research-article

Software for Automation of User Requirements Prioritization

Authors:

T. AfanasievaAuthors Info & Claims

ICGDA '19: Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Geoinformatics and Data Analysis

Pages 1 - 5

https://doi.org/10.1145/3318236.3318251

Published: 15 March 2019 Publication History

Abstract

This paper describes the system for automating the user requirements prioritization URPCalc. A key feature is the presentation of user requirements as an estimation of priorities based on key characteristics of users and changes in these ratings over time. This approach allows us to estimate the change in the relevance of user requirements and forecast it for the near future. The proposed approach focuses on ensuring quality and reducing labor costs for a product manager by developing software for analyzing and prioritizing user requirements. The article presents and discusses the algorithms and architecture of the URPCalc system.

References

[1]

Yadav M., Goyal N. and Yadav. J. 2015. Agile Methodology over iterative approach of Software Development. In Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (May 2015), 542--547.

[2]

Wingo R. and Tanik. M. 2015. Using an agile software development methodology for a complex problem domain. In Proceedings SoutheastCon 2015 (June 2015), 1--8.

[3]

Rizwan M. and Qureshi. J. 2012. Agile software development methodology for medium and large projects, IET Software, vol. 6 (Aug. 2012), 358--363.

[4]

Rover D., Ullerich C., Scheel R., Wegter J. and Whipple C. 2015. Advantages of agile methodologies for software and product development in a capstone design project. In Proceedingseedings Frontiers in Education Conference (February 2015), 1--9.

[5]

Benefield R. 2009. Agile Deployment: Lean Service Management and Deployment Strategies for the SaaS Enterprise. In Proceedings 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (January 2009), 1--5.

Digital Library

[6]

McLaughlin M. 2018. 'What Is Agile Methodology?', VersionOne{Online}. Available: https://www.versionone.com/agile-101/agile-methodologies/ URL. {Accessed: 10-May-2018}.

[7]

Sutherland M. and Schwaber M. 2018. The Definitive Guide to Scrum:The Rules of the Game. The Scrum Guide, 2018 {Online}. Available: https://www.scrumguides.org/ URL. {Accessed: 10-May-2018}

[8]

ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-1:2013. Standards catalogue. International Organization for Standardization. September 2013. Retrieved 05 November 2018.

[9]

Farris P., Bendle N., Pfeifer P. and Reibstein D. 2015. Marketing Metrics: The Definitive Guide to Measuring Marketing Performance. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education (August 2015), 55--59.

Digital Library

[10]

Gunning M., Kelley J., Khandker N., Kornienko I., Richer P., Sneden J. and Stephen K. 2007. Systems and Methods for Project Management Task Prioritization, 2007, US20090133027A1.

[11]

Lober R., Padois V. and Sigaud O. 2015. Variance modulated task prioritization in Whole-Body Control. In Proceedings. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (October 2015), 3944--3949.

[12]

Xu Y., Li K., Hu J. and Li K. 2014. A genetic algorithm for task scheduling on heterogeneous computing systems using multiple priority queues. In Proceedings Information Sciences, Elsevier Inc (February 2014), 255--287.

[13]

Kano N., Seraku N., Takahashi F. and Tsuji S. 1984. Attractive Quality and Must-be Quality. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control (1984), 39--44.

[14]

Hohmann L. 2006. Innovation Games: Creating Breakthrough Products Through Collaborative Play. Pearson Education (August 2006).

Digital Library

[15]

Wiegers K. 1999. First Things First: Prioritizing Requirements. Software Development (September 1999).

Digital Library

[16]

Hudda S., Mahajan R., Chopra S. 2016. Prioritization of User-Stories in Agile Environment. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9 (December 2016), 1--23.

[17]

Popli R., Chauhan N. and Sharma H. 2014. Prioritising user stories in agile environment. 2014 International Conference on Issues and Challenges in Intelligent Computing Techniques (February 2014), 515--519.

[18]

Ecar M., Kepler F. and Pablo S. 2018. Cosmic User Story Standard. Lecture Notes in Business Information In Proceedingsessing, val. 314 (May 2018), 3--18.

[19]

Nuseibeh B. and Easterbrook S. 2000. Requirements engineering: a roadmap. In Proceedingseedings of the conference on the future of Software engineering, ACM New York (June 2000), 35--46.

Digital Library

[20]

Gotel O. and Finkelstein A. 2002. An Analysis of the Requirements Traceability Problem. In Proceedings. In Proceedingseedings of IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, (August 2002), 94--101.

[21]

Afanasieva T. and Sapunkov A. 2018. Calculating the priorities of user problems in software development. In Proceedings. 12th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (October 2018), 234--240.

[22]

Afanasieva T., Yarushkina N., Toneryan M., Zavarzin D., Sapunkov A. and Sibirev I. 2015. Time series forecasting using fuzzy techniques. In Proceedings. International Joint Conferece IFSA-EUSFLAT 15 (July 2015), 1068--1075.

[23]

Afanasieva T. and Sapunkov A. 2015. Selection of time series forecasting model, using a combination of linguistic and numerical criteria. In Proceedings. 10th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (October 2016), 341--346.

[24]

B2B Family {Online}. Available: https://b2bfamily.com URL. {Accessed: 1- December-2018}

[25]

OmniDesk {Online}. Available: https://omnidesk.ru URL. {Accessed: 1- December-2018}

[26]

Trello {Online}. Available: http://trello.com URL. {Accessed: 1- December-2018}.

Cited By

Armah IHayfron-Acquah JTakyi KGyening REshun M(2023)The use of knapsack 0/1 in prioritizing software requirements and Markov chain to predict software successInternational Journal of Information Technology10.1007/s41870-023-01476-4Online publication date: 15-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01476-4
Arshad HShaheen SKhan JAnwar MAurangzeb KAlhussein M(2023)A novel hybrid requirement’s prioritization approach based on critical software project factorsCognition, Technology and Work10.1007/s10111-023-00729-325:2-3(305-324)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10111-023-00729-3
Rottoli GCasanova C(2022)Multi-criteria and Multi-expert Requirement Prioritization using Fuzzy Linguistic LabelsParadigmPlus10.55969/paradigmplus.v3n1a13:1(1-18)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.55969/paradigmplus.v3n1a1
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

An Approach for Eliciting Software Requirements and its Prioritization Using Analytic Hierarchy Process
ARTCOM '09: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and Computing

Most software engineering methods presume that requirements are explicitly and completely stated; however, experience shows that requirements are rarely complete and usually contain implicit requirements. The failure or success of a software system ...
User Requirements and System Requirements

Stakeholders, analysts, and designers often fail to differentiate the roles of user and system requirements. Unfortunately, treating them as the same thing can create problems for projects. Here are three strategies for managing user and system ...
A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research

Context: During requirements engineering, prioritization is performed to grade or rank requirements in their order of importance and subsequent implementation releases. It is a major step taken in making crucial decisions so as to increase the economic ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

ICGDA '19: Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Geoinformatics and Data Analysis

March 2019

156 pages

ISBN:9781450362450

DOI:10.1145/3318236

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Department of Informatics, University of Oslo

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 March 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

ICGDA 2019

ICGDA 2019: 2019 2nd International Conference on Geoinformatics and Data Analysis & 2019 2nd International Conference on Software and Services Engineering

March 15 - 17, 2019

Prague, Czech Republic

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

5
Total Citations
View Citations
162
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)7
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 01 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Armah IHayfron-Acquah JTakyi KGyening REshun M(2023)The use of knapsack 0/1 in prioritizing software requirements and Markov chain to predict software successInternational Journal of Information Technology10.1007/s41870-023-01476-4Online publication date: 15-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01476-4
Arshad HShaheen SKhan JAnwar MAurangzeb KAlhussein M(2023)A novel hybrid requirement’s prioritization approach based on critical software project factorsCognition, Technology and Work10.1007/s10111-023-00729-325:2-3(305-324)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10111-023-00729-3
Rottoli GCasanova C(2022)Multi-criteria and Multi-expert Requirement Prioritization using Fuzzy Linguistic LabelsParadigmPlus10.55969/paradigmplus.v3n1a13:1(1-18)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.55969/paradigmplus.v3n1a1
Alaidaros HBakodah ABamsaoud S(2022)A Review on Requirements Prioritization Approaches of Software Project Management2022 International Conference on Intelligent Technology, System and Service for Internet of Everything (ITSS-IoE)10.1109/ITSS-IoE56359.2022.9990930(1-5)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSS-IoE56359.2022.9990930
Fatima RZeshan FAhmad AHamid MAhmad ATahir S(2021)Software Requirements Change Prediction Model2021 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA)10.1109/DASA53625.2021.9682217(607-612)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA53625.2021.9682217

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents