research-article

It Is Your Turn: Collaborative Ideation With a Co-Creative Robot through Sketch

Authors:

Fangtian YingAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 1 - 14

https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376258

Published: 23 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Co-creative systems have been widely explored in the field of computational creativity. However, existing AI partners of these systems are mostly virtual agents. As sketching on paper with embodied robots could be more engaging for designers' early-stage ideation and collaborative practices, we envision the possibility of Cobbie, a mobile robot that ideates iteratively with designers by generating creative and diverse sketches. To evaluate the differences in co-creativity and user experience between the co-creative robots and virtual agents, we conducted a comparative experiment and analyzed the data collected from quantitative scales, observation, and semi-structured interview. The results reveal that Cobbie is more satisfying in motivating exploration, provoking unexpected ideas and engaging designers in the collaborative ideation process. Based on these findings, we discussed the prospects of co-creative robots for future developments of human-AI collaborative systems.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (paper131pv.mp4)

Preview video

Download
17.41 MB

References

[1]

Ali Algarni. 2019. Exploring Neuroscience of Creativity Theories in designing Co-creative Agents. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (C&C'19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 686--690.

Digital Library

[2]

Patrí cia Alves-Oliveira, Patrí cia Arriaga, Ana Paiva, and Guy Hoffman. 2017. YOLO, a Robot for Creativity: A Co-Design Study with Children. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (CHI'17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 423--429.

Digital Library

[3]

Sule Anjomshoae, Amro Najjar, Davide Calvaresi, and Kary Framling. 2019. Explainable Agents and Robots: Results from a Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS'19). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 1078--1088.

[4]

Patti Bao, Elizabeth Gerber, Darren Gergle, and David Hoffman. 2010. Momentum: getting and staying on topic during a brainstorm. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 12331236.

Digital Library

[5]

Luca Benedetti, Holger Winnemoller, Massimiliano Corsini, and Roberto Scopigno. 2014. Painting with Bob: assisted creativity for novices. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST'14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 419--428.

Digital Library

[6]

Peter Brandl, Clifton Forlines, Daniel Wigdor, Michael Haller, and Chia Shen. 2008. Combining and Measuring the Benefits of Bimanual Pen and DirectTouch Interaction on Horizontal Interfaces. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces (AVI'08). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 154--161.

Digital Library

[7]

Erin A. Carroll, Celine Latulipe, Richard Fung, and Michael Terry. 2009. Creativity factor evaluation: towards a standardized survey metric for creativity support. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition (C&C'09). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 127--136.

Digital Library

[8]

Sung-En Chien, Li Chu, Hsing-Hao Lee, Chien-Chun Yang, Fo-Hui Lin, Pei-Ling Yang, Te-Mei Wang, and Su-Ling Yeh. 2019. Age Difference in Perceived Ease of Use, Curiosity, and Implicit Negative Attitude toward Robots. ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact. 8, 2, Article 9 (May 2019).

Digital Library

[9]

Brock Craft and Paul Cairns. 2009. Sketching sketching: outlines of a collaborative design method. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology (BCS-HCI'09). BCS Learning & Development Ltd. Swindon, UK, 65--72.

Digital Library

[10]

Jim Davies, Ashok K. Goel, and Nancy J. Nersessian 2009. A Computational Model of Visual Analogies in Design. Cognitive Systems Research: Special Issue on Analogies 10, 3(2009), 204--215.

Digital Library

[11]

Nicholas Davis, Chih-Pin Hsiao, Kunwar Yashraj Singh, and Brian Magerko. 2016. Co-Creative Drawing Agent with Object Recognition. In Twelfth Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference.

[12]

Nicholas Davis. An Enactive Approach to Facilitate Interactive Machine Learning for Co-Creative Agents. 2015. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C'15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 345--346.

Digital Library

[13]

Nicholas Davis, Chih-Pin Hsiao, Kunwar Yashraj Singh, Lisa Li, and Brian Magerko. 2016. Empirically Studying Participatory Sense-Making in Abstract Drawing with a Co-Creative Cognitive Agent. In Proceedings of the 21st Interactional Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 196--207.

Digital Library

[14]

Sebastian Deterding, Jonathan Hook, Rebecca Fiebrink, Marco Gillies, Jeremy Gow, Memo Akten, Gillian Smith, Antonios Liapis, and Kate Compton. 2017. Mixed-Initiative Creative Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 628--635.

