library

[76]

JaYoung Sung, Rebecca E. Grinter, and Henrik I. Christensen. 2009. Pimp my Roomba: Designing for personalization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 193--196.

Digital Library

[77]

Haodan Tan, John Tiab, Selma Šabanović, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. Happy moves, sad grooves: Using theories of biological motion and affect to design shape-changing interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 1282--1293.

Digital Library

[78]

Russell Toris, Julius Kammerl, David V. Lu, Jihoon Lee, Odest Chadwicke Jenkins, Sarah Osentoski, Mitchell Wills, and Sonia Chernova. 2015. Robot web tools: Efficient messaging for cloud robotics. In IROS. 4530--4537.

[79]

Albert van Breemen, Xue Yan, and Bernt Meerbeek. 2005. iCat: An animated user-interface robot with personality. In Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. ACM, 143--144.

Digital Library

[80]

Cesar Vandevelde, Francis Wyffels, Bram Vanderborght, and Jelle Saldien. 2017. Do-it-yourself design for social robots: An open-source hardware platform to encourage innovation. IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag. 24, 1 (2017), 86--94.

[81]

Kazuyoshi Wada and Takanori Shibata. 2007. Living with seal robots—Its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Trans. Rob. 23, 5 (2007), 972--980.

Digital Library

[82]

Ryan Wistort and Cynthia Breazeal. 2009. TOFU: A socially expressive robot character for child interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 292--293.

Digital Library

[83]

Yunbo Zhang, Wei Gao, Luis Paredes, and Karthik Ramani. 2016. CardBoardiZer: Creatively customize, articulate and fold 3D mesh models. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 897--907.

Digital Library

Cited By

Seifi HBhatia AHornbæk K(2024)Charting User Experience in Physical Human–Robot InteractionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/365905813:2(1-29)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3659058
Maheux MLétourneau DWarren PPanchea ARobillard JMichaud F(2024)Designing a Tabletop SAR as an Advanced HRI Experimentation PlatformProceedings of the 2024 International Symposium on Technological Advances in Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3648536.3648538(10-19)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3648536.3648538
Hu YLu JScinto-Madonich NPineros MLopes PHoffman G(2024)Designing Plant-Driven Actuators for Robots to Grow, Age, and DecayProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661519(2481-2496)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661519
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Blossom: A Handcrafted Open-Source Robot
1. Computer systems organization
  1. Embedded and cyber-physical systems
    1. Robotics
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Interaction design

Recommendations

Blossom: A Tensile Social Robot Design with a Handcrafted Shell
HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

We describe the design and implementation of Blossom, a social robot that diverges from convention by being flexible both internally and externally. Internally, Blossom»s actuation mechanism is a compliant tensile structure supporting a free-floating ...
Blossom: A Tensile Social Robot Design with a Handcrafted Shell (Demo Abstract)
HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

We describe the design and implementation of Blossom, a social robot that diverges from convention by being flexible both internally and externally. Internally, Blossom»s actuation mechanism is a compliant tensile structure supporting a free-floating ...
Blossom: A Tensile Social Robot Design with a Handcrafted Shell
HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

We describe the design and implementation of Blossom, a social robot that diverges from convention by being flexible both internally and externally. Internally, Blossom»s actuation mechanism is a compliant tensile structure supporting a free-floating ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction Volume 8, Issue 1

March 2019

102 pages

EISSN:2573-9522

DOI:10.1145/3317963

Editors:
Odest Chadwicke Jenkins
University of Michigan, USA
,
Selma Sabanovic
Indiana University, USA

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 March 2019

Accepted: 01 January 2019

Revised: 01 December 2018

Received: 01 September 2018

Published in THRI Volume 8, Issue 1

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Funding Sources

Google

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

41
Total Citations
View Citations
5,559
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1,342
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)150

Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Seifi HBhatia AHornbæk K(2024)Charting User Experience in Physical Human–Robot InteractionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/365905813:2(1-29)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3659058
Maheux MLétourneau DWarren PPanchea ARobillard JMichaud F(2024)Designing a Tabletop SAR as an Advanced HRI Experimentation PlatformProceedings of the 2024 International Symposium on Technological Advances in Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3648536.3648538(10-19)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3648536.3648538
Hu YLu JScinto-Madonich NPineros MLopes PHoffman G(2024)Designing Plant-Driven Actuators for Robots to Grow, Age, and DecayProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661519(2481-2496)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661519
Dobrosovestnova AReinboth TWeiss A(2024)Towards an Integrative Framework for Robot Personality ResearchACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/364001013:1(1-22)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640010
Thompson SNarcomey ALew AVázquez MGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Shutter: A Low-Cost and Flexible Social Robot Platform for In-the-Wild DeploymentsCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3641090(94-96)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3641090
Schiffer SLiu AGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)MoBi-LE - A Low-Cost 3D-printable Robot to Educate Children in Waste DisposalCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640680(955-959)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3640680
O'Connell ABanga AAyissi JYaminrafie NKo ELe ACislowski BMataric MGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Design and Evaluation of a Socially Assistive Robot Schoolwork Companion for College Students with ADHDProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634929(533-541)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634929
Frijns HStoeva DSchürer OGelautz M(2024)Programming Robot Animation Through Human Body Movement2024 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO)10.1109/ARSO60199.2024.10557907(273-279)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO60199.2024.10557907
Joshi SKamino WŠabanović S(2024)Social robot accessories for tailoring and appropriation of social robotsInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-01077-yOnline publication date: 1-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01077-y
Zawieska KHannibal G(2023)Towards a conceptualisation and critique of everyday life in HRIFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2023.121203410Online publication date: 14-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1212034
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents