Streamlining Computer Science Curriculum Development and Assessment using the New ABET Student Outcomes
Authors: 
Steve Hadfield, Troy Weingart, 
Joel Coffman, David Caswell, 
Barry Fagin, Traci Sarmiento, Paul GrahamAuthors Info & Claims
Steve Hadfield, Troy Weingart, Joel Coffman, David Caswell, Barry Fagin, Traci Sarmiento, Paul GrahamAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 10, Pages 1 - 6
Abstract
Recent updates to the ABET accreditation body's Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs provide opportunities for program design and assessment efficiency and effectiveness improvements. An exploration of these opportunities resulted in a re-examination of our Computer Science program design. The resulting changes streamlined the program's management and assessment process while improving its effectiveness in maintaining a robust and relevant program. This paper documents the recent ABET changes and describes how the results of these changes further improved an already successful Computer Science program.
References
[1]
ABET. 2017. Criterial for Accrediting Computing Programs -- CAC Version 1.0. Online: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2018-2019/#GC3.
[2]
ABET. 2017. Criterial for Accrediting Computing Programs -- CAC Version 2.0. Online: https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/C001-18-19-CAC-Criteria-Version-2.0-updated-02-12-18.pdf.
[3]
ABET. 2018. Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs -- 2019-2020. Online: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2019-2020/#GC3.
[4]
United States Air Force Academy. {n. d.}. Institutional Outcomes. Online: https://www.usafa.edu/academics/outcomes/.
[5]
Association for Computing Machinery. 2018. ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Online: https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics.
[6]
Srividya Bansal, Ajay Bansal, and Odesma Dalrymple. 2015. Outcome-Based Education Model for Computer Science Education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 28, 2 & 3 (2015). http://www.journaleet.org/index.php/jeet/article/view/56668
[7]
Brown University Science and Technology Studies. {n. d.}. A Framework for Making Ethical Decisions. Online: https://www.brown.edu/academics/science-and-technology-studies/framework-making-ethical-decisions.
[8]
Donald B. Crouch and Leslie Schwartzman. 2003. Computer Science Accreditation: The Advantages of Being Different. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '03). ACM, New York, NY, 36--40.
[9]
Eugene Essa, Andrew Dittrich, Sergiu Dascalu, and Jr. Harris, Frederick C. 2010. ACAT: A Web-Based Software Tool to Facilitate Course Assessment for ABET Accreditation. In 2010 Seventh International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations. 88--93.
[10]
Steve Hadfield, Dino Schweitzer, David Gibson, Barry Fagin, Martin Carlisle, Jeff Boleng, and Dave Bibighaus. 2011. Defining, Integrating, and Assessing a Purposeful Progression of Cross-Curricular Initiatives into a Computer Science Program. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). T3J--1--T3J--6.
[11]
Haidar M. Harmanani. 2013. A Bottom-Up Outcome-Based Learning Assessment Process for Accrediting Computing Programs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS).
[12]
Martin E. Hellman. 2017. Cybersecurity, Nuclear Security, Alan Turing, and Illogical Logic. Commun. ACM 60, 12 (November 2017), 52--59.
[13]
Jeffrey Miller. 2016. Minimizing Effort for ABET Student Outcomes Assessment while Maintaining Effective Results. In 2016 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI). 365--369.
[14]
NSA/CSS. {n. d.}. National Centers of Academic Excellence. Online: https://www.nsa.gov/resources/students-educators/centers-academic-excellence/.
[15]
Joint Task Force on Computing Curriculum. 2013. Computer Science Curricula 2013 -- Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science. Online: https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/cs2013_web_final.pdf.
[16]
Joint Task Force on Cybersecurity Education. 2017. Cybersecurity Curricula 2017 -- Curriculum Guidelines for Post-Secondary Degree Programs in Cybersecurity (Version 1.0). Online: https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/curricula-recommendations/csec2017.pdf.
[17]
Muhammad Rashid and Imran A. Tasadduq. 2014. Holistic Development of Computer Engineering Curricula Using Y-Chart Methodology. IEEE Transactions on Education 57, 3 (August 2014), 193--200.
[18]
Natasha F. Veltri, Harold W. Webb, Alexei G. Matveev, and Enrique G. Zapatero. 2011. Curriculum Mapping as a Tool for Continuous Improvement of IS Curriculum. Journal of Information Systems Education 22, 1 (2011), 31.
[19]
Kwok-Bun Yue. 2007. Effective Course-based Learning Outcome Assessment for ABET Accreditation of Computing Programs. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 22, 4 (April 2007), 252--259. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1229637.1229682
Index Terms
- Streamlining Computer Science Curriculum Development and Assessment using the New ABET Student Outcomes
Recommendations
Interpreting the ABET Computer Science Criteria Using Competencies
SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - Volume 1Since the early 21st century, ABET's accreditation criteria have focused on learning outcomes (what students learn) rather than what professors teach. Such accreditation criteria bring to bear the need for programs to establish clear learning objectives ...
ABET accreditation with IT criteria
SIGITE '05: Proceedings of the 6th conference on Information technology educationIn recent years the SIGITE community has invested significant effort into developing IT accreditation standards. New draft general and program specific accreditation criteria were recently created. The Brigham Young University IT program is undergoing ...
The Impact of Accreditation on Student Learning Outcomes
In recent years, student outcomes in higher education has captured the interest and concern of accreditation communities, governments, employers as well as international organizations. Student outcomes is becoming the principal gauge of higher education'...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2019 Public Domain.
This paper is authored by an employee(s) of the United States Government and is in the public domain. Non-exclusive copying or redistribution is allowed, provided that the article citation is given and the authors and agency are clearly identified as its source.
Sponsors
In-Cooperation
- UOC: University of Calgary
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 03 May 2019
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
WCCCE '19
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
WCCCE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 15 of 29 submissions, 52%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 78 of 117 submissions, 67%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 184Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)9
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in