research-article

Open access

SAQIP: A Scalable Architecture for Quantum Information Processors

Authors:

Sahar Sargaran,

Naser MohammadzadehAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO), Volume 16, Issue 2

Article No.: 12, Pages 1 - 21

https://doi.org/10.1145/3311879

Published: 18 April 2019 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Proposing an architecture that efficiently compensates for the inefficiencies of physical hardware with extra resources is one of the key issues in quantum computer design. Although the demonstration of quantum systems has been limited to some dozen qubits, scaling the current small-sized lab quantum systems to large-scale quantum systems that are capable of solving meaningful practical problems can be the main goal of much research. Focusing on this issue, in this article a scalable architecture for quantum information processors, called SAQIP, is proposed. Moreover, a flow is presented to map and schedule a quantum circuit on this architecture. Experimental results show that the proposed architecture and design flow decrease the average latency and the average area of quantum circuits by about 81% and 11%, respectively, for the attempted benchmarks.

References

[1]

B. Lekitsch, S. Weidt, A. G. Fowler, K. Mølmer, S. J. Devitt, C. Wunderlich et al. 2017. Blueprint for a microwave trapped ion quantum computer. Sci. Adv. 3 (2017), e1601540.

[2]

N. M. Linke, D. Maslov, M. Roetteler, S. Debnath, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman et al. 2017. Experimental comparison of two quantum computing architectures. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 114, 3305--3310.

[3]

S. Debnath, N. M. Linke, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, K. Wright, and C. Monroe. 2016. Demonstration of a small programmable quantum computer with atomic qubits. Nature 536 (2016) 63.

[4]

T. Harty, D. Allcock, C. J. Ballance, L. Guidoni, H. Janacek, N. Linke et al. 2014. High-fidelity preparation, gates, memory, and readout of a trapped-ion quantum bit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 220501.

[5]

A. Myerson, D. Szwer, S. Webster, D. Allcock, M. Curtis, G. Imreh et al. 2008. High-fidelity readout of trapped-ion qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008), 200502.

[6]

N. Akerman, N. Navon, S. Kotler, Y. Glickman, and R. Ozeri. 2015. Universal gate-set for trapped-ion qubits using a narrow linewidth diode laser. New J. Phys. 17 (2015) 113060.

[7]

N. Timoney, I. Baumgart, M. Johanning, A. Varón, M. B. Plenio, A. Retzker et al. 2011. Quantum gates and memory using microwave-dressed states. Nature 476 (2011), 185.

[8]

Y. Wang, M. Um, J. Zhang, S. An, M. Lyu, J.-N. Zhang et al. 2017. Single-qubit quantum memory exceeding ten-minute coherence time. Nature Photon. 11 (2017) 646.

[9]

C. Langer, R. Ozeri, J. D. Jost, J. Chiaverini, B. DeMarco, A. Ben-Kish et al. 2005. Long-lived qubit memory using atomic ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005), 060502.

[10]

D. Kielpinski, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland. 2002. Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer. Nature 417 (2002), 709--711.

[11]

N. D. Guise, S. D. Fallek, K. E. Stevens, K. Brown, C. Volin, A. W. Harter et al. 2015. Ball-grid array architecture for microfabricated ion traps. J. Appl. Phys. 117 (2015), 174901.

[12]

C. Monroe and J. Kim. 2013. Scaling the ion trap quantum processor. Science 339 (2013), 1164--1169.

[13]

C. Monroe, R. Raussendorf, A. Ruthven, K. Brown, P. Maunz, L.-M. Duan et al. 2014. Large-scale modular quantum-computer architecture with atomic memory and photonic interconnects. Phys. Rev. A 89 (2014), 022317.

[14]

T. Monz, P. Schindler, J. T. Barreiro, M. Chwalla, D. Nigg, W. A. Coish et al. 2011. 14-qubit entanglement: Creation and coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011), 130506.

[15]

M. Ahsan and J. Kim. 2015. Optimization of quantum computer architecture using a resource-performance simulator. In Proceedings of the 2015 Design, Automation 8 Test in Europe Conference 8 Exhibition. 1108--1113.

Digital Library

[16]

M. Ahsan, R. V. Meter, and J. Kim. 2016. Designing a million-qubit quantum computer using a resource performance simulator. ACM J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst. 12 (2016) 39.

Digital Library

[17]

T. S. Metodi, D. D. Thaker, A. W. Cross, F. T. Chong, and I. L. Chuang. 2005. A quantum logic array microarchitecture: Scalable quantum data movement and computation. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO’05). 12.

Digital Library

[18]

R. v. Meter and M. Oskin. 2006. Architectural implications of quantum computing technologies. ACM J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst. 2 (2006), 31--63.

Digital Library

[19]

J. Levy. 2001. Quantum-information processing with ferroelectrically coupled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001), 052306.

[20]

A. G. Fowler, S. J. Devitt, and L. C. Hollenberg. 2004. Implementation of Shor's algorithm on a linear nearest neighbour qubit array. Arxiv Preprint Quant-ph/0402196 (2004).

Digital Library

[21]

P. Aliferis and A. W. Cross. 2007. Subsystem fault tolerance with the bacon-shor code. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007), 220502.

[22]

J. E. Levy, A. Ganti, C. A. Phillips, B. R. Hamlet, A. J. Landahl, T. M. Gurrieri et al. 2009. Brief announcement: The impact of classical electronics constraints on a solid-state logical qubit memory. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures. 166--168.

Digital Library

[23]

J. E. Levy, M. S. Carroll, A. Ganti, C. A. Phillips, A. J. Landahl, T. M. Gurrieri et al. 2011. Implications of electronics constraints for solid-state quantum error correction and quantum circuit failure probability. New J. Phys. 13 (2011), 083021.

[24]

A. Farghadan and N. Mohammadzadeh. 2017. Quantum circuit physical design flow for 2D nearest‐neighbor architectures. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 45, 7 (2017), 989--1000.

Digital Library

[25]

Y. S. Weinstein, C. S. Hellberg, and J. Levy. 2005. Quantum-dot cluster-state computing with encoded qubits. Phys. Rev. A. 72 (2005), 020304.

[26]

R. Stock and D. F. James. 2009. Scalable, high-speed measurement-based quantum computer using trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009), 170501.

[27]

S. J. Devitt, A. G. Fowler, T. Tilma, W. J. Munro, and K. Nemoto. 2010. Classical processing requirements for a topological quantum computing system. Int. J. Quant. Info. 8 (2010), 121--147.

[28]

S. J. Devitt, A. M. Stephens, W. J. Munro, and K. Nemoto. 2011. Integration of highly probabilistic sources into optical quantum architectures: Perpetual quantum computation. New J. Phys. 13 (2011), 095001.

[29]

X.-C. Yao, T.-X. Wang, H.-Z. Chen, W.-B. Gao, A. G. Fowler, R. Raussendorf et al. 2012. Experimental demonstration of topological error correction. Nature, 482 (2012), 489-494.

[30]

K. Nemoto, M. Trupke, S. J. Devitt, A. M. Stephens, B. Scharfenberger, K. Buczak et al. 2014. Photonic architecture for scalable quantum information processing in diamond. Phys. Rev. X. 4 (2014), 031022.

[31]

A. Paler, S. J. Devitt, K. Nemoto, and I. Polian. 2014. Mapping of topological quantum circuits to physical hardware. Sci. Rep. 4 (2014).

[32]

J. Sau and M. Barkeshli. 2016. Physical architecture for a universal topological quantum computer based on a network of majorana nanowires. In Proceedings of the APS Meeting.

[33]

X. Fu, M. Rol, C. Bultink, J. Van Someren, N. Khammassi, I. Ashraf et al. 2017. An experimental microarchitecture for a superconducting quantum processor. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture. 813--825.

Digital Library

[34]

X. Fu, L. Riesebos, M. Rol, J. van Straten, J. van Someren, N. Khammassi et al. 2018. eQASM: An executable quantum instruction set architecture. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1808.02449 (2018).

[35]

A. Zulehner, A. Paler, and R. Wille. 2018. An efficient methodology for mapping quantum circuits to the IBM QX architectures. {Online}. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.04722v3.

[36]

M. Y. Siraichi, V. F. d. Santos, S. Collange, and F. M. Q. Pereira. 2018. Qubit allocation. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization. 113--125.

Digital Library

[37]

IBM. 2019. IBM QX Backend Information. Retrieved from https://www.research.ibm.com/ibm-q/.

[38]

M. Mariantoni, H. Wang, T. Yamamoto, M. Neeley, R. C. Bialczak, Y. Chen et al. 2011. Implementing the quantum von neumann architecture with superconducting circuits. Science 334 (2011), 61--65.

[39]

M. Whitney, N. Isailovic, Y. Patel, and J. Kubiatowicz. 2007. Automated generation of layout and control for quantum circuits. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computing Frontiers. 83--94.

Digital Library

[40]

M. G. Whitney, N. Isailovic, Y. Patel, and J. Kubiatowicz. 2009. A fault tolerant, area efficient architecture for shor's factoring algorithm. ACM SIGARCH Comput. Architect. News 37 (2009), 383--394.

Digital Library

[41]

N. Isailovic, M. Whitney, Y. Patel, and J. Kubiatowicz. 2008. Running a quantum circuit at the speed of data. In ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News. 177--188.

Digital Library

[42]

N. Isailovic, Y. Patel, M. Whitney, and J. Kubiatowicz. 2006. Interconnection networks for scalable quantum computers. In ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News. 366--377.

Digital Library

[43]

D. Gottesman and I. L. Chuang. 1999. Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations. Nature 402 (1999), 390--393.

[44]

K. Svore, A. Cross, A. Aho, I. Chuang, and I. Markov. 2004. Toward a software architecture for quantum computing design tools. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quantum Programming Languages (QPL’04). 145--162.

[45]

K. M. Svore, A. V. Aho, A. W. Cross, I. Chuang, and I. L. Markov. 2006. A layered software architecture for quantum computing design tools. IEEE Comput. 39 (2006), 74--83.

Digital Library

[46]

T. S. Metodi, D. Thaker, A. W. Cross, F. T. Chong, and I. L. Chuang. 2005. A general purpose architectural layout for arbitrary quantum computations. In Proceedings of the Conference on Defense and Security. 91--102.

[47]

T. Metodi, D. Thaker, A. Cross, F. T. Chong, and I. L. Chuang. 2005. QLA: Quantum logic array microarchitecture, a brief overview. Recreation Pool Lodge 2 (2005).

[48]

D. D. Thaker, T. S. Metodi, A. W. Cross, I. L. Chuang, and F. T. Chong. 2006. Quantum memory hierarchies: Efficient designs to match available parallelism in quantum computing. In ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News. 378--390.

Digital Library

[49]

M. J. Dousti, A. Shafaei, and M. Pedram. 2014. Squash: A scalable quantum mapper considering ancilla sharing. In Proceedings of the 24th Edition of the Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI. 117--122.

Digital Library

[50]

J. Heckey, S. Patil, A. JavadiAbhari, A. Holmes, D. Kudrow, K. R. Brown et al. 2015. Compiler management of communication and parallelism for quantum computation. In ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News. 445--456.

Digital Library

[51]

R. Risque and A. Jog. 2016. Characterization of quantum workloads on SIMD architectures. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC’16). 1--9.

[52]

F. T. Chong, D. Franklin, and M. Martonosi. 2017. Programming languages and compiler design for realistic quantum hardware. Nature 549 (2017), 180.

[53]

M. Spišiak and J. Kollár. 2017. Quantum programming: A review. In Proceedings of the IEEE 14th International Scientific Conference on Informatics. 353--358.

[54]

M. Soeken, T. Haener, and M. Roetteler. 2018. Programming quantum computers using design automation. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation 8 Test in Europe Conference 8 Exhibition (DATE’18). 137--146.

[55]

D. Maslov. 2017. Basic circuit compilation techniques for an ion-trap quantum machine. New J. Phys. 19 (2017), 023035.

[56]

H. Goudarzi, M. J. Dousti, A. Shafaei, and M. Pedram. 2014. Design of a universal logic block for fault-tolerant realization of any logic operation in trapped-ion quantum circuits. Quant. Info. Process. 13 (2014), 1267--1299.

Digital Library

[57]

M.-C. Kim, D.-J. Lee, and I. L. Markov. 2012. SimPL: An effective placement algorithm. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Design Integr. Circ. Syst. 31 (2012), 50--60.

Digital Library

[58]

K. R. Brown, J. Kim, and C. Monroe. 2016. Co-designing a scalable quantum computer with trapped atomic ions. Npj Quant. Info. 2 (2016), 16034.

[59]

N. Mohammadzadeh. 2016. Physical design of quantum circuits in ion trap technology--a survey. Microelectron. J. 55 (2016), 116--133.

Digital Library

[60]

J. Cirac, P. Zoller, H. Kimble, and H. Mabuchi. 1997. Quantum state transfer and entanglement distribution among distant nodes in a quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997), 3221.

[61]

S. Van Enk, H. Kimble, J. Cirac, and P. Zoller. 1999. Quantum communication with dark photons. Phys. Rev. A 59 (1999), 2659.

[62]

A. M. Steane and D. Lucas. 2000. Quantum computing with trapped ions, atoms and light. Arxiv Preprint Quant-ph/0004053 (2000).

[63]

L.-M. Duan, M. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller. 2001. Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Nature 414 (2001), 413--418.

[64]

R. Van Meter, K. Nemoto, and W. Munro. 2007. Communication links for distributed quantum computation. IEEE Trans. Comput. 56 (2007), 1643--1653.

Digital Library

[65]

L.-M. Duan and C. Monroe. 2010. Colloquium: Quantum networks with trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010), 1209.

[66]

J. Kim and C. Kim. 2009. Integrated optical approach to trapped ion quantum computation. Quant. Info. Comput. 9 (2009), 181--202.

Digital Library

[67]

S. J. Devitt, W. J. Munro, and K. Nemoto. 2011. High performance quantum computing. Progr. Info. 8 (2011), 49--55.

[68]

R. Van Meter, K. Nemoto, W. Munro, and K. M. Itoh. 2006. Distributed arithmetic on a quantum multicomputer. In ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News. 354--365.

Digital Library

[69]

R. Van Meter, T. D. Ladd, A. G. Fowler, and Y. Yamamoto. 2010. Distributed quantum computation architecture using semiconductor nanophotonics. Int. J. Quant. Info. 8 (2010), 295--323.

[70]

T. Monz, K. Kim, W. Hänsel, M. Riebe, A. Villar, P. Schindler et al. 2009. Realization of the quantum toffoli gate with trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009), 040501.

[71]

I. Buluta and F. Nori. 2009. Quantum simulators. Science 326 (2009), 108--111.

[72]

C. Figgatt, D. Maslov, K. Landsman, N. Linke, S. Debnath, and C. Monroe. 2017. Complete 3-qubit grover search on a programmable quantum computer. Nature Commun. 8 (2017), 1918.

[73]

T. Choi, S. Debnath, T. Manning, C. Figgatt, Z.-X. Gong, L.-M. Duan et al. 2014. Optimal quantum control of multimode couplings between trapped ion qubits for scalable entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014), 190502.

[74]

L. Postler, Á. Rivas, P. Schindler, A. Erhard, R. Stricker, D. Nigg et al. 2018. Experimental quantification of spatial correlations in quantum dynamics. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1806.08088 (2018).

[75]

P. Kaufmann, T. F. Gloger, D. Kaufmann, M. Johanning, and C. Wunderlich. 2018. High-fidelity preservation of quantum information during trapped-ion transport. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), 010501.

[76]

D. Hucul, M. Yeo, W. Hensinger, J. Rabchuk, S. Olmschenk, and C. Monroe. 2008. On the transport of atomic ions in linear and multidimensional ion trap arrays. Quant. Info. Comput. 8 (2008), 501--578.

Digital Library

[77]

M. Rowej, A. Ben-Kish, B. Demarco, D. Leibfried, V. Meyer, J. Beall et al. 2002. Transport of quantum states and separation of ions in a dual RF ion trap. Quant. Info. Comput. 2 (2002), 257--271.

Digital Library

[78]

H. Häffner, C. F. Roos, and R. Blatt. 2008. Quantum computing with trapped ions. Phys. Rep. 469 (2008), 155--203.

[79]

Y. Cao, G. Wang, H. Liu, and C. Sun. 2018. Implementation of a toffoli gate using an array of coupled cavities in a single step. Sci. Rep. 8 (2018), 5813.

[80]

A. M. Steane. 1996. Error correcting codes in quantum theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996), 793.

[81]

IBM. 2017. IBM SPSS Analytics Toolkit.

[82]

G. Karypis and V. Kumar. 2000. Multilevel k-way hypergraph partitioning. VLSI Design 11 (2000), 285--300.

[83]

S. B. Horton. 1997. The optimal linear arrangement problem: Algorithms and approximation. Doctoral Dissertation. School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.

Digital Library

[84]

M. Juvan and B. Mohar. 1992. Optimal linear labelings and eigenvalues of graphs. Discrete Appl. Math. 36 (1992) 153--168.

Digital Library

[85]

Q. Liu and M. Marek-Sadowska. 2005. Pre-layout physical connectivity prediction with application in clustering-based placement. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD’05). 31--37.

Digital Library

[86]

G. Xu, L.-D. Huang, D. Z. Pan, and M. D. Wong. 2005. Redundant-via enhanced maze routing for yield improvement. In Proceedings of the 2005 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference. 1148--1151.

Digital Library

[87]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang. 2010. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.

Digital Library

[88]

A. Y. Kitaev. 2003. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann. Phys. 303 (2003), 2--30.

[89]

K. M. Svore, D. P. DiVincenzo, and B. M. Terhal. 2006. Noise threshold for a fault-tolerant two-dimensional lattice architecture. Arxiv Preprint Quant-ph/0604090 (2006).

Digital Library

[90]

M. Suchara, J. Kubiatowicz, A. Faruque, F. T. Chong, C.-Y. Lai, and G. Paz. 2013. QuRE: The quantum resource estimator toolbox. In Proceedings of the IEEE 31st International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD’13). 419--426.

[91]

F. Lu and D. C. Marinescu. 2007. Quantum error correction of time-correlated errors. Quant. Info. Process. 6 (2007), 273--293.

Digital Library

[92]

A. M. Sllame and V. Drabek. 2002. An efficient list-based scheduling algorithm for high-level synthesis. In Proceedings of the Euromicro Symposium on Digital System Design. 316--323.

Digital Library

[93]

S. A. Cuccaro, T. G. Draper, S. A. Kutin, and D. P. Moulton. 2004. A new quantum ripple-carry addition circuit. Arxiv Preprint Quant-ph/0410184 (2004).

[94]

M. Ahsan. 2016. SQripT Toolset. Retrieved from https://users.cs.duke.edu/∼ahsan/.

[95]

D. Moehring. 2017. IONQ. Retrieved from https://ionq.co/.

[96]

D. Wineland. NIST Ion Storage Group. Retrieved from https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/ion-storage.

[97]

R. Van Meter and C. Horsman. 2013. A blueprint for building a quantum computer. Commun. ACM 56 (2013) 84--93.

Digital Library

[98]

V. Vedral, A. Barenco, and A. Ekert. 1996. Quantum networks for elementary arithmetic operations. Phys. Rev. A 54 (1996), 147.

[99]

P. W. Shor. 1999. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM Rev. 41 (1999), 303--332.

Digital Library

[100]

T. G. Draper, S. A. Kutin, E. M. Rains, and K. M. Svore. 2004. A logarithmic-depth quantum carry-lookahead adder. Arxiv Preprint Quant-ph/0406142 (2004).

Digital Library

Cited By

Pradheep Kumar KSharma NSeitz J(2024)Designing a Quantum Computer to Gear up Artificial Intelligence for Industry 4.0Topics in Artificial Intelligence Applied to Industry 4.010.1002/9781394216147.ch13(239-255)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394216147.ch13
Shaker LAl-Amiery AIsahak WAl-Azzawi W(2023)Advancements in Quantum Optics: Harnessing the Power of Photons for Next-Generation TechnologiesJournal of Optics10.1007/s12596-023-01320-9Online publication date: 22-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-023-01320-9
Cheng XChen XCao KZhu PFeng SGuan Z(2023)Optimization of the transmission cost of distributed quantum circuits based on merged transferQuantum Information Processing10.1007/s11128-023-03927-022:5Online publication date: 28-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-023-03927-0
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