Digital Library

[15]

Daniel Dixon, Manoj Prasad, and Tracy Hammond. 2010. iCanDraw: using sketch recognition and corrective feedback to assist a user in drawing human faces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 897--906.

Digital Library

[16]

Judith E. Fan, Monica Dinculescu, and David Ha. 2019. collabdraw: An Environment for Collaborative Sketching with an Artificial Agent. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (C&C'19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 556--561.

Digital Library

[17]

Juan Fasola and Maja J Mataric. 2013. Experimental Robotics. Springer, Heidelberg, Chapter Socially Assistive Robot Exercise Coach: Motivating Older Adults to Engage in Physical exercise, 463--479.

[18]

Mary Ellen Forster, Andre Gaschler, Manuel Giuliani, Amy Isard, Maria Pateraki, and Ronald P.A. Petrick. 2012. Two People Walk Into a Bar: Dynamic MultiParty Social Interaction with a Robot Agent. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction (ICMI'12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3--10.

Digital Library

[19]

Alex Graves. 2013. Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networks. Computer Science (2013). arXiv: 1308.0850 [cs.NE]

[20]

Matthew Guzdial, Nicholas Liao, Jonathan Chen, Shao-Yu Chen, Shukan Shah, Vishwa Shah, Joshua Reno, Gillian Smith, and Mark O. Riedl. 2019. Friend, Collaborator, Student, Manager: How Design of an AIDriven Game Level Editor Affects Creators. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Paper No. 624.

Digital Library

[21]

Joshua T. Gyory, Jonathan Cagan, and Kenneth Kotovsky. 2018. Are you better off alone? Mitigating the underperformance of engineering teams during conceptual design through adaptive process management. Research in Engineering Design 30, 85102(2019).

[22]

David Ha and Douglas Eck. 2017. A Neural Representation of Sketch Drawings. arXiv: 1704.03477 [cs.NE]

[23]

Chipp Jansen and Elizabeth Sklar. 2019. Co-creative Physical Drawing Systems. ICRA.

[24]

Jonas Jongejan, Henry Rowley, Takashi Kawashima, Jongmin Kim, and Nick Fox-Gieg. 2016. The Quick, Draw! -A.I. Experiment. (2016). https://quickdraw.withgoogle.com/

[25]

Deny W. Junaidy and Yukari Nagai. 2013. Co-Creation Model for Traditional Artisans in the Current Creative Environment. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition (C&C'13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 324--327.

Digital Library

[26]

Peter H. Kahn, Jr., Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Brian T. Gill, Solace Shen, Jolina H. Ruckert, and Heather E. Gary. 2016. Human Creativity Can be Facilitated Through Interacting With a Social Robot. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '16). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 173--180.

[27]

Pegah Karimi, Nicholas Davis, Mary Lou Maher, Kazjon Frace, and Lina Lee. 2019. Relating Cognitive Models of Design Creativity to the Similarity of Sketches Generated by an AI Partner. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (C&C'19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 259--270.

Digital Library

[28]

Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Tovi Grossman, Hyunmin Cheong, Ali Hashemi, and George Fitzmaurice. 2017. DreamSketch: Early Stage 3D Design Explorations with Sketching and Generative Design. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 401--414.

Digital Library

[29]

Janin Koch, Andres Lucero, Lena Hegemann, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2019. May AI? Design Ideation with Cooperative Contextual Bandits. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1--12.

Digital Library

[30]

Pavlos Koulouris and Evangelia V. Dimaraki. 2014. Digital Gaming for Co-Creativity in Learning: TheoryFramed Co-Design with School Communities. In Proceedings of the 18th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics (PCI'14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 16.

Digital Library

[31]

Eun Kwon, Gerard J. Kim. 2010. Humanoid Robot vs. Projector Robot: Exploring an Indirect Approach to Human Robot Interaction. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI '10). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 157--158.

[32]

Matthew V. Law, JiHyun Jeong, Amritansh Kwatra, Malte F. Jung, and Guy Hoffman. 2019. Negotiating the Creative Space in Human-Robot Collaborative Design. In Proceedings of 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS'19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 645--657.

Digital Library

[33]

Matthew V. Law, Nikhil Dhawan, Hyunseung Bang, So-Yeon Yoon, Daniel Selva, and Guy Hoffman. 2018. Side-by-side Human-computer Design Using a Tangible User Interface. In Design Computing and Cognition '18. DCC 2018. Springer, Cham.

[34]

Duri Long, Mikhail Jacob, and Brian Magerko. 2019. Designing Co-Creative AI for Public Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (C&C'19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 271--284.

Digital Library

[35]

Arnold Lund. 2001. Measuring Usability with the USE Questionnaire. Usability and User Experience Newsletter of the STC Usability SIG. 8(2001).

[36]

Makoto Nakajima, Daisuke Sakamoto, and Takeo Igarashi. 2014. Offline Painted Media for Digital Animation Authoring. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 321--330.

Digital Library

[37]

Changhoon Oh, Jungwoo Song, Jinhan Choi, Seonghyeon Kim, Sungwoo Lee, and Bongwon Suh. 2018. I Lead, You Help But Only with Enough Details: Understanding the User Experience of Co-Creation with Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1--13.

Digital Library

[38]

Ayberk Ozgur, Wafa Johal, Francesco Mondada, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2017. Haptic-Enabled Handheld Mobile Robots: Design and Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2449--2461.

Digital Library

[39]

Eujin Pei, Ian Campbell, and Mark Evans. 2011. A Taxonomic Classification of Visual Design Representations Used by Industrial Designers and Engineering Designers. The Design Journal 14, 1 (2011), 64--91.

[40]

Cecil Piya, Vinayak, Senthil Chandrasegaran, Niklas Elmqvist, and Karthik Ramani. 2017. Co-3Deator: A Team-First Collaborative 3D Design Ideation Tool. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 6581--6592.

Digital Library

[41]

Aaron Powers, Sara Kiesler, Susan Fussell, and Cristen Torrey. 2007. Comparing a Computer Agent with a Humanoid Robot. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI'07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 145--152.

Digital Library

[42]

Prashanth Thattai Ravikumar. 2017. Notational Communication with Co-creative Systems: Studying Improvements to Musical Coordination. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C'17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 518--523.

Digital Library

[43]

Ruth Schulz, Philipp Kratzer, and Marc Toussaint. 2017. Building a Bridge with a Robot: A System for Collaborative On-table Task Execution. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction (HAI'17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 399--403.

Digital Library

[44]

Ticha Sethapakdi and James McCann. 2019. Painting with CATS: Camera-Aided Texture Synthesis. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1--9.

Digital Library

[45]

Ching-Long Shih and Li-Chen Lin. 2017. Trajectory Planning and Tracking Control of a Differential-Drive Mobile Robot in a Picture Drawing Application. Robotics. 6, 3(8, 2017).

[46]

Hyunyoung Song, Francois Guimbretiere, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2010. MouseLight: Bimanual Interactions on Digital Paper Using a Pen and a Spatially-Aware Mobile Projector. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2451--2460.

Digital Library

[47]

Hyunyoung Song, Tovi Grossman, George Fitzmaurice, Francois Guimbretiere, Azam Khan, Ramtin Attar, and Gordon Kurtenbach. 2009. PenLight: Combining a Mobile Projector and a Digital Pen for Dynamic Visual Overlay. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 143152.

Digital Library

[48]

Masaki Suwa, John S. Gero, and Terry A. Purcell. 1998. The Roles of Sketches in Early Conceptual Design Processes. In Proceedings of Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1043--1048.

[49]

Theophanis Tsandilas, Magdalini Grammatikou, and Stephane Huot. 2015. BricoSketch: Mixing Paper and Computer Drawing Tools in Professional Illustration. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces (ITS'15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 127--136.

Digital Library

[50]

Pierre Wellner. 1991. The DigitalDesk calculator: tangible manipulation on a desk top display. In Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST'91). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 27--33.

Digital Library

[51]

Blake Williford, Abhay Doke, and Michel Pahud. 2019. DrawMyPhoto: Assisting Novices in Drawing from Photographs. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (C&C'19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 198--209.

Digital Library

[52]

Yang Zhang, Chris Harrison. 2018. Pulp Nonfiction: Low-Cost Touch Tracking for Paper. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Paper No. 117.

Digital Library

[53]

OPEN AI LAB. 2019. Tengine. https://github.com/OAID/Tengine

Cited By

Satpathy INayak AJain VPatnaik B(2024)The Renaissance of Human-Robot Coalescence in Industry 5.0Human-Machine Collaboration and Emotional Intelligence in Industry 5.010.4018/979-8-3693-6806-0.ch006(113-128)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6806-0.ch006
Bremers AJu W(2024)Can Machines Tell What People Want? Bringing Situated Intelligence to Generative AIProceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686172(1-6)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686169.3686172
Ghajargar M(2024)AI and Future-Making: Design, Biases, and Human-Plant InteractionsProceedings of the 27th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3681716.3681738(24-35)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3681716.3681738
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

It Is Your Turn: Collaborative Ideation With a Co-Creative Robot through Sketch
1. Computer systems organization
  1. Embedded and cyber-physical systems
    1. Robotics
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Collaborative and social computing devices

Recommendations

Creative Computing for Bespoke Ideation
COMPSAC '15: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 39th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference - Volume 01

Today, idea generation is an extremely important activity for both academic researchers and industrial groups. A considerable number of applications and research studies have been made in the past years in order to increase the effectiveness of idea ...
Smart "Error"! Exploring Imperfect AI to Support Creative Ideation
CSCW

Designers widely accept AI as a partner in the design process for its efficient and intelligent decision-making. However, AI is often not perfect, and AI error often makes humans dumbfounded. Literature has pointed out the value of such AI error, while ...
Exploring Creativity Support for Concept Art Ideation
CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Creatives often struggle with fixation on a narrow set of ideas. There is potential for co-creative systems to stimulate creatives in new and powerful ways. We sought to lay a foundation for such systems with an exploratory study. We recruited 20 ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2020

10688 pages

ISBN:9781450367080

DOI:10.1145/3313831

General Chairs:
Regina Bernhaupt
Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
,
Florian 'Floyd' Mueller
Monash University, Australia
,
David Verweij
Newcastle University, UK
,
Josh Andres
RMIT, Australia
,
Program Chairs:
Joanna McGrenere
University of British Columbia, Canada
,
Andy Cockburn
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
,
Ignacio Avellino
University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA
,
Alix Goguey
Grenoble Alpes University, France
,
Pernille Bjørn
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Shengdong (Shen) Zhao
National University of Singapore, Singapore
,
Briane Paul Samson
Future University Hakodate, Japan & De La Salle University, Philippines
,
Rafal Kocielnik
University of Washington, USA

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 April 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Conference

CHI '20

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '20: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 25 - 30, 2020

HI, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

66
Total Citations
View Citations
2,349
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)500
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)40

Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Satpathy INayak AJain VPatnaik B(2024)The Renaissance of Human-Robot Coalescence in Industry 5.0Human-Machine Collaboration and Emotional Intelligence in Industry 5.010.4018/979-8-3693-6806-0.ch006(113-128)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6806-0.ch006
Bremers AJu W(2024)Can Machines Tell What People Want? Bringing Situated Intelligence to Generative AIProceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686172(1-6)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686169.3686172
Ghajargar M(2024)AI and Future-Making: Design, Biases, and Human-Plant InteractionsProceedings of the 27th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3681716.3681738(24-35)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3681716.3681738
Tsiakas KMurray-Rust D(2024)Unpacking Human-AI interactions: From Interaction Primitives to a Design SpaceACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/366452214:3(1-51)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3664522
Nevsky ABircanin FCruice MWilson SSimperl ENeate T(2024)"I Wish You Could Make the Camera Stand Still": Envisioning Media Accessibility Interventions with People with AphasiaProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675598(1-17)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3663548.3675598
He JHoude SGonzalez GSilva Moran DRoss SMuller MWeisz J(2024)AI and the Future of Collaborative Work: Group Ideation with an LLM in a Virtual CanvasProceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3663384.3663398(1-14)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3663384.3663398
Lin PAndersen KSchmidt RSchoenmakers SHofmeyer HPauwels PIjsselsteijn W(2024)Text-to-Image AI as a Catalyst for Semantic Convergence in Creative CollaborationsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661543(2753-2767)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661543
Law MNwagwu NKwatra ALee SDiangelis DYu NGonzalez-Pumariega GRajesh AHoffman G(2024)Affinity Diagramming with a RobotACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/364151413:1(1-41)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3641514
Deshpande MPark JPait SMagerko B(2024)Perceptions of Interaction Dynamics in Co-Creative AI: A Comparative Study of Interaction Modalities in DrawctoProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656202(102-116)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3656202
Ning ZZhang ZBan JJiang KGan RTian YLi T(2024)MIMOSA: Human-AI Co-Creation of Computational Spatial Audio Effects on VideosProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656189(156-169)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3656189
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents