Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3313276.3316343acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Quantum proof systems for iterated exponential time, and beyond

Published: 23 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

We show that any language solvable in nondeterministic time exp( exp(⋯exp(n))), where the number of iterated exponentials is an arbitrary function R(n), can be decided by a multiprover interactive proof system with a classical polynomial-time verifier and a constant number of quantum entangled provers, with completeness 1 and soundness 1 − exp(−Cexp(⋯exp(n))), where the number of iterated exponentials is R(n)−1 and C>0 is a universal constant. The result was previously known for R=1 and R=2; we obtain it for any time-constructible function R.
The result is based on a compression technique for interactive proof systems with entangled provers that significantly simplifies and strengthens a protocol compression result of Ji (STOC’17). As a separate consequence of this technique we obtain a different proof of Slofstra’s recent result on the uncomputability of the entangled value of multiprover games (Forum of Mathematics, Pi 2019).
Finally, we show that even minor improvements to our compression result would yield remarkable consequences in computational complexity theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics: first, it would imply that the class MIP* contains all computable languages; second, it would provide a negative resolution to a multipartite version of Tsirelson’s problem on the relation between the commuting operator and tensor product models for quantum correlations.

References

[1]
Sanjeev Arora, Carsten Lund, Rajeev Motwani, Madhu Sudan, and Mario Szegedy. 1998. Proof Verification and the Hardness of Approximation Problems. J. ACM 45, 3 (1998), 501–555.
[2]
Sanjeev Arora and Shmuel Safra. 1998. Probabilistic Checking of Proofs: A New Characterization of NP. J. ACM 45, 1 (1998), 70–122.
[3]
László Babai, Lance Fortnow, and Carsten Lund. 1991. Non-deterministic exponential time has two-prover interactive protocols. Computational Complexity 1 (1991), 3–40. Issue 1.
[4]
Mohammad Bavarian, Thomas Vidick, and Henry Yuen. 2017. Hardness amplification for entangled games via anchoring. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM, 303–316.
[5]
William W. Boone. 1958. THE WORD PROBLEM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 44, 10 (1958), 1061–1065.
[6]
Richard Cleve, Peter Hoyer, Benjamin Toner, and John Watrous. 2004. Consequences and limits of nonlocal strategies. In Computational Complexity, 2004. Proceedings. 19th IEEE Annual Conference on. IEEE, 236–249.
[7]
Alain Connes. 1976. Classification of injective factors Cases I I 1, I I ∞, I I I λ, λ, 1. Annals of Mathematics (1976), 73–115.
[8]
Matthew Coudron and William Slofstra. 2018. Complexity Lower Bounds for Approximating Entangled Games to High Precision. (2018).
[9]
STOC ’19, June 23–26, 2019, Phoenix, AZ, USA Joseph Fitzsimons, Zhengfeng Ji, Thomas Vidick, and Henry Yuen
[10]
Toby S Cubitt, David Perez-Garcia, and Michael M Wolf. 2015. Undecidability of the spectral gap. Nature 528, 7581 (2015), 207.
[11]
Joseph Fitzsimons, Zhengfeng Ji, Thomas Vidick, and Henry Yuen. 2018. Quantum proof systems for iterated exponential time, and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.12166 (2018).
[12]
Joseph Fitzsimons and Thomas Vidick. 2015.
[13]
A multiprover interactive proof system for the local Hamiltonian problem. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science. ACM, 103–112.
[14]
Tobias Fritz. 2012. Tsirelson’s problem and Kirchberg’s conjecture. Reviews in Mathematical Physics 24, 05 (2012), 1250012.
[15]
Tsuyoshi Ito, Hirotada Kobayashi, and John Watrous. 2012. Quantum interactive proofs with weak error bounds. In Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference. ACM, 266–275.
[16]
Tsuyoshi Ito and Thomas Vidick. 2012.
[17]
A multi-prover interactive proof for NEXP sound against entangled provers. Proc. 53rd FOCS (2012), 243–252. arXiv: arXiv:1207.0550
[18]
Rahul Jain, Zhengfeng Ji, Sarvagya Upadhyay, and John Watrous. 2010. QIP = PSPACE. Commun. ACM 53, 12 (2010), 102–109. arXiv: 0907.4737
[19]
Zhengfeng Ji. 2016. Classical verification of quantum proofs. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM, 885–898.
[20]
Zhengfeng Ji. 2017. Compression of quantum multi-prover interactive proofs. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2017, Montreal, QC, Canada, June 19-23, 2017, Hamed Hatami, Pierre McKenzie, and Valerie King (Eds.). ACM, 289–302.
[21]
[22]
Zhengfeng Ji, Debbie Leung, and Thomas Vidick. 2018. A three-player coherent state embezzlement game. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.04926 (2018).
[23]
N. Johnston, R. Mittal, Russo V., and J. Watrous. 2016. Extended nonlocal games and monogamy-of-entanglement games. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 472 (2016), 20160003.
[24]
Marius Junge, Miguel Navascues, Carlos Palazuelos, D Perez-Garcia, Volkher B Scholz, and Reinhard F Werner. 2011. Connes’ embedding problem and Tsirelson’s problem. J. Math. Phys. 52, 1 (2011), 012102.
[25]
OG Karlampovič. 1982. A finitely presented solvable group with unsolvable word problem. Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya 19, 1 (1982), 151.
[26]
Alexei Yu Kitaev, Alexander Shen, and Mikhail N Vyalyi. 2002.
[27]
Classical and quantum computation. Number 47. American Mathematical Soc.
[28]
Anand Natarajan and Thomas Vidick. 2018.
[29]
Low-degree testing for quantum states, and a quantum entangled games PCP for QMA. In Proceedings of Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). arXiv: 1801.03821
[30]
Anand Natarajan and Thomas Vidick. 2018. Two-Player Entangled Games are NP-Hard. In 33rd Computational Complexity Conference, CCC 2018, June 22-24, 2018, San Diego, CA, USA (LIPIcs), Rocco A. Servedio (Ed.), Vol. 102. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 20:1–20:18. LIPIcs.CCC.2018.20
[31]
P. S. Novikov. 1955.
[32]
On the algorithmic unsolvability of the word problem in group theory. Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov. 44 (1955), 3–143.
[33]
Narutaka Ozawa. 2013.
[34]
About the Connes embedding conjecture. Japanese Journal of Mathematics 8, 1 (2013), 147–183.
[35]
William Slofstra. 2016. Tsirelson’s problem and an embedding theorem for groups arising from non-local games. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03140 (2016).
[36]
William Slofstra. 2019. The set of quantum correlations is not closed. In Forum of Mathematics, Pi, Vol. 7. Cambridge University Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Constant-sized self-tests for maximally entangled states and single projective measurementsQuantum10.22331/q-2024-03-21-12928(1292)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Two Prover Perfect Zero Knowledge for MIP*Proceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3618260.3649702(991-1002)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Constant-Sized Robust Self-Tests for States and Measurements of Unbounded DimensionCommunications in Mathematical Physics10.1007/s00220-024-05122-3405:9Online publication date: 31-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Quantum proof systems for iterated exponential time, and beyond

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    STOC 2019: Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing
    June 2019
    1258 pages
    ISBN:9781450367059
    DOI:10.1145/3313276
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 June 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Quantum multiprover interactive proofs
    2. quantum correlations
    3. quantum entanglement
    4. self-testing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Singapore?s Ministry of Education and National Research Foundation
    • US Air Force
    • NSF Physics Frontiers Center
    • US Air Force Office of Scientific Researc
    • National Science Foundation
    • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
    • Singapore National Research Foundation

    Conference

    STOC '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)74
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Constant-sized self-tests for maximally entangled states and single projective measurementsQuantum10.22331/q-2024-03-21-12928(1292)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Two Prover Perfect Zero Knowledge for MIP*Proceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3618260.3649702(991-1002)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Constant-Sized Robust Self-Tests for States and Measurements of Unbounded DimensionCommunications in Mathematical Physics10.1007/s00220-024-05122-3405:9Online publication date: 31-Aug-2024
    • (2023)Counterexamples in self-testingQuantum10.22331/q-2023-07-11-10517(1051)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2023
    • (2022)Constant-sized correlations are sufficient to self-test maximally entangled states with unbounded dimensionQuantum10.22331/q-2022-01-03-6146(614)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2022
    • (2022)Nonlocal games, compression theorems, and the arithmetical hierarchyProceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3519935.3519949(1-11)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2022
    • (2020)A generalization of CHSH and the algebraic structure of optimal strategiesQuantum10.22331/q-2020-10-21-3464(346)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2020
    • (2019)NEEXP is Contained in MIP*2019 IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS.2019.00039(510-518)Online publication date: Nov-2019

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media