SAQIP: A Scalable Architecture for Quantum Information Processors
1. Computer systems organization
  1. Architectures
    1. Other architectures
      1. Quantum computing

Recommendations

Realizing parallelism in quantum MISD architecture
CF '19: Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers

We propose an idea to speed up instruction execution through a probabilistic approach, using the parallelism offered by quantum computers. For this, we divide the instruction set of an arbitrary quantum instruction set architecture (QISA) into separate ...
An arbitrary twoqubit computation In 23 elementary gates or less
DAC '03: Proceedings of the 40th annual Design Automation Conference

Quantum circuits currently constitute a dominant model for quantum computation [14]. Our work addresses the problem of constructing quantum circuits to implement an arbitrary given quantum computation, in the special case of two qubits. We pursue ...
The effect of communication costs in solid-state quantum computing architectures
SPAA '03: Proceedings of the fifteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures

Quantum computation has become an intriguing technology with which to attack difficult problems and to enhance system security. Quantum algorithms, however, have been analyzed under idealized assumptions without important physical constraints in mind. ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization

ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization Volume 16, Issue 2

June 2019

317 pages

ISSN:1544-3566

EISSN:1544-3973

DOI:10.1145/3325131

Editor:
Koen De Bosschere
Ghent University, Belgium

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 April 2019

Accepted: 01 February 2019

Revised: 01 January 2019

Received: 01 July 2018

Published in TACO Volume 16, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
1,303
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)166
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22

Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Pradheep Kumar KSharma NSeitz J(2024)Designing a Quantum Computer to Gear up Artificial Intelligence for Industry 4.0Topics in Artificial Intelligence Applied to Industry 4.010.1002/9781394216147.ch13(239-255)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394216147.ch13
Shaker LAl-Amiery AIsahak WAl-Azzawi W(2023)Advancements in Quantum Optics: Harnessing the Power of Photons for Next-Generation TechnologiesJournal of Optics10.1007/s12596-023-01320-9Online publication date: 22-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-023-01320-9
Cheng XChen XCao KZhu PFeng SGuan Z(2023)Optimization of the transmission cost of distributed quantum circuits based on merged transferQuantum Information Processing10.1007/s11128-023-03927-022:5Online publication date: 28-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-023-03927-0
Li BAhmed SSaraogi SLambert NNori FPitchford AShammah N(2022)Pulse-level noisy quantum circuits with QuTiPQuantum10.22331/q-2022-01-24-6306(630)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-01-24-630
Davarzani ZZomorodi MHoushmand M(2022)A hierarchical approach for building distributed quantum systemsScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-022-18989-w12:1Online publication date: 14-Sep-2022
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18989-w
Hoseinimanesh GMohammadzadeh N(2021)A Transformation-Based Quantum Physical Synthesis Approach for Nearest-Neighbor ArchitecturesQuantum Reports10.3390/quantum30300283:3(435-443)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum3030028
Keszocze OMohammadzadeh NWille R(2021)Exact Physical Design of Quantum Circuits for Ion-Trap-based Quantum Architectures2021 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)10.23919/DATE51398.2021.9474188(344-349)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE51398.2021.9474188
Rodrigo SBandic MAbadal Svan Someren HAlarcón EAlmudéver CPalesi MTumeo AGoumas GAlmudever C(2021)Scaling of multi-core quantum architecturesProceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers10.1145/3457388.3458674(144-151)Online publication date: 11-May-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3457388.3458674
Wu XDebroy DDing YBaker JAlexeev YBrown KChong F(2021)TILT: Achieving Higher Fidelity on a Trapped-Ion Linear-Tape Quantum Computing Architecture2021 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA)10.1109/HPCA51647.2021.00023(153-166)Online publication date: Feb-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCA51647.2021.00023
Nikahd EMohammadzadeh NSedighi MZamani M(2021)Automated window-based partitioning of quantum circuitsPhysica Scripta10.1088/1402-4896/abd57c96:3(035102)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2021
https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/abd57c
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents