Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3319502.3374792acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Patricc: A Platform for Triadic Interaction with Changeable Characters

Published: 09 March 2020 Publication History

Abstract

While social robots for education are slowly being integrated in many scenarios, ranging from higher-education, through elementary school and kindergarten, the use case of robots for toddlers in their homes has not gained much attention. In this contribution, we introduce Patricc, a robotic platform that is specifically designed for toddler-parent-robot triadic interaction. It addresses the unique challenges of this age group, namely, desire for continuous physical interaction and novelty. Patricc's unique design enables changing characters by using dress-able puppets over a 3D-printed skeleton and the use of physical props. A novel authoring tool enables robot behavior and content creation by non-programmers. We conducted an evaluation study with 18 parent-toddler pairs and compared Patricc to similar tablet-based interactions. Our quantitative and qualitative analyses show that Patricc promotes significantly more triadic interaction, measured by video-coded gaze, compared to the tablet and that parents indeed perceive the interaction as triadic. Furthermore, there was no novelty-induced significant change in task-oriented behaviors, when toddlers interacted with two different characters consecutively. Finally, parents pointed out the benefits of changeable puppet-like characters over tablets and the appropriateness of the platform for the target age-group. These results suggest that Patricc can serve as the first gateway of toddlers to the emerging world of social robots.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (fp1123aux.zip)
Supplementary Information File: Patricc_supp_info.pdf Includes: Detailed summary of quantitative video coding. Detailed summary of semi-structured interviews.
MP4 File (p399-gvirsman.mp4)

References

[1]
Nalini Ambady and Robert Rosenthal. 1992. Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, Vol. 111, 2 (1992), 256.
[2]
Prerana Baruah and Binny Borkha Boruah. 2016. Positive peer pressure and behavioral support. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology; Hisar, Vol. 7, 2 (June 2016), 241--243.
[3]
Tony Belpaeme, James Kennedy, Aditi Ramachandran, Brian Scassellati, and Fumihide Tanaka. 2018a. Social robots for education: A review. Science robotics, Vol. 3, 21 (2018), eaat5954.
[4]
Tony Belpaeme, Paul Vogt, Rianne Van den Berghe, Kirsten Bergmann, Tilbe Goksun, Mirjam De Haas, Junko Kanero, James Kennedy, Aylin C. Kuntay, and Ora Oudgenoeg-Paz. 2018b. Guidelines for designing social robots as second language tutors. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 10, 3 (2018), 325--341.
[5]
Aude Billard, Sylvain Calinon, Ruediger Dillmann, and Stefan Schaal. 2008. Robot programming by demonstration. Springer handbook of robotics (2008), 1371--1394.
[6]
Cynthia L. Breazeal. 2004. Designing sociable robots .MIT press.
[7]
Jan de Wit, Thorsten Schodde, Bram Willemsen, Kirsten Bergmann, Mirjam de Haas, Stefan Kopp, Emiel Krahmer, and Paul Vogt. 2018. The effect of a robot's gestures and adaptive tutoring on children's acquisition of second language vocabularies. In Proceedings of the 2018 acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction. ACM, 50--58.
[8]
James Diprose, Bruce MacDonald, John Hosking, and Beryl Plimmer. 2017. Designing an API at an appropriate abstraction level for programming social robot applications. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, Vol. 39 (2017), 22--40.
[9]
Naja Ferjan Ramirez and Patricia Kuhl. 2017. Bilingual Baby: Foreign Language Intervention in Madrid's Infant Education Centers . Mind, Brain, and Education, Vol. 11, 3 (2017), 133--143.
[10]
Fernando Garcia-Sanjuan, Javier Jaen, Vicente Nacher, and Alejandro Catala. 2015. Design and Evaluation of a Tangible-mediated Robot for Kindergarten Instruction. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3:1--3:11. https://doi.org/10.1145/2832932.2832952 event-place: Iskandar, Malaysia.
[11]
Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss. 1967. Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Sociology the journal of the British sociological association, Vol. 12, 1 (1967), 27--49.
[12]
Goren Gordon, Cynthia Breazeal, and Susan Engel. 2015. Can Children Catch Curiosity from a Social Robot?. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91--98. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696469
[13]
Goren Gordon, Samuel Spaulding, Jacqueline Kory Westlund, Jin Joo Lee, Luke Plummer, Marayna Martinez, Madhurima Das, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2016. Affective Personalization of a Social Robot Tutor for Children's Second Language Skills. In Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[14]
Marika Hein and Dan Nathan-Roberts. 2018. Socially Interactive Robots Can Teach Young Students Language Skills; a Systematic Review . Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 62, 1 (Sept. 2018), 1083--1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621249
[15]
Seung Han Kim and Jae Wook Jeon. 2007. Programming lego mindstorms nxt with visual programming. In 2007 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems. IEEE, 2468--2472.
[16]
Blanka Frydrychova Klimova. 2013. Teaching English to pre-school children. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 93 (2013), 503--507.
[17]
Jacqueline M. Kory-Westlund and Cynthia Breazeal. 2019. A Long-Term Study of Young Children's Rapport, Social Emulation, and Language Learning With a Peer-Like Robot Playmate in Preschool . Frontiers in Robotics and AI, Vol. 6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00081
[18]
Hideki Kozima, Marek P. Michalowski, and Cocoro Nakagawa. 2009. Keepon. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 1, 1 (2009), 3--18.
[19]
J. Richard Landis and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics (1977), 159--174.
[20]
Iolanda Leite, Carlos Martinho, and Ana Paiva. 2013. Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 5, 2 (2013), 291--308.
[21]
Iolanda Leite, Marissa McCoy, Monika Lohani, Daniel Ullman, Nicole Salomons, Charlene Stokes, Susan Rivers, and Brian Scassellati. 2015. Emotional Storytelling in the Classroom: Individual Versus Group Interaction Between Children and Robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 75--82. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696481 event-place: Portland, Oregon, USA.
[22]
Iolanda Leite, André Pereira, Allison Funkhouser, Boyang Li, and Jill Fain Lehman. 2016. Semi-situated Learning of Verbal and Nonverbal Content for Repeated Human-robot Interaction. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2993148.2993190 event-place: Tokyo, Japan.
[23]
Daniel Leyzberg, Aditi Ramachandran, and Brian Scassellati. 2018. The Effect of Personalization in Longer-Term Robot Tutoring . ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact., Vol. 7, 3 (Dec. 2018), 19:1--19:19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3283453
[24]
Robyn Longhurst. 2003. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Key methods in geography, Vol. 3 (2003), 143--156.
[25]
Tino Lourens and Emilia Barakova. 2011. User-friendly robot environment for creation of social scenarios. In International Work-Conference on the Interplay between Natural and Artificial Computation. Springer, 212--221.
[26]
Joseph E. Michaelis and Bilge Mutlu. 2017. Someone to Read with: Design of and Experiences with an In-Home Learning Companion Robot for Reading. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 301--312. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025499 event-place: Denver, Colorado, USA.
[27]
Javier Movellan, Micah Eckhardt, Marjo Virnes, and Angelica Rodriguez. 2009. Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction . ACM, 307--308.
[28]
Hae Won Park, Ishaan Grover, Samuel Spaulding, Louis Gomez, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2019. A model-free affective reinforcement learning approach to personalization of an autonomous social robot companion for early literacy education. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 687--694.
[29]
Hae Won Park, Rinat Rosenberg-Kima, Maor Rosenberg, Goren Gordon, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2017. Growing growth mindset with a social robot peer. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 137--145. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020213
[30]
Penny M. Pexman. 2017. The role of embodiment in conceptual development. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience (2017), 1--10.
[31]
Emmanuel Pot, Jerome Monceaux, Rodolphe Gelin, and Bruno Maisonnier. 2009. Choregraphe: a graphical tool for humanoid robot programming. In RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 46--51.
[32]
Rinat Rosenberg-Kima and Goren Gordon. 2018. Robotator: Social Robot as Facilitator of Small Group Instructional Activity in Higher Education . Ben-Gurion University, Israel.
[33]
Brian Scassellati, Laura Boccanfuso, Chien-Ming Huang, Marilena Mademtzi, Meiying Qin, Nicole Salomons, Pamela Ventola, and Frederick Shic. 2018. Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long-term, in-home social robot. Science Robotics, Vol. 3, 21 (Aug. 2018), eaat7544. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat7544
[34]
Adam Setapen and Cynthia Breazeal. 2012. DragonBot: a platform for longitudinal cloud-HRI. In Human-Robot Interaction.
[35]
Masahiro Shiomi, Kasumi Abe, Yachao Pei, Tingyi Zhang, Narumitsu Ikeda, and Takayuki Nagai. 2016. Chicaro: Tele-presence robot for interacting with babies and toddlers. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction. ACM, 349--351.
[36]
Masahiro Shiomi, Takayuki Kanda, Iris Howley, Kotaro Hayashi, and Norihiro Hagita. 2015. Can a Social Robot Stimulate Science Curiosity in Classrooms? International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 7, 5 (Nov. 2015), 641--652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0303--1
[37]
Irwin W. Silverman and Michelle Gaines. 1996. Using Standard Situations to Measure Attention Span and Persistence in Toddler-Aged Children: Some Cautions . The Journal of Genetic Psychology, Vol. 157, 4 (Dec. 1996), 397--410. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1996.9914874
[38]
Michael Suguitan and Guy Hoffman. 2019. Blossom: A Handcrafted Open-Source Robot . ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact., Vol. 8, 1 (March 2019), 2:1--2:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3310356
[39]
Fang-Wu Tung. 2011. Influence of Gender and Age on the Attitudes of Children towards Humanoid Robots. In Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Applications (Lecture Notes in Computer Science ), Julie A. Jacko (Ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 637--646.
[40]
Manuela M. Veloso. 2018. The increasingly fascinating opportunity for human-robot-ai interaction: The cobot mobile service robots. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), Vol. 7, 1 (2018), 5.
[41]
Jacqueline Kory Westlund, Jin Joo Lee, Luke Plummer, Fardad Faridi, Jesse Gray, Matt Berlin, Harald Quintus-Bosz, Robert Hartmann, Mike Hess, Stacy Dyer, and others. 2016. Tega: A Social Robot. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 561--561.
[42]
S. Woods, K. Dautenhahn, and J. Schulz. 2004. The design space of robots: investigating children's views. In RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No. 04TH8759). 47--52. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374728
[43]
Zhen-Jia You, Chi-Yuh Shen, Chih-Wei Chang, Baw-Jhiune Liu, and Gwo-Dong Chen. 2006. A robot as a teaching assistant in an English class. In Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06) . IEEE, 87--91.
[44]
Kristina M. Zosuls and Diane N. Ruble. 2018. Gender-typed toy preferences among infants and toddlers. In Gender typing of children's toys: How early play experiences impact development. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 49--72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000077-004

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Interaction-Shaping Robotics: Robots that Influence Interactions between Other AgentsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3643803Online publication date: 2-Feb-2024
  • (2024)"It's Not a Replacement:" Enabling Parent-Robot Collaboration to Support In-Home Learning Experiences of Young ChildrenProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642806(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Investigating Causality in Parent-Toddler-Robot InteractionCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640661(502-506)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 2020
690 pages
ISBN:9781450367462
DOI:10.1145/3319502
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 March 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. english as second language
  2. parent-child-robot
  3. toddler robot interaction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

HRI '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)59
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Interaction-Shaping Robotics: Robots that Influence Interactions between Other AgentsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3643803Online publication date: 2-Feb-2024
  • (2024)"It's Not a Replacement:" Enabling Parent-Robot Collaboration to Support In-Home Learning Experiences of Young ChildrenProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642806(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Investigating Causality in Parent-Toddler-Robot InteractionCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640661(502-506)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Effect of Social Robot's Role and Behavior on Parent-Toddler InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634928(222-230)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2023)A systematic review of studies of parental involvement in computational thinking educationInteractive Learning Environments10.1080/10494820.2023.221418532:9(5373-5396)Online publication date: 25-May-2023
  • (2023)Twenty-first century parents’ attitudes and beliefs on early childhood robotics educationEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12218-129:9(11211-11233)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Multiparty Interaction Between Humans and Socially Interactive AgentsThe Handbook on Socially Interactive Agents10.1145/3563659.3563665(113-154)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2022
  • (2022)”What color are the fish’s scales?” Exploring parents’ and children’s natural interactions with a child-friendly virtual agent during storybook readingProceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3501712.3529734(185-195)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Non-Dyadic Interaction: A Literature Review of 15 Years of Human-Robot Interaction Conference PublicationsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/348824211:2(1-32)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Designing Long-term Parent-child-robot Triadic Interaction at Home through Lived Technology Experiences and Interviews2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900834(401-408)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